Package: android-libboringssl
Version: 14.0.0+r11-4
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi Roger,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
android-libboringssl as a package shipping a library whose ABI changes on
32-bit
Source: gf-complete
Version: 1.0.2+2017.04.10.git.ea75cdf-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in
Source: getfem
Version: 5.4.2+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Package: android-libart
Version: 14.0.0+r15-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi Jochen,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
android-libart as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could
not be compiled and
Source: getdns
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: cmor
Version: 3.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: gerris
Version: 20131206+dfsg-19
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Hi,
in connection with the time_t transition in Debian Med we are
discussing[1] whether we really need 32 bit support for some of our
tools or whether we should realistically drop this support to
concentrate on problems which are more relevant for our users.
I wonder whether we could also
Source: geomview
Version: 1.9.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:06:46 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: colpack: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062096,
regarding colpack: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Source: geoip
Version: 1.6.12-11
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: gensio
Version: 2.8.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: colpack
Version: 1.0.10-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: colord-gtk
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: collectd
Version: 5.12.0-15
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: coinor-bonmin
Version: 1.8.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:47:50 +0100 Laurent Bigonville
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that fwupd is not starting anymore on my machine.
>
> In the logs I can see:
>
> jan 29 10:40:28 eriador systemd[1]: Starting fwupd.service - Firmware
> update daemon...
> jan 29 10:40:28 eriador fwupd[13042]:
Source: coin3
Version: 4.0.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:18:12 + mwhud...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: czmq
> Version: 4.2.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> As part of the 64-bit time_t
Source: codeblocks
Version: 20.03+svn13046-0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: fuse
Version: 2.9.9-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: fuse3
Version: 3.14.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:14:08AM +0100, Leon Marz wrote:
> Hi there,
> I just quickly checked. cglm doesn't use time_t in its sources or in its
> ABI. I think the abi-compilance-checker just failed to analyze this
> package for some reason. Therefore I would like to NOT transition cglm.
> Also
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:25:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061766: fixed in xmds2 3.1.0+dfsg2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061766,
regarding xmds2 ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:24:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060959: fixed in python-xkcd 2.4.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060959,
regarding python-xkcd: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'pypandoc' has no
attribute 'convert'
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:24:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058450: fixed in pexpect 4.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058450,
regarding pexpect: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13
Source: cmph
Version: 2.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: llvm-toolchain-17
Version: 1:17.0.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
invocation)
[7653/8837]
Source: arrayfire
Followup-For: Bug #1061920
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
diff -Nru arrayfire-3.3.2+dfsg1/debian/changelog
Hi there,
I just quickly checked. cglm doesn't use time_t in its sources or in its
ABI. I think the abi-compilance-checker just failed to analyze this
package for some reason. Therefore I would like to NOT transition cglm.
Also I don't like the new name.
Thank you very much for your work on this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1061888 - pending
Bug #1061888 [src:anfo] anfo: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061888:
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:08:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1061966: fixed in audit 1:3.1.2-2.1~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061966,
regarding file loss due to combining time64 + /usr-move
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:20:08AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if
> >
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058596: fixed in node-yarnpkg
1.22.19+~cs24.27.18-2+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058596,
regarding yarnpkg broken on bookworm - yarnpkg --help fails with TypeError:
commander.on is not a
Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:03:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053496: fixed in netplan.io 0.106-2+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053496,
regarding netplan.io: autopkgtest tmpfails in stable with new systemd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi jim_p, if you are referring to:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/mesa/-/commit/15e037dba159f893360d642e4efa13e09682b080
I don't think is related to this issue.
I suggest to report it here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues
In your log this looks
Package: mesa-vdpau-drivers
Followup-For: Bug #1059782
X-Debbugs-Cc: pitsior...@outlook.com
So, 23.3.4 reached testing today and the problem is still there. As expected,
it is not an upstream issue, so can the maintainer have a look at the
forementioned patch and correct the package?
If it
Hi,
sergiodj upload the new upstream release of python3-build [0]. -doc
package was added.
Meanwhile I will try to add some autopkgtest to detect this kind of
bugs.
Thanks!
[0] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/python-build_1.0.3-1.html
--
cheers,
Emmanuel Arias
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
Source: biosquid
Version: 1.9g+cvs20050121-15
Followup-For: Bug #1061931
Hi Andreas,
FYI your emails did not make it to my mailserver because they fail SPF
for your sending domain; it appears your mails are going via the Debian
mailservers but you are using a non-Debian sender address? So
Source: cluster-glue
Version: 1.0.12-22
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clxclient
Version: 3.9.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clucene-core
Version: 2.3.3.4+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clsync
Version: 0.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clthreads
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clhep
Version: 2.1.4.1+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: clippoly
Version: 0.11-10
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: belle-sip
Followup-For: Bug #1061930
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
Since there is a new upstream version of belle-sip in experimental with
a new
Source: clblas
Version: 2.12-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Il 31/01/2024 09:54, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
Source: cinnamon-desktop
Version: 5.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to
Source: lomiri-app-launch
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
The package has a ftbfs issue on my amd64 build:
69% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 13
Total Test time (real) = 201.54 sec
The following tests FAILED:
1 - helper-test (Failed)
4 -
Source: clanlib
Version: 1.0~svn3827-11
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
The libddccontrol library is, to my knowledge, only used by packages
generated by the same source package, namely ddccontrol and
gddccontrol. And time_t is only used internally, not exposed via the
library's ABI. Under these circumstances, I don't think transitioning
libddccontrol is, technically
Source: bamf
Followup-For: Bug #1061929
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:00:26AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
> to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
> important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
>
Source: avogadrolibs
Followup-For: Bug #1061927
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: genometools
Version: 1.6.5+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: gegl
Version: 1:0.4.46-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: gelemental
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 1:09 AM wrote:
> If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
> this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
Are you going to nuke my work on dcmtk 3.6.8 transition ?
Source: gecode
Version: 6.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: audit
Followup-For: Bug #1061926
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This updated patch also fixes bug #1061966, which is a consequence of the
library
Source: clalsadrv
Version: 2.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: cinnamon-desktop
Version: 5.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: ck
Version: 0.7.1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: ciftilib
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: chipmunk
Version: 7.0.3-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: chise-base
Version: 0.3.0-2.3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: chicken
Version: 5.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: audacious
Followup-For: Bug #1061925
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: atril
Followup-For: Bug #1061924
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: chemps2
Version: 1.8.12-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: gearmand
Version: 1.1.20+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: chafa
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: cglm
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: cgsi-gsoap
Version: 1.3.11-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: at-spi2-core
Followup-For: Bug #1061923
Quite right; an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name,
affecting a good number of packages among the first set of uploads.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 2.2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: astrometry.net
Followup-For: Bug #1061922
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: gdcm
Version: 3.0.22-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
Source: asl
Followup-For: Bug #1061921
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: arpack
Followup-For: Bug #1061919
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
Source: armnn
Followup-For: Bug #1061918
Apologies, an oversight in the conversion script caused us to fail to
update strict versioned dependencies on the previous package name.
Please find attached a fixed patch.
This has also now been uploaded to experimental.
diff -Nru
301 - 382 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
