Bug#1063957: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8

2024-05-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > I noticed one package affected by this issue, prettytable, has > switched to a fork, pytest-lazy-fixtures (note the s at the end of the > name). > > Would someone like to package this for Debian to fix several packages > failing to

Bug#1070188: python3-spyder: uninstallable in unstable due to pylint

2024-05-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 02:14:36PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Le 02/05/2024 à 06:07, Julian Gilbey a écrit : > > On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > > > Package: python3-spyder > > > Version: 5.5.1+ds-1 > > > Severity: im

Bug#1070188: python3-spyder: uninstallable in unstable due to pylint

2024-05-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Package: python3-spyder > Version: 5.5.1+ds-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > python3-spyder is no longer installable in sid; it depends (and > build-depends) on pylint (< 3.1~) but pylint is currently 3.1.0-1 in >

Bug#1069357: cpp-httplib: FTBFS on arm64: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 meson test --timeout-multiplier=3 --test-arg

2024-04-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 01:59:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: cpp-httplib > Version: 0.14.3+ds-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all

Bug#1069624: rapidfuzz: Fails to build on arch: all

2024-04-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Jeremy, On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 02:01:26PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > Source: rapidfuzz > Version: 3.6.2+ds-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > The arch: all build for rapidfuzz is failing: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rapidfuzz > > If you use sbuild, I believe

Bug#1069261: cwlformat: fails with newer ruamel.yaml

2024-04-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: cwlformat Version: 2022.02.18-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch I've uploaded ruamel.yaml version 0.18.6 and it has unfortunately broken the test suite of cwlformat. There is a simple patch, applied upstream, to fix this: it just updates the expected output of the test. It is here:

Bug#1059838: cython: autopkgtest regression with Python 3.12 on ppc64el

2024-04-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
severity 1059838 normal thanks On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 11:59:09AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Source: cython > Version: 3.0.7-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python3.12 > > Hi Maintainer > > cython's autopkgtests fail with Python 3.12 on ppc64el[1].

Bug#1063971: marked as pending in python-dateutil

2024-03-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1063971 in python-dateutil reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1066046: mystic: fails autopkgtests on i386, armel, armhf, ppc64el

2024-03-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
Source: mystic Version: 0.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream The autopkgtests are failing on mystic/tests/test_collapse.py, line 177. Making this bug report to track progress.

Bug#1064824: node-d3: fails to export map and other functions

2024-03-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:39:00PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:18:01PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > [...] > > (!) Conflicting re-exports > > "index.js" re-exports "map" from both > > "../../../usr/share/nodejs/d3-array/

Bug#1064824: node-d3: fails to export map and other functions

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:18:01PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > [...] > So it's specifically "map" that is problematic, and I just happen to > have stumbled upon it: d3 v5 depends on d3-array version 1, but the > version of node-d3-array in unstable is 3.2.0+~cs5.0.6-2,

Bug#1064824: node-d3: fails to export map and other functions

2024-03-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Nilesh, On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 02:06:08AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > This gives lots of differences still; stripping down to just the > > differences still has many, many differences: some new exports not in > > the original d3, and some lost exports; the list begins: > > $ diff -u

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-22 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:46:16PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break > debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? > > (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas > 2.x transition. I

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:46:16PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break > debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? > > (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas > 2.x transition. I

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:36:29PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Thank you for caring about not breaking other packages, and yes, that's a > good reason to not upload that new upstream for now. > > Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy? (It > shouldn't be able to,

Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1

2024-02-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:03:34AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > This has been merged but not uploaded - is there a reason it shouldn't be, > or have you just not had time? Hi Rebecca, Yes; I've upgraded to the latest version in my local repo, which includes this patch upstream, but it's now

Bug#1063274: marked as pending in pydevd

2024-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1063274 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1063274: marked as pending in pydevd

2024-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1063274 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1063491: python3-jedi: unvendoring python3-typeshed breaks other packages

2024-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-jedi Version: 0.19.1+ds-1 Severity: grave Unfortunately, just removing the vendored typeshed from this package causes other packages to break. I don't fully understand the mechanism, but jedi looks to load things from the vendored directory, and if it doesn't find them, things

Bug#1058365: add patch

2024-02-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:00:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch > > patch at > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/708712831/python-jedi_0.18.2-1_0.18.2-1ubuntu1.diff.gz Hi Piotr, Are you able to upload a fixed or new version of python-jedi to address this serious bug? It

Bug#1063034: nvidia-kernel-dkms: should depend on kernel headers

2024-02-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: nvidia-kernel-dkms Version: 525.147.05-5 Severity: serious This module did not build on my machine. I tracked down the cause to the absence of the relevant linux-headers package, which is required to build the module. This package should depend on linux-headers-generic to ensure that

Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 02:23:21AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > +Maytha who prepared the upload. > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 05:05:55PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > > > You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about > >

Bug#1061659: Fwd: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to testing for too long: i386 autopkgtest regression

2024-01-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Nilesh, You did the last upload of this package - do you have any idea about this bug? Best wishes, Julian - Forwarded message from Paul Gevers - Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:50:51 +0100 From: Paul Gevers Subject: Bug#1061659: src:golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse: fails to migrate to

Bug#1061366: python3.12: Python3.12 segfaults on python-xarray testsuite

2024-01-23 Thread Julian Gilbey
reassign 1061366 python3-xarray thanks On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:19:35AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Package: python3.12 > Version: 3.12.1-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: 4 > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > > Python3.12 segfaults on the unittest suite for

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:28:53PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi all, > > A quick update > [...] > > Updates: > [...] > > (2) It appears that all of the autopkgtests triggered by > python3-werkzeug 2.3.8 have passed (though most are no longer showing > o

Bug#1060020: marked as pending in flask-dance

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1060020 in flask-dance reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1060020: flask-dance: FTBFS with python3-werkzeug >= 2.3.8

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Source: flask-dance Version: 7.0.0-1 Severity: serious flask-dance fails its tests when built with python3-werkzeug 2.3.8-1 (and also with version 3.0.x in experimental as well), and needs updating to handle this. Also reported upstream to https://github.com/singingwolfboy/flask-dance/issues/425

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi all, A quick update On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 1/3/24 22:22, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote: > > > Hi Carsten, > > > [...] > > > > > > My poi

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:13:19PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 1/3/24 22:22, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote: > > > Hi Carsten, > > > [...] > > > > > > My point was that if, for w

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 09:23:58AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hello Carsten, > [...] > There are other packages that currently FTBFS because werkzeug 2.2.x > is not compatible with Python 3.12 in some small ways. It would fix > those FTBFS bugs now; 6 months is a long time

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hello Carsten, On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:07:01AM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Julian, > > Am 03.01.24 um 22:22 schrieb Julian Gilbey: > > Just to throw in: these werkzeug failures are also causing a similar > > FTBFS in debugpy; I've temporarily addressed it b

Bug#1058318: flask-login: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13

2024-01-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote: > Hi Carsten, > [...] > > My point was that if, for whatever reason, werkzeug 3.0.1 is not yet fit for > release, it should be enough to upgrade to 2.3.5 to address these unit test > failures. > [...] > > That doesn't make any sense

Bug#1057950: marked as pending in dask.distributed

2024-01-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057950 in dask.distributed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1058401: marked as pending in debugpy

2023-12-29 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058401 in debugpy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1058222: marked as pending in pydevd

2023-12-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058222 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1058222: marked as pending in pydevd

2023-12-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058222 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1059334: marked as pending in python-bytecode

2023-12-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1059334 in python-bytecode reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1056460: python-bytecode's autopkg tests fail with Python 3.12 (armhf)

2023-12-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
severity 1056460 important thanks On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:python-bytecode > Version: 0.15.1-1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid trixie > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python3.12 > > python-bytecode's autopkg tests fail

Bug#1058429: marked as pending in textdistance

2023-12-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1058429 in textdistance reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1056531: cython 3.x (for Python 3.12)

2023-12-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
severity 1056531 important retitle 1056531 spyder-kernels: cannot handle Cython files with Python 3.12 thanks Update on this bug. cython3-legacy and the current cython3 (which I've just updated to not fail the autopkgtest tests with Python 3.12) do not have working pyximport modules. So I'm

Bug#1056531: cython 3.x (for Python 3.12)

2023-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:06:41PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > [...] > > Excellent - I didn't know about that. Are you OK for me to upload > > versions of cython and cython-legacy which depend on this to fix the > > Python 3.12 breakage? > > not for cython, which won't need that soonish for

Bug#1056531: cython 3.x (for Python 3.12)

2023-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:34:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11.12.23 16:19, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > [...] > > > You could package a non-conflicting cython-legacy, however that would > >

Bug#1056531: cython 3.x (for Python 3.12)

2023-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:09:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > [...] > You could package a non-conflicting cython-legacy, however that would > require more changes, also how to build it. Hi Matthias, Unfortunately, at least some of cython3-legacy doesn't currently work with Python 3.12, and

Bug#1056516: marked as pending in qstylizer

2023-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1056516 in qstylizer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1057730: marked as pending in python-jellyfish

2023-12-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1057730 in python-jellyfish reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1055555: marked as pending in python-jellyfish

2023-12-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #105 in python-jellyfish reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1057451: rust-ahash: autopkgtests failing

2023-12-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
Source: rust-ahash Version: 0.8.5-2 Severity: serious Hi Jonas, I have a package that depends on the newer version of rust-ahash, so I've just taken a quick look at this package, which is not migrating to testing because the autopkgtests are failing. I am no Rust expert, so I don't know the

Bug#1050086: rust-ahash: Fails to build

2023-12-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 11:31:42AM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > Source: rust-ahash > Version: 0.8.3-7 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > rust-ahash fails to build. Here's a build log excerpt: > [...] This bug report can be closed, as 0.8.5-2 does successfully build. Best wishes, Julian

Bug#1055555: python-jellyfish fails tests with Python 3.12

2023-12-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:27:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:python-jellyfish > Version: 0.8.9-1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid trixie > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python3.12 > > python-jellyfish fails tests with Python 3.12 > > [...] There is a new

Bug#1054699: marked as pending in node-webfont

2023-11-29 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1054699 in node-webfont reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1052842: marked as pending in pydevd

2023-10-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1052842 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1040940: rmlint-gui fails to start: SyntaxError: source code cannot contain null bytes

2023-07-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: rmlint-gui Version: 2.9.0-2.4 Severity: grave euler:~ $ rmlint --gui File "/tmp/.shredder-bootstrap.py.KFWS71", line 23 SyntaxError: source code cannot contain null bytes The generated temporary source file has a null byte at the end of the file. This is quite possibly already

Bug#1040179: rmlint-gui: invalid Python version number breaks other packages

2023-07-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Carlos, A quick update: I have uploaded 2.9.0-2.4 to DELAYED/7-days. The debdiff between -2.3 and -2.4 is attached. Best wishes, Julian On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 04:47:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > This package has a grave bug against it as it breaks other

Bug#1040179: rmlint-gui: invalid Python version number breaks other packages

2023-07-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Carlos, This package has a grave bug against it as it breaks other packages. I'll do an NMU in the next couple of days (uploading to the delayed queue) unless you would like to do it yourself. Please do let me know! Best wishes, Julian On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 10:23:09AM +0100, Julian

Bug#1036438: anki: Anki outdated and causing problems in synchronizing and importing decks

2023-05-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
forcemerge 958853 1036438 thanks On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 10:38:17PM +0200, Pedro GONZÁLEZ MURILLO wrote: > Package: anki > Version: 2.1.15+dfsg-3 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: pedrogonzalezmurillo...@gmx.com > > Dear Maintainer, > [...] > > The problem could be solved by packaging

Bug#1033106: safeeyes fails to load plugins with Python 3.11

2023-03-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
. If you would like me to skip the delayed queue, I'm happy to do that, and if you would prefer me to delete the updated version and fix it yourself, I can do that too. Best wishes, Julian On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:25:22PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Package: safeeyes > Version: 2

Bug#1033106: safeeyes fails to load plugins with Python 3.11

2023-03-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: safeeyes Version: 2.1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch upstream Safeeyes uses the deprecated inspect.getargspec() function, which was dropped in Python 3.11, so no plugins are loaded, significantly impairing the functionality of this package. There is a one-line patch at

Bug#1024047: python-line-profiler

2023-02-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 04:16:53PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:14:24 +0000 Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Just an FYI: though ubelt is a requirement for running the tests, a > > much more serious problem is that python-line-profiler requires an > > al

Bug#1024047: python-line-profiler

2023-02-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
Just an FYI: though ubelt is a requirement for running the tests, a much more serious problem is that python-line-profiler requires an alpha version of Cython 3.0.0 to compile, and that is not (yet?) packaged for Debian. Hopefully at some point over the next two years, Cython 3.0 will mature

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: > > Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any > > rules? > > See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 . Oh,

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Andrey, On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:53:33AM +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:50:34PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free > > software". What benefits would having the

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+) > > > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in > > bookworm? > > Because we aim to have a single Python release supported in every stable > release. I am not

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
How about using Buster and > 3.9 if 3.11 doesn't work (yet) for you ? > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > On Feb 5, 2023 11:38, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in > > bookworm? > > > > I was trying to

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in bookworm? I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I needed do not yet run on Python 3.11. I was saved by being able to run in a Python

Bug#958853: Fix

2022-12-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Dan O'Huiginn wrote: > Upstream has now moved away from Bazel: > https://github.com/ankitects/anki/commit/5e0a761b875fff4c9e4b202c08bd740c7bb37763 > > The new build system uses cargo and ninja. It'll still be a substantial job > to package this for

Bug#1026247: Spyder shows a popup message on start: "You have missing dependencies! Mandatory: qdarkstyle"

2022-12-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
forcemerge 1024008 1026247 thanks On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 07:42:52AM +0100, local10 wrote: > Package: spyder > Version: 5.3.3+dfsg-3 > > > Every time I start Spyder the following popup shows up: > >     You have missing dependencies! This is due to the version of

Bug#1025000: python-qtawesome: Includes non-source Font Awesome 5

2022-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
forwarded https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/issues/220 thanks On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 09.12.22 um 07:49 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > > I saw you have excluded the files in unreleased 1.2.1+dfsg-1 version of > > the package. Are you planning to

Bug#1025867: src:spyder: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: python3-qdarkstyle (< 3.1~)

2022-12-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Paul, On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:14:22PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: spyder > Version: 5.3.3+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bookworm > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: edos-uninstallable > > Dear maintainer(s), > > Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your

Bug#1025000: python-qtawesome: Includes non-source Font Awesome 5

2022-12-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Andrius, On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 10:59:35AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi, > [...] > > I got the impression that the removed fonts can be drop-in-replaced with > ones from DFSG-compatible fork from fonts-fork-awesome, but I did not check > that. I am in contact with finalcif upstream and

Bug#1025000: python-qtawesome: Includes non-source Font Awesome 5

2022-12-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:28:37AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > [...] > I also forgot to push my 1.2.1-1 changes to salsa, unfortunately. > Oops! But that's history now. Ah, I never released that version, so please ignore this comment! Salsa is fine. Best wishes, Julian

Bug#1025000: python-qtawesome: Includes non-source Font Awesome 5

2022-12-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:49:10AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 16:16:19 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: > > This package contains three font files > > /usr/share/python-qtawesome/fonts/fontawesome5-*-webfont.ttf > > which are licensed freely but are not built

Bug#1024008: python3-spyder is not installable

2022-11-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:09:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:13:14AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > I maintain pydevd, so I'll try to look at that soon; someone else will > > have to handle pyzmq. > > pyzmq built on several architectures (incl

Bug#1024008: python3-spyder is not installable

2022-11-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
Dear Adrian, On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 08:28:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: python3-spyder > Version: 5.3.3+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > python3-spyder : Depends: python3-pylsp (< 1.6~) but 1.6.0-1 is to be > installed >

Bug#1022188: debugpy: FTBFS due to either "Timed out..." or "Address already in use"

2022-11-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Sergio, On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:44:41PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:43:10PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > Source: debugpy > > Version: 1.6.3+ds-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > Hi, > > >

Bug#1022188: debugpy: FTBFS due to either "Timed out..." or "Address already in use"

2022-11-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Sergio, On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:43:10PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Source: debugpy > Version: 1.6.3+ds-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > debugpy is currently FTBFSing: > [...] > > The long summary is too big to post here, but you can see the full log > at: > > >

Bug#1019965: pydevd: FTBFS in sid (failed tests)

2022-09-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
severity 1019965 normal thanks On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 02:41:29PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Source: pydevd > > Version: 2.8.0+git20220826.8ee4065+ds-1 > > Severity: serious > > &g

Bug#1019965: pydevd: FTBFS in sid (failed tests)

2022-09-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 02:41:29PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: pydevd > Version: 2.8.0+git20220826.8ee4065+ds-1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, please have a look at the build log, some tests are now failing. > > Can also be seed in Debian CI > >

Bug#1016511: marked as pending in pydevd

2022-08-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1016511 in pydevd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1016511: python3-pydevd: missing Breaks+Replaces: python3-omegaconf (<< ???)

2022-08-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 07:41:51AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: python3-pydevd > Version: 2.8.0+git20220714.32dee0b+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > Control: block -1 with 1016510 > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed

Bug#958853: Fix

2022-07-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:22:00PM -0700, Drew Stephens wrote: > I managed to get 2.1.15 from the package working for now for putting > int(round()) around numbers in preferences.py and deckconf.py when they were > returning the unexpected float type error. For some reason, even though it > says

Bug#1015744: python3-matplotlib: version 3.5.2-2 is breaking spyder autopkgtests

2022-07-22 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 05:57:58PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > same as #1015745 > > It's not scipy, it's the python3-defaults transition. python3.9 is > being dropped as a supported python version. Ah, thanks! Sorry for the noise. Julian

Bug#1015744: python3-matplotlib: version 3.5.2-2 is breaking spyder autopkgtests

2022-07-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-matplotlib Version: 3.5.2-2 Severity: serious Something significant seems to have changed in version 3.5.2-2 of this package, as it now breaks the spyder 5.3.1+dfsg-1 autopkgtests: see https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/spyder/testing/amd64/ The tests passed with version 1.8.1-6.

Bug#1015745: python3-scipy: version 1.8.1-7 is breaking spyder autopkgtests

2022-07-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-scipy Version: 1.8.1-7 Severity: serious Something significant seems to have changed in version 1.8.1-7 of this package, as it now breaks the spyder 5.3.1+dfsg-1 autopkgtests: see https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/spyder/testing/amd64/ The tests passed with version 1.8.1-6. The

Bug#1014844: python-lsp-server: breaks spyder 5.3.1 and needs to be held until spyder 5.3.2 is released

2022-07-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
Source: python-lsp-server Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: serious This package is incompatible with the currently released version of spyder (5.3.1). As explained by upstream in https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/17550#issuecomment-1079828357 the releases of PyLSP and Spyder are performed by

Bug#1014489: deepdiff: autopkgtest failing due to missing dependencies

2022-07-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Source: deepdiff Version: 5.8.2-2 Severity: serious The recent patch to add python3-toml and python3-clevercsv to the Build-Depends forgot to add the same dependencies to the autopkgtest dependencies. As a result, the autopkgtests are now failing and this package is preventing the migration of

Bug#1013700: marked as pending in python-qtpy

2022-07-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013700 in python-qtpy reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1013700: Strangely rare pytest 7.x bug report

2022-07-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 08:39:32PM +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > On Jul/04/2022, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi Carles, > > > > Thanks for your thoughts! Yes, indeed that seems to be the issue. > > But what I don't un

Bug#1013700: Strangely rare pytest 7.x bug report

2022-07-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
.cpython3_3.9_qtpy.build.qtpy.tests' > /home/carles/git/python-qtpy > > Then let's try to avoid the initial "." confusion: > > $ mv .pybuild pybuild > $ cd pybuild/cpython3_3.9_qtpy/build; python3.9 -m pytest qtpy/tests ; cd - > > It works. > > I don't kno

Bug#1013700: Strangely rare pytest 7.x bug report

2022-07-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Dear all, I wonder whether you might have any clue about https://bugs.debian.org/1013700 I have mostly worked out the "cause" of the bug, but I haven't quite got to the bottom of it. When running the command PYTHONPATH=. python3.10 -m pytest qtpy/tests in the directory

Bug#1012793: libpyside2-py3-5.15 uninstallable on unstable: unsatisfiable Depends

2022-06-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:43:34AM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Julian! > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Package: libpyside2-py3-5.15 > > Version: 5.15.2-2.1 > > Severity: serious > > > > This package depends on

Bug#1012793: libpyside2-py3-5.15 uninstallable on unstable: unsatisfiable Depends

2022-06-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: libpyside2-py3-5.15 Version: 5.15.2-2.1 Severity: serious This package depends on qtbase-abi-5-15-2 and qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-2, but libqt5core5a now Provides: qtbase-abi-5-15-4 and libqt5qml5 now Provides: qtdeclarative-abi-5-15-4. The dependencies of this package need updating to

Bug#1012188: python3-poppler-qt5: puts files in /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages

2022-05-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-poppler-qt5 Version: 0.75.0-3+b1 Severity: serious This packages installs the file /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/python_poppler_qt5-0.75.0.dist-info/RECORD which is a violation of the Python Policy: Public Python 3 modules must be installed in the system Python 3 modules

Bug#1011152: spyder: Console not starting. Spyder alerts : iPython 7.31.1 & qtconsole 5.3.0 not installed. But they are !

2022-05-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
It's a pleasure! We cannot write instructions to cover every eventually; that is effectively impossible. But it seems like you did the right thing to sort out your problem, which I am pleased to hear. Best wishes, Julian On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:42:37PM +0200, epsommum...@virgilio.it

Bug#1011152: spyder: Console not starting. Spyder alerts : iPython 7.31.1 & qtconsole 5.3.0 not installed. But they are !

2022-05-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
Dear RB68, On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:54:19PM +0200, RB68 wrote: > Package: spyder > Version: 5.3.0+dfsg1-7 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > X-Debbugs-Cc: epsommum...@virgilio.it > > Dear Maintainer, > > I upgraded Spyder 4.2.1 to 5.3 both on my main desktop PC and

Bug#1009836: python3-pylsp-flake8: give upstream source in the d/copyright file

2022-04-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-pylsp-flake8 Version: 0.4.0-2 Severity: serious The debian/copyright file for this package currently does not state the location of the upstream sources. (Marked "serious" because this is a violation of Policy section 12.5.) I'm happy to fix this myself if you would like me to.

Bug#1005640: fonttools: Missing dependency python3-unicodedata2 (ITP needed)

2022-02-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:15:16PM +0800, Yao Wei wrote: > Package: fonttools > Version: 4.29.1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 3.5 > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-fo...@lists.debian.org > Control: block 1005477 by -1 > Control: block 1005474 by -1 > > This package has missing dependency of

Bug#1004855: python3-ipykernel: missing dependency on debugpy

2022-02-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:33:30PM +, Gordon Ball wrote: > ps, I had a search just now and it looks like someone else was working > 1 year ago on `ptvsd` (renamed `debugpy` later), but it doesn't look > like it was ever uploaded. But perhaps something to build upon. > >

Bug#1004855: python3-ipykernel: missing dependency on debugpy

2022-02-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:33:30PM +, Gordon Ball wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:35:19AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Package: python3-ipykernel > > Version: 6.7.0-1 > > Severity: serious > > X-Debbugs-Cc: Julien Puydt , Gordon Ball > > &g

Bug#1004855: python3-ipykernel: missing dependency on debugpy

2022-02-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 01:06:56PM +, Gordon Ball wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:35:19AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Package: python3-ipykernel > > Version: 6.7.0-1 > > Severity: serious > > X-Debbugs-Cc: Julien Puydt , Gordon Ball > > > >

Bug#1004855: python3-ipykernel: missing dependency on debugpy

2022-02-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-ipykernel Version: 6.7.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Julien Puydt , Gordon Ball ipykernel depends on the debugpy package, as stated in setup.py. However, within Debian build, python3-debugpy is not listed in the Build-Depends, so the resulting binary package does not

  1   2   3   4   >