On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> You mentionned rebuilding Qt 4. Does it happen with binaries you have
> rebuilt yourself, or at least that link to libraries you have rebuilt
> yourself?
Yes
> If yes, make sure you don't have binutils-gold installed, as it is
> currently broken
On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
> > I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> > x86_64 users running on Core i7.
>
> I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and h
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
> I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
problem. And downgrading eglibc helped.
> Does only Qt related applications c
I probably have the same problem: running Sid x86_64 I updated to eglibc
2.11.1-3 (from 2.10.2-9) and apps are crashing. E.g. I tried to build Qt 4.6.3
and qmake is crashing while configuring.
cat /proc/cpuinfo:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
gcc -v:
gcc ver
Hi,
even with cups (1.4.2-4) installed I still can't print.
Cheers,
André
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Philipp,
Josef released a new version.
Cheers,
André
On Monday 28 March 2005 15:31, Christian Loose wrote:
>
> I changed the license locally here from QPL to GPL v2 or later.
> Please speak up now, if you don't agree with this license change.
> Otherwise I will commit the changes to HEAD on Wednesday evening
> (CEST).
OK.
What about backporting for
On Saturday 26 March 2005 09:15, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual
> QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward
> with the change.
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this
shouldn't
On Friday 25 February 2005 03:30, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL. As the maintainer of
> kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove
> cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet
> with debian's free software guid
9 matches
Mail list logo
