Source: ruby-uc.micro-rb
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Er
Source: bitshuffle
Version: 0.3.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: haskell-copilot-c99
Version: 3.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
"Darrick J. Wong" writes:
...
> Curiously, this log says:
>
> Oct 24 05:35:32 in-target: Setting up xfsprogs (6.4.0-1) ...^M
>
> So ... is it running 6.4 and not 6.5?
The daily test versions of Debian-Installer draw components from
"unstable", which is where the 6.5 version is at present, which t
Source: postgis
Version: 3.4.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: metview
Version: 5.20.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g
Source: trompeloeil-cpp
Version: 44-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: libappimage
Version: 1.0.4-5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: ensmallen
Version: 2.20.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: immer
Version: 0.8.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: vulkan-validationlayers
Version: 1.3.250.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mecat2
Version: 0.0+git20200428.f54c542+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libodsstream
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: e-antic
Version: 1.3.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: tomcat10
Version: 10.1.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Version: 1:0.6.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: warzone2100
Version: 4.3.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: tl-expected
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: qtbase-opensource-src-gles
Version: 5.15.10+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gdcm
Version: 3.0.21-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: node-webfont
Version: 11.4.0+dfsg2+~cs35.7.26-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: Pixmap.o:
Source: slic3r-prusa
Version: 2.6.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: glib2.0
Version: 2.78.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> >>> MALLOC_
Source: tomlplusplus
Version: 3.3.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c++ -Ite
Source: weston
Version: 12.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /
Source: cli11
Version: 2.1.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86
Source: pyferret
Version: 7.6.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Enter
Source: nodejs
Version: 18.13.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> not ok
Source: therion
Version: 6.1.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -DFMT_SHA
Source: nmap
Version: 7.94+git20230807.3be01efb1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: open3d
Version: 0.17.0+ds-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Pipelines (Ten
Source: gringo
Version: 5.4.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/
Source: hera
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: spdlog
Version: 1:1.10.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: nmodl
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/obj-x86_64-
Source: fuzzylite
Version: 6.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: yade
Version: 2023.02a-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> (/usr/share/texlive/te
Source: newsboat
Version: 2.32-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -std=c++11 -O2 -g
Source: termpaint
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c++ -Ilibtestlib.a.p
Source: netgen
Version: 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ros2-rosidl
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: ableton-link
Version: 3.1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: genomicsdb
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: qt6-base
Version: 6.4.2+dfsg-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: olm
Version: 3.2.13~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: megahit
Version: 1.2.9-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -I/<
my apologies if this doesn't post correctly, ive not posted here before. I am
just trying to help how i can, to give visibility into the current state
This appears to build properly for me.
# debian-12.2.0-amd64-netinst.iso# Clean Install via VMware VM: EFI+Secure
boot# apt-get update && apt-get
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:49:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054460: fixed in libpod 4.7.1+ds4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054460,
regarding podman,podman-docker: file overlap with podman-compose/docker-compose
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1054667 4.2.1-1
Bug #1054667 [src:node-browserify-sign] node-browserify-sign: CVE-2023-46234
Marked as found in versions node-browserify-sign/4.2.1-1.
> found 1054667 4.2.1-3
Bug #1054667 [src:node-browserify-sign] node-browserify-sign: CVE-
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1054460 [podman,podman-docker] podman,podman-docker: file overlap with
podman-compose/docker-compose
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1054460: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054460
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054460 in libpod reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpod/-/commit/6cd165bbd5b60cc9e5f63417ecd80f89b78
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 20:09:57 +0200 Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:04:00PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Sadly in Debian there is no way to make that happen. Think for
example
> > > about bin-nmu.
> > Could you give a complete list of problems?
>
> There are at least those pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1054650 normal
Bug #1054650 [dbus] dbus: makes the machine extremely slow, freezes on shutdown
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> tags 1054650 + wontfix
Bug #1054650 [dbus] dbus: makes the machine extremely slow, freezes on shutdo
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 07:55:07PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 05:07:12PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Package: librust-env-logger-0.7+default-dev
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > https://buildd.d
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:04:00PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Sadly in Debian there is no way to make that happen. Think for example
> > about bin-nmu.
> Could you give a complete list of problems?
There are at least those problems:
- Bin-nmu can't change binary package names.
- There is no wa
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:07:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054445: fixed in softhsm2 2.6.1-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054445,
regarding softhsm2-common: Missing Depends on passwd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
I am going to upload a NMU in order to fix this.
The changes are in the git repo.
Am 27.10.23 um 13:45 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
Package: dbus
Version: 1.14.10-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
dbus 1.14.10-2 makes the machine extremely slow (this affects the
boot, login, the su command, and package installation at least),
and it freezes on shutdown.
El 18/8/23 a las 11:33, Simon McVittie escribió:
Does your archive rebuild infrastructure build other things in parallel on
the same machine,
Usually yes, however...
or any other factor like that which could make it more
likely to get stuck / take a long time than a production buildd?
it al
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1054666 + upstream
Bug #1054666 [src:open-vm-tools] open-vm-tools: CVE-2023-34059 CVE-2023-34058
Added tag(s) upstream.
> found 1054666 2:12.3.0-1
Bug #1054666 [src:open-vm-tools] open-vm-tools: CVE-2023-34059 CVE-2023-34058
Marked as found i
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 05:07:12PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: librust-env-logger-0.7+default-dev
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mdevctl&arch=arm64&ver=1.2.0-4%2Bb3&stamp=
Source: jcc
Severity: serious
Please remove the package jcc. It is not needed by any other package and its
Section is oldlibs.
Judging by the popcon it is unused. If nobody complains I am going to file a RM
bug when it is removed from testing.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 06:19:33PM +0200, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:45:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >
> > mkfs.xfs in xfsprogs 6.5 turned on both the large extent counts and
> > reverse mapping btree features by default. My guess is that grub hasn't
> > caught
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:45:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> mkfs.xfs in xfsprogs 6.5 turned on both the large extent counts and
> reverse mapping btree features by default. My guess is that grub hasn't
> caught up with those changes to the ondisk format yet.
>
> Ah, yeah, upstream grub
Source: node-browserify-sign
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for node-browserify-sign.
CVE-2023-46234[0]:
| browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of
| node's crypto public key functions, muc
Source: open-vm-tools
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for open-vm-tools.
CVE-2023-34059[0]:
| open-vm-tools contains a file descriptor hijack vulnerability in the
| vmware-user-suid-wrapper. A malicious actor
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 05:20:42PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Philip Hands writes:
> ...
> > Could this be related to #1051543?
> >
> > I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that
> > helps.
>
> It seems (to me at least) that the patch there does not apply usefully
Package: telegram-send
Version: 0.37-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to run
Hello,
Using testing as of now:
$ /usr/bin/telegram-send
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/telegram/utils/request.py:49: UserWarning:
python-telegram-bot is using upstream urllib3. This is allowed but not
support
Package: blastem
Version: 0.6.3.4-1+b2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: jsupert...@dnmx.org
Dear Maintainer,
Selecting "Open ROM" or going to options and selecting "System" causes the
program to crash with a Segmentation Fault.
-- System Information:
Debian
Philip Hands writes:
...
> Could this be related to #1051543?
>
> I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that
> helps.
It seems (to me at least) that the patch there does not apply usefully
to the version we're talking about, so I'll leave it to people that know
more
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: librust-env-logger-0.7+default-dev
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mdevctl&arch=arm64&ver=1.2.0-4%2Bb3&stamp=1697626199&raw=0
>
> ...
> Merged Build-Depends: ..., librust-env-logger+defa
Package: raspi-firmware
Version: 1.20230405+ds-2
Followup-For: Bug #1041096
X-Debbugs-Cc: h...@rudygodoy.com
Dear Maintainer,
the problem was present again for this kernel version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architect
Hi Phil,
Am 27.10.23 um 10:23 schrieb Philip Hands:
Could this be related to #1051543?
I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that helps.
Okay. I am going to wait for more info from you. If that does not help,
can you please explain which of xfsprogs-udeb's progra
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #1053873 [cronie] cronie: Crond with high load after 19-01-2038
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> tags -1 + unreproducible
Bug #1053873 [cronie] cronie: Crond with high load after 19-01-2038
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
1053873: http
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
I have not been able to reproduce this bug. It is already forwarded
upstream for further discussion.
--
Lance Lin
GPG Fingerprint: 4A31 DB5A 1EE4 096C 8739 9880 9036 4929 4C33 F9B7
OpenPGP_0x903649294C33F9B7.asc
Description: OpenPG
Source: inheritenv
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: lola...@debian.org
inheritenv fails to build from source if it does not have access to
the Internet.
Full build log at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inheritenv/0.2-2/+latestbuild/amd64
Build log excerpt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1054654 Uses LWP::Debug::trace without explicit 'use LWP::Debug;'
Bug #1054654 [liblwp-protocol-http-socketunix-perl] Tries to use
LWP::Debug::trace which is long gone from libwww-perl
Changed Bug title to 'Uses LWP::Debug::trace without
Hello,
I misinterpreted the error.
LWP::Debug::trace() still exists, but one needs to explicitly add
use LWP::Debug;
to the code to be able to use it.
Either way, the code is still very old, broken in the default state,
LWP::Debug only exists for legacy code and should not be used anymore (a
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:49:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052738: fixed in astroplan 0.9.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052738,
regarding astroplan: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'astroquery'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: liblwp-protocol-http-socketunix-perl
Version: 0.02-4
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi!
The module has been broken for a long long time, it tries to
unconditionally use LWP::Debug::trace which has been remove from LWP.
The attached reproducer shows the problem.
There is a forked and wo
Package: dbus
Version: 1.14.10-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
dbus 1.14.10-2 makes the machine extremely slow (this affects the
boot, login, the su command, and package installation at least),
and it freezes on shutdown. This is reproducible (I've tested on
2 successiv
I got a backtrace when bug have occurred.
(gdb) backtrace
#0 IO_validate_vtable (vtable=0x7f6dfadba9e0 <_IO_helper_jumps>)
at ../libio/libioP.h:943
#1 outstring_func (done=0, length=104,
string=0x55b1a369a410 "\n(connmand:525): GLib-CRITICAL **: 21:20:35.691:
g_date_set_time: assertion
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:55:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > > ## Image packages contains more version info
> > > >
> > > > Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
> > >
> > > > It will not longer be possible to reliabl
Source: gammapy
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: debci
scipy 1.10.1-4 is triggering errors in test_ndmap.py
test_binary_dilate and test_binary_dilate_erode_3d
on both i386 and s390x.
The error looks a little like
https://github.com/gammapy/gammapy/issues/3662 which was solved by
ad
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:35:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054591: fixed in python-pyflow 1.1.20-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054591,
regarding python3-pyflow: ${VERSION} not expanded in package metadata, causing
PEP-440 validation failures
to be marked as do
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > ## Image packages contains more version info
> > >
> > > Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
> >
> > > It will not longer be possible to reliably derive the package name from
> > > kernel release (see above), as both va
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052806: fixed in influxdb-python 5.3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052806,
regarding influxdb-python: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13
to be
Package: xfsprogs-udeb
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openqa
While doing openQA testing of Debian-Installer, I notice that XFS installs
started failing a few days ago, and comparing the versions of udebs that changed
between success and failure, the o
On 2023-10-27 09:07, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> What happens if you use bing 192.168.7.123 192.168.7.1
>
> where .1 is your gw and .123 your own ipv4 in this subnet instead of
> localhost
It doesn't seem very happy. Here's a log. There are a bunch of errors
or at least messages surrounding some
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:34:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054581: fixed in python-asdf 3.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054581,
regarding asdf: Missing dependency on asdf-unit-schemas (breaks pkg_resources)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Source: propellor
Version: 5.13-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
propellor FTBFS with ghc 9.4 (it still builds fine with 9.0 in testing):
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/propellor/-/jobs/4840519
[139 of 180]
Your message dated Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:19:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052789: fixed in python-traitsui 8.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052789,
regarding python-traitsui: FTBFS: RuntimeError: No traitsui.toolkits plugin
found for toolkit qt
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 podman,podman-docker: file overlap with
> podman-compose/docker-compose
Bug #1054460 [podman] Podman 4.7.1 file overlap with podman-compose
Changed Bug title to 'podman,podman-docker: file overlap with
podman-compose/docker-compose' from 'Podman 4.7.1 fi
Hey,
Am 23.10.2023 um 12:21 schrieb Sanjoy Mahajan:
Package: bing
Version: 1.3.5-5
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Sanjoy Mahajan
Bing has not worked for me for many versions. bing 1.1 works fine, but
1.3 in all versions that I've tried for years always fails. Here's the
log from a typic
201 - 295 of 295 matches
Mail list logo