Source: context-modules
Version: 20240428-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package should not migrate to testing for now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
Source: context
Version: 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package should not migrate to testing for now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'),
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2024.20240401-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have
Source: biber
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: grave
biber should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Foreign
Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.3.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #1056312
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Hello Mark,
In 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 an "Breaks: ... texlive-binaries (<< 2009-12)" statement
was introduced to make sure the broken tl-bin packages are phased out.
We now need the same
Control: block -1 by 1056204
Control: merge -1 1056183
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: raspi-firmware
Version: 1:1.20231024+ds-1+rpt1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.4
Hello,
the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware
is a
mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to
be a
mount point the
Source: texlive-lang
Version: 2022.20230122-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
TL-base & TL-extra won't migrate to testing for now, cause they break
other packages (latexml & pycirkuit). Therefore I block TL-lang too
until the other issues are sorted
Source: texlive-lang
Version: 2022.20221123-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
this piece of software is tightly bind to package texlive-extra.
This package in turn currently can't migrate to testing due to
incompatibility to LaTeXML. The issue is
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2022.20221123-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
this piece of software is tightly bind to package texlive-extra.
This package in turn currently can't migrate to testing due to
incompatibility to LaTeXML. The issue is
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base
On 29.07.22 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
this happened due to a change in doc package. Reassign to
texlive-latex-base for now, will close shortly.
Hilmar
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/huertatipografica/Alegreya-Sans/issues/24
On 10.11.19 Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl) wrote:
Hi,
> I'm afraid your package fails to build from source:
>
I made the mistake to declare a Dep on your package w/o checking
before if there are RC bugs on
Source: wp2latex
Version: 3.100-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: 4.
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source since gcc-11 is the default compiler:
g++ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
Package: libmaxminddb-dev
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.10
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrade of package libmaxminddb-dev.
apt-listchanges: Mailing root: apt-listchanges: changelogs for sid
(Reading database ... 148796 files and
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2020.20201203-2
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
The new texlive-base has an impact on docbook based documentations,
see
https://bugs.debian.org/976475
https://bugs.debian.org/976508
https://bugs.debian.org/976519
https://bugs.debian.org/976535
Source: jupyter-sphinx-theme
Version: 0.0.6+ds1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.30
Hi,
your package fails to run the autopkg test, this prevents the migration
of TL 2020 to testing. The failure is probably caused by the upload of
Sphinx 2.4.3. to unstable.
Please be so kind to
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2020.20200327.54578-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Justification: Policy §7.6.1
Dear Maintainer,
The upgrade transaction for the texlive family, version 2020 failed for me
with a file overwrite (transcript below). This is non-deterministic based
on the
Package: wp2latex
Version: 3.86-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch upstream
Justification: 4.
Dear Maintainer,
the package FTBFS on s390x & arm64.
./atoms/include/typedfs.h:73:14: note: previous declaration as ‘typedef long
int __s64’
73 | typedef int __s64 __attribute__((mode(DI)));
|
On 26.07.18 Andreas Beckmann (a...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi Josué,
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
> a release, thus the severity.
>
> From the attached log (scroll to the
On 27.10.16 Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
> > Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken
> > or incomplete:
>
> arggg :(
>
#842293, I've set you as submitter.
> IMHO, this should
On 05.09.16 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi Matthias,
> This package builds using the hardening-includes package, which
> is now replaced by dpkg-dev's DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS settings.
>
> Please consider dropping the build dependency of hardening-includes
> and use the
On 14.04.16 Florian Ernst (f...@lf.net) wrote:
Hi Flo,
I'm trying to understand the problem.
> please consider the following (abridged) transcript of trying to run
> proftpd-basic from inetd, but ending up having it running standalone:
>
> root@testvz12:~# debconf-get-selections | grep proftpd
On 03.06.14 Mattias Ellert (mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se) wrote:
Hi,
\begin{figure}[H] fails with:
LaTeX Error: Unknown float option `H'
This causes build failures for packages that generate documentation
using Doxygen. See e.g.:
On 03.06.14 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
On 03.06.14 Mattias Ellert (mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se) wrote:
Hi,
\begin{figure}[H] fails with:
LaTeX Error: Unknown float option `H'
This causes build failures for packages that generate documentation
using Doxygen. See e.g
On 03.06.14 Eric Fort (eric.f...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil: running `xetex -ini -jobname=xelatex -progname=xelatex -etex
xelatex.ini' ...
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.4-0.9998 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
(INITEX)
restricted \write18 enabled.
Killed
Could you run
On 30.05.14 John David Anglin (dave.ang...@bell.net) wrote:
Package: texlive-bin
Version: 2014.20140528.34243-1
Followup-For: Bug #749718
See:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=texlive-binarch=hppaver=2014.20140528.34243-1stamp=1401375185
checking dependency style of
On 30.05.14 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Disable luajit on hppa too?
You did that already. I'm sorry, noticed it to late.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 30.05.14 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org) wrote:
Hil
Thanks! It has been built on s390x, but I'm seeing some problems when texlive
is
installed, e.g.:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=s3qlarch=s390xver=2.8.1%2Bdfsg-1%2Bb1stamp=1401449820
Building format(s)
On 05.01.14 John O'Hagan (m...@johnohagan.com) wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:32:22 +0100
Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
Hm, I wouldn't expect hard links at that location, but I don't know
enough about ucf to evaluate. Did you experience system crashes on
that box recently (i.e
On 04.01.14 John O'Hagan (m...@johnohagan.com) wrote:
Hi John,
please keep the bug address in Cc if you need fast response.
Hm, I wouldn't expect hard links at that location, but I don't know
enough about ucf to evaluate. Did you experience system crashes on
that box recently (i.e. in June and
On 04.01.14 John O'Hagan (m...@johnohagan.com) wrote:
Hi ucf maintainer,
Next try, use Debian E-Mail address.
In the output below one notices that in /var/lib/ucf/ sit some hard
links pointing to other files in same directory. Is this an expected
behavior?
If not: how can we remedy the
On 03.01.14 John O'Hagan (johnmoha...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
Installation of the package fails, here is the output of aptitude:
root@mini:/home/john# aptitude install texlive-base
The following NEW packages will be installed:
texlive-base
The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will
On 31.08.13 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Hi,
I imported the 2 changed files into my texinfo 5.1 build dir. Now the
test suite fails even more often. I'm afraid we have to use an svn
checkout...unless upstream prepares a release ASAP and we disable the
test suite until
On 31.08.13 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Hi,
I reported upstream @texinfo and got the following information:
This is already solved in svn in r5308 and r5298. Thanks for the
report nevertheless!
I imported the 2 changed files into my texinfo 5.1 build dir. Now
the test suite
On 25.08.13 Dominic Hargreaves (d...@earth.li) wrote:
Hi,
Please ask debian-p...@lists.debian.org if you need help with preparing
or testing a change; if you have a suitable test i386 system you can
install perl 5.18 by adding experimental to your sources as well as the
repository at
On 30.08.13 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
If you find time (I am in the mountains the next days) please run the
tests with
PERL_HASH_SEED=0
and see if it succeeds.
This is an env var I have to set before building?
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 30.08.13 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On Fr, 30 Aug 2013, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
This is an env var I have to set before building?
Yes, and export it, too, otherwise it will not be seen by the
sub-process.
Sorry, no improvement
tags 720866 - moreinfo
tags 720866 - unreproducible
forwarded 720866 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?39904
stop
On 30.08.13 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On Fr, 30 Aug 2013, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, no improvement:
Umpf, so we have to investigate.
Can you send
On 25.08.13 Dominic Hargreaves (d...@earth.li) wrote:
Hi,
This package FTBFS with perl 5.18:
FAIL: test_scripts/sectioning_equivalent_nodes_test_renamed_nodes.sh
FAIL: test_scripts/layout_formatting_chm.sh
This doesn't obviously look like a perl 5.18 issue for me, but it
failed on two
On 29.07.13 Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de) wrote:
Hi,
your package fails to build, even on release architectures,
apparently due to missing Build-Depends(-Arch), possibly
due to either them appearing in Build-Depends-Indep (which
probably should be empty) or by you using an unclean and
On 26.07.12 Sebastian Ramacher (sebast...@ramacher.at) wrote:
Hi,
This is a bug in rubber. makeindex requires relative paths if
TEXMFOUTPUT is not set to the correct directory. rubber calls
makeindex with absolute paths, though.
Benjamin Mako Hill provided a patch, which probably solves
tags 682892 + help
stop
On 08.08.12 Adrian Knoth (a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de) wrote:
Hi all!
Same problem over here, Benjamin's patch does the trick.
IMHO, it would be good to have (the|a) fix in wheezy.
Many thanks to you both! I've put a new package here:
Hi Emmanuel,
I got this serious bug report b/c of some changes in the makeindex
module. The output routine of rubber uses absolute paths when calling
makeindex. Could you comment on this and eventually send a patch, so
the bug can be fixed for wheezy?
According to Sebastian Ramacher the problem
On 26.07.12 Sebastian Ramacher (sebast...@ramacher.at) wrote:
Control: clone 680845 -1
Control: reassign -1 rubber
Control: retitle -1 rubber: calls makeindex with absolute paths
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/rubber/+bug/706338
Control: block 680845 by -1
On 08/07/12
On 29.06.12 Arne Wichmann (a...@anhrefn.saar.de) wrote:
begin quotation from Norbert Preining (in
20120627143050.ge25...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at):
On Mi, 27 Jun 2012, Arne Wichmann wrote:
Hi,
Given that, the relevant files should be removed from debian,
as they are not DFSG-free.
On 13.06.12 Lionel Elie Mamane (lio...@mamane.lu) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex luatex.ini'
...
warning: kpathsea: configuration file texmf.cnf not found in these
directories:
On 13.06.12 Lionel Elie Mamane (lio...@mamane.lu) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:31:18PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 13.06.12 Lionel Elie Mamane (lio...@mamane.lu) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex
luatex.ini' ...
warning: kpathsea
severity 670040 normal
stop
On 22.04.12 Juhapekka Tolvanen (juht...@iki.fi) wrote:
Hi,
Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2011.20120322-1
Severity: grave
This is overdone. Just b/c you found a single program in
texlive-latex-extra not working, doesn't mean it is completely useless.
%
On 16.04.12 Osamu Aoki (os...@debian.org) wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:55:46PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
1. Use polyglossia instead of babel when using XeLaTeX.
In this case we'd look at a bug in dblatex generating invalid TeX
input files for XeTeX.
Yah.. that is a
On 20.02.12 Rogério Brito (rbr...@ime.usp.br) wrote:
Hi,
Package: texlive-binaries
Followup-For: Bug #659907
Hi there.
I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if
the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause.
This is probably #612924. For
On 15.02.12 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net) wrote:
retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
thanks
On 2012-02-14 19:47:16 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
Hi Marc,
The log is attached. Maybe this is a bug in jadetex, but as it worked
before, it may
tags 656618 + fixed-upstream
stop
On 20.01.12 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
Today I installed the Linux 3.2 kernel, rebooted into it and tried
to compile the open-vm-tools for that kernel. The build failed,
the relevant error message is:
I can confirm
reassign 656618 open-vm-source
found 656618 8.8.0+2011.09.23-491607-1
stop
On 20.01.12 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Package: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.12.20-562307-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
correct
Package: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.12.20-562307-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Today I installed the Linux 3.2 kernel, rebooted into it and tried to
compile the open-vm-tools for that kernel. The build failed, the relevant
Package: jupp
Version: 3.1.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
this issue is probably related to #644468. I tried to install jupp, which
failed with the same error message:
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main jupp i386 3.1.18-1 [230 kB]
On 22.08.11 Christoph Egger (christ...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
setting to serious again as this now happens with dash from
unstable. if you think this is a dash problem and not a texinfo
one please reassign.
That patch is already in upstream, I guess this is not a bug in dash.
Norbert: I
On 15.08.11 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi Frank,
I'm still here (going on vacation next saturday).
Many thanks for the upload.
BTW: I used the following statement in the Debian changelog to reopen
another bug: (Reopens: #618033). The bug was not re-opened, I did
this now
On 13.08.11 Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:43:27PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
Could you check if the broken LFS support also introduced #637667?
I.e. simply comment the patch (partial_lfs_support.diff) in the
series files, rebuild
On 15.06.11 Kiko Piris (fpi...@portsdebalears.com) wrote:
On 15/06/2011 at 15:27 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi!
At least you get a completely different error message than me and
you are in a completely piece of code when the build fails.
I do not really understand what you are saying
On 09.03.11 Kiko Piris (fpi...@portsdebalears.com) wrote:
Hi,
I was able to compile open-vm-modules on linux-2.6.32.28, but with
linux-2.6.32.32 I can't.
Either with make-kpkg modules_image or module-assistant.
I suspect it???s the same bug than #614292, but since I'm not
sure i report
severity 612502 important
stop
On 25.02.11 Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de) wrote:
Hilmar Preu�e dixit:
Hi,
I applied the patch to our SVN, the next upload will have the fix.
Thanks a lot! (As I said, it probably doesn’t FTBFS in 99.9% of all
builds, across all architectures – but the
On 20.02.11 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Hi,
Today I installed the new 2.6.37 kernel provided by Debian: Linux sid
2.6.37-1-686 #1 SMP Tue Feb 15 18:21:50 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
The modass fails to build a kernel specific package of open-vm-source, the
build log is attached
Package: open-vm-source
Version: 1:8.4.2-261024-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Today I installed the new 2.6.37 kernel provided by Debian: Linux sid
2.6.37-1-686 #1 SMP Tue Feb 15 18:21:50 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
The modass fails to build a kernel specific package
On 02.01.06 Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: serious
The license is clearly non-free:
| All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
| stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
|
On 02.01.11 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On Fr, 31 Dez 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Happy new year,
Not good[TM]. I'll open a wishlist bug to have that changed. Should
be that hard to source /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf at the beginning of these
Can you transplant the X hierarchy
On 30.12.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
Most of our scripts (the ones written for Debian) expect TEXMFDIST to
be /u/s/texmf-texlive and TEXMFSYSVAR to be /v/l/texmf.
Looking through the whole trigger code I see many instances of that.
To make it completely clear:
On 27.12.10 Braun Gábor (bra...@renyi.hu) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Package: tex-common
Followup-For: Bug #607857
AFAIK the paths texlive uses can be freely configured by the sysadmin.
So I think the paths /var/lib/texmf/ etc in the examples are
simplification to clearly state the idea and not
On 24.12.10 Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp) wrote:
Hi,
The question is *WHY* an ls-R file is created there, because none
of *our* scripts (AFAIS) creates it, all call mktexlsr with
a list of arguments, so do every package using dh_installtex and
triggers.
When mktexlsr is called, it
On 23.12.10 Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp) wrote:
Hi,
I've found that texlive-base package creates files in /usr/local.
(thanks to piuparts)
0m23.9s DEBUG: No broken symlinks as far as we can find.
0m25.2s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
On 23.12.10 Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp) wrote:
Hi,
Attach piuparts logs here, could you check it please?
Just a short notice: please compress logs before sending. This mail
didn't make it to the maintainer mailing list due to its size.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To
On 20.08.10 Klaus Ethgen (kl...@ethgen.de) wrote:
Hi,
The bug is easily to fix. Just rename /usr/bin/install-info to
/usr/bin/broken-install-info and everything works well as the
/usr/sbin/install-info too is used now.
Don't think so:
hi...@sid:~ $ /usr/sbin/install-info
install-info:
On 13.04.10 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (toli...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
I could reproduce this bug in a minimal chroot. However I also had
to install ttf-linux-libertine and texlive-latex-recommended to get
the minimal example of the inital bug report to work. Hope that
helps.
Thanks for
severity 576599 normal
stop
On 06.04.10 Raphael Frey (freyraph...@lavabit.com) wrote:
Hi
The package 'lmodern' which includes the lmodern fonts should be a
dependency of 'texlive-xetex' because if the package is not
installed, the program 'xelatex' will abort, mourning: ! LaTeX
Error: File
Package: drbd0.7-module-source
Version: 0.7.25-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I'm trying to build a drbd0.7 package containing the modules for kernel
2.6.26. The build fails, the log is attached. I tested only on i386, but the
error message is rather generic, I
Dear Petr,
http://bugs.debian.org/551229
Down here in the Debian bug tracking system we got a report telling
that a specific feature of longtable stops working as soon as the
czech or slovak babel package is used. As the feature works fine,
when using language english I suspect a bug in the
On 17.02.10 Daniel Schepler (dschep...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing this build failure still (or maybe again?) with texlive-extra
version 2009-7, which is supposed to have #562497 fixed:
At least for me the --filter option of epstopdf seems to work again:
hi...@sid:~ $ epstopdf
On 01.02.10 Jochen Friedrich (joc...@scram.de) wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.4.2.1~dfsg-5
Severity: grave
since the last upgrade, about any GETNEXT request makes snmpd crash,
first logging an assertion failure, then stumbling over what looks like
a null pointer dereference
severity 565722 important
stop
On 18.01.10 Linda (lindamarce...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-1~lenny2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Insufficient error description. Further we don't support every setup.
Could you sent us a
On 03.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
How many packages are affected: No idea.
Yes, the switch from 2007 - 2009 will have some consequences, but
in general it is enough to adapt the build dependencies, that
should suffice (but in some cases).
In TL 2007 we had:
*
On 03.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On So, 03 Jan 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
In TL 2007 we had:
* make texlive-latex-recommended provide latex-ucs-uninames, latex-ucs,
latex-ucs-contrib as these Debian packages have been given up for
adoption
On 17.12.09 oh...@debian.org (oh...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
Package: ptex-bin
Version: 3.1.10+0.04b-2.1
Severity: grave
I can't install ptex-bin at the latest sid environment, which
include TeX Live 2009.
fmtutil: running `ptex -ini -jobname=ptex
On 15.12.09 Gerd Sebald (gerd.seb...@gmx.de) wrote:
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2009-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is #560885 and friends. I'll leave that bug here on texlive-base
to make sure we don't get it another time.
fmtutil:
On 13.12.09 Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) wrote:
Hi,
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.LHrpVsJ9
Please include this file if you report a bug.
Please do so.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 28.05.09 lam...@debian.org (lam...@debian.org) wrote:
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild settroubleshoot:
Automatic build of setroubleshoot_2.1.11-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
Build started at 20090525-0351
On 12.05.09 Fabrice Coutadeur (fabric...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hi,
Package: luatex
Version: 0.40.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty ubuntu-patch
When building the package, it's
severity 520920 important
stop
On 26.03.09 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.org) wrote:
Hi,
Now, as here the bug seems to require a large bibtex file and
action from the user (assuming no tex-compilation servers), the
severity can probably be lowered.
[x] Done
BTW, can bibtex8 safely be
On 06.04.09 Bradley Smith (bradsm...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
reopen 522371
I suspect you've reopened the wrong bug since this is fixed and
builds fine on all architectures? If you disagree please provide
more information as to why.
I suspect that your fix was only necessary due to
reassign 521549 debianutils
notfound 521549 3.0.1
severity 521543 serious
merge 521543 521549
stop
On 28.03.09 Junichi Uekawa (dan...@netfort.gr.jp) wrote:
Package: sesible-utils
Severity: serious
Version: 0.0.1
Preparing to replace debianutils 3.0 (using debianutils_3.0_i386.deb) ...
On 23.03.09 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.org) wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
(Note: I suppose that there's some memory corruption, that can lead
to security problems, hence the
On 26.03.09 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.org) wrote:
Hi,
BTW, can bibtex8 safely be used in place of bibtex (no
compatibility problems)?
From the manual page:
8-bit BibTeX is an enhanced, portable C version of BibTeX
0.99. It has been enhanced in these areas:
-
On 24.03.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Can you please send a *MINIMAL* test suite? Anything else is
hard to trace down.
Attached. This is still large, but this seems to be needed. Just
type bibtex livre_fp in the directory.
thanks. I can reproduce
On 20.03.09 Riku Voipio (riku.voi...@iki.fi) wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:21:53PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi,
No, it is something different. See email to bug report. I will
fix it tonight, needs an upload of tex-common and a rebuild of
the packages. BUMMER
Have the
On 18.03.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On Mi, 18 Mär 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Another remark: I just updated my system to the latest release
and noticed that the formats for *jadetex haven't been rebuild.
Claing
Hmmm, you mean which release and which version
On 17.03.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
But in the build log we have:
Setting up texlive-base (2007.dfsg.2-1) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all.
This may take some time... done.
Correct, but
On 17.03.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
Another remark: I just updated my system to the latest release and
noticed that the formats for *jadetex haven't been rebuild. Claing
fmtutil-sys --all fixed this, but I'm wondering why they weren't
rebuilt during postinst. Maybe we
On 17.03.09 Daniel Schepler (schep...@math.berkeley.edu) wrote:
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks package builds
Since the upload of texlive-base version 2007.dfsg.2-1, I've
started getting numerous build failures in packages that built
On 17.03.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
On Di, 17 Mär 2009, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt tex.fmt
I can't find the format file `tex.fmt'!
I just now installed texlive-latex-base in a clean pbuilder and it
Package: xulrunner-1.9
Version: 1.9.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Mike,
I'm filing this bug ad grave, as I believ it is grave. Feel free to
downgrade. On my unstable system the pre-inst script fails to run:
Selecting previously deselected package
On 24.11.08 Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:51:47AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Package: xulrunner-1.9
Version: 1.9.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm filing this bug ad grave, as I believ
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
