No they aren't. I will soon upgrade on debian git, a new version (3.5.2) that does not include anymore thoose file. The "_source" will be included into tgz (even if we debian package does not need it since it use the external package of ckeditor instead). The flash files will also be removed, so it should solve this report too. I will contact you as soon as it is ready.
2014-04-14 8:41 GMT+02:00 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Your package seems to include some files that lack sources > > in prefered forms of modification: > > > > - ckeditor files in this case please purge it and use packaged one > > Please check your assertions twice before filing serious bugs: > > htdocs/includes/ckeditor/ckeditor.js > [...] > > htdocs/includes/ckeditor/_source/plugins/specialchar/lang/el.js > > That "_source" directory is the source of ckeditor... > > > - flash file > > > > > htdocs/includes/jquery/plugins/datatables/extras/TableTools/swf/copy_csv_xls.swf > > > htdocs/includes/jquery/plugins/datatables/extras/TableTools/swf/copy_csv_xls_pdf.swf > > There's no license violation (dual license: BSD+GPL2) here but the sources > are indeed > missing from the dolibarr source package. > > I don't know whether it's best to include the missing sources or to get > rid of those Flash files. Laurent, what do you think? Are those Flash > files important? > > Cheers, > -- > Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer > > Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook: > → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ > > -- Laurent Destailleur (alias Eldy) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Social networks of my OpenSource projects: Dolibarr Google+: https://plus.google.com/+DolibarrOrg/ Dolibarr Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dolibarr Dolibarr Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dolibarr AWStats Google+: https://plus.google.com/+AWStatsOrgPoject/ AWStats Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/awstats.org AWStats Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/astats_project
