Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2024 05:20:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066140: fixed in afflib 3.7.20-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066140,
regarding afflib: strlcpy,strlcat in .symbols but not part of API; ftbfs with
glibc >= 2.38
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > === FAILURES
> > ===
> > ___ TestUtils.test_init_once_and_debug_mode
> >
> >
> > self = >
You may be interested in these upstream commits;
b01478d ("Fix some parts of macro expansion are not guarded")
0194b80 ("strerror and memset require string.h")
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2024 01:34:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071294: fixed in amsynth 1.13.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071294,
regarding amsynth: FTBFS: src/amsynth_dssi_gtk.cpp:238:86: error: invalid
conversion from ‘int (*)(const char*, const char*,
Hello,
Le 2024-05-17 à 16 h 38, Santiago Vila a écrit :
Package: src:libevent
Version: 2.1.12-stable-8.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1071363 important
Bug #1071363 [src:snappy] snappy-tools: FTBFS: snappy.cpp:575:51: error: call
of overloaded ‘Compress({anonymous}::fd_source*, {anonymous}::FILE_sink*)’ is
ambiguous
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> usertags 1071293 + bittenby
User is p...@debian.org
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bittenby.
> forwarded 1071293
> https://gitlab.com/ddcci-driver-linux/ddcci-driver-linux/-/merge_requests/15
Bug #1071293 [ddcci-dkms] ddcci-dkms:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:snappy 1.2.0-2
Bug #1071363 [src:snappy-tools] snappy-tools: FTBFS: snappy.cpp:575:51: error:
call of overloaded ‘Compress({anonymous}::fd_source*, {anonymous}::FILE_sink*)’
is ambiguous
Bug reassigned from package 'src:snappy-tools' to
Control: reassign -1 src:snappy 1.2.0-2
Control: merge 1070785 -1
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:41:58PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:snappy-tools
> Version: 1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1066140 src:afflib
Bug #1066140 [afflib] afflib: strlcpy,strlcat in .symbols but not part of API;
ftbfs with glibc >= 2.38
Bug reassigned from package 'afflib' to 'src:afflib'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.7.20-1.1.
Ignoring
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 17 May 2024 22:39:03 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated
> t/simplesets.t
> 1..2
> ok 1 - use Net::Interface;
> Failed 1/2 subtests
Thanks for your bug report!
I can confirm it in a sid cowbuilder chroot, also
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #1071326 [src:libnet-interface-perl] libnet-interface-perl: FTBFS: failing
tests
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1071326: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071326
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 21:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071270: fixed in rust-hashbrown 0.14.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071270,
regarding librust-hashbrown-dev: fails to build: method `resize_inner` not
found for this struct
to be marked as done.
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 17 May 2024 21:10:01 +0100, Ben Morris wrote:
> Although upstream has not yet bumped the version number, I believe they have
> committed changes that fix this to their GitLab repo.
They’ve committed changes that allow the module to build, but it doesn’t work
— see the discussion
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Is there a chance this could be spurious?
Unlikely because it also happens here:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html
Thanks.
Is there a chance this could be spurious? The R API is reasonably stable,
including the part for embedding R (and I am upstream for a small project
doing that from C++). rpy2 is also mature and stable. So could this be a
one-off?
Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel |
Package: src:sway-notification-center
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:starlink-pal
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:srpc
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:sooperlooper
Version: 1.7.8~dfsg0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:rpy2
Version: 3.5.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with python3
Package: src:snappy-tools
Version: 1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-cran-maptools
Version: 1:1.1-8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:rp-pppoe
Version: 3.15-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
test -f
Package: src:r-cran-rniftilib
Version: 0.0-35.r79-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-cran-rgeos
Version: 0.6-4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-cran-randomfieldsutils
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:r-cran-randomfields
Version: 3.3.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-cran-eco
Version: 4.0-3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-variantannotation
Version: 1.48.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:r-bioc-xvector
Version: 0.42.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-sparsearray
Version: 1.2.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-shortread
Version: 1.60.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-s4vectors
Version: 0.40.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-s4arrays
Version: 1.2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-rtracklayer
Version: 1.62.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-rsamtools
Version: 2.18.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-rhdf5
Version: 2.46.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-oligo
Version: 1.66.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-hilbertvis
Version: 1.60.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-hdf5array
Version: 1.30.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-affxparser
Version: 1.74.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:r-bioc-genefilter
Version: 1.84.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:qrisk2
Version: 0.1.20150729-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:pynn
Version: 0.10.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3
Package: src:python-numpysane
Version: 0.40-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:psensor
Version: 1.1.5-1.4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:pptpd
Version: 1.4.0-13
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:pigx-rnaseq
Version: 0.1.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:pixz
Version: 1.0.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel
Package: src:netcdf-parallel
Version: 1:4.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:msgraph
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:meson-python
Version: 0.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:lomiri-indicator-network
Version: 1.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:libnet-interface-perl
Version: 1.016-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:libmodbus
Version: 3.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:libhtp
Version: 1:0.5.48-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:libdumbnet
Version: 1.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libesmtp
Version: 1.1.0-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:libapache2-mod-auth-openidc
Version: 2.4.15.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh
Package: src:infinipath-psm
Version: 3.3+20.604758e7-6.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh
Package: src:jack-capture
Version: 0.9.73-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:intel-mkl
Version: 2020.4.304-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:heartbeat
Version: 1:3.0.6-14.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Only
Package: src:gitsome
Version: 0.8.0+ds-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:guestfs-tools
Version: 1.52.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:gpsd
Version: 3.25-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
if [ ! -f
Package: src:guake-indicator
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:gajim
Version: 1.8.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3
Package: src:fuse-posixovl
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:fte
Version: 0.50.2b6-20110708-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:ess
Version: 24.01.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with elpa
Package: src:drogon
Version: 1.8.7+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:cups-filters
Version: 1.28.17-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:cppgir
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:concurrent-log-handler
Version: 0.9.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:cava-alsa
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:canna
Version: 3.7p3-21
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:blobwars
Version: 2.00-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --parallel
dh:
Package: src:apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:amsynth
Version: 1.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: ddcci-dkms
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Although upstream has not yet bumped the version number, I believe they have
committed changes that fix this to their GitLab repo.
*** /var/lib/dkms/ddcci/0.4.4/build/make.log
DKMS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # already happening in testing/unstable
> severity 1069909 serious
Bug #1069909 [dcraw] dcraw: FTBFS due to conflicting memmem prototype
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> severity 1068782 serious
Bug #1068782 [libesmtp] libesmtp: fixes
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 19:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070456: fixed in crystal 1.12.1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070456,
regarding crystal: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1069790
Bug #1069790 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [librust-err-derive-dev]
librust-err-derive-dev: impossible to install
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # this is already happening in testing/unstable
> severity 1066140 serious
Bug #1066140 [afflib] afflib: strlcpy,strlcat in .symbols but not part of API;
ftbfs with glibc >= 2.38
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping
Package: librust-err-derive-dev
Version: 0.3.1-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #1069790
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This issue is not yet solved. Not sure why it was flagged as done, without
further information - it is not yet done.
If you need more details, then please elaborate
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1071277 3.20.5-3
Bug #1071277 [src:petsc4py] petsc4py: binary-all FTBFS
The source 'petsc4py' and version '3.20.5-3' do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as fixed in versions petsc4py/3.20.5-3.
Bug #1071277 [src:petsc4py]
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 06:32:03PM +0900, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> I packaged and uploaded 0.5.0 and this bug is fixed for me now, but
> I'd like to hear from you all before closing this bug.
The bug is also fixed for me with 0.5.0-1. Thanks for getting this
fixed!
Best wishes,
Ryan
--
|)|/
Source: quaternion
Version: 0.0.95.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=quaternion=amd64=0.0.95.1-1%2Bb3=1715958046=0
/usr/bin/c++
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 17:54:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060579: fixed in lomiri-indicator-transfer 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060579,
regarding lomiri-indicator-transfer: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1060579 [src:lomiri-indicator-transfer] lomiri-indicator-transfer: Please
switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1060579 to the same tags previously set
--
1060579:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1060579 in lomiri-indicator-transfer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 17:19:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1070455: fixed in ayatana-indicator-display 24.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070455,
regarding ayatana-indicator-display: FTBFS: Errors while running CTest
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2024 00:01:28 +0700
with message-id <461c35fc58071bcb6608bbd46990aaeb.arna...@kali.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066546,
regarding scrounge-ntfs: FTBFS: list.c:44:6: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘lseek64’; did you mean ‘lseek’?
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 16:35:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071273: fixed in skales 0.20170929-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071273,
regarding skales: Architecture should be 'all'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 16:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063143: fixed in filament 1.9.25+dfsg3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063143,
regarding filament: FTBFS: fatal error: 'localintermediate.h' file not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # also happens on amd64
> retitle 1069390 guile-gnutls: FTBFS: tests/list-pk-algorithms.scm fails
Bug #1069390 [src:guile-gnutls] guile-gnutls: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test:
error: cd b4deb && make -j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose"
Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2024 16:08:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071142: fixed in dnsmasq 2.90-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071142,
regarding dnsmasq-base: fails to purge when passwd is not installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo