Bug#1073152: ruby-xmlrpc 0.3.3-1 has a file conflict with conserver-client

Package: ruby-xmlrpc Version: 0.3.2-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, ruby-xmlrpc 0.3.3-1 ships a new file named /usr/bin/console This file already exists in another package named conserver-client. Conserver has been shipping this binary for a very long time. (probably since 2001 when that pa

Bug#1051543: grub2: Fails to load normal.mod from a XFS v5 parition.

try->len - 1 > (char *) end) > > Looking at the grub_xfs_next_de(), should the ‘+1’ be ‘+3’? > If you don't mind, I think this would be better discussed on grub-devel. I only posted the update here because my original patch was linked here. -- Jon Doge Wrangler X(7): A program f

Bug#1051543: grub2: Fails to load normal.mod from a XFS v5 parition.

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 23:43:28 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > there's now a patch from Jon DeVree upstream, which might fix this for > > you. Is it possible for you to test his patch? > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg0005

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

when I ran make modules_install Jon On 27/08/2023 11:24, Jon Westgate wrote: Dear Marco and others, I will do a test build using ZSTD and see if that works. - I think the first thing I did was to switch back to XZ when this first happened Yesterday. I've been using XZ for module compression sinc

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

it the .config and make -j8 && make -j8 modules_install && make install then reboot. I'm not applying any patches, I do used the NVIDIA drivers on some boxes. Jon On 27/08/2023 02:10, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 26, Jon Westgate <0...@fsck.tv> wrote: The er

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

Dear Marco, I'm using XZ if I turn off compression my initrd fails it's too big. Jon On 26/08/2023 22:25, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 26, Jon Westgate wrote: Yes I am using compressed modules And are these modules compressed with xz or something else? This new code was in

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

Yes I am using compressed modules On 26/08/2023 18:34, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 26, Jon Westgate <0...@fsck.tv> wrote: The system partially booted but systemd then prevented boot due to missing modules, The error message it gave was "decompresson failed with status 6

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

uot; On 26/08/2023 18:58, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Aug 26, Jon Westgate <0...@fsck.tv> wrote: Kernel: Linux 6.4.11 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) I see that you are using a custom kernel. What is the status of the CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_* kernel configuration options? OpenPGP_0x4

Bug#1050586: kmod: Updating to kmod to 30+20230601-1 results in a non booting system modules cannot be decompressed

fan I used another system to download the older versions of kmod and libkmod2 and as able to use dpkg to downgrade them. I installed both on another system and it does the same. I'm not sure if this effects other system's with sysvinit or non efi. Regards Jon Westgate -- System Info

Bug#999754: Acknowledgement (tcsh: character class expansion is badly broken)

> Suggested resolutionn is to update the buster package to tcsh 6.23.00. Sorry, I should have written 'update the bullseye package'. Kimmon Suominen's suggested patches would doubtless be better from a distribution stability perspective, and I'm fine with that approach as well.

Bug#999754: tcsh: character class expansion is badly broken

Package: tcsh Version: 6.21.00-1.1 Severity: grave Tags: newcomer Justification: causes non-serious data loss Dear Maintainer, tcsh does not respect character classes. Minimal example: $ mkdir a $ touch a/a a/B $ echo a/[a-z] a/a a/B I expect the result to simply be 'a/a' since 'B' is not in [a

Bug#941414: dehydrated fails to find nonce

Package: dehydrated Version: 0.3.1-3+deb9u2 Followup-For: Bug #941414 Oh, my fault - this version of dehydrated is really old; I'm still running stretch on this server. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.11 APT prefers stable APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,

Bug#941414: Me too / or upgrade to the latest version of dehydrated

I also ran into this change today. The grep -i fix works for me as well (but the devs recommend upgrading the package).

Bug#924706: icedtea-netx: javaws symlink is broken

Package: icedtea-netx Version: 1.7.2-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, The files in /usr/share/icedtea-web/bin have the wrong file names in the new package and this breaks javaws. itweb-settings and policyeditor are also broken. In the old 1.7.1-1 package: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Mar 15 23:

Bug#802917: DenyHosts is still useful

. But for the time being I use both. I will be using an old DenyHosts package until such time as the Debian team chooses to support this again. Thanks for your time, Jon -- Sent from my Debian Linux workstation -- http://www.debian.org/intro/about Jon Foster JF Possibilities, Inc. j...@jfpossibi

Bug#869406: linux-image-4.9.0-3-amd64: Various USB Wifi adapters don't work after upgrade to Stretch (Installing new kernel)

Package: src:linux Version: 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 Severity: grave Tags: ipv6 Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I recently aquired this computer with clean hard drive attempted to install Stretch. Knowing that y USB WiFi adapter needed the ath9k firmware, I also downloaded the f

Bug#868282: virtualbox-dkms: kernel modules fail to build due to missing files

Package: virtualbox-dkms Version: 5.1.22-dfsg-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, My apologies if I misjudged the impact, but I'm pretty sure this failure is universal. 4 files are missing from the virtualbox-source and virtualbox-dkms packages that render

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Here is an updated debdiff, it works on a fully updated jessie. Should > we track these updates in a branch of the collab-maint repo? Excellent, thanks. This patch works and I've put it into a dedicated stable branch 'jessie'

Bug#830549: fails to build (insserv is needed in Build-Depends)

attached patch (add it to Build-Depends). -- Jon Boden ubuntuBSD -- The power of FreeBSD kernel with familiarity of Ubuntu OS! http://www.ubuntubsd.org/ -- https://twitter.com/ubuntuBSD diff -Nur -x '*~' -x changelog -x debhelper-build-stamp ../debian/control debian/control --

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Hey Michael, I just attempted a build with your diff and I'm seeing the attached errors. It looks like the debian-specific ifde

Bug#823567: ndiswrapper-dkms fails to compile

ymore. It can be replaces with the working function 'strncasecmp()' without any other changes. Then it will compile, and I've had zero issues with this so far. Thanks, Jon. *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the sit

Bug#821795: lttng-modules-dkms: module FTBFS in jessie against Linux 3.16: error: conflicting types for 'trace_mm_page_alloc_extfrag'

* Michael Jeanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a debdiff against the current package fixing the build > failure, I'll ask Jon to make a new upload. Thanks Michael, I'm traveling this week and next, I'll try to get to this as soon as I can but it may be a week or two

Bug#804611: socat: FTBFS: undefined reference to `SSLv3_client_method'

ssl.c were already doing it so I went for it. -- Jon Doge Wrangler X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1) and tmux(1). diff -Nru socat-1.7.3.0.orig/sslcls.c socat-1.7.3.0/sslcls.c --- socat-1.7.3.0.orig/sslcls.c 2015-01-24 05:15:22.0 -0500 +++ socat-1.7.3.0/sslcls.c 201

Bug#797961: ecryptfs-utils removed from testing

Hi, ecryptfs-utils has been removed from testing due to this bug which I think is a bit of an overkill. I use this package daily, as all my users have a private directory (ecryptfs-setup-private) and I don't really use ecryptfs-setup-swap, so this bug does not affect me, but I'm losing a (IMO) ve

Bug#786659: Do not depend on libghc-hamlet-dev

git-annex will be removed from testing next Friday and shakespeare was migrated successfully a few days ago. Any chance of updating git-annex so it doesn't get removed?

Bug#770133: gcalcli 2.x is no longer compatible with google's api

Package: gcalcli Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Google just removed the deprecated APIs used by gcalcli 2.x rendering the package unusable. The upstream author says that the APIs in question have been deprecated for years and that everyon

Bug#767632: ust: FTBFS on most architectures

Thanks, this is my fault and not upstream. I made a mistake in the symbols files, should have this fixed up by Monday. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#762755: Info received (bind 9.9.5-4.1: assertion failure)

s compiler code optimizations may cause crashes in BIND. For more information, see the operational advisory at https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01167/. [RT #35968] -- Jon Kernel Archaeologist X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Bug#762755: bind 9.9.5-4.1: assertion failure

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 00:32:45 -0400, Jon DeVree wrote: > I have this and poked around monitoring everything while it happened > repeatedly. I stumbled onto a reliable means of reproduction: > > dig -t ocsp.verisign.net. > > Happens with dnssec enable and disabled,

Bug#762755: bind 9.9.5-4.1: assertion failure

still happened. https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/56802b91286a Its presumably the reply from verisign that kills it, but I'm not sure why. -- Jon Kernel Archaeologist X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#753832: Fwd: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

- Forwarded message from Jon Bernard - Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:42:49 -0400 From: Jon Bernard To: Debian FTP Masters Subject: Re: udt_4.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED * Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > udt_4.11+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the poo

Bug#751337: [PATCH] tests: test_ctf_writer: replace HOST_NAME_MAX

AC_DEFINE(HOST_NAME_MAX, 256, [Define to 256 if neither have HOST_NAME_MAX nor _POSIX_HOST_NAME_MAX]), + [[#include ]]) + ], + [[#include ]] +) + # Checks for library functions. AC_FUNC_MALLOC AC_FUNC_MMAP -- Jon --

Bug#751336: babeltrace: FTBFS on armel (test failure)

"Fix: don't perform > unaligned integer read/writes" [0] which I was able to verify. This is a > few commits past v1.2.2 so it should be easy to cherry pick. > > [0] > http://git.efficios.com/?p=babeltrace.git;a=commit;h=190e4503d40620471db3acc2a05dc1b8f9c74f7f

Bug#745891: ltt-control: FTBFS on armel (selected processor does not support ARM mode `dmb')

; /tmp/ccBG89vh.s:5292: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode > > `dmb' > > make[4]: *** [rculfhash.lo] Error 1 > > In related news, build logs missing compiler command lines suck. Agreed, I'll disable this in the next upload. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#741687: ust: FTBFS: error: no suitable Python interpreter found

ython is missing. Yep, you're right. It gets pulled in by another dependency on the others. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#728256: liblttng-ust2: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/lttng-ust.3.gz

smooth upgrade. Let me get lttng-tools updated to 2.3.0 in sid first and then I'll tackle this right away. Thanks again. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#723850: 2.3.0 version does not compile properly

ll, but DKMS will fail to build, with an error similar to the above in make.log. It sorta sucks, but I'm not sure of a better way of handling it. If you have suggestions I'm all ears. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#626391: venkman removal?

On 09/18/2013 11:20 AM, David Prévot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 [ Replying back the actual bug report. ] Hi Jon, Le 17/09/2013 22:55, Jon a écrit : On 09/17/2013 05:20 PM, David Prévot wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:27:28PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: jon wrote

Bug#710650: Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a test. Also, I n

Bug#710650: Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

en-devel to make sure what he's doing is acceptable to you guys. Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688779: (no subject)

notfound 688779 liburcu/0.7.4-1 found 688779 ltt-control/2.1.0~rc4-1 thanks -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

ritney for > migrations. You should either fix it, or mark notfound liburcu/0.7.4-1 & > found ltt-control/$brokenversion as to fix this inconsistency. I don't completely follow, can you give some clarification? Also, can you include a link to where I can see the britney information y

Bug#705827: babeltrace: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

0fc1d4912843a Author: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Mon Apr 22 12:12:50 2013 -0400 Fix kFreeBSD build Use general error numbers available on kFreeBSD. Reported-by: Petr Salinger Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers This will be in the next release,

Bug#700620: [Openstack-devel] Bug#700620: Bug#700620: Bug#700620: Rewriting the .ini parsing bit of openstack-pkg-tools

Hi, I saw this bug and I got a bit concerned. I'm a likely user of the openstack packages in Debian — well I/we could be, if they fit our needs — but I'm really worried that they are going to be vastly over-engineered. In a way it reminds me of the exim4 packages: the situation is not entirely ana

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

* Faidon Liambotis wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > > I suspect the buildd (schroeder in this case) has a 32bit userland and thus > > has > > a HOSTTYPE of "sparc" instead of "sparc64". I should be a

Bug#705037: FTBFS on sparc

res they should limit the b-d on, since clearly > an unrestricted one would just result into more build failures. Also a good point, thank you for the suggestions. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701779: Clarification

the install prior to upload in what I thought to be a clean environment... I suppose that needs some looking into. Nice catch, thanks for reporting this. I'll get a fix uploaded shortly. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#694520: chocolate-doom: there are no humans in Maintainer:/Uploaders: fields

Package: chocolate-doom Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: policy section 3.3 There are no humans in the Uploaders or Maintainers fields for this version of the package, which is a policy violation. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT polic

Bug#648272: abuse-frabs: Claudio add-on does not allow distribution or commercial use

g out separately, so I've cloned this bug. Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (revision 13790) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +abuse-sdl (1:0.8+dfsg1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Remove src/addon/claudio: the license appears to be non-free. +Closes:

Bug#633809: tagging 633727, tagging 633809

Hi Ansgar, 2½ months ago you tagged 633809 pending, but there's no commit to the VCS in that time and it hasn't been resolved by an upload. May I ask, is this bug really pending? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

liburcu-dev with this fix. (I presume liburcu-dev already > Depends: liburcu1 (= ${binary:Version}.) Ahh, good advice. Thanks. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Jon Bernard wrote: > * Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > Jon Bernard writes: > > > > > Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source > > > to > > > find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the >

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

* Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Jon Bernard writes: > > > Is there an easier way of doing this without searching through the source to > > find all liburcu calls and then pinning them to a specific version in the > > symbols file? - or is that how it's done? > > You

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

ntrol version 2.1.0-2 with this change, and avoid the binNMUs, no? What am I missing? Also, which of these in your opinion is the best/most-proper solution? Thanks in advance, -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688730: lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working

further in to that. > > Thanks in advance! You are absolutely correct on both points, thanks for pointing this out. I've just uploaded "-2" that should have you fixed up. Let me know if you're still having issues. Cheers -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#687654: xmame-sdl,xmame-x: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade

I'm taking a look at this bug. It appears to be because the source package for the binaries in squeeze is 'xmame', but the source package for the binaries in wheezy is 'mame'. Also, this commit may be related: commit 6d0c77edac6cf78e2fbe6e71e64836a51fb40623 Author: Emmanuel Kasper Date: Wed

Bug#682132: deutex: recommends doom-wad, which is only in non-free

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:26:32AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 19.07.2012 19:53, schrieb Ivo De Decker: > >Please lower this recommends to a suggests. > > Since deutex is also used to contruct the freedom iwads, maybe the > recommends could get changed into "freedoom | freedm | doom-wad".

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > could you please take 5 seconds to answer this, please? Hi Cyril, Sorry yes. (I wish I had a better bug workflow. Stuff like this keeps getting lost. Kind of ironic given the package.) OK being realistic, I haven't devoted any ti

Bug#674438: liblhasa-dev: please depend on liblhasa0

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:05:31PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Please correct liblhasa-dev to depend on liblhasa0 to keep liblhasa.so > from potentially dangling. > > Thanks! Oops! Thanks for pointing this out. I've just uploaded a fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@li

Bug#664185: dropping bup from s390

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > The test tries to mmap a file with the size of slightly above 1GiB. > > In bup.bloom: > | create(): expected = 268435456 > | create(): bits = 30 > | create(): size = 1073741824 > | ! tbloom.py:38 4 == 4 Yes. The FTBFS can be work

Bug#661329: closed by Thomas Goirand (Bug#661329: fixed in deng 1.9.0-beta6.9+dfsg1-2.1)

>* Non-maintainer upload. I think it's really bad form to NMU without any warning. Kees is not a developer, he relies on sponsors to upload his packages. He is also not listed on . You didn't use a DELAY queue, you haven't filed an nmudiff to the bts…

Bug#670169: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#670169: empty lib{pam,nss}-sss packages

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:26:55PM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > looks perfectly fine, since you are searching for the string > 'libpam-sss' from the installed files.. you want the -L switch. How embarrassing - thanks for pointing this out! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@l

Bug#670169: empty lib{pam,nss}-sss packages

package: libpam-sss version: 1.8.1-1 severity: grave (same for libnss-sss) I don't believe this can be right: > # dpkg -S libpam-sss > libpam-sss: /usr/share/doc/libpam-sss/changelog.Debian.gz > libpam-sss: /usr/share/doc/libpam-sss > libpam-sss: /usr/share/doc/libpam-sss/copyright > # dpkg -S l

Bug#668181: qtscrob: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:25:57PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: Re: Bug#668181: qtscrob: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL Thanks for bringing this to my attention! > It might be enough to change the libcurl build dependency > to libcurl4-gnutls-dev. Sadly this doesn't appear to be

Bug#665271: qtscrob: FTBFS: build dependencies incomplete

27;ll sort it out today. I can't run pbuilder right now (3G connection / data caps) but I'm on my way to a conference and I can borrow the wifi there. (In my feeble defence I prepared this package on a train :)) Thanks, -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-req

Bug#664185: bup: FTBFS on s390 (mmap/cannot allocate memory)

Package: src:bup Version: 0.25~git2011.11.04-3 Severity: serious Justification: RC / not in wheezy https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bup&arch=s390&ver=0.25~git2011.11.04-3&stamp=1327681274 googling around suggests perhaps > That one should be because of the 31-bit address space layo

Bug#654596: git: failure to upgrade from squeeze (NOT btrfs; symlink errors)

Package: git Version: 1:1.7.2.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: package uninstallable I think the fix for #645009 has broken upgrades in other situations: > Preparing to replace git 1:1.7.2.5-1 (using > .../git_1%3a1.7.8~rc3-1_i386.deb) ... > Moving /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50git-core.el ou

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > > I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > should delay it longer. > > Woul

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

longer? I'm right now working on the new upstream release of 0.16 that will fix this issue. I should have this tested and uploaded by the end of the day. Cheers -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#649351: bup and python 2.7

sion of the source in VCS (broken builds) which I haven't had time to resolve yet. I may give up, branch from my last upload which did work just to get past the 2.7 transition at least. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#629373: Remote DoS with vsftpd on Linux 2.6.32

e pram". Thanks for clarifying. > not amused. I don't recall telling a joke. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#629373: Remote DoS with vsftpd on Linux 2.6.32

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:58:27PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 09/05/2011 02:29 PM, Jon Dowland wrote: > >You forgot (or haven't got around to) pushing back to git.debian.org… > > i never used git.debian.org in the first place. So you didn't. So instead I should

Bug#629373: Remote DoS with vsftpd on Linux 2.6.32

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > tag 629373 pending > thanks > > fixed in git. You forgot (or haven't got around to) pushing back to git.debian.org… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#637636: fixed in ust 0.15-2

* Julien Cristau wrote: > found 637636 0.15-2 > kthxbye > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 15:10:35 +, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > ust (0.15-2) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* [0fb2d5c] Update liburcu version dependency (Closes: #637636) > > So you cha

Bug#626076: deleting downloads.sqlite doesn't fix it for me.

Deleting downloads.sqlite doesn't fix it for me. It does make it so I can open the downloads window without crashing, but I still can't download anything. Commenting out the file: file line in the gnomevfs default module file does the trick. -- Jon Daley http://jon.limedaley.

Bug#633145: bup: FTBFS: -Werror

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:00:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > I've pushed the below commit to the collab-maint repo, and will upload > shortly. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Bug#626391: mozilla-venkman: Venkman freezes, have to restart browser

Package: mozilla-venkman Version: 0.9.88.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Venkman locks up when manually stepping through scripts. You have to close it and the browser completely. The lockup is reliably recreated when encountering document.write calls, b

Bug#608568: bup: needs tight dependency on python

s built. The attached patch fixes this bug. Thanks - I've uploaded a 0.16b-2squeeze1 carrying this patch to testing-proposed-updates. I'm finishing another packaging change before I upload a new sid package, but it will carry this too. -- Jon Dowland signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#555711: Reopening

p/ > > *:bash          cpu             shell/ > > ---/etc/cgrules.conf--- > > > > Allow the creation of a default group, and add > > group sysdefault { > cpu { > cpu.rt_runtime_us = 50; > } > } > > to your cgconfig.conf and let me know about it. > > Also if that fails, does this happen with current upstream? Is this something I should add to the default config for Debian? Is 50 a reasonable default, or is there something else that makes more sense? Cheers -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#605504: release team advice: chocolate-doom lock-up / OOD libsdl-mixer

> Which confuses the bts a bit. > > (Or maybe a not found chocolate-doom/1.4.0-1 would also do the trick.) Let's see if the above cures this. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#605504: release team advice: chocolate-doom lock-up / OOD libsdl-mixer

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:17:48PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > Chocolate doom (contrib) upstream has alerted me to an RC bug > <http://bugs.debian.org/605504>. The problem is actually in > libsdl-mixer1.2 and is fixed upstream. There are three possible > ways to resolve this f

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52:00 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > diff -Nru ust-0.5/debian/changelog ust-0.5/debian/changelog > > --- ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-07-02 11:34:52.0 -0400 > > +++ ust-0.5/debian/changelog2010-

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

* Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: > > * Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:06:24AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > > The following message is a courtesy copy of an article &

Bug#605504: HG patch URL for my own convenience

Just so I can find it again -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#605504: release team advice: chocolate-doom lock-up / OOD libsdl-mixer

or what implications this would have on linking packages. My next step personally is to try to answer my own questions in 2. or 3., but any steer from you folks would be very welcome. Many thanks, -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#604416: linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64: Kernels >2.6.32 hang on boot at "Initializing cgroup subsys blkio

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-27 Severity: critical Tags: d-i upstream Justification: breaks the whole system Symptoms similar to https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=603776 -- Package-specific info: ** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached ** Model inf

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

ld-area/ust_0.7-2.1.dsc | > > filterdiff -x '*changelog' | wc -l > > 50 > > What is the status? This is still unfixed in Squeeze. For reference, the patch that went into upstream can be found here: http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/2010-September/003328.html -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#598309: Security unblock requests (ust/0.7-2.1)

sion in squeeze (version 0.5-1). I belive this is the correct thing to do, but I have never dealt with a security issue in one of my packages going into a release, so I'm a bit nervous about what to do. What is your suggestion on how to proceed? -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#594535: [gnome-shell] cannot start after upgrade to 2.29.0-3+b1

I don't get a blinking screen, I get the following: j...@hathor:~$ gnome-shell --replace & [1] 3493 j...@hathor:~$ do_wait: drmWaitVBlank returned -1, IRQs don't seem to be working correctly. Try adjusting the vblank_mode configuration parameter. Shell kill

Bug#598309: ust: NMU diff for 0.7-2.1 (Intent to NMU)

NMU. Yes, please do so. Upstream has already fixed this, I expect a new release very soon, but this is a fine solution in the mean time. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#552228: could you have another look at archfs?

On 23 Sep 2010, at 18:32, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > so it seems to be really worth checking it as a tentative solution to close > this bug (I guess too late for squeeze inclusion :-/) Hi, I was delaying this update due to http://code.google.com/p/archfs/issues/detail?id=31 - I didn't ha

Bug#597576: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: 2.6.32-23 still vulnerable to CVE-2010-3301

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-23 Justification: root security hole Severity: critical Tags: security The changelog says the CVE-2010-3301 was fixed in this update: * x86-64, compat (CVE-2010-3301): - Retruncate rax after ia32 syscall entry tracing - Test %rax for the syscall numbe

Bug#596751: not suitable for squeeze

Package: debgtd Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: serious I do not think debgtd is currently useful enough to warrant a place in a stable release. I have not spent time on it in a while and perhaps should consider removing it altogether - however, for the time being, I just want to block it from being i

Bug#595949: bup: FTBFS everywhere: test failures

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:54:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Source: bup > Version: 0.17b-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > > Hi, > > your package FTBFS everywhere, eg. on amd64: So it does, thanks for spotting. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debi

Bug#552228: bump severity

severity 552228 serious thanks I think this bug should preclude archfs from Debian. Whilst it has a promising future, this package cannot be used for any real backup repository due to the limitations described in this bug. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Bug#555711: Quick update

do, If you can provide additional information it would be most useful. After some time I will close it and you can reopen if you still find it to be an issue. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#584374: merge bugs

merge 584248 584374 thanks Aha I missed the version on the second bug; this appears to be the missing git build-dep after all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#584374: having trouble reproducing

rding to <https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=bup>. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#549480: closed by Jon Bernard (Bug#549480: fixed in libcgroup 0.34-2)

red-Start and Required-Stop) on $syslog in both cgconfig and cgred, so I am confused by this one. What is the required change to fix the syslog dependency? -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#549480: closed by Jon Bernard (Bug#549480: fixed in libcgroup 0.34-2)

is package (0.35) and I'll make sure your changes are included. Out of curiosity, what tool are you using to do the archive-wide check of init scripts? -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

  1   2   3   >