Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:34:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055693: fixed in mlpy 3.5.0+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055693,
regarding mlpy ftbfs with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:34:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056819: fixed in mlpy 3.5.0+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056819,
regarding mlpy: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:34:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054748: fixed in mlpy 3.5.0+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054748,
regarding mlpy: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'version'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:19:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056825: fixed in numpy 1:1.26.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056825,
regarding numpy: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1060986
Bug #1060986 [src:mrcal] mrcal: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile.tests:85:
test-nosampling] Error 1
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1060986:
Package: gajim
Version: 1.8.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: skqu...@rushpost.com
Dear Maintainer,
At some point within the last few days, I am suddenly unable to launch gajim.
This is the console output I am receiving:
skquinn@crossbow:~$ gajim
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2024 03:19:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060116: fixed in wfuzz 3.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060116,
regarding wfuzz: please remove python3-future build-dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1060116 [src:wfuzz] wfuzz: please remove python3-future build-dependency
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1060116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1060116 in wfuzz reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1061277 [src:abinit] abinit: FTBFS with Python 3.12
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1061277: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061277
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: abinit
Followup-For: Bug #1061277
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear maintainers,
Please find attached a patch that fixes the build failure with python 3.12.
This change has been uploaded to Ubuntu for the python
Hi,
I created a patch for ModuleNotFoundError with Python 3.12. I worked on
it in a fork, and created MR [0]. I hope it fixes the issue with the
build.
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mlpy/-/merge_requests/5
Cheers!
Yogeswaran.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: abinit
Version: 9.10.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: arraybo...@ubuntu.com
When building the abinit package on a system with Python 3.12 installed,
the build fails with a
Dear Maintainer,
After sphinx-autoapi/3.0.0-0.1 entered in unstable [1], I'm able to
build successfully your package in a sid chroot environment.
I can reproduce the failure reported in this bug after building
against sphinx-autoapi/2.0.0-2 from snapshot.d.o [2].
Kind Regards
[1]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fixed by src:fastapi-0.101.0-2.
> close 1059494
Bug #1059494 [src:python-refurb] src:python-refurb: unsatisfied build
dependency in testing: python3-fastapi
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Source: sudo
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: yacc/lex are prefered source
Dear Maintainer,
You do not pass the --with-devel=yes configure flags thus you do not rebuild
from source autogenerated file like gram.c and gram.h from gram.y
Usually debian build from source grammar file
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 21:44:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057601: fixed in python-pytest-trio 0.8.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057601,
regarding python-pytest-trio: FTBFS: Reason: UndefinedError("'logo' is
undefined")
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi 1058089 (2024.01.21_17:19:38_-0400)
> This package ships a separate version of the source for each python 3.X
> version. So, this requires a new upstream release, git snapshot, or
> a patch with the 3.12 tree.
Oh, no, it does have the py3.12 dir. Never mind.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
This package ships a separate version of the source for each python 3.X
version. So, this requires a new upstream release, git snapshot, or
a patch with the 3.12 tree.
https://github.com/uqfoundation/multiprocess/commits/master/py3.12
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 21:05:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058027: fixed in pybj 0.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058027,
regarding pybj: FTBFS with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi,
Le dimanche 21 janvier 2024 à 21:38 +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 21-01-2024 21:06, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Would kicking the mathcomp-analysis package out of testing allow
> > the
> > migration of the rest of the Coq-related packages and at least give
> > a
> >
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:49:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056505: fixed in python-stack-data 0.6.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056505,
regarding python-stack-data's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1059662: fixed in python-django-pgschemas 0.15.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059662,
regarding python-django-pgschemas: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
On 21-01-2024 21:06, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
Would kicking the mathcomp-analysis package out of testing allow the
migration of the rest of the Coq-related packages and at least give a
coherent set there?
It seems src:mathcomp-analysis is a leaf package that can easily be
removed
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:38:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056511: fixed in python-urllib3 1.26.18-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056511,
regarding python-urllib3's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:38:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056508: fixed in python-tornado 6.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056508,
regarding python-tornado autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:38:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1042594: fixed in python-tornado 6.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1042594,
regarding python-tornado: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20: TypeError:
Python directive method get_signature_prefix()
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1059662 in python-django-pgschemas reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1059662 [src:python-django-pgschemas] python-django-pgschemas: autopkgtest
failure with Python 3.12
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1059662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1056505 [src:python-stack-data] python-stack-data's autopkg tests fail
with Python 3.12
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1056505: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056505
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1056505 in python-stack-data reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1057442 with 1055488
Bug #1057442 [src:onboard] onboard ftbfs with Python 3.12
1057442 was not blocked by any bugs.
1057442 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1057442: 1055488
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hi,
Le dimanche 21 janvier 2024 à 08:42 +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Source: coq
> Version: 8.17.0+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Control: close -1 8.18.0+dfsg-1
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> The Release
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1056511 in python-urllib3 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1056511 [src:python-urllib3] python-urllib3's autopkg tests fail with
Python 3.12
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1056511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1042594 + pending
Bug #1042594 [src:python-tornado] python-tornado: FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1,
docutils 0.20: TypeError: Python directive method get_signature_prefix() must
return a list of nodes. Return value was 'coroutine '.
Added tag(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1059835 https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/5927
Bug #1059835 [src:cython] cython: autopkgtest regression with Python 3.12 on
32-bit
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/5927'.
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:34:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056872: fixed in cython 3.0.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056872,
regarding python-stack-data: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1059838 https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/5926
Bug #1059838 [src:cython] cython: autopkgtest regression with Python 3.12 on
ppc64el
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/5926'.
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:27:08 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1058400: [Help] Re: python-stack-data: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12
3.11" returned exit code 13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058400,
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1056872 in cython reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1056872 [src:python-stack-data] python-stack-data: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1056872: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:49:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060898: fixed in linux-apfs-rw 0.3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060898,
regarding apfs-dkms: fails to build module: super.c:17:10: fatal error:
version.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1060931 https://github.com/python-babel/babel/issues/1059
Bug #1060931 [src:python-babel] python-babel: FTBFS: E
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/<>/babel/locale-data/sr_ME.dat'
Set Bug
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 15:58:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1059995: fixed in pdns 4.8.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059995,
regarding pdns: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): pdns.service: Failed to set
up IPC namespacing: Resource temporarily unavailable
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-01-2024 12:36, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > can you confirm two additional things please:
> >
> > 1) this happens only on the large host?
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pdns/testing/s390x/41650331/
>
> Seems it
Dear Maintainer,
After removing "-W" from [1], your package builds fine in a sid chroot
environment.
I guess is safe to stop treating sphinx warnings as errors.
Kind Regards
[1] https://sources.debian.org/src/breathe/4.35.0-2/documentation/Makefile/#L5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1056872 cython/3.0.7-2
Bug #1056872 [src:python-stack-data] python-stack-data: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
Marked as found in versions cython/3.0.7-2.
> tags 1056872 + patch
Bug #1056872 [src:python-stack-data] python-stack-data: ftbfs with
Control: severity -1 important
I believe the gcr tests are just flaky.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1057562 [src:gcr4] gcr4: FTBFS: failing tests
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1057562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 15:06:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1040321: fixed in firebird4.0 4.0.4.3010.ds6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040321,
regarding firebird-utils: undeclared file conflict with firebird3.0-server
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
oops.
Am 21.01.24 um 15:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Here the new libxml2 removes functions and symbol versions used by
gazillions of packages over the whole of the Debian archive.
And no, the exact point of Debian library package names is that they
HAVE to change on ABI changes.
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:46:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056845: fixed in pynfft 1.3.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056845,
regarding pynfft: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:46:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056836: fixed in pyfftw 0.13.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056836,
regarding pyfftw: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:46:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055704: fixed in pynfft 1.3.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055704,
regarding pynfft ftbfs with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:46:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1055703: fixed in pyfftw 0.13.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055703,
regarding pyfftw ftbfs with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:37:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060932: fixed in lazarus 3.0+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060932,
regarding doublecmd: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:16: override_dh_install]
Error 2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:37:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060995: fixed in lazarus 3.0+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060995,
regarding ddrescueview: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:10:
override_dh_auto_build] Error 2
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:37:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061009: fixed in lazarus 3.0+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061009,
regarding winff: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:16:
override_dh_auto_build-arch] Error 2
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi,
Am 21.01.24 um 15:27 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 21/01/2024 14:49, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Exactly that is the point of #1059040. The binary packages have to be
renamed. (Then rebuild against libxml2-WHATEVERNEW). Then a rebuild
LO will have a proper dependency on libxml2-WHATEVERNEW.
I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1061155 normal
Bug #1061155 [cron] cron: "crontab -e" does not report "unsafe" mail and so job
output can be lost
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On 21/01/2024 14:49, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Exactly that is the point of #1059040. The binary packages have to be
renamed. (Then rebuild against libxml2-WHATEVERNEW). Then a rebuild LO
will have a proper dependency on libxml2-WHATEVERNEW.
I agree that package with different APIs should bump
Hi,
Am 21.01.24 um 14:44 schrieb Eric Valette:
ii libxml2 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
And this one *from experimental* changed ABI (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059040). Don't
install it on systems you don't want breakage in.
Bingo you got it. However this means that
Control: retitle -1 xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS: test_inputcapture: Timed out
waiting for response from SetPointerBarriers
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 20:37:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > 26/28 xdg-desktop-portal:pytest / pytest test_inputcaptureFAIL
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS: test_inputcapture: Timed out waiting
> for response from SetPointerBarriers
Bug #1061019 [src:xdg-desktop-portal] xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS: tests failed
Changed Bug title to 'xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS: test_inputcapture: Timed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1061242 with 1059040
Bug #1061242 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-draw]
libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start with libxml2 2.12 (error loading a
dll that is installed)
1061242 was not blocked by any bugs.
1061242 was not blocking
Hi,
Am 12.01.24 um 17:56 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the
xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version
2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1061242 libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start with libxml2 2.12
> (error loading a dll that is installed)
Bug #1061242 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-draw]
libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start with libxml2
Changed Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1061242 libreoffice-draw
Bug #1061242 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice-impress]
libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start with libxml2
Bug reassigned from package 'libreoffice-impress' to 'libreoffice-draw'.
Ignoring request to
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:35:19 +0100
with message-id <1c932e17-1137-4cf3-a9c1-955ed6c23...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061242: libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start.
Its display an error loading a dll that is installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061242,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1061242 4:24.2.0~rc2-2
Bug #1061242 [libreoffice-impress] libreoffice-impress: impress cannot start.
Its display an error loading a dll that is installed
No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/4:24.2.0~rc2-2.
> retitle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1054431 wishlist
Bug #1054431 [src:node-puppeteer] node-puppeteer: website is build with
Docusaurus not packaged for debian
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing control commands:
> tags 1056819 pending
Bug #1056819 [src:mlpy] mlpy: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1056819 to the same tags previously set
> tags -1 help
Bug #1055693 [src:mlpy] mlpy ftbfs with Python 3.12
Added tag(s) help.
--
1055693:
Processing control commands:
> tags 1056819 pending
Bug #1056819 [src:mlpy] mlpy: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags -1 help
Bug #1054748 [src:mlpy] mlpy: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'version'
Added tag(s) help.
--
1054748:
Control: tags 1056819 pending
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
after applying the patch for the cython3 issue the build issues of this
package are remaining. This is strange since the missing modules are
provided inside the package. I wonder what trick I might need to do to
convince the Python3
Hello,
Thank you for your bug report.
I shall lower the severity of your bug report, since it
"causes non-serious data loss"
a...@example.org would be parsed as a valid e-mail address if one uses
regexp matching.
What improvement would you suggest? Should "crontab -e" send an e-mail
to
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:54:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056461: fixed in turing 0.11~beta-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056461,
regarding python3-future: (other packages)'s autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: libreoffice-impress
Version: 4:24.2.0~rc2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I open a odp file, I get the message: loading of component failed
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libsdlo.so
dpkg -S /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libsdlo.so
libreoffice-draw:
Package: endless-sky
Version: 0.10.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3, 12.5
The upgrade to 0.10.4 missed the changes in upstream licensing and
copyright notices.
The changes in the summary, as supplied by upstream, can be seen at
79 matches
Mail list logo
