Bug#1002134: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1002134: odil: FTBFS: Value.cpp:269:69: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 5)

2021-12-22 Thread Julien Lamy
Le 21/12/2021 à 17:03, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : Source: odil Version: 0.12.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.

Bug#956749: Removing support for an arch (cf. bug#956749: odil: FTBFS on mips64el)

2020-04-15 Thread Julien Lamy
Le 15/04/2020 à 11:15, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: >> Following the build failures of Odil on mips64el (which never really >> built correctly, due to timeouts), I'd like to remove the support for >&g

Bug#807675: More failures apparently unrelated to "SCU Failed: 0006:0213 Data dictionary missing"

2015-12-13 Thread Julien Lamy
Using the latest version of DCMTK, I'm unable to reproduce the error in a freshly-updated sid pbuilder running on jessie, so the following diagnosis is a bit of a guesswork. The "Address already in use" message points to an already-running DICOM server on port 2, which prohibits running the

Bug#804578: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#804578: Does not build using dcmtk 3.6.1

2015-12-02 Thread Julien Lamy
Hi, In DCMTK 3.6.0, EC_Normal and ECC_Normal are copies of one another [1] and so the patch replacing ECC_Normal by EC_Normal should introduce no regression *with DCMTK 3.6.0*. In DCMTK 3.6.1, currently in unstable, the API of error conditions has changed : ECC_Normal is not declared anymore, the