tags 1016230 + pending
thanks.
> LN == Lucas Nussbaum [2022-7-29]
[...]
LN> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
LN> on amd64.
Thanks for the report. It should be fixed by adding a
Build-Depends-Indep on texlive-latex-extra. I'll test and upload a
fixed
> BR == Bastien ROUCARIES [2018-12-4]
BR> Hi, I plan to do a NMU in a week about this bug.
BR> Can you ACK ?
Hi Bastien,
thank you for your offer. However I would like to cater this by myself,
therefore please do not NMU.
--
Thanks,
Davide
>>>>> AB == Andreas Beckmann [2017-8-12]
AB> On 2017-08-12 02:43, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
>> I think I found the cause. At installation time the auctex package
>> starts in background (per default) the script udpate-auctex-elisp, which
>> keeps runn
ive --force
/var/lib/auctex/${emacsen-flavor}" in auctex emacsen remove script.
Since "update-auctex-elisp" should be a rather distinct and private
process name, I think I will do it with something along the lines of
"pkill -f update-auctex-elisp", as in the patch attached.
--
Th
> RV == Rémi Vanicat [2016-11-20]
RV> Hello, I intent to nmu auctex for those 3 bugs, with the attached
RV> patch:
Fine with me, thanks for your work. While you are at it, I think you
could also drop emacs23 support (just remove emacs23 wherever it
occurs).
--
Regards,
Davide
> RV == Rémi Vanicat [2016-9-23]
RV> I intent to NMU auctex to fix this problem this week-end, if there
RV> is no opposition against it.
Thanks Rémi,
you are welcome to NMU with this patch.
RV> Davide, if you don't have time enough to take care of this package,
RV> the new debian emacs
LN == Lucas Nussbaum [2014-11-9]
LN Source: auctex
LN Version: 11.87-2
LN Severity: serious
LN Tags: jessie sid
LN User: debian...@lists.debian.org
LN Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141108 qa-ftbfs
LN Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
LN Hi,
LN During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a
tag 768724 + pending
thanks
LN == Lucas Nussbaum [2014-11-9]
LN Hi Davide,
[...]
LN sbuild (which is used on the buildds) only uses the first alternatives
LN in build-dependencies in order to provide reproducible builds.
I see. Shouldn't perhaps sbuild only use the first installable
tag 706098 +unreproducible +moreinfo
thanks
DC == Domenico Cufalo [2013-4-24]
DC I just upgraded my machine from Squeeze to Wheezy.
DC As in subject, it seems that auctex is not loaded by emacs. In another
DC machine (but with wheezy Xfce 32bit; fresh installation), on the contrary,
I'm
DC not
severity 694800 important
thanks
TK == Thomas Koch [2012-11-30]
TK Package: auctex
TK Version: 11.86-12
TK Severity: serious
Downgrading to important (reread http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer:
I fail to see how the serious level applies to this bug; feel free to
educate me if you disagree).
BH == Ben Hutchings [2008-12-7]
BH I am uploading the following changes to delayed/3.
Thanks Ben,
I will let it in for the moment, due to the security implications. I
think I will revert to /tmp as soon as I have some more time to ponder
about it, which won't happen for at least two weeks.
MJ On Sat Oct 25 08:25, Sven Joachim wrote:
That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a
Debian-specific patch that lets sendmail.el throw an error if neither
sendmail nor /usr/bin/mail can be found, first reported and discussed
in #429059. Since a sensible solution had already
AM == Agustin Martin [2008-10-23]
AM For the records, a proposed fix for sendmail.el Debian changes in emacs22
AM is to use
AM (if (not (file-executable-p /usr/bin/mail))
AM (progn
AM (message /usr/bin/mail is not executable)
AM (setq mail-interactive t)))
AM instead of
AM (if (not
TW == Thomas Weber [2008-10-21]
TW Package is dead upstream, maintainer seems MIA.
Maintainer is here and reads what you write.
--
Ciao, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ == Matthew Johnson [2008-10-22]
MJ I am happy to NMU or sponsor a fix
What about coordinating with the maintainer?
--
Thanks, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
please attach the
/usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog file.
--
Thanks, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fant == Frank Küster [2006-10-26]
fant Davide, I hope I don't interfere while you are just about to
fant upload your own version. But since we haven't heard anything from
fant you, I am not willing to wait.
No problem for me, just go ahead. However, please, next time do spell
your intentions
tags 374789 + confirmed pending
thanks.
YD == Yavor Doganov [2006-6-21]
YD I am unable to remove the package, the following error occurs:
I see, thanks for reporting.
--
Ciao, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
JG == Julian Gilbey [2006-6-6]
JG No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the
JG /usr/bin/emacs symlink not existing.
Do you think we can close this bug?
--
Ciao, Davide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Frank,
as always, thank you very much for your help with the BTS.
LJM == Lewis, James M [2006-3-16]
LJM !! Found it. I had EMACS_UNIBYTE=t in the environment. I unset
LJM that and it installed. I think that was cruft left over from
LJM emacs 20 days. Can't remember now why I had it
Hi folks,
just a quick mail to state that this is not the first time that we
encounter this problem. Autoconf should not be called (of course, it
should be called for CVS versions only); it's a timing problem, as you
noticed. I do not recall if its in auctex or mailcrypt bts, but we have
severity 341226 important
tags 341226 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
LFLD == Luis Fernando Llana Díaz [2005-11-29]
LFLD Package: auctex
LFLD Version: 11.55-1
LFLD Severity: critical
LFLD Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi!
Please, do not abuse severity levels. You can find a
22 matches
Mail list logo
