Hello Matthias and Dmitry,
Sorry for being MIA. As I'm currently busy with my life and work, I want to
give up all my packages for adoption. (I forgot about the proper procedure
here, so please kindly take over as you wish.)
Please let me know if a GPG-signed copy of this email is needed.
Thank
mat...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 09:30:08PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I've uploaded source+binary identical as before (as it has been in the
> > archive, any modifications would be a bad idea). If this won't work, the
> > maintainer (Guo Yixuan) is a better
Control: block -1 by 872959 872961
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > gcc-doc-defaults FTBFS since GCC-7 was made the default compiler:
>
> Which raises a question: where's gcc-7-doc?
I'm going to have a new upload,
; > Andreas
>
> cu
> Adrian
No problem. Please go ahead.
Yixuan
>
> --
>
>"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
GUO Yixuan
On Sep 2, 2015 12:52, "Mitsuya Shibata" wrote:
>
> Control: owner !
>
> sorry for very late reply.
> I will tackle the bug in this weekend.
Thank you! If no renaming is needed, then you only need to bump the package
version, rebuild and upload.
Actually, after rebuilding
Control: tag -1 + pending
Control: forwarded -1
https://code.google.com/p/sunpinyin/issues/detail?id=327
So we need either
$ pod2man -n genpyt genpyt.pod genpyt.1
or
$ pod2man genpyt.pod genpyt.1
I'll try to fix this.
It's here
for target 'build' failed
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
So we need either
$ pod2man -n genpyt genpyt.pod genpyt.1
or
$ pod2man genpyt.pod genpyt.1
I'll try to fix this.
Regards,
GUO Yixuan
Control: merge -1 784200
Control: reassign -1 src:librime
Control: tag -1 + pending
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libyaml-cpp0.5
Control: retitle -2 dependency problem breaks librime
Control: severity -2 important
Hi,
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 04:40:23PM -0700, Hong Xu wrote:
Package:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Source: boinc
Version: 7.4.14+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
boinc failed to build on the buildds with the following error:
|
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:14:49PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
The only problem for using uversionmangle is:
I: librime source:
debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle line 3
N:
N
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:01:49PM -0400, GUO Yixuan wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 08:27:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:11:18AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
You did not present rationale to do extrastep with the second option
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
header, and let uscan do the repacking: [1]
Files-Excluded
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Guo Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:30:52AM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
For this, I think it's easier to add a Files-Excluded line to
debian/copyright
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 08:27:12PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:45:32AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan culu@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev = librime1-dev
renaming, from Aron, as we
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:39:39PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
Why are not we uploading the new librime?
Osamu
I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev = librime1-dev
renaming, from Aron, as we discussed in a previous thread. [1]
In addition, because the symbol files
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 01:18:53AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:35:56AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: librime-dev
Version: 0.9.9-1
Severity: grave
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-outdated
librime-dev can no longer be installed in
,
GUO Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sunpinyin/sunpinyin/issues/42
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:50PM -0500, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
I bisected the regression and opened a bug upstream
https://github.com/sunpinyin/sunpinyin/issues/42.
Lingzhu Xiang
Thank you!
GUO Yixuan
bypassing
restricted shell/command configurations.
This only applies to OpenSSH 6.2 and 6.3 built against OpenSSL
supporting AES-GCM. It has been fixed in upstream, OpenSSH 6.4.
This seems to be the same as #729029?
Cheers,
GUO Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
Control: fixed -1 7.0.65+dfsg-1
Marked as fixed in the current version in sid.
Regards,
GUO Yixuan
於 2013年05月07日 23:48, Gianfranco Costamagna 提到:
This bug have been fixed between 7.0.36 and 7.0.38.
You can see both changelogs (on ubuntu raring, not the same configuration but
the same
:
No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[3]: *** [seti_boinc-main.o] Error 1
This is a known bug of boinc (libboinc-app-dev), which is fixed in the
next upload (7.0.65+dfsg-2).
Cheers,
GUO Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git
GUO Yixuan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On 10/23/2012 09:35 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
The packages in unstable are updated to 4.7 (or 4.6 on some archs)[1],
I actually knew this; I can't think why I didn't say so in the report.
and waiting for release team's unblock grant
(or 4.6 on some archs)[1],
and waiting for release team's unblock grant.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/gcc-doc
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcc-doc-defaults.html
Regards,
Guo Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
, as
Andreas has noted, a lot of obsolete stuff could probably be
removed from the maintainer scripts.
I see that NMU prefer to be minimal. Maybe my patch will still be
useful in case of a maintainer upload.
Cheers,
Guo Yixuan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
severity 649344 important
thanks
Hi,
I'm lowering severity, for policy 4.13 is a should, and violations of
it are not considered release critical.
Regards,
Guo Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
be correct, I guess. You may need to
change the 2.13.2-41~ if it's not the case.
As in:
dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \
/etc/timidity/timidity.daemon 2.13.2-41~ timidity-daemon -- $@
Cheers,
Guo Yixuan
From 62b51523e6a4d802567358bc3c9758cf9b1e1a9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guo Yixuan
We added a patch[1], and think it will fix this error.
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc-app-seti.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/101_freebsd_build.patch;h=e02e9a8a4bc14f33d33ab41e19fdbfa8bf10bce4;hb=8dc89b3126d80321134311930e3464845db00174
Cheers,
Guo Yixuan
29 matches
Mail list logo