namespace
currently follows that convention. It's rather confusing that src:rust-rio isn't
the io_uring one, regardless of packaging practices. Please consider using a
more descriptive or namespaced name. It may be a good chance to discuss about
naming of non-crates.io packages in Debian, thus sending to debian-rust.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ates.io. They could probably be RM'd altogether.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
been python-lldb-7. Now that buster is oldoldstable, is this
still relevant?
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:40:24 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> (11900+ lines of inlined build log)
Hi Gianfranco,
It would be great if you had kindly sent the log as a separate attachment or
pasted its r-b URL.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
any more months.
1.0 has been released: https://github.com/chmln/sd/releases/tag/v1.0.0
I'm now preparing the update.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Actually the maintainer is OK with bumping to 1.0, saving the effort to go
epoch: https://github.com/chmln/sd/issues/200
I'll wait for its release. The point release is unfortunately missed, however.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
On 2023-07-08 17:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 01:58:50 +0800 Blair Noctis wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 14:12:08 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> > Package: sd
>> > Version: 0.7.6-1
>
>> > squeeze had a sd binary package built from (u
hat. Do you think I can use epoch here? Or should I change its name?
(Sorry about the late reply, the email didn't reach me.)
Control: owner -1 !
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
python3.11', '-c', 'import importlib;
> print(importlib.util.MAGIC_NUMBER)') failed with status code 1
> dpkg: error processing package python3-minimal (--configure):
> installed python3-minimal package post-installation script subprocess
> returned error exit status 1
> ...
>
&g
sing their
>> pre-generated static files.
>
> ... which is a Policy violation.
Not if we have also their source and can build them ourselves IIRC?
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
efore next freeze stage to find a way to
actually fix it (involves node-d3-* deps, removing downloads, etc). Apologies
for the flawed update.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'll work on it after
freeze, please don't RM it.
[ncspot]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020522
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tallable
>
>
[aes-ctr] and aes-soft are both deprecated upstream, we are [planning] to update
to aes then RM them.
[aes-ctr]: https://crates.io/crates/aes-ctr
[aes-soft]: https://crates.io/crates/aes-soft
[planning]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-rust/2022/11/msg00002.h
librust-reqwest-0.11+rustls-tls-dev, in turn
tealdeer.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(>= 0.4.4-~~) |
> librust-log-0.4+default-dev:amd64 (>= 0.4.4-~~)
> -
> package: librust-log-dev
> version: 0.4.17-3
> architecture: amd64
> depends: librust-value-bag-1.0.0+error-dev:amd64 |
> librust-value-bag-1.0.0+error-dev:amd64
>
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tly
rustc which we currently don't have. Is it safe to close this?
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s the
"original" JS file present. Original in quotes because it's still generated from
a coffee script, but *its upstream* distributes the coffee script together with
generated JS.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
rust-zstd-sys 2.0.1 has been ACCEPTED, rust-zstd-safe 5.0.2 is in NEW. rust-zstd
should follow.
--
Sdrager,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:02:02 +0800 Blair Noctis wrote:
> After some tests I found that its bundled, pre-generated configure script may
> be the cause. jemalloc itself successfully builds using its autogen.sh script.
The cause should be upstream config.{guess,sub} not having a riscv64gc
d into a runtime chosen variant of
LAPACK procedure `gtsv`, which in local testing was `dgtsv`.
1:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=specutils=riscv64=1.8.0-1=1661681347=0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'),
hich is the randomly generated UUID
v4, or "fast-rng" that references a "private_rand" feature, using the
rand crate rather than getrandom.
--
Regards,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--
Regards,
Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_0xC21D9AD423A39727.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
22 matches
Mail list logo
