ix multiarch support in *.conf files (Closes: #990808).
+
+ -- Marcos Fouces Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:22:06 +0200
+
ganglia-modules-linux (1.3.6-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Remove version requirement for libganglia1-dev as 3.3.5 is older than
diff -Nru ganglia-modules-linux-1.3.6/debian/rules ganglia
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #980588 in dsniff reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Moritz!
Yes, i uploaded it to salsa.d.o and i am waiting for Frontdesk aproval
to become DD (that should happens in a few days) in order to upload it
myself instead of asking for sponsorship.
Its new home is here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ganglia.
Thanks,
Marcos
El vie, 11-09-2020
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957860 in tcpick reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi!
I think that rfdump package is not related with Python. I think there
is a mistake.
Greetings,
Marcos
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957587 in ncrack reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #957760 in rfdump reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hello Moritz
I did some work time ago on ganglia [1] but i never get this work
published due to unactive/unresponsive uploaders.
I also done some work on ganglia-web and ganglia-linux-modules packages
(also unpublished).
I believe that it is still a good piece of software that deserve its
place
El jue, 16-04-2020 a las 13:50 +0200, Marcos Fouces escribió:
> tags 953234 pending
> thanks
>
> Hello
>
> An updated release is on salsa.d.o repo:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/recon-ng
>
> Just needs a sponsor review.
>
> Greetings,
> Marcos.
>
>
Hello Moritz
I believe that bbqsql could be removed. It has a very low popcon and i
didn't see any repo on Github taking over from Neophasis.
Greetings,
Marcos.
El jue, 26-03-2020 a las 23:05 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff escribió:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:11:19AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
Hello Fardin
I am the uploader of websploit in Debian distro. I am trying to package
your new release but AFAIK one of the dependencies (python-wifi) is
only for python2. Currently we cannot package new python2 modules in
Debian.
Please, let me know if i am wrong because i am all for packaging
Hello
I just uploaded a new release of arp-scan to git [0]. I tested it and
it works well on my machine (Debian testing).
Could some DD review and upload the package?
Greetings,
Marcos
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/arp-scan
El lun, 04-11-2019 a las 18:42 +0100, Reiner
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #944129 in arp-scan reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hello
Similar issues were discussed in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726998
You could also find that Lintian folks uses several levels of error
tags to describe this problem, for instance:
*
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-statistics-website.html.
It is
Hello Michael,
I am aware of the configuration option you mention but i decided to
create a patch changing the CheckUpdates() function because i don't know
if it is used in another part of the software.
I also can understand your desire to know where and when an Lynis audit
is performed but it
Hello,
I use testing and updated hundreds of package without any trouble.
Please, could you give an example of a package that fails to upgrade?
Greetings,
Marcos.
On 11/1/19 18:52, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 05:26:25PM -0500, deb...@mailinator.com wrote:
>> Package: snoopy
Hello Hilko!
Great news!
El 11/12/17 a las 01:14, Hilko Bengen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> just a heads-up: I am working on porting ncrack to OpenSSL 1.1. There
> are two main causes of issues:
>
> (1) OpenSSL-related checks in opensshlib/configure.ac are broken, they use
> old SSLeay_* APIs, this is
, Marcos Fouces wrote:
control: severity -1 grave
This could lead to DOS or, even worst, remote code execution. Following
Hilko Bengen's advice: i re-adjust the severity.
Hi Marcos,
thanks a lot for fixing this bug as well as the similar #716355, #716457
and #716458 in dsniff for stretch
Hello Lukas
Maybe you should create a "debian/stretch" branch from 2.4b1+debian-24
tag and commit your patch here. If you want, you can add yourself as
uploader and tag it as "2.4b1+debian-25" release. Later we will merge it
with "debian/master" branch.
I hope there's some DD willing to
7814418ede8b378aa522c544dbcaeee68b93ef22
Author: Marcos Fouces <mfou...@yahoo.es>
Date: Fri Mar 17 23:54:45 2017 +0100
Fix piuparts issues on autolog.init file
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 021df1f..092d8eb 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+autolog
Anyone?
El 09/03/17 a las 15:33, Marcos Fouces escribió:
Hello Hilko
I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all
changes i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
It is still posible to get sniff in shape for stretch? If so, could
you sponsor it
Hello Hilko
I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all changes
i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
It is still posible to get sniff in shape for stretch? If so, could you
sponsor it or tell me what else to do?
Thanks,
Marcos
[1]
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi,
On 25/02/17 18:00, James Cowgill wrote:
On 23/02/17 22:44, Marcos Fouces wrote:
I am agree with you, when i fix these bugs i will create a separate git
branch, cherry-pick only freeze-allowed changes and try to get a package
ready for stretch.
Ok. Since I can
Hi James,
El 23/02/17 a las 12:57, James Cowgill escribió:
Hi,
On 22/02/17 23:16, Marcos Fouces wrote:
Hello
I uploaded to repo a first attempt of libnids1.24 package wich aims to
close its two critical bugs:
#855602: fixed upstream in 1.24 release.
As I wrote in the bugreport, the fix
to
armhf machines so testing should not be an issue. Unfortunately, i can
do it myself.
Greetings,
Marcos
El 17/02/17 a las 00:41, Axel Beckert escribió:
Hi Marcos,
Marcos Fouces wrote:
+dsniff (2.4b1+debian-24) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add -fno-strict-aliasing compiler flag
0ab3416139747f3eeb166622eb688911653c55fc
Author: Marcos Fouces <mfou...@yahoo.es>
Date: Thu Feb 16 00:00:33 2017 +0100
Add aditional compiler flags.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 185ef84..56d4db9 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+dsniff (2.4b1+deb
A new revision of the package is hosted at pkg-security team. I did some
improvements (i also add your patch) and the package is hopefully ready
for upload. Just need a sponsor.
Check it here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-security/dsniff.git/
Cheers,
Marcos
El 20/12/16 a las 15:37,
d94cce942eb8846497484efa5511e65d1100899e
Author: Marcos Fouces <mfou...@yahoo.es>
Date: Wed Aug 31 00:30:56 2016 +0200
Update changelog
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 56eda46..7e6d719 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ncrack (0.5-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=
28 matches
Mail list logo
