Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-07-14 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/06/15 10:10, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2015-06-06 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@gnutls.org wrote: On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:19 -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: export AUTOGEN_TRACE=everything AUTOGEN_TRACE_OUT='/tmp/ag-log.txt' Log is attached. [...] FWIW, it also works for me on sid (both

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-07-14 Thread Bruce Korb
From: Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com To: Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com Cc: Eric S. Raymond e...@snark.thyrsus.com Subject: Re: How to do a bootstrap build? Bruce Korb bruce.k...@gmail.com: Uploaded with the correct fix: http://autogen.sourceforge.net/data/autogen-5.18.6pre5.tar.xz

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-29 Thread Bruce Korb
byte arrays, i.e. traditional strings. I'll have a look again next weekend. :( Sorry. On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@gnutls.org wrote: On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 17:18 -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: On 06/28/15 04:26, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: http

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-28 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/28/15 04:26, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: http://autogen.sourceforge.net/data/autogen-5.18.5pre20.tar.xz That version works for me. OK, then, I've now unwound all the Guile wrapper macro removals from top of tree. http://autogen.sourceforge.net/data/autogen-5.18.6pre3.tar.xz If

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-27 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/06/15 10:10, Andreas Metzler wrote: FWIW, it also works for me on sid (both amd64 and i386). FWIW, it appears to be related to the disablement of Guile 1.6. I may have to unwind that until I can figure out how Guile 1.6 support causes regex execution problems Meanwhile, I've

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-07 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/07/15 06:33, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: I've compiled and run the attached version of that program and it succeeds (no valgrind warnings either). So the isolated case works, but the same expression embedded in autogen fails. The more interesting environment settings might be the LC_*

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-06 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/05/15 23:33, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:19 -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: export AUTOGEN_TRACE=everything AUTOGEN_TRACE_OUT='/tmp/ag-log.txt' Log is attached. In that log, I find: Compiling '[ -~]' with bits 0x1 === compiled as extended RE CASE no match: `c

Bug#787866: autogen: after upgrade to 5.18.5 autogen no longer works

2015-06-05 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/05/15 13:18, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Trying to run autogen on my def files fails consistently after upgrading 5.18.5. Downgrading to the .4 version works

Bug#747592: autogen: build hangs on testsuite (amd64)

2014-06-01 Thread Bruce Korb
On 05/29/14 12:57, Hector Oron wrote: Apologies for delay. Find attached file. Enough of a delay has gone by that the final 5.18.3 version is now out. I believe it addresses the experienced issue. To the best I can determine, this code: die() { echo Killing AutoGen ${AG_pid}

Bug#747592: autogen: build hangs on testsuite (amd64)

2014-05-17 Thread Bruce Korb
On 05/12/14 05:38, Hector Oron wrote: I am attaching failed log found in buildd, but did not get uploaded as it never finished building. Unfortunately, the build logs do not have enough information. The automake automated testing redirects all output to a log file and reports SUCCESS or

Bug#747592: autogen: build hangs on testsuite (amd64)

2014-05-10 Thread Bruce Korb
On 05/10/14 03:20, Andreas Metzler wrote: Control: forwarded 747592 http://sourceforge.net/p/autogen/bugs/161/ Control: tags 747592 confirmed upstream Control: severity 747592 serious On 2014-05-10 Hector Oron zu...@debian.org wrote: Source: autogen Version: 5.18.3~pre34 [...] Hello,

Bug#629142: Processed: unarchiving 629142

2012-08-17 Thread Bruce Korb
On 08/17/12 10:27, Andreas Metzler wrote: usually my /bin/sh is dash. However I have just changed my setup and made bash /bin/sh and reran the test. It failed on the 5th invocation. Do you have any idea why the error requires several tries to reproduce? Only an obvious guess: something or

Bug#629142: Processed: unarchiving 629142

2012-08-16 Thread Bruce Korb
On 08/14/12 23:53, Andreas Metzler wrote: rm -rf FAILURES testdir ; VERBOSE=true ; export VERBOSE ; \ make check TESTS=errors.test make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/AUTOGEN/autogen-5.16.2/autoopts/test' make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory

Bug#629142: Processed: unarchiving 629142

2012-08-16 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Andreas, Thank you. I now have enough information to diagnose the issue. It fails in the invocation of autogen with ${AG_L} below: case ${BASH_VERSION} in not-good-enough ) echo You are running Solaris without bash available. echo duplicate option flags cannot be tested. ;; * )

Bug#629142: Processed: unarchiving 629142

2012-08-12 Thread Bruce Korb
On 08/12/12 09:01, Andreas Metzler wrote: I do not think this warrants a release, No, but it is in source now. Anyway, with the patch a testsuite error appeared: --- PASS: equiv.test /bin/bash: line 5: 17976 Killed TERM='' top_builddir=../..

Bug#676115: autogen: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `invoke-xml2ag.texi'. Stop.

2012-06-04 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/04/12 15:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: autogen Version: 1:5.12-0.1 Severity: serious Going out on a limb, I am going to guess that when the ia64 issue is fixed, this will be fixed, too: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=103593aid=3531608group_id=3593 autogen 5.16

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-07-11 Thread Bruce Korb
On 07/10/11 08:42, Kurt Roeckx wrote: fmemopen.c:752:10: error: '_IOT__IOTBASE_fmemc_get_buf_addr_t' undeclared That means that hurd has a non-standard definition for _IOWR. #ifdef HURD #define _IOT__IOTBASE_fmemc_get_buf_addr_t sizeof(fmemc_get_buf_addr_t) #endif 5.12 still failed with

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-07-11 Thread Bruce Korb
On 07/11/11 10:14, Kurt Roeckx wrote: That means that hurd has a non-standard definition for _IOWR. #ifdef HURD #define _IOT__IOTBASE_fmemc_get_buf_addr_t sizeof(fmemc_get_buf_addr_t) #endif 5.12 still failed with the same error message. Then HURD is not #defined in hurd. I had to read

Bug#630176: Info received (Bug#630176: autogen: Sets rpath to /usr/lib)

2011-06-13 Thread Bruce Korb
And, yes, I was typing and firing off a test at the same time. autoopts-config.in should be patched thus: static_libs=${libdir}/libopts.a cflags=-I${includedir} case ${libdir} in /lib | /lib64 | /usr/lib | /usr/lib64 ) ldopts='' ldflags=-lopts ;; * ) test -n ${ldopts} \

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-06-05 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Kurt, Thank you. On 06/05/11 02:53, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I applied your patch and it build on most arches now. Excellent! Thank you! I still need to chase down why it would have failed with a non-directory for HOME. It should not have, but that should not be crucial. I'm still waiting

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-06-05 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/05/11 02:53, Kurt Roeckx wrote: It failed on hurd with this message: i486-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. . In file included from ag.c:35:0: fmemopen.c: In function 'ag_fmemioctl': fmemopen.c:752:10: error: '_IOT__IOTBASE_fmemc_get_buf_addr_t' undeclared I've done some more

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-06-03 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/03/11 13:47, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Source: autogen Version: 1:5.11.9-0.1 Severity: serious catastrophic? Seems odd that it fails everywhere. I have several test platforms that all work: Solaris, Free BSD and Linux. Can I get access to these build platforms and poke around? Thanks. --

Bug#629142: autogen: FTBFS: Various aborts

2011-06-03 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/03/11 15:06, Kurt Roeckx wrote: catastrophic? Seems odd that it fails everywhere. I have several test platforms that all work: Solaris, Free BSD and Linux. Can I get access to these build platforms and poke around? Thanks. serious just means that this is a blocker for the next

Bug#628316: autogen: FTBFS: tests failed

2011-05-28 Thread Bruce Korb
FAILURE: warning diffs: 1c1 #warning undefining SECOND due to option name conflict [-Wcpp] --- #warning undefining SECOND due to option name conflict GCC warning format changed. autogen test needs to change, too. This was fixed months ago. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#628316: autogen: FTBFS: tests failed

2011-05-28 Thread Bruce Korb
also see Bug #624755 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#624755: autogen FTBFS with GCC 4.6

2011-05-01 Thread Bruce Korb
On 05/01/11 04:04, Matthias Klose wrote: patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/70844378/autogen_1%3A5.10-1.1_1%3A5.10-1.1ubuntu1.diff.gz Fix in pending release 2011-04-07 Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org thanks to Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org * autoopts/test/cond.test

Bug#562791: Bug#562607: Patch for NMU

2010-01-31 Thread Bruce Korb
Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi, I've NMU'd your package. Please find the patch that I used attached. Some comments: - You might want to use something like: dh_makeshlibs -V libopts25 (= 1:5.10) This would require that you update this properly on new release. I've just used -V would would

Bug#562791: libopts25: didn't bump shlibs or soname.

2009-12-27 Thread Bruce Korb
If you generate the option code with new templates and run against old library, you will have a conflict. The library will reject the new code. The new library will accept a program generated against old templates and linked against the old library. Or, I should say it is supposed to. I do not

Bug#555500: autogen: FTBFS: usr/share/info/dir exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere

2009-11-10 Thread Bruce Korb
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Schepler dschep...@gmail.com wrote: Package: autogen Version: 1:5.9.9-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... rm -f /tmp/buildd/autogen-5.9.9/debian/tmp/usr/share/autogen/*.tar.gz dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_install --fail-missing

Bug#409056: libopts version number

2007-02-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Matt Kraai wrote: Howdy, AutoGen 5.8.3 built libopts.so.25. AutoGen 5.8.8 built libopts.so.24. This change was made in version 4.71 of VERSION, whose comment was test warning stuff :) Is this just a mistake? Should I decrement AO_AGE to 2 so that it builds libopts.so.25 again?

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-18 Thread Bruce Korb
Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : Daniel Schepler wrote: I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0) THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the initial mmap

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-02-02 Thread Bruce Korb
Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit : Daniel Schepler wrote: I got: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0) THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the initial mmap

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

2006-01-27 Thread Bruce Korb
Matt Kraai wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit : On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I don't know

Bug#340851: autogen also FTBFS on i386 now

2005-12-19 Thread Bruce Korb
Daniel Schepler wrote: Just a quick note that I've been able to reproduce the failure on the license.test test on an i386 system as well, so it's apparently not alpha-specific. I just ran pbuilder on the 1:5.7.3-1 source package twice in a row, and it failed both times. Another quick

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 failure

2005-12-06 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Matt, According to my reading of the doc for mmap, this should work. It does work on other platforms. It also seg faults instead of returning ((void*)-1). Now, what? :-( If you don't want to require that users use a kernel that doesn't misbehave like this, shouldn't you add an autoconf

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 failure

2005-12-05 Thread Bruce Korb
On Thursday 01 December 2005 08:11 am, Bruce Korb wrote: The call to scm_makstr() is faulting (every time for me): Hi all, I have now been able to recreate the failure on this call fairly often, but I have not found a cause. Nevertheless, this call is only useful if you use SCM_CHARS

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 failure

2005-12-01 Thread Bruce Korb
The call to scm_makstr() is faulting (every time for me): $ uname -a Linux juist 2.6.13.2 #2 Fri Sep 23 18:45:17 CEST 2005 alpha GNU/Linux $ gdb ../../autogen (gdb) set args --trace=everything -b license --no-def -T license.tpl (gdb) run Starting program: /home/bkorb/autogen-5.7.3/agen5/autogen

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 fixed two license test bugs

2005-11-30 Thread Bruce Korb
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:33 pm, Matt Kraai wrote: I wasn't able to reproduce this problem with autogen 1:5.7.3-1 in the unstable chroot on escher.debian.org. Falk, would you try to reproduce the problem and let me know whether or not you are able to? I was able to reproduce it

Bug#340851: 5.7.3 fixed two license test bugs

2005-11-26 Thread Bruce Korb
1. the test used a POSIX-ism that failed if the shell did not grok POSIX extensions to Bourne. 2. If the license file size was a multiple of pagesize, then strlen() would seg fault. OTOH, neither of these would affect the pseudo macro processing: It also fails with autogen 1:5.7.2-1

Bug#302412: exploitable temporary file race in unshar (fwd)

2005-04-01 Thread Bruce Korb
On Thursday 31 March 2005 05:30 pm, Santiago Vila wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bruce Korb wrote: Wrong assumption. It was announced on info-gnu. May I suggest that sharutils 4.3.77 and 4.3.78 are not put in directories named 4.3.77 and REL-4.3.78, then? The current layout is a little bit