On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Benoit Plessis wrote:
>> //pref("network.protocol-handler.external.http", true);
>
> This is clearly not a bug fix, merely an workaround ..
> By doing this you prevent openning of http link in your mails, which is (to
> me at least) more useful than displa
tags 459564 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:39:20PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Followup-For: Bug #459564
>
> Starting with this version, my icedove tray icon is broken and the
> Provider for Google Calendar plugin no longer works (my calenda
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Hi,
>
> after uprading to 2.0.0.9-2 from 2.0.0.6-1, my addons don't work
> anymore. I tried to uninstall them and reinstall th
reassign 443440 gtk+-2.0
tags 443440 + patch
thanks
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:55:49AM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Trying to start
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:42:46PM +1200, Richard Patterson wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> This is still a bug, I don't think saying "use the Debian rebranded
> Lightning" constitutes a fix.
> The official Lightning xpi is still broken when trying to use it with
> Icedove.
>
> Replicated on several i
reassign 445959 gcc-4.2
thanks
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
This smells like a compiler regression in g++-4.2 or even a buggy
buildd ... 2.
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:44:28PM +1000, Robert Moonen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb /usr/bin/icedove
instead use:
$ icedove -g
and do the same as before to get a backtrace.
Thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack|
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
> May have to do with spell checking: Things went smoother after switching off
> Spell-as-you-type, nevertheless this behavior is new and and I used SAYT
> before on a regular basis.
>
>
Ok thanks ... this is probably a sp
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> okay this one works fine, but it's on english :( Not so bad but maybe the
> maintainer could package the german version, too ;)
>
Not sure how lang packs are distributed for lightning ... but if they
are available, may
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez wrote:
> I have found this very same problem in Gutsys's version of
> Thunderbird. So I downloaded sid's icedove-dbg package and generated
> the following backtrace. I now this is not a proper debian system, but
> hope it helps.
Wha
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez wrote:
> I have found this very same problem in Gutsys's version of
> Thunderbird. So I downloaded sid's icedove-dbg package and generated
> the following backtrace. I now this is not a proper debian system, but
> hope it helps.
Can
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:42:49PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi, I get this error while I try to use icedove, downloads messages
> and says "Receiving 1 of 1" and then stops and gives this b
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Simon Waters wrote:
> >
> > I will try purging the packages as per the original poster.
>
> No joy with purge reinstall.
>
> The problem here maybe resolved, hard to be sure.
>
> I disabled all functional extensions, and re-enabled
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:24:18PM -0700, JT Hundley wrote:
> That fix worked! Thanks a ton!
>
> Bryan Bayerdorffer wrote:
> > I had the same problem even after purge/reinstall of 2.0.0.0-4. I
> > noticed that omitting the pre-2.0 prefs.js made the address book work.
> > I blew away the followin
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 07:27:47PM -0700, JT Hundley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> After upgrading to the new Icedove and restarting, my address book
> is still empty, yet the data is still in my book.ab file.
Try to uninstall icedove ... and install again.
- Ale
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:14:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You fixed it up for amd64 - what about the rest of us?
>
Be patient ... let the buildd finish :).
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The unive
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Igor Stirbu wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Followup-For: Bug #425390
>
>
> It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts.
> I started icedove with the following command:
Try:
first uninstall ... then install icedove again.
- A
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:13:56PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Have you upgraded icedove? If not ... please purge it ... and
reinstall. There are issues with current upgrade that might cause
rando
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:28:12PM +0200, Thomas Renard wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Followup-For: Bug #425390
>
> I am not able to create a new profile with a new user account with 2.0.0.0-3.
>
> The normal behavior on first startup of icedove would be:
>
> - (Dialog) ask fo
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:19:47PM +0100, Martin Orr wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
>
> The upgrade 1.5 -> 2.0 still doesn't convert the directories in
> /usr/lib/icedove to symlinks correctly. The chrome directory is converted,
> but defaults and greprefs a
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:32:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ icedove --debug
> /usr/lib/icedove/run-mozilla.sh -g /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin
> MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib/i
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:42:56PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Firefopx started to crash too...
>
OK, thanks for confirming this.
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 01:00:09PM +0300, Török Edvin wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-2
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> The following directories are empty after installing icedove 2.0.0-2:
> /usr/lib/icedove/defaults
> /usr/lib/icedove/chrome
> /usr/lib/iced
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:13:24PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #425061
>
Can you please start icedove in -safe-mode and see if it still
happens?
# icedove -safe-mode
thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Deb
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:11:43PM +0200, David Andel wrote:
>
> Since the last email I have started and stopped icedove several times
> without a problem. But then I've compacted that first folder again, and
> icedove crashed. And then it crashed after startup again. Removing the
> .msf file a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:28:16PM +0200, David Andel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 14:52 +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > Didn't you get that error with iceape as well?
>
> yes
>
> > So, please let us know what is special about your setup,
Didn't you get that error with iceape as well?
So, please let us know what is special about your setup, anything
right off your head?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:43:36AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.8.0.9-1
> Severity: critical
>
> xulrunner has security issues which are fixed in 1.8.0.10-3
>
xulrunner (1.8.0.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Mike Hommey ]
* New upstream release (taken from
tags 406862 + patch
thanks
As Mike pointed out in the iceape bug (#406861), this is probably:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302250
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages pr
retitle 406604 CVE-2006-5877: Enigmail crashes on inline gpg
thanks
this is CVE-2006-5877
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Debian Bugreport Mailaddress wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail
> Version: 2:0.91-4sarge2
> Severity: grave
>
> Enigmail has had a serious bug for a lo
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:26:26PM +0100, Debian Bugreports Mailaddress wrote:
> Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> > Yes, I am aware of this issue ... however, I have not yet verified if
> > sarge version is affected. If so it should definitly get a security
> > update
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 06:17:31PM +0100, David Andel wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After first startup, the import of mail folders seemed to work fine, then the
> main window showing the mail lists appeared and
Yes, I am aware of this issue ... however, I have not yet verified if
sarge version is affected. If so it should definitly get a security
update.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Debian Bugreport Mailaddress wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail
> Version: 2:0.91-4sarge2
> Sever
tags 402886 + unreproducible
thanks
if no-one can reproduce, this can be downgraded to important.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexa
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
>
> Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> | On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
> |>line rewritten so one can easily see this information. I first did a
> |>search for this patter
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
>
> On one of my accounts mails with a certain spam level get their subject
> line rewritten so one can easily see this information. I first did a
> search for this pattern, removing all found messages.
How is this done?
>
> Th
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:45:13AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs wrote:
>
> One more thing I remembered having forgotten to tell while doing all this
> :-[ : my "Mail" folder is on a separate FAT32 partition, in order to be
> able to share my folders with Windows (dual-boot). I know, it's not
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:45:13AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. First, I'd like to apologize but after 2 or 3
> hangs, I got mad and already saw icedove going in this state into stable,
> and I possibly overreacted a bit (I'd like to stay at etch
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.8.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Hi,
>
> since upgrade to the dfsg version, I already had to kill and restart
> icedove already ~5 times since yesterday.
> Phenomens are very different but it alway
close 393182 1.5.0.8-1
thanks
transitional thunderbird-dev package should be provided as of icedove
1.5.0.8-1.
If there are still problems, let me know.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 03:14:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: thunderbird-dev
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.5.0.7-2
>
> Hi
>
> You
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:25:51PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> i'm guessing from the comment "Also, they distribute non-free software as
> plug-ins" that gnuzilla has messed with the plugin finder, is this something
> that debian wants? (it seems like it would interfere with a lot of users who
> wa
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:08:14PM +1000, Joel wrote:
> Given that the restriction applies to firefox and thunderbird it
> probably applies to SunBird as well right?
>
>
Yes it does, but sunbird won't ship in debian etch as they don't
release from any stable branch. However, I guess removing it
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:21:05PM +0200, Florian Boelstler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> version 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b.2 from asac works fine here as well on two
> systems running Sarge.
>
Would you volunteer to test "pre-releases" for next security updates?
I would notify you by mail as soon as there are pro
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:24:58PM +0200, Daniel Smolik wrote:
> I use previous version of mozilla from http://snapshot.debian.net/ (great
> site)
> and it works without problem.
> Dan
>
new packages are on its way. You can get a cure on i386 now by using
packages from my security preview archiv
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:56PM +0200, emilio brambilla wrote:
> hello,
>
> I can confirm too that version 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b.2 from
> http://people.debian.org/~asac/security/ works correctly and solve the
> bug on both the workstation I have here!
>
As you are a sarge desktop user, please k
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:09:53AM -0500, John McMonagle wrote:
> Please get this available asap.
> Only 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b. is available for sarge and it is seriously flawed.
>
> All the previous versions that worked are no longer available.
>
> Have users that need to get work done.
>
> Manag
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:59:04AM -0400, Simon Valiquette wrote:
>
> I am using Mozilla and Netscape for ages (well, since I stopped
> surfing on Goopher web sites). For different reasons, I always
> disliked Firefox/Thunderbird and preferred a better integrated
> interface (memory is cheap an
retitle 383344 thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
tags 383344 + help
thanks
Can anyone with amd64 platform confirm this? I would like to see at
least one other voice to justify this package with security fixes to
not enter testing.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed
OK,
I am preparing a new package revision that produces debug
symbols. Since I have no amd64 box at hand, would you volunteer to
respin this package on your machine in order to get a readable
backtrace (Of course, I would provide instructions)?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is
tags 383344 + unreproducible
tags 383344 + moreinfo
thanks
Please be responsive if you file a GRAVE bug ... if noone else reports
this problem, I will downgrade this.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> Please try to verify that this problem exi
Please try to verify that this problem exists if you start a fresh
account/profile.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:34:24AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Severity: serious
>
> Mozilla applications are known to require a lot of maintainance, and
> this is particularly true for the huge Mozilla suite. The 6 Mozilla
> updates since Sarge's release should show that,
retitle 376572 produce enigmail binary for mozilla/seamonkey
severity 376572 wishlist
thanks
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander S
reopen 382445
severity 382445 important
tags 382445 + unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:44:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
> nothing happens. No process; ps auxw shows nothing related to
> thunderbird. So I try to run thunderbird via /usr/lib/thunderbird-bin
> from the comma
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:48:37PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
> Package: thunderbird
> Version: 1.5.0.4-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> running /usr/bin/thunderbird gives no feedback; running
> /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird-bin states that it cannot find li
tags 382385 + patch
thanks
This is due to new the more strict behaviour of current gcc.
A patch for this is available in thunderbird package:
debian/patches/90_gcc-extern-fix.dpatch
maybe it needs backporting
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:47AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: mozi
severity 374382 grave
severity 374400 grave
merge 374382 374400
tags 374400 + confirmed
tags 374400 + pending
tags 374382 + confirmed
tags 374400 + pending
thanks
yes, its time to template this, so I won't forget to bump version in install.rdf
in future. Anyway, Fix is pending!!
- Alexander
p.
;
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:57 +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > your are right. We missed to close this bug. At least its fixed in
> > stable-security.
> > For unstable I don't know.
> It's not yet fixed for Etch/Sid. For two months!
> I d
close 364242 2:1.7.8-1sarge6
thanks
your are right. We missed to close this bug. At least its fixed in
stable-security.
For unstable I don't know.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages pr
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:36:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> When starting Thunderbird, I get the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla-thunderbird
> selected locale: en-US
> DOUBLE-CLICK: 250 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 --> -1 The program
> 'mozilla-thunderbird-bin' received a
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:53:55PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi there--
>
> This bug (and its merged fellow) appears to be the only thing keeping
> Thunderbird 1.5 out of etch. It has now been tagged pending since 19
> March, which is well over a month ago. Can we expect a version with
severity 364680 important
thanks
yes, a security issue but not a blocker IMO. Anyway, I will do some
research on this. I don't remember exactly why mozilla decided not to
switch this of by default in 1.5.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
reply
Please test the testbuild that fixes those issues here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/2006-April/000266.html
Especially, look out for regressions in mozilla dependants.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
repl
tags 357623 + pending
thanks
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:10:25PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
> Would someone please kindly fix this? It's been almost 6 months now,
> and I'm getting rather sick of recompiling mozilla myself.
>
> AMD64 gets no respect...
>
Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I p
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:15:48AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> tags 321644 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder why Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> set this bug to unreproducible,
> we have no woreking mozilla since August in the amd64 port, and 1.7.12-1
> is still affected.
>
severity 334621 important
thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:42:06AM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> Version: 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Thunderbird reverts to plain authentication for SMTP, in order to
> provide more
severity 333265 important
thanks
as long as this is not reported happening to anyone, I guess it is
unreproducible.
Can you please try if latest from unsable solves your problem?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /r
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:04:15PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Thunderbird segfaults after reading some (2) new RSS items. Im
> displaying the url not reading the RSS text.
> I thi
tags 330295 + etch-ignore
thanks
not all files have been relicensed to gpl. MPL is non-free,
nevertheless keep.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:07:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Is this bug about the fact that the MPL isn't free, or about the fact that
> the copyright file doesn't mention the
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> this potential license problem is blocking (among others) the transition
> of 1.0.7-1, which fixes several serious security problems. As the problems
> some debian-legal people seem to have spotted haven't been noticed by n
tags 329664 + pending
tags 329667 + pending
tags 325536 + pending
tags 292475 + pending
thanks
I will wait one or two more days, because mozilla is about to release
1.0.7 which addresses several security issues.
Setting pending, because the 1.0.6 package is ready here.
- Alexander
p.s. please
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> - # Protect quotes and $ in command-line arguments from two shell evals
> - moreargs="$moreargs \"$(echo "$1" | sed -e 's/"/\\\"/g' \
> - -e 's/[$]/\\\$/g')\""
> + [EMAI
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
> > * Alexander Sack:
> >
> >> Attached a start script that should fix this issue ...
> >
> >> echo moreargs $moreargs
> >
> > This seems to be some debugging cruft. Have you sent the correct
> > version?
>
> U
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:41:02PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> merge 329664 329667
> thanks
>
> On 05/09/22 17:27 +0200, Florian Weimer said ...
> > Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> > Version: 1.0.6-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> >
> > The --compose option executes shell comma
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:07:02PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 1.8 branch, meaning next mozilla and thunderbird upstream releases will
> also benefit from the fix. I will file this arm fix upstream.
Great, but don't forget to ask for review.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is li
tags 325536 + confirmed
thanks
will get into next upload.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:18:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:11:26AM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
>
Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:07:51AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Severity: serious
>
> The current mozilla package fails to build on
79 matches
Mail list logo
