Source: projectile
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: qt6-3d
Version: 6.4.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ocaml-asn1-combinators
Version: 0.2.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocaml-hex
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: superqt
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: trapperkeeper-authorization-clojure
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-pangolearn
Version: 2022-07-09+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: datalad-container
Version: 1.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-jekyll-asciidoc
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: aiomysql
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: qtmir
Version: 0.8.0~git20230115.30c2337-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: uc-echo
Version: 1.12-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: rust-async-global-executor
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: liquidsoap
Version: 2.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: renpy
Version: 8.0.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: jruby-utils-clojure
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-gitlab-markup
Version: 1.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: drslib
Version: 0.3.1.p3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: schedule
Version: 1.1.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: nbibtex
Version: 0.9.18-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: devpi-common
Version: 3.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-pytray
Version: 0.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: belenios
Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: twms
Version: 0.07z+git20201202+bb7c3f8-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rows
Version: 0.4.2~0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: libgeo-distance-xs-perl
Version: 0.13-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pgocaml
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: snpeff
Version: 5.1+d+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pdb2pqr
Version: 3.5.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ocaml-x509
Version: 0.16.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-rack
Version: 2.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ArgumentEr
Source: lomiri
Version: 0.1~git20230111.ba0fc6a-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: ocaml-ipaddr
Version: 5.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nuitka
Version: 1.3.5+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-dcos
Version: 0.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: refstack-client
Version: 0.0.0~2021.08.18.fa73ef2524-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: nurpawiki
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocaml-pbkdf
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rauc
Version: 1.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa
Source: sleef
Version: 3.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: sphinxcontrib-autoprogram
Version: 0.1.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libervia-backend
Version: 0.9.0~hg3993-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: snpsift
Version: 5.1+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: vistrails
Version: 3.0~git+9dc22bd.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: trapperkeeper-scheduler-clojure
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure
Version: 1.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: recommonmark
Version: 0.7.1+ds-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: ocsigenserver
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ibus-typing-booster
Version: 2.20.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-oxiri
Version: 0.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: ocaml-cohttp
Version: 4.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocaml-conduit
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocaml-mirage-crypto
Version: 0.10.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: rust-protoc-rust
Version: 2.27.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-os-api-ref
Version: 2.1.0+ds1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: jalview
Version: 2.11.2.5+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: trapperkeeper-status-clojure
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: php-log
Version: 1.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-jenkins
Version: 1.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: trac
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: precious
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: nagstamon
Version: 3.10.1+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: ocaml-eqaf
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: duecredit
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: ruby-typhoeus
Version: 1.4.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: enigmail
Version: 2:2.2.4-0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: crowbar
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: eliom
Version: 9.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocaml-ca-certs
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ocsipersist
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: bidi-clojure
Version: 2.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230203 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1030261 [src:jenkins-job-builder] jenkins-job-builder autopkg tests fail
with setuptools 66
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1030261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030261
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Maintainer
Since setuptools 66.0.0, support for PEP 440 non-conforming versions
has been removed [1].
It appears '1.0a-SNAPSHOT' is not a PEP 440 conforming version, so I
think simply dropping this test scenario is sufficient. Please see
patch below.
Regards
Graham
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 02:37:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030383: fixed in rust-backoff 0.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030383,
regarding rust-backoff: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 01:20:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030372: fixed in rust-xor-name 5.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030372,
regarding rust-xor-name FTBFS: error: no matching package named `arrayvec` found
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 00:34:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1030366: fixed in rust-tree-magic-mini 3.0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030366,
regarding rust-tree-magic-mini: Depends/Build-Depends on cruft package
librust-petgraph+default-dev
to be marked as
Hi bert,
Thank you for the detailed information, and the TL;DR;. I now have a
working version of the request-tracker5 package, which I've just
uploaded to unstable.
So, our immediate concern is resolved.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
and...@etc.gen.nz |
Catalyst
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026669: fixed in request-tracker5 5.0.3+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026669,
regarding request-tracker5: FTBFS: can't locate java: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 23:50:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026680: fixed in python-pyrdfa 3.5.2+20220504~ds-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026680,
regarding python-pyrdfa: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: clean] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> tags 1027540 + patch
Bug #1027540 [src:newsboat] newsboat: FTBFS: src/poddlthread.cpp:63:29: error:
‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use
CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1027540 + pending
Control: tags 1027540 + patch
Control: tags 1027540 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for newsboat (versioned as 2.21-1.5) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1027540 https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/issues/2297
Bug #1027540 [src:newsboat] newsboat: FTBFS: src/poddlthread.cpp:63:29: error:
‘CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION’ is deprecated: since 7.32.0. Use
CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 22:19:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1015874: fixed in php-dompdf 2.0.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015874,
regarding php-dompdf: CVE-2022-2400
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
* Dmitry Shachnev [2023-02-03 22:34]:
> I think one more line is needed in debian/rules:
>
> export DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM
Indeed; thanks for pointing that out!
- FC
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 21:35:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028695: fixed in python-hdf5storage 0.1.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028695,
regarding python-hdf5storage: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
python-numpy-doc
to be marked as done.
This
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:45:56PM +0100, FC Stegerman wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Updating my previous suggestion based on this new information, it
> becomes:
>
> adding this to debian/rules
>
> include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk
I think one more line is needed in debian/rules:
export
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 21:19:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028825: fixed in python-igor 0.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028825,
regarding python-igor: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute
'complex'
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 19:04:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028864: fixed in dateutils 0.4.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028864,
regarding dateutils: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j1 check
"TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j1 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
to
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 19:05:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997847: fixed in golang-github-hashicorp-go-slug 0.9.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997847,
regarding golang-github-hashicorp-go-slug: autopkgtest regression:
testdata/archive-dir: no such file or
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #997847 [src:golang-github-hashicorp-go-slug]
golang-github-hashicorp-go-slug: autopkgtest regression: testdata/archive-dir:
no such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
997847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997847
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997847 in golang-github-hashicorp-go-slug reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: retitle -1 pytango FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
This is FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pytango=all
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pytango=9.3.6-2%2B
Several error messages in lines like
> self.host, self.port = args
E
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 pytango FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Bug #1030297 [src:pytango] pytango: FTBFS: = 364 failed, 689 passed, 26
xfailed, 2 warnings, 40 errors in 176.40s (0:02:56) =
Changed Bug title to 'pytango FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds' from 'pytango: FTBFS:
= 364
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028084: fixed in guidata 2.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028084,
regarding guidata FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:34:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1029446: fixed in haskell-diagrams 1.4.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1029446,
regarding libghc-diagrams-dev: Depends: libghc-diagrams-core-dev (< 1.5) but
1.5.0.1-1+b1 is to be installed
to be
Source: rust-backoff
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/rust-backoff/30821230/log.gz
...
error[E0428]: the name `rt_sleeper` is defined multiple times
--> src/future.rs:211:1
|
206 | fn rt_sleeper() -> impl Sleeper {
|
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027229: fixed in mlpy 3.5.0+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027229,
regarding mlpy: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'bool' from 'numpy'
(/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/numpy/__init__.py)
to be
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:20:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1003746: fixed in php-horde-imp 6.2.27-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003746,
regarding php-horde-imp: (autopkgtest) needs update for php8.1: Failed
asserting that 'This action is not supported.
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1027229: fixed in mlpy 3.5.0+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027229,
regarding mlpy: autopkgtest fail with numpy/1.24.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo