On 08/30/2016 06:35 PM, Mark - Syminet wrote:
The systemd unit file, or something in this patch is causing imapproxy to
randomly timeout and die, see following thread at upstream mailing list:
On 06/21/2016 12:34 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
Any news on this? I don't like seeing my packages removed from testing
because of this. Obviously I'd be willing to sponsor (or NMU) if
needed.
Either is fine with me, to be honest.
The changes needed are fairly minimal for libsieve, AFAIK.
(thank
On 12/03/2015 12:15 PM, Stéphane CHIRON wrote:
I have found a strange directory related to bind graph :
/var/cache/bindgraph/,cgi-bin,bindgraph.cgi
Huh? Are those COMMAS ?
Doesn't look like made by the package
Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi José,
feel free to prepare the upload and ping me for sponsoring. It could be
worth asking advance permission to Release Team, though.
Since it is marked as RC and doesn't introduce any code changes, it
shouldn't be necessary.
I will send the diff to -release as
Holger Levsen wrote:
Package: bindgraph
Version: 0.2a-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy
Georges Khaznadar wrote:
tags 591601 + patch
tags 591601 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for bindgraph (versioned as 0.2a-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Please sponsor an upload proper instead so that
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi. Any progress with this upload/sponsoring? Would be nice to have
this issue fixed in testing soon. :)
Indeed. The upload is ready, but found no sponsors yet.
Any upload-capable one reading this is welcome to sponsor.
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Olivier Berger wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:42:26PM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
usertags 505589 awaiting-sponsor
A new version is being tested right now.
Anyone cares to sponsor it ?
It seems that libsmbios won't be in the next release... is it just still
waiting
Evgeni Golov wrote:
Hi Jose,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:01:44AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Evgeni Golov wrote:
Hi,
There is a fixed package awaiting sponsoring.
Sent to -mentors more than a week ago, with no responses so far.
Well, then it comes now:
First
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 20:45:48 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
Mh, I thought Lenny's dpkg does support format 3.0 (quilt)?
lenny's dpkg does (sort of, there were some bugs that should be fixed
with the next point release afaik), but dak won't accept 3.0 packages
Evgeni Golov wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
The problem being that upstream author, Marco D'Itri, does not agree
with bindgraph being packaged for Debian.
Some time ago, I had to repackage bindgraph source (that's where the 'a'
suffix comes from) to include the changes with respect to the original
Evgeni Golov wrote:
Hi,
There is a fixed package awaiting sponsoring.
Sent to -mentors more than a week ago, with no responses so far.
It also includes some needed enhancements / updates.
I have looked at the issue, and it seems that the bind9 dependency is
useless. We can start before
stor...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Package: mysql-server
Version: 5.1.41
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Please provide the output from the command below:
$ objdump -T /usr/sbin/mysqld | grep sort_order_hebrew
It might as well be some kind of problem during upgrade
tags 505589 + pending
usertags 505589 awaiting-sponsor
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 505589 serious
Bug #505589 [libsmbios] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: missing #include
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
A new
lam...@debian.org wrote:
Package: libsmbios
Version: 2.0.3.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
A new version of libsmbios is in preparation.
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi, Cyril
Thank you for your report. Please see below.
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Package: libconfig8
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: MEH.
Various issues:
- libconfig8 conflicts against libconfig6. Coinstallability is the
whole point of changing package name…
reassign #514103 ftp.debian.org
retitle #514103 RM: picwiz -- RoM: does not work with KDE4
severity #514103 wishlist
thanks
Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi,
Current picwiz is useless in KDE 4. The best here is ask for removal, so
I will ask for removal in one week if the maintainer does not do it
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Package: picwiz
Version: 0.3.1-2+b1
Severity: normal
Please remove the build-depend on kdebase-dev, you don't use it.
(This bug will become seriosu post lenny where kdebase-dev will be a
kde4 thingie)
FIXED. Please find the updated version at:
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf
for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO.
I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better.
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:22:46AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
I still don't see this new version anywhere.
Are you aware that the release is scheduled eight days from now?
FIXED. The enclosed patch (also available at my repo) is the latest version.
It does work
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 05:32:52PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
Your change to the postrm script makes it fail at purge if ucf is not
present any more. You shouldn't use '' with 'set -e' here:
Uh, I'm wrong here. Sorry about that. It always seemed counterintuitive
me
Niko Tyni wrote:
Do you mean 1.2.6-5 at
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/
dated 19-Jan-2009? As I noted before, it still overwrites user
configuration, particularly listen_port, without warning, so it's not
an acceptable fix for this bug.
Of course not.
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
The attached new patch seems to work for me, but please verify. It uses ucf
for config file handling, which simplifies things IMO.
I'm attaching an improved version that handles listen_port better.
I do
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
Any progress with this Release Critical bug?
Ready to be uploaded, at:
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/mail/imapproxy/up-imapproxy_1.2.6-5.dsc
Thank you to Niko Tyni and other contributors.
Thanks to Christian for the other to upload.
Matthew Johnson wrote:
We are BSPing in Cambridge this weekend, if you need this uploaded, let
me know
Thanks. I think I can have the package fixed (and tested!) tonight.
Will send the package's URL to the bug's address.
Have fun, and kill many bugs :-)
Cheers,
J.L.
--
To
This is release-critical (policy 10.7.3), raising the severity.
Jose, the config script needs to read in the configuration file and
parse debconf defaults from there. The debconf database must not be
used as a registry.
Patches welcome.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
José Luis Tallón wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 503713 patch
thanks
José Luis Tallón wrote:
I look forward to your suggestion and/or patch
Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting José Luis Tallón ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
José Luis, any plans to prepare an upload? I'd be happy to sponsor it
if needed as fixing two RC bugs during this week-end would continue my
one RC bug per week-end series...
Indeed
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 503713 patch
thanks
José Luis Tallón wrote:
I look forward to your suggestion and/or patch.
Time did not allow me to finish this yesterday
Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
I've been looking in to this bug because I use this package myself too,
and because it is among the RC bugs blocking lenny.
As I wrote in my message to control@ [1], I merged this issue with
#481103 because they report the same issue only for a different version
Michael Casadevall wrote:
I've created a NMU to handle updating this package should the original
maintainer need help with the update. The changelog is as follows:
[snip]
Thanks, the updated package was sent for upload about 10 days ago. Still
waiting
(I already poked the interested parties
Hi
Luk Claes wrote:
retitle 494316 libsmbios: version 2.0 needed for 2.6.26 kernel
severity 494316 serious
thanks
Ok, title and severity of bug changed to match this.
Please ask for a freeze exception once a new version is uploaded.
Cheers
Sorry for the delay -- I have been away.
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[big snip]
If you would sponsor it, we can certainly upload an architecture: any
version of lcdproc --- please remember that I have no access to any
porting machine and am thus unable to test compilation on other arches.
That's what the buildd network is
Package: libsmbios
severity #491795 important
tags #491795 + moreinfo
usertags #491795 + ubuntu
quit
Hi, Mario
Mario Limonciello wrote:
Package: libsmbios
Version: 0.13.13
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
*** Please type your report below this line ***
There
Hi, Mike
What you report here is indeed *grave*
I am about to package version 3.2 per another user's request
(otherwise, I would have requested this package's removal from the
Archive in light of this)
Mike Hommey wrote:
severity 488467 grave
retitle 488467 libtrash is dangerously
Sven Hartge wrote:
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.6-3
Severity: critical
The postinst overwrote my working /etc/imapproxy.conf with an empty file
and thus causes the daemon to fail to start and consequentially all
applications using the proxy.
Which PERL version are you using?
(i.e.
Sven Hartge wrote:
Um 03:04 Uhr am 24.06.08 schrieb José Luis Tallón
I have been unable to reproduce this bug in my preliminar testing.
Would you mind giving me some more details ?
Unfortunately, it seems that my test environment was flawed (stale
configuration file left from
tags #487761 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi, Sven
I have been unable to reproduce this bug in my preliminar testing.
Would you mind giving me some more details ?
Does 1.2.6-2 exhibit this behaviour ?
The -3 upgrade has been done to fix an annoying bug (non-grave, just
Ralf Treinen wrote:
Sorry but this isn't resolved yet:
Unpacking libsieve2-1 (from .../libsieve2-1_2.2.6-1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsieve2-1_2.2.6-1_amd64.deb (--
unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libsieve.so.1', which is also in package
Nicolas François wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:25:50 +0100
Source: lcdproc
Binary: lcdproc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lcdproc 0.5.2-1 states Architecture: i386 amd64 in its control file.
Yes, that's a bug.
I don't understand why this package is marked as FTBFS on powerpc, when
autobuilding for that arch is not supposed
Luk Claes wrote:
José Luis Tallón wrote:
The attached file is the diff for my kchmviewer 3.1-1.1 NMU. The associated
changelog entry is:
kchmviewer (3.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.3.
* Correct typographical error
Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi,
The attached file is the diff for my kchmviewer 3.1-1.1 NMU. The associated
changelog entry is:
kchmviewer (3.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.3.
* Correct typographical error in package description
tags 474869 + pending
thanks
Chris Lamb wrote:
tags 474869 + patch
thanks
Thank you, Chris :-)
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uwe Storbeck wrote:
Same behaviour here, bindgraph stopped displaying any graphs after
the upgrade from sarge to etch.
Thanks for the patch, it works for me too.
I'm awaiting a sponsor for a new package fixing all known bugs for some
days allready.
Posted the RFS to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about
severity #470431 normal
tags #470371 + moreinfo
thanks
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install imapproxy
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: baghira
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
if /bin/sh ../libtool
severity #441970 normal
quit
Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When checking mail, kcheckgmail says:
An error occurred logging in to Gmail
GMail's login procedure has changed, check for new version.
For now
severity #432404 wishlist
thanks
David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
Package: bindgraph
Version: 0.2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
No graphs are generated.
If run from the command line w/o any arguments it produces:
BindGraph was never meant to be called directly
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
After a full release cycle, it is high time we did.
Having nobody actually using 'progsreiserfs' ---the installations
reported by popcon are certainly due to mistaken installations looking
for 'reiserfsprogs'---, and given that upstream
Steve Langasek wrote:
reopen 400066
thanks
- restrict building to just i386, amd64 (Closes: #400066)
This is not an acceptable solution at all. There is nothing x86-specific
about this package, and even up to *0.5.1-1*, the package was building
successfully on alpha until
José Luis Tallón wrote:
So I'll update and post 0.13.6 instead (now it has been released)
Ooopss... it was 5am and I thought it was a release, not a beta :$
Looking forward to Thomas' test result for the EFI Macs :-)
ETA: tonight
This was for the package, sorry.
It has just
Julien BLACHE wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi José,
waiting for a fixed source package.
Which I will send later today
Any news on this ? Beside the fix for this bug, the new version also
supports EFI machines which have a non-standard SMBIOS entry
Julien BLACHE wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(btw I tested my fixed version of 0.13.5 and it works fine as far as
pommed's usage of libsmbios goes ;)
I have just sent the latest version to you. Let's test and have it
uploaded :-)
It's making
Julien BLACHE wrote:
Michael E Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
(BTW Michael, the libtool script used in 0.13.5 is very old and does
not know how to build C++ shared libraries properly - updating to a
modern
Julien BLACHE wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi José,
waiting for a fixed source package.
Which I will send later today
Any news on this ?
Sorry, had a busier end-of-week than expected.
Beside the fix for this bug, the new version also
supports
Julien BLACHE wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://devel.adv-solutions.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsmbios/libsmbios_0.13.5-1.dsc
( .orig.tar.gz .diff.gz are there )
Everything *seems* to be allright (can test it on a Dell until tomorrow
at least)
Note
Julien BLACHE wrote:
severity 418425 serious
merge 418134 418425
thanks
Noel Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
since the upgrade to 0.13.4 I get this:
# /etc/init.d/pommed start
Starting pommed: /usr/sbin/pommed: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libsmbios.so.1: undefined symbol:
Julien BLACHE wrote:
José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you have serious desires to upload something, you could as well
sponsor my upload of libsmbios 0.13.5-1
I am currently going over the package again, fixing the remaining bits,
and expect to have a finished version
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Can you please bounce this mail to the bug log? I didn't want to do so
because this is private mail, but this really really should be part of
the bug log.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:13:39AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[snip]
Fine. I did put the function back where it was though, instead of moving
it way below, because the stuff in between can hang (for example, when
failing to connect, it'll indefinitely retry every 15 seconds, causing
'start' to hang).
Yup. I
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 05:30:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Frankly, though, the init script has a *lot* of bad code that's trying to
second-guess start-stop-daemon in ways that it shouldn't. The right way to
fix this is to kill off all of this extra code,
severity #415954 important
thanks
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.4-10
Severity: serious
This doesn't break unrelated software.
This happened during an upgrade just now:
Starting IMAP proxy: /etc/init.d/imapproxy: line 56: [: too many arguments
Failed to start
Steve Langasek wrote:
severity 415954 serious
quit
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:10:08AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.4-10
Severity: serious
This doesn't break unrelated software.
No, it breaks
Pierre Bauduin wrote:
Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Architecture: i386
Hi there,
I think I have found a grave problem in the kcheckgmail that comes
with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 etch.
Basically, it always fails to authenticate to gmail.com
Ryan Sinn wrote:
Please don't close this bug until the actual fix is available... I
can't find it in the pool yet -- and it's still broken on my system.
Please learn how to interact with the BTS.
This was generated automatically upon the upload which closes this bug.
That means that the
Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Thijs,
I really don't understand why this bug should be considered 'grave'.
Thank you for your interest, Steve. The bug has been patched anyway :-)
Seems to be working, so I will proceed to ask for an sponsored upload
soon, along with some additional translations.
Nicolas François wrote:
reopen 400066 !
found 400066 0.5.1-2
retitle 400066 lcdproc_0.5.1-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: impossible
constraint in asm
thanks
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:23:12AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
After discussion with upstream, it was agreed that lcdproc 0.5.1
Julien BLACHE wrote:
GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
libsmbios-dev does not provide libsmbios.so, making it impossible to link
against libsmbios.
libsmbios1 has libsmbios.so - or do I misunderstand your bug report?
Nope, it does not, and libsmbios-dev ships an
Grant Grundler wrote:
[snip]
hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -fPIC -Wall -Wall -O3 -Wno-unused-function -b -o
bayrad.sl bayrad.o
hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: bayrad.sl: No such file or directory
hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: unrecognized option '-b'
gcc --help on hppa says:
-b machine Run gcc
Steve Langasek wrote:
Check for AC_FIND_MTAB_FILE in acinclude.m4. It tries to find the file
but it is not there.
Though lcdproc probably doesn't need to be built on s390 anyway... :)
Not completely sure about this, but I might as well add a !s390 to the
control file and be done with
Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: lcdproc
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of lcdproc_0.5.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
if s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -Wall
Sune Vuorela wrote:
severity 345872 serious
thank you bts
A large chunk of the package is silently not build due to buggy auto* rules
in
upstream.
I have just returned home, and a new release (in cooperation with
upstream) is on its way (should hit NEW anytime soon).
I'd appreciate it
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
I got a sponsor a bit faster than expected.
Of course. John is trying to screw me.
Here is the patch.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Hammers wrote:
block 343762 by 337250
thanks
Bacula FTBFS which prevents me from doing an NMU upload :(
The upload is coming, sorry.
Just hadn't had the time to finish it.
bye,
-christian-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:34:38PM +, Mark Hymers wrote:
Attached is a patch which fixes this FTBFS. It turns out that for some
reason, bscan and bcopy, when built against postgres, now need to have
libdl explicitly added to the link line. The package then
Enrico Zini wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, my fault, this one slipped when I checked the package.
I'm reopening this bug which was closed by this changelog entry:
* Updated to newer upstream version ... (Closes: #231304)
- Will this work? (Closes: #244169)
Of course a bug should be closed when the
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: bacula
Severity: serious
Version: 1.36.3-2
Hmm... sorry... are you a buildd admin??
or trying to build from source for whatever reason?
AFAIK, the buildds are doing fine any more details you can give me
to help diagnose the problem?
From my pbuilder build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thank you, Lamont.
Incorporating changes as soon as possible.
Is there anything that upstream can do to help with this? i would
forward the information
Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hi, Adeodato:
Hello,
I plan on uploading NMUs for the above bugs very soon. The packages are:
[snip]
kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-1.1
[snip]
I have had *enormous trouble* recompiling kwirelessmonitor with the new
toolchain... any incantation to make it work?
I
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Fwd: Bug#325820: baghira: FTBFS: 'ResizeHandle' has not
been declared]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:32:04 +0200
From: Thomas Lübking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: José Luis Tallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
Hi Sven...
Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
other account and it will work.
Thanks, Rober... i'll have to remove that i think.
Jose Luis is in the new
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
Ok, but now that sarge is released, what are the plans for etch ? The question
is if i keep parted without reiserfs support, or if i add it again ?
If there really is interest in support for ReiserFS in
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 05:37:48PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Well, i personally couldn't care less, since i don't use reiserfs, which is
known to eat data for breakfast,
Hmmm... that was *years* ago, when Linux2.4's VM was not stable enough.
Jamie ffolliott wrote:
Jose,
I had some work done on this back in November, so I took some time to clean
it up, finished off some more and tested a patch. I hope no one else has
invested much time in these pgsql bugs yet, but I believe this will close
both this one and 272191.
Well, i have
85 matches
Mail list logo
