Bug#309486: libc6 upgrade failed leaving system unusable

is this? Am I reading you right to say that you unpacked the same -22 debs and then things worked again? If you dare, could you try to reproduce the problem? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#309486: libc6 upgrade failed leaving system unusable

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:42:08AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:09:16AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole

Bug#308792: After the last update Via C3 systems give assertion failed in ld.so at boot

. Probably your mmap is busted. I do not see anything that would cause this in -21 either. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308625: binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing

the other patches are still necessary. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297769: patch

sure apt can cope. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304089: [PPC] Enable -mvrsave=yes by default

but not all apps * set it, so we don't rely on it now (and in fact we need * to save restore VSCR even if VRSAVE == 0). -- paulus So if you insist that GCC needs to fiddle the register, when nothing is looking at it, you'll need some better reason why. -- Daniel Jacobowitz

Bug#297769: patch

, but I'd have to play around with it to make sure. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297769: patch

this special situation (ex: distro compatibility and so on) because -21 should be the last call for sarge stuff... Could you explain what it is you're worried about? We absolutely ought to have this patch... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#297798: libc6: dlerror valgrind error

. dlerror's result is only guaranteed until the next call to a dl* function. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292673: additional info

: # mv /lib/tls/ld-2.3.2.so /lib/ should cure the problem. ISTR that Red Hat has a patch for this in their glibc RPMs already. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2