TK yet.
Will push a fix soon.
Best Regards
Markus Frosch
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997504 in terminator reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi Jerome,
On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 12:29 -0400, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
> I've attempted, but was unable, to reproduce this bug.
>
> I set up the yubikey-luks challenge-response on a fresh stretch system,
> and after upgrading to bullseye, it was working as before, which
> suggests the package is
t /etc/crypttab
* Screenshots of the prompt, error messages, maybe boot in recovery mode
You should always be able to unlock with any other passphrase, as long as the
YubiKey is not present, I hope this works for you?
Also make sure you have updated initramfs, after upgrading yubikey-luks: update-
initramfs -uv
Best Regards
Markus Frosch
Hi Christian,
On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 15:44 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Looking at the upstream yubikey-luks repository, I noticed what seems to
> be an important recent fix, namely for the password (used as the yubikey
> challenge) being exposed in the process list:
>
>
-dompdf, which is not depent on by any
package in testing.
Only possible candidate would be civicrm [2], which seems not be able to
make it to bullseye.
Also see the orphan [3].
Best Regards
Markus Frosch
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979022
[2] https://tracker.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
Somehow this message didn't reach the BTS...
Forwarded Message
Von: Sandro Knauß
An: Tobias Frost , 969...@bugs.debian.org, Markus Frosch <
lazyfro...@debian.org>, Erwan David
Betreff: Re: Bug#969788: nextcloud-desktop: Upgrade remove
tags -1 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:29:17 +0200 Erwan David wrote:
> Package: nextcloud-desktop
> Version: 3.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I had 3 synchronized folders, after upgrade I had only the first defined,
configuration of
Hi Emilio,
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 12:40 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Stretch version of {{ package }}:
>
I'm not aware of any security issues with Terminator.
Not sure why went wrong here,
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 19:05 +0200, Adrian Vondendriesch wrote:
> I wasn't able to find any way to tell pybuild to pass any argument right
> after "python3 setup.py" and the action it should call (for instance
> "install"). Passing --install-args to pybuild doesn't work. Therefor I
> did the same
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #959856 in terminator reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: appstream-generator
Version: 0.8.1-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi maintainer,
the package possible needs rebuilding.
> appstream-generator: error while loading shared libraries: libglibd-2.0.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/yum-utils/commit/0c946a3b072b921a96d1b47a9653367db74d5cf0
Upstream has applied more refactoring, I will rebase our patches at a
later point, for now it should work.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
https://lazyfrosch.de
signatur
istro build system, I would
proceed with uploading a fix and join as co-maintainer.
I already created a salsa project:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/yum-utils
@Mike: Can I get a short approval?
Also: Is the experimental upload ready for buster?
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de /
>
> Kind regards,
>
> El dom., 27 ene. 2019 a las 7:00, Markus Frosch
> () escribió:
>>
>> Hey all,
>> is anyone taking care about the RC bug [2] in terminator[1] for upcoming
>> buster?
>>
>> I plan to do an NMU over the next days, if
to adopt the package as well, since I'm using
terminator. Anyone opposes that?
Cheers
Markus Frosch
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/terminator
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/918149
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
https://lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
is the actual dependency as it seems
Redmine (from its Gemfile) actually no longer mentions
"protected_attibutes".
Suggestion: Update redmine dependencies
Still a problem: Why dependency resolver wants to remove seemingly
unrelated packages?
Anything I can help with?
Cheers
Markus Frosch
.5.1+29.g5df2b95-1.
Make sure to also check NEWS and README.md
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
https://lazyfrosch.de
ounts as an attachment!
$ grep -r ^deb sources.list sources.list.d/*.list | wc -l
15
$ apt list | wc -l
117049
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
https://lazyfrosch.de
sources.list:deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian buster main contrib non-free
sou
Package: apt-show-versions
Version: 0.22.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello Maintainer,
this might be connected to #913477, but I'm not sure.
Since upgrading to current testing today the package broke during
configure.
Might be related to the latest perl transition.
dpkg-reconfigure icinga-web then succeeded
Thanks for the report, I think the explicit character set would be the best
solution.
Testing pending.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
downgrade the severity if this bug is specific to that weird
> combination.
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> ___
> Pkg-nagios-devel mailing list
> pkg-nagios-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nagios-devel
>
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
migration to stretch? Or is there some new
auto-security mechanism? :)
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s < 2,
this bug
wouldn't affect Debian.
Would love if someone could approve or object my analysis.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: severity -1 important
On 25.07.2016 13:11, Markus Frosch wrote:
> Hey all,
> this is a interesting problem, while looking on the 3 dependent packages.
> (see below)
>
> We have 3 choices to go on:
>
> 1. Still provide zendframework 1 in a separated path,
a "vendor_ruby"
installation.
But that should be fixable to packages that use it.
Regards
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey all,
this is a interesting problem, while looking on the 3 dependent packages. (see
below)
We have 3 choices to go on:
1. Still provide zendframework 1 in a separated path, so it won't conflict with
ZF2/3
2. Embed needed code into the packages, and drop the full library
3. Remove all 3
I had a look on the RedHat patch for ImageMagick in RHEL 7.
Please see it attached.
Thats for Errata: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0726.html
It seems like the were adding the mitigation, and further path security for the
delegated actions.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar
.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
eporting, I will have a detailed look tomorrow.
Though this is no grave bug, but still important.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
their upstream releases? In lack of
a proper patch source, the Oracle way...
Cheers
Markus Frosch
- --
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVyDkrAAoJEPJhXZqrmHtuBtQH/3kp+00a6xaICX1Z9jiVHDa9
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:47:23 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Source: virtualbox
Version: 4.3.30-dfsg-1
Severity: critical
Hi Gianfranco,
thanks for your summary.
Although I'm not involved in maintaining virtualbox, still a few
thoughts:
* What would
this on other systems and explain any changes you did
to XML configuration or from the user side?
I really doubt that this is a major problem, and if it can be
reproduced only
So far, sorry for the late answer...
Best Regards
Markus Frosch
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + wontfix upstream - security
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:42:24 +0200 Bernhard Schmidt be...@birkenwald.de wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:28:20AM -0400, Braiam Peguero wrote:
Hi,
From version 2.30
close 775252
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Control: fixed 775252 1.12.0-1
I just noticed I forgot to set the BTS information in changelog.
This problem has been finally fixed with 1.12.0-1.
Cheers
Markus Frosch
- --
mar...@lazyfrosch.de / lazyfro...@debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
on arm64, Versions
0.6.24+dfsg1-3 was the first to fail on arm64, the intervening versions
were not built on arm64 due to bug 769696.
Thanks for noticing.
Patch pending in GIT, will do some work on the package this week, then
upload.
--
Markus Frosch
lazyfro...@debian.org / mar
.
Does is matter and is this really of severity serious?
I don't think it would require a DFSG tarball where. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
Cheers
Markus
--
Markus Frosch
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
version of nagvis?
Cheers
Markus
--
Markus Frosch
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of nrpe based checks before realizing they just
opened a security hole on all their systems...
If this can't be solved, maybe we could recommend better
alternatives?
--
Markus Frosch
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
tags 694641 + pending
tags 694262 + pending
thanks
Update to unstable coming soon.
The flash component has been removed and the feature disabled.
In addition a upstream patch was applied to allow the user to
re-enable it when he wants
-Markus
--
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
this with the upstream project and upload a new
version with a dfsg tarball asap. Current expectations are to remove
this file completely!
Best Regards
Markus
--
Markus Frosch
mar...@lazyfrosch.de
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
42 matches
Mail list logo
