Bug#839190: [SECURITY] [DSA 3681-1] wordpress security update

2016-09-30 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:29:41 +0200 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: As for the more general trend, it might also be because the landscape is more and more complex and time consuming, and there's never enough people to help on this. Yes, I can imagine that (for more than a decade, I

Bug#658830: libpam-shield: doesn't block any IP when allow_missing_dns=no

2012-02-06 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
Package: libpam-shield Version: 0.9.2-3.2 Severity: grave Tags: security With allow_missing_dns and allow_missing_reverse set to no (default configuration in Squeeze), pam_shield doesn't take any action whatsoever, besides logging the IP. If I set both variables to yes, the IPs are

Bug#658830: libpam-shield: doesn't block any IP when allow_missing_dns=no

2012-02-06 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
Sorry, I forgot the link to the bugfix [1] [1] https://github.com/walterdejong/pam_shield/commit/afa7b246018787fe6028289c414c33292641e1e0 On 2/6/12 10:47 , Laurentiu Pancescu wrote: Package: libpam-shield Version: 0.9.2-3.2 Severity: grave Tags: security With allow_missing_dns

Bug#586975: evolution: segmentation fault in the itip-formatter plugin

2010-06-23 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
Package: evolution Version: 2.30.1.2-3 Severity: serious Evolution reproducibly crashes in its itip-formatter plugin when selecting any email message containing a meeting request from Google Calendar. I attached a full gdb backtrace. As a workaround, I disabled the Itip Formatter plugin in

Bug#494408: exec-shield for lenny

2008-12-26 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
Ok, it's actually revision 1.89 from Fedora CVS. [1] It applies without any rejects to the current Debian kernel source, and it seems to work without any problems on my old Athlon Thunderbird (no NX bit). I attached the results produced by paxtest with the stock Debian kernel and with the

Bug#494408: exec-shield for recent kernels

2008-12-24 Thread Laurentiu Pancescu
Did you try the more recent versions of exec-shield from Fedora CVS? [1] RedHat continues to maintain the patch, I think it's standard in Fedora, along with SELinux. I didn't try to apply their latest patch for 2.6.26 (revision 1.93 or 1.94) to a Debian kernel source, but it might be a better