fix this problem here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/squid-team/squid/-/merge_requests/12
> <https://salsa.debian.org/squid-team/squid/-/merge_requests/12>
Thanks for looking into it. I’ve merged your patches and will upload shortly.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- mailto:
Il giorno 12/lug/2015, alle ore 14:49, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
ha scritto:
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:04:53AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, libecap3 upload was necessary to be able to upload
squid 3.5 packages and took a long time
...@debian.org ha scritto:
Ping?
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
Package: squid3
Version: 3.4.8-5
Severity: grave
Tags: patch upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Upstream fixed an issue with server with multiple IP addesses (10 IPs in
current Debian package
version) that can make squid3 crash or consume excessive CPU.
-- System Information:
Package: squid3
Version: 3.4.8-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch upstream
Upstream fixed a security issue in digest_authentication that can allow
disabled user or users
with changed password to access the squid service with old credentials.
See
Package: squid3
Version: 3.4.8-5
Severity: grave
Tags: patch upstream
Upstream fixed an issue with missing capabilities while squid sets TOS/DiffServ
marks
on outgoing packets, which can lead to missing marks and unwanted behavior in
security
devices handling those packages
-- System
not experience the behavior you reported, so I need more
information to confirm that this is the case.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D
version) and test if the
bug is still there.
Best regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Andrey,
Thanks a lot for you patch. I’ve added it and uploaded 0.2.0-3 right now.
I’ll push the patch upstream but since it has already moved to 1.0.0 with
different autoconf script I don’t see the chance for it to be applied.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit
features and am now planning the right setup to
substitute current squid 2.7 installations.
Do you have any suggestion on this process?
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R
...@gwolf.org ha scritto:
Luigi Gangitano dijo [Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 04:51:04PM +0100]:
I'm sorry for being a little out-of-service lately. I wish to
apologize, but at the same time confirm that I'm always following
and keeping track of all the issues. Regarding this specific issue,
I'm in favor
an upload for CVE-2012-5643 and subsequent
CVE-2013-0189 targeting stable-security for a DSA?
Note that the initial patch was incomplete and the full fix is at [1].
[1]: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/SQUID-2012_1.patch
Regards,
Salvatore
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu
Please go ahead and submit it to debian-security.
Regards,
L
Il giorno 23/feb/2013, alle ore 17:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
ha scritto:
Ciao Luigi
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Ciao Salvatore,
Thanks a lot for your NMU. I really
all the NMUs and fixes the warning and how you prefer it to be
uploaded.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
Hi Amos,
I suspect that such exception will not be the case, but will contact RT and ask
for an opinion. Can you please tell me a date when 3.2.1 is expected?
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B
the will not be included in wheezy.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
Il giorno 04/lug/2012, alle ore 16:43, Moritz Muehlenhoff ha scritto:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:58:30PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
severity 668065 serious
thanks
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:08:40PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
severity 668065 important
thanks
I'm temporarly
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48 5A35 FF1E 6EB7 90E5 0F6D 0284 F20C 2BA9 7CED
Hi everybody,
Il giorno 20/apr/2012, alle ore 20:21, Gunnar Wolf ha scritto:
Note that I'm not the Drupal maintainer - That's Luigi
Gangitano. Luigi, what's your opinion on this?
My opinion, as discussed with the security team, is that wheezy should be
released with drupal7 only. Since
uploading right now, the build system is
manually chosen.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi Cristoph,
I cannot reproduce this bug, can you please check the debhelper version on the
box? Since sarg uses debhelper for all of its building, this should definitely
be a debhelper bug, not a sarg one.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG
tags 643437 +fixed-upstream +pending
thanks
Upstream fixed the FTBFS in SVN r14901. A new package will be uploaded as soon
as upstream completes a new release.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B
cannot se any of this characteristics in this bug. Nor I found any debian
policy violated. Can you point me to it?
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Zdenek,
this issue is known upstream and a fix is in preparation. It will be uploaded
with the next new upstream release.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
uses a test to detect if ipv6 is supported on the current system,
which may return false. Also it must support both split-stack and
unified-stack on Linux.
Setting to RC because the behaviour is not sufficient fixed.
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D
using a stable version or testing for your production sites. :-)
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
URL: http://www.piramide.ch
E-mail: fla...@piramide.ch
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
the security issue either, since dpkg-reconfigure can only be run
by root and root can always access /etc/dbconfig-common/drupal6.conf and read
the database password.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A
Hi Holger,
this bug is due to a move of configuration file from the /etc/squid to the
/etc/sarg directory.
Please excuse my ignorance. Evidently dpkg doesn't carry information on moved
config files. Is there any way to avoid that prompt while still keeping the
move?
Regards,
L
--
Luigi
Il giorno 16/feb/2010, alle ore 22.10, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
Yes. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
Thanks Julien for pointing this out to me. I will upload a new version with
these changes in the next few days.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit
.
Funny, actually I NMUed it myself :)
I know. :-) You just didn't add the closing tag. :-)
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
for languages are names with ISO codes. Instructions
on needed configuration fixes are in README.Debian already.
The next version of squid-langpack will ship compatibility links for
old-style configurations.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu...@debian.org -- gangit...@lugroma3.org
GPG
As stated in the original bug report, this bug was reported by
upstream security advisory SQUID-2009:1. Since the fix was upload via
NMU by Steffen, I'll wait it's migration to lenny and then upload a
new version with the advisory reference.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- lu
here:
http://debian.koumbit.net/debian/dists/testing-security/main/source/web/drupal5_5.9-1.1%2blenny1.dsc
I hope that works for you guys.
Thanks,
a.
--
Antoine Beaupré
Réseau Koumbit Networks
+1.514.387.6262
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26
) and the bug
seems to be gone. I guess you can close this bug then.
Did you get the debug dump I sent you? It was rather large and I got
some bounce messages a few days later, but forgot to follow up on it.
Some relatives visited and other things came up, so I'm sorry I didn't
keep you informed.
--
Luigi
Hi Ian,
can you please confirm if this bug applies to the latest version of
squid3 (squid3-3.0.RC1-1) in unstable?
Since I could not reproduce the bug in my test systems I can only
rely on your reports to track resolution.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
Ian,
can you please test squid3-3.0.RC1 I've just uploaded?
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
changed anything with regard to this
problem.
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarded 440646 http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2079
thanks
Ian,
thanks for the added details, I'm now forwarding this bug to the
upstream bug db.
Can you please check for error messages in /var/log/squid/cache.log?
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
of the filetype icons. I reloaded and
got another icon. It took a few reloads to get the intended changelog
to load. On another occasion, a Wikipedia article was seriously
corrupted. Pages which load many style sheets, little images,
javascript, etc seem to be most succeptable to this bug.
--
Luigi
forwarded 427516 http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1987
thanks
This seems a potential DoS bug in Squid. I'm forwarding it to the
upstream BugZilla.
Regards,
L
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B
.
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGG5SI8ZumGJJMDCYRAhSCAJsHrsMv6LrphFYiLQYcUX4y2wluKwCfVAyp
JG06xtG7AJwziKO3KbmNSys=
=gYe6
-END PGP
Please find it attached.
Il giorno 13/ott/06, alle ore 05:45, Jurij Smakov ha scritto:
Can you please send the output of the 'prtconf -p -v' command to the
bug 392078?
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618
and running temporarily.
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
opened as 377697. I'm merging your reported
with the previous one. Please check the bug reports before opening a
new bug, next time.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
? Since I see no other
justification I'm downgrading severity of this bug to important.
I can't reproduce this bug with the default squid configuration,
installed in a clean environment.
Can you please provide your configuration file?
Thanks,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
Can you please provide a copy of the logfile that caused sarg to
segfault?
Thanks,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
server for you.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
only the user-mode part of the driver. Could you please
check if 3D acceleration is enabled?
Right. I just checked the symptom and didn't notice that fglrx module
was not loaded.
So I can only confirm that the problem was not solved in 2.6.15 with
the latest drivers.
Regards,
--
Luigi
):
Please test with 8.23.7-1 and report if the problem persists.
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.20.8-1.1
Severity: grave
Even with the latest NMU (see Bug# 345040) I can't get a console after logging
out of X on a Thinkpad T42p. Driver has been compiled from fglrx-kernel-src
against a custom 2.6.15 kernel.
kernel BUG at arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c:137!
of the failing process?
Regards,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDj1vT8ZumGJJMDCYRAgGRAJ4v75zdMeNjDuln83Gp1pBz1Nj6QgCeNk2b
name change, vulnerabilities now have
the CVE prefix, not CAN any more).
In addition, I just noticed that in version 2.5.10-6 you added a
security patch 46-ntlm-scheme-assert.dpatch which is not actually
applied in 00list. Please add it. (One of the reasons why I hate
dpatch :-/ ).
- --
Luigi
has been fixed in squid-2.5.9-9, which is already in
sarge. There's no reference in the changelog since there was no CAN id
available at upload time.
A fix for woody is in the works.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A
severity 305605 important
thanks
I'm downgrading severity of this bug from RC to important because (if it
exists at all), it only applies to woody, so is not 'release critical'
for sarge.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03
corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
md5sum: 715494248752557eb0b718f2a4dd34c9
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/mandrake/official/updates/corporate/2.1/SRPMS/squid-2.4.STABLE7-2.6.C21mdk.src.rpm
Great! They didn't fix it (no post patch in it) and added the setcookie
,
which has bind 9.3).
You should add a default setting in /etc/default/bindgraph according to
the version of bind9 currently installed.
Since then, this bug will make bindgraph unusable in testing and should
be fixed before release, thus the 'grave' severity.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano
will stay open for a long time without any deterministic evidence of
what triggered this particular SEGV.
If you see the segmentation fault again, please make a copy of the squid
logfile and mail them with the report.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
this bug further, altought there's no easy
way to fix already installed configuration files.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio
Why is this grave? Error is self-explainatory, and since it is the
sistem that lacks something, it's not squid fault.
If you don't want to add the right line to /etc/hosts, you can uncomment
visible_hostname in /etc/squid/squid.conf.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
?
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
/etc/hosts correctly.
Regards,
--
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
64 matches
Mail list logo
