Please go ahead and NMU.
Emilien
Le sam. 26 janv. 2019 à 15:18, Bruno Kleinert a écrit :
> Hi Emilien,
>
> please consider addressing this RC bug.
>
> Just to raise awareness: I plan to NMU with my previously attached
> patch around week 7.
>
> Cheers - Bruno
>
Hi Georges,
Do you have any time to look into this?
I have also created a bug report at
https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/650 to see if any of the upstream
developers are motivated to take this over.
Best,
Emilien
ᐧ
Emilien
2016-08-06 0:05 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen
TLDR: Please check if the /var/lib/tomcat8/shared folder is still used
with Tomcat 8.
I have applied the previously attached patch, the package builds fine,
but when installing the .deb the following error occurs:
Setting up biomaj-watcher (1.2.2-2) ...
Updating Context.xml...
Configuration
Unblock request sent to the Release team, see bug #773113.
+Emilien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Unblock request sent to the Release team, see bug #773113.
The unblock request was approved.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
FYI: I have removed the jessie tag, as
- the Jessie Freeze policy in effect (i.e. not reasonable to have the
new upstream version 1.1.0-1 that's in Git be included in Jessie)
- the package is already removed from Testing (on 2014-07-18)
Cheers,
+Emilien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Package: shaarli
Version: 0.0.42~beta~dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
After installing shaarli from Testing on a new machine, a 500 Internal Server
Error is logged when accessing the page for the first time.
From /var/log/nginx/error.log:
2014/12/13 14:39:27 [error]
Hi team, read below for an important announcement regarding the GNU
Health package in Debian.
2014-06-02 23:28 GMT+02:00 Emilien Klein emil...@klein.st:
Piuparts identified this bug in March, and I haven't taken the time to
fully address the issue that only happens in certain locales it seems
Per chance I'm just stumbling on bug #748561 (I unsubscribed from
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org due to volume a while
ago, seems like I should reconsider).
Piuparts identified this bug in March, and I haven't taken the time to
fully address the issue that only happens in certain
Hi Andreas and the python-nautilus maintainer,
I have just installed nautilus-image-manipulator in a fresh Sid
installation (came with nautilus and python-nautilus as dependencies)
and I didn't have any issues of any kind running nautilus and the extension.
I assume this bug was indeed fixed
I have been granted upload rights for Shaarli by Georges, and have
uploaded the package to ftp-master.
Should anything in particular be done (e.g. pushing directly to
testing?) or does this follow the regular upload process?
+Emilien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I am fine with your NMU. Thanks for taking care of it.
No need to delay more if you want.
+Emilien
2014-04-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org:
tags 742805 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for nautilus-image-manipulator (versioned as
Hi David, Salvatore and Georges,
2014-04-01 20:24 GMT+02:00 Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:38:55PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Package: shaarli
Version: 0.0.41~beta~dfsg2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch upstream
Control: forward -1
Hi team,
I have made the switch to use su instead of sudo [0].
Please upload gnuhealth 2.4.1-2 to unstable.
On 02/24/2014 01:57 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I am also open to use su instead of sudo. That's even what I first
did, but (for some reason I can't remember) didn't get the command to
run
Hi Mentors,
TLDR: in order to execute a command as another user, should `sudo` or
`su --command` be used?
I'd like to get your opinion on how to best solve this issue:
I've got a package [0] that uses dbconfig-common to manage its
database. The database is owned by a specific user (not root).
Hi Andreas,
Le 23 févr. 2014 22:30, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu a écrit :
Hi Emilien,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:49:46PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
2014-02-23 19:53 GMT+01:00 Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 08:38:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote
I assumed/believed sudo was part of the base Debian system, as I don't
have issues when building the package with pbuilder.
I indeed want to execute those commands as the user that owns the database.
I understood sudo (su DO) was meant to execute commands as another user,
while su is used to
Le 21 févr. 2014 21:57, Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st a écrit :
This is already weird:
populating database via scriptfile... error encountered populating
database: /usr/share/dbconfig-common/scripts/gnuhealth-server/install/pgsql
exited with non-zero status
Might be to a call
Next to zach's workaround of using monkeysign (which worked for 14 of the
16 keys I had to sign [0] [1]), another possibility is to downgrade gnupg:
# apt-get install gnupg/stable
(credit to odyx@d.o who suggested this to me privately)
Thanks for maintaining signing-party.
+Emilien
[0]
Hi Sebastian,
2013/6/1 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org:
Hi Emilien,
On 2013-03-03 18:33:48, Emilien Klein wrote:
Is there someone on the Python Apps Team that would be willing to
upload the NMU I prepared? It's uploaded to mentors.d.n [0]?
+Emilien
[0] http://mentors.debian.net
Hi Marco,
2013/3/1 Marco Rodrigues goth...@gmail.com:
Which e-mail did you try to contact me? goth...@sapo.pt? That one I really
don't check it =(
No problem, most important is that we got in touch at last.
I'm not so active lately unfortunately, but I'm glad you want to help to
maintain
Hi Marco Rodrigues and the Python Applications Packaging Team,
The subdownloader package you co-maintain has a grave bug [0] which
resulted in the package being removed from Testing more than 2 years
ago.
This bug has been fixed in version 2.0.18 (4 releases later than
2.0.14 packaged in
Package: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
If the configuration file has been edited manually, it will not be
possible to start Nautilus Image Manipulator afterwards.
Reason is that the width and height parameters will be floats, but N
I M will assume they are integers,
Package: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: grave
1fichier.com, the file locker to which Nautilus Image Manipulator can
send files after having resized them, has changed the server to which
files are to be POSTed. which breaks the application. No useful error
message is
gladly take care of the Debian packaging
Thanks,
+Emilien
[0] http://mentors.debian.net/package/subdownloader
2012/11/23 Emilien Klein emil...@klein.st:
Hi Python Applications Packaging Team and Marco Rodrigues,
Please have a look at the patch I sent to fix this Severity: grave
bug
Hi Andre,
2012/11/24 Andre Verwijs i...@verwijs-pc.nl:
RE x-terminal-emulator as default term breaks nautilus-open-terminal
the problem stil exists, how do i fix it ?
Not sure what you mean by the problem. Can you have a look at bug
#693894 and tell me if that's related?
According to the
Hi Python Applications Packaging Team and Marco Rodrigues,
Please have a look at the patch I sent to fix this Severity: grave
bug which caused the removal of SubDownloader from the archive.
As mentioned in my previous mail, I've prepared a NMU [0] for this, it
would be nice if you could check it.
Hi,
The following patch (already applied upstream [0]) fixes this bug.
I've prepared a NMU (versioned as 2.0.14-1.1) and uploaded it to
mentors.d.n [1], please review and upload.
Thanks,
+Emilien
[0]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~subdownloader-developers/subdownloader/trunk/revision/552
[1]
reassign 684836 python-distutils-extra
merge 682631 684836
affects 682631 nautilus-image-manipulator
thanks
This is similar to bug #682634, which most probably finds its cause in
python-distutils-extra
Cheers,
+Emilien
P.S.: this is the first time I'm reassigning and merging bugs, let me
know
Hi Salvatore,
2012/6/26 Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org:
tags 676045 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for nautilus-image-manipulator (versioned as 1.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
2012/6/27 Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org:
I can cancel the NMU if you would like to upload yourself, this would be
perfect! It's still time do to so[1].
I just checked the patch and everything is fine. I'm OK with you doing the NMU.
Btw, I had some warnings on build:
WARNING:
While wanting to package a new version of nautilus-image-manipulator
in Sid I encountered the same crash as reported by Andrea Veri.
With both nautilus-python 1.1-1 and nautilus-image-manipulator 0.4-1
installed, this is the output of `aptitude dist-upgrade` as of today:
Les paquets suivants ont
Just released version 0.4 that contains the transition to nautilus 3
and GObject introspection. I'm getting to work on packaging it!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
33 matches
Mail list logo
