El lun, 31-03-2008 a las 11:03 +0300, Riku Voipio escribió:
> reopen 417083
> severity 417083 serious
> thank
>
> Looks like the changes in the NMU have been lost with new upstream
> version; Alternatively the upstream has added new files without
> proper headers. Serious now since gcc-4.3 is def
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 12:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: apertium-es-ca
> version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 12:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > I'm not sure what is wrong here, the Build-Depends states:
> >
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, lttoolbox (>
I'm not sure what is wrong here, the Build-Depends states:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, lttoolbox (>= 3.0.0),
apertium (>= 3.0.1), libapertium3-3.0-0-dev (>= 3.0.1), libxml2-utils
(>= 2.6.26), xsltproc (>= 1.1.20-1), gawk (>= 3.1.5), pkg-config (>=
0.21-1)
But it appears that y
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:46 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> tags 446785 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:00:23AM +0100, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > >
> > > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > > #0 ~ApertiumRE (this=0x7
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 00:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 06:29:05PM +0100, Francis Tyers wrote:
> >
> > $ strace apertium-preprocess-transfer apertium-en-ca.trules-en-ca.xml
> > trules-en-ca.bin
>
> I hope this is good too:
> Core was gen
Hi,
Can you give some more information, particularly your compiler version,
and versions of the relevant libraries, and anything else you might find
useful, e.g. attach the output of:
$ strace apertium-preprocess-transfer apertium-en-ca.trules-en-ca.xml
trules-en-ca.bin
And if you're feeling par
7 matches
Mail list logo
