to qsynaptics, ftp.debian.org.
I guess the right course it to upload a package that changes
any to a list of allowed arches and then to clone the bug against
ftp.debian.org asking for removal of the old binary.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
to build the package with -B to reproduce it, though.
Also I could reproduce it with dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -B on my
main system, but not in a pbuilder.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
reassign 333796 wnpp
severity 333796 normal
retitle 333796 O: xconq -- A graphical multi-player strategy game and game
design system
thanks
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:20:14PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force them
to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the
package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
other people to force them
to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the
package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the
package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 336535 patch
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:56:03AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
kismet FTBFS on mips/mipsel with a g++-4.0 ICE (which is most probably
the same as in #336463, will add more information there).
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kismetver=2005.08.R1
a bug against l-k-h for this reason.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
equivalents, or else to copy the bits you need from some particular
version of the kernel headers.
The former is not available, so I'll do the latter.
Ack.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
as destination.
High severity since at least the mips(el) buildds currently use sudo and
were hit by the problem.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1
://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=2.12.0-2pkg=gnome-netstatusarch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/09/msg00020.html
for more information.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin
delete them (which leads to uneccessary rebuilds, though...)
Sorry for not noticing that earlier. I just found a point that is not in my
usual sponsoring checklist ;)
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500
user debian-qa@lists.debian.org
usertag 300675 proposed-removal
thanks
Since these package seems indeed to be uttertly useless these days I
propose to remove it. Please respond within a week if you have any
objections.
Gruessse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
tag 336053 patch
thanks
A patch for this issue is attached.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Nur --exclude batch amaya-9.2.1/Amaya/amaya/AHTURLTools.c
amaya-9.2.1.new/Amaya/amaya/AHTURLTools.c
--- amaya-9.2.1/Amaya/amaya/AHTURLTools.c 2005
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-ruby (1.9.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Update build-dependencies to libmagick9-dev (Closes: #332455)
+(Necessary source changes backported from upstream 1.9.3)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:41:19 +0100
+
librmagick-ruby (1.9.0
.
As the week has now passed, do you have time to do the NMU, Sven?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From tests that I did you can work around it by lowering the optimisation
to -01 (on mips(el) only of course).
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1
finished at 20051028-0305
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=1.13-3pkg=rpc2arch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
'
| make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20051028-0306
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=1.6-4pkg=rvmarch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld
since tetex doesn't depend on
+it anymore. (Closes: #332702)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:36:27 +0200
+
dvipng (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* added t1lib support to dvipng; by adding libt1-dev to Build-Depends
diff -Naur dvipng-1.5.bak/debian/control dvipng
tags 335002 patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:05:41PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
wordtrans suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k.
Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it.
I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch
unless
tags 334997 patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
kxmleditor suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k.
Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it.
I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch
tags #335001 patch
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
superkaramba suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k.
Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it.
I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 02:32:59AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: libgnome-jni
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: grave
libgnome-jni is uninstallable on i386, ia64, m68k, and powerpc because
it still depends on libgcj4 there which doesn't exists anymore.
Please upload a new version so
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:01:56AM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
El Viernes, 28 de Octubre de 2005 22:44, Frank Lichtenheld escribió:
I'm afraid that due to a domain expiration problem, I lost some mails,
including the one reporting the bug. :(
I was aware of the FTBFS, though, so I
(Closes: #336046)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:50:41 +0200
+
ots (0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (CVS snapshot).
diff -Naur ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20.bak/debian/rules
ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20/debian/rules
--- ots-0.4.2+cvs
package. So you can't use it on
purge, at least not unconditionally.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell
come later in the build process (at least my previous experiences
with the amaya code suggest this).
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1
/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
I'm not entirely sure why this usually works right but adding
--disable-rpath to your configure call in debian/rules which removes the
-R /usr/lib argument of the linker call fixes it and is recommended anyway.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian
via IRC from neuro:
to be portable, dcgui and friends should include sys/sem.h instead, and
use sysconf on _SC_SEM_VALUE_MAX to get that, rather than the SEMVMX
#define from linux/sem.h
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
of the one suggested in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html
Just adding the line suggested above would suffice though, you don't
have to use the patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur monotone_0.23-3/debian/control monotone-0.23
the
header linux/sem.h anyway, the only thing it seems to use is SEMVMX.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686
to use is SEMVMX.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an important
package to test and build d-i images for s390...
So what should happen with it? Orphaning it perhaps or at least asking
for co-maintainers? Will the new upstream version be packaged or does
it suck too much?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
manually.
Using the same names that java-package uses is probably the best choice.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unless there will emerge a real consensus
in the project regarding the identify contributors clauses in various
licenses.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
and added a #include of glext.h.
Yeah. Mine was more of a short-term solution :)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for some stuff but not for others. By competly
using debhelper I was able to reduce your debian/rules to half
of its size
2.3 don't call make in Makefiles, use $(MAKE)
2.4 Please use the CFLAGS mandated by policy and support
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Gruesse,
Frank
make in Makefiles, use $(MAKE)
2.4 Please use the CFLAGS mandated by policy and support
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
2.5 The Suggests on bash is completly bogus since it is
essential anyway. Plus you have a typo in the fieldname
s/Suggest/Suggests/
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
/2005/09/msg00020.html
for more information.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
/msg00020.html
for more information.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
/2005/09/msg00020.html
for more information.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
/2005/09/msg00020.html
for more information.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
:52.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+amaya (8.5-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Change build-dependency from gdk-imlib1-dev to gdk-imlib11-dev.
+Isn't required strictly speaking but makes sbuild happy
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
But it looks I will need yet another additional NMU to get it build on the 64
arches, too :(
Done that. Build fine on alpha but failed with a very weird error on
ia64. Don't know if it is maybe only a buildd error.
Attached
is now build-depending on g++-3.4
* Closes: #334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
build-depending is not enough. You have also tell configure to use
it... No idea how to do that in cdbs, though, so I can't provide
a patch...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www
int GLsizeiptrARB;
# else
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel
of the strict dependency on libgnome-java)
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
to archive it...
You might also be interested in snapshot.debian.net. They already do
such archiving.
But you are right that we should add links to the source images there.
I've done that for most of the cases.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de
,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE
think this bug is really RC, so downgrading, too)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale
Hi.
I propose to make to attached NMU to make amaya installable in unstable
again (and fix some other build related issues on the way). If there are
no objections I will upload it in the next days.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur amaya-8.5
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:16:45PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:44:09AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said
Package: lyx
Severity: serious
lyx currently can't be installed on ia64 due to a binNMU that produced
dependencies on lyx-common with the binNMU version number
Package: dnprogs
Version: 2.30
Severity: serious
in mail/receive.c you use $ in macro names. This isn't allowed on
arm by default anymore. See #327849 for details and a possible
fix (aside from just not using $ in macro names...)
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: enigmail
Severity: serious
I guess you are aware of it since you uploaded mozilla 1.7.12 yourself
but lets note it in the BTS, too: enigmail is currently neither buildable nor
installable in sid and needs to be updated for 1.7.12
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information
found 286471 2.1.5-10-4
thanks
According to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=inventorver=2.1.5-10-4arch=alphastamp=1124871129file=logas=raw
your 64bit fixes didn't work on alpha...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
found 303779 2:3.4.0-4
thanks
Somehow you managed to not fix the bug despite of claiming so in the
changelog, motor stilf FTBFS on alpha and ia64
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: pinball-dev
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: serious
pinball was compiled with libstdc++6, so you need to change
the libstdc++5-3.3-dev dependency of pinball-dev to libstdc++6-dev, too
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
is still in Debian for that very reason.
No, it isn't. It is still in testing since the new rrdtool didn't migrate to
there yet, but there is no librrd0-dev in unstable anymore...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
reassign 332366 ftp.debian.org
retitle 332366 RM: xezmlm -- RoM; depends on removed package (ezmlm)
severity 332366 normal
thanks
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:22:11AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Yes. It was orphaned for a while
:56.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dvtitler (0.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Recompile for CXX transition (Closes: #32)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:11:28
+0200
+
dvtitler (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
upload.
+ * Reapply the previous NMU patches for fixing mips(el) builds
+(Closes: #199557, #283117)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:27:27 +0200
+
openal (0.2005080600-2) unstable; urgency=low
* added openal-config (Closes: #323054)
diff -Naur openal
,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG
without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990
close 222384 1.0.0-3
close 222384 1.0.0-2.2
thanks
Closing this bug for the sake of version tracking. Not sure if the above
will work correctly, though... Let's find out.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
by a recompile.
I can offer to do this as an NMU if needed.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:46:27PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Package: xezmlm Severity: serious
Frank xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from
Frank unstable. While this is not in itself an RC bug
so that ezmlm gets
properly removed there.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel
Package: hmake
Severity: serious
hmake depends on ghc6|ghc5|nhc98
on arm the only one of these packages that is available is nhc98, but
this is going to be removed (see #331704).
So hmake needs to drop the arm binary.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release
.deb
dpkg: can't mmap package info file `/var/lib/dpkg/available': Invalid argument
As cdebootstrap fails with nearly the same error message
(s/available/status) one might suspect that it is actually a
libc/kernel problem, seems to work flawlessly on my 2.4.x system
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld
, please reply to this
mail
and describe your problem.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a new,
bugfree version of it. NEW processing should not cost you too much
time nowadays...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:42:32PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:28:04 +0200
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
(Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
Martin's
(and reportedly sparc) by compiling with
+-fno-strict-aliasing, based on a patch by Petr Salinger
+(Closes: #323798)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:00:31 +0200
+
openmotif (2.2.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
* NMU.
diff -u openmotif-2.2.3/debian/rules
reassign 327662 ftp.debian.org
retitle 327662 RM: dedit -- RoM and RoQA; old, rc-buggy and unmaintained
severity 327662 normal
thanks
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 05:32:17PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote:
2005-09-11 (日) の 16:46 +0200 に Frank Lichtenheld さんは書きました:
Your package did show up on this list
of it from unstable,
too?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED
work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
thanks for your patch, I'll upload a fixed package soon. (To be more exact:
after I return from my holidays, which will be in in two weeks
approximately.)
What has happened to that?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL
Hi.
This package was removed before sarge. Is it planned to get it fixed up
for etch or at least in unstable or should it just be removed from
the archive alltogether?
Gruesse from the QA Meeting,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: fcmp
Severity: serious
freecraft was removed from testing because of a RC bug. Since this package
is pretty much useless without freecraft, I removed it, too. This bug should
hold it out from testing until freecraft is ready to go in again.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:44:13PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
fixed[0], waiting for my sponsor... this package solves *only* this bug,
I want to get 0.34-1 into 3.1r1 too.
It's been two weeks since then. Problems
@@
+bonobo (1.0.22-2.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build with a non-broken liborbit (Closes: #308013)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:17:02 +0200
+
bonobo (1.0.22-2.3) unstable; urgency=low
* tests/test-any.c: patch from Andreas Jochens
601 - 700 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
