control: severity -1 important
Downgrading severity. These packages aren't in a stable release yet,
so a conflicts doesn't help upgrades.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I'd say this means dhcrelay itself is pretty much completely broken, and I'm
upgrading severity accordingly. It shouldn't subject the BOOTREPLY packets to
interface checking, or it should have a
Hi,
I uploaded an nmu fixing the recent security issues. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
sudo.patch
Description: Binary data
control: forwarded -1
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-hackers/2013-February/002007.html
Here's a patch that fixes the problem for us. It makes dhcrelay listen on all
interfaces and relay BOOTREPLY packets from them, but still only rely
BOOTREQUEST packets from requested interfaces (those
control: severity -1 wishlist
Reducing severity since this is a request to support a newer specification.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 important
This doesn't make the package completely unusable. This is just a bug
(although an important one).
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 normal
You have a mix of deb-multimedia packages, which often leads to
problems. Please try to reproduce this on a clean installation.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
package: src:isc-dhcp
version: 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5
severity: serious
If /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf still exists (from lenny times), it will
be automatically copied to /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf, thus overwriting
any changes made by the user while they were running squeeze.
I'm currently preparing a fix
Note that /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf has the same md5sum as
/etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf in the upgrade case, and a different one on
fresh squeeze installs. This is probably caused by
if [ -z $2 ]; then
if [ -e /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf ]; then
cp /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf
control: severity -1 important
Please verify which of them (if any) actually apply to Debian's version
of webkit. All of the appear to apply to some kind of memory corruption
or access restriction bypass which makes them good candidates. If they
turn out not to pose a risk for the user,
Hi,
I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
boost.patch
Description: Binary data
control: reassign -1 eglibc
control: forcemerge 698102 -1
control: tag -1 -security
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Michael Tsang wrote:
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD logs me with a wrong egid. I did the following steps:
1. Install a new copy of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
2. Configure the system to use LDAP
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
There is no requirement that precompiled binaries must not be included
in source packages, only that they are rebuilt. The build system for
this package rebuilds, and overwrites
examples/storage/swfstore.swf
control: tag -1 patch
Attempting to build lsb in a wheezy amd64 chroot I get
PYTHONPATH=. python3.2 test/test_initdutils.py -vv
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test/test_initdutils.py, line 4, in module
import initdutils as iu
File /lsb-4.1+Debian8/initdutils.py, line 18
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:57:56 -0500
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
Michael So, the issue with the bind embed is that even though the
Michael entire thing is built, only a very small part is actually used
Michael by dhcp. I don't
Huge guess here, but can you try with vesa rather than nouveau?
How? (there is no more an Xorg.conf)
That doesn't preclude creating one for testing purposes. It will
still be used if it exists.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Alberto wrote:
Package: libwebkitgtk-1.0-0
Version: 1.8.1-3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Just open midori or GtkLauncher and type in the address bar
http://www.facebook.com; or http://www.twitter.com; and press Enter.
The
control: reassign -1 src:cairo
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Alberto wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 03:09 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Just open midori or GtkLauncher and type in the address bar
http://www.facebook.com; or http://www.twitter.com; and press Enter.
The browser
control: severity -1 normal
control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
control: user -1 release.debian@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 rm
Please remove latrine from Debian testing, it is too outdated to go into
wheezy. A new release is upcoming, so there is no need to remove it from
control: severity -1 important
This problem doesn't make the package completely unusable, so it isn't
really a serious issue. A disconnect every minute yes is annoying, so
that's why I'm setting at important since a fix would indeed be
desirable, but this isn't going to stop the release.
Best
control: severity -1 important
This is an issue in one part of the program and doesn't make the whole
thing unusable. Lowering severity appropriately.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
control: severity -1 important
justification 696284 unusable without workarounds (echo 2
/proc/mem/alignment)
Given such a simple workaround, this really shouldn't be considered as
a release blocker.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 important
This should not be considered release critical since it only affects a
kernel version that won't be in the release.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu to delayed/1 fixing this issue. The changes
are backported directly from the experimental package. Please see
attached patch.
can you please
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu to delayed/1 fixing this issue. The changes
are backported directly from the experimental package. Please see
attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
munin.patch
Description: Binary data
control: severity -1 wishlist
control: retitle -1 oss4: switch back to vmix floating-point mode once
it uses proper api
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
If I misunderstood the situation, feel free to downgrade again.
Apologies, but you have. Like I said, the issue was
control: severity -1 important
On second throught, lately I got the crash only when I blanked my screen
with the following command:
xlock -nolock -mode blank
Previously it also froze during operation, but it seems this issue has
been solved since my last update.
I will watch it further
control: reassign -1 bzr
control: found -1 2.6.0~bzr6571-1
control: retitle -1 bzr: breaks bzr-loom 2.2.0-2
Only experimental bzr has this problem.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
control: severity -1 wishlist
control: tag -1 upstream
control: reopen -1
Reopening since the issue was worked around rather than fixed. This
should really be addressed upstream, so it should be forwarded there
by someone with more interest than myself.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
control: severity -1 normal
Downgrading the severity since this not a severe issue and its easy
enough to workaround.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Andreas
I've uploaded both packages to mentors.
commons-httpclient - bug #692442 CVE-2012-5783
axis - bug #692650 CVE-2012-5784
Since axis uses commons-httpclient, we need fix and upload both
packages.
Upstream has ignored axis patch, and rejected commons-httpclient patch.
control: tag -1 -patch
Removing patch tag since some work needs to be done here.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I have rescheduled it to 5 days (+4). Please test the new package in the mean
time.
I have not tested it, but do consider your approach to be an
improvement, Odyx. Since you have already offered to defend it for the
Release Team, I
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
That seems awfully fragile.
It removes support for the previous path, as apparently used in squeeze.
It seems to break if there's more than one (or zero) paths matched by
the glob.
I've uploaded a more robust fix to delayed/3. Please
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Didier Raboud wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. I
think the nice
Hi, I've prepared an nmu based on the patch. See attached. Let me
know if you want to upload it, or I'll do so in a couple days.
Best wishes,
Mike
oss4.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Hi,
Just a side note, the +nmuX notation is meant for native packages, for
a non-native you should add .X after the debian version.
So for this NMU it should be 4.2-build2007-1.1
Actually that's only a devref guideline. +nmuN is
Could anyone please re-test this issue, on real hardware?
With current Wheezy in a VM I'm unable to reproduce it. hald properly
detects a fully functional (virtual) USB pointer and keyboard.
Possibly the issue went away with the upgrade of some package. For
example the recent fix for
package: kfreebsd-8
severity: serious
version: 8.1+dfsg-8
Hi, a security advisory was issued for freebsd, and kfreebsd-8 is affected:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2012-November/001440.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
package: kfreebsd-8
severity: serious
version: 9.0-8
Hi, a security advisory was issued for freebsd, and kfreebsd-9 is affected:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2012-November/001440.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
package: kfreebsd-10
severity: serious
version: 10.0~svn232747-1
Hi, a security advisory was issued for freebsd, and kfreebsd-10 is affected:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2012-November/001440.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
The best way to see whether an issue is fixed is to make it available
to the people experiencing the problem. If you're afraid of causing
problems in unstable, you can use experimental first.
Not the case here Michael :-)
My worry is that this seems more like a hack than a proper fix.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
That version got a lintian autoreject. I've fixed that and
re-uploaded. Please see new patch attached.
Best wishes,
Mike
tdom.patch
I've backported the routine to validate certificate name, and I've made
a patch (attached).
I'm not sure it's a good idea apply the patch, it can break programs
that connect with bad hostnames (ips, host in /etc/hostname, etc)
Would you mind getting your patches for these issues reviewed
Pending an upload, whenever some of us has the time to do it.
On the other hand, I'm still not quite sure that this can be viewed as a fix.
I'm removing the patch tag, because the approiate tag would be pending, but as
I said before, I'm still not sure of this.
The best way to see whether an
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
tdom.patch
Description: Binary data
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see
attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
obmenu.patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 22:58:48 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
May I remind you Michael about the proper NMU procedure??? It seems that
your D-D courses have been become a bit
version: 6.0.35-5+nmu1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 important
Since icedtea-web is built with Java 6, VariableX509TrustManagerJDK7.class is
not built and shipped with the icedtea-netx-common package.
This makes several Java applications using Java Web Start unusable like
https://ibank.cib.hu/ throwing the following
control: tag -1 unreproducible, moreinfo
Hi, I've just tested this, and it works fine for me. Could you post a
debugging backtrace and an strace?
$ gdb dvdisaster
run
backtrace
$ strace dvdisaster
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi, I've just tested this, and it works fine for me. Could you post a
debugging backtrace and an strace?
$ gdb dvdisaster
run
backtrace
$ strace dvdisaster
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
control: severity -1 important
Mulitarch-related bugs like this one should be max severity important
since its only a release goal.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 important
Unfortunately, there is no consistent or standardized behavior when
the battery runs out. If you let that happen, you take the risk of
losing unsaved data.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
apt-p2p.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
May I remind you Michael about the proper NMU procedure??? It seems that your
D-D courses have been become a bit forgotten.
You're a DD. You have the power to cancel stuff in the deferred
queue. That's why it's deferred: to give you a
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
prime.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
tomcat7.patch
Description: Binary data
We have three options:
- Drop openjdk6 from Wheezy (and proceed with the needed changes to allow
that)
- The Java maintainers take up the responsibility and step up to support
openjdk6 in stable- and oldstable-security for Wheezy
- A note is being added to the release notes that
control: severity -1 important
The continued use of datestamps in the package version makes it
difficult to understand which upstream version it is based on, and
appears to violate policy ยง5.6.12 (hence the severity). Policy says
Usually this will be in the same format as that specified by
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing these issues to delayed/5. I saw this
was commited to git, but hasn't been uploaded after a long while. The
delayed upload is to give you time to do a maintainer upload instead.
Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
mlterm.patch
control: severity -1 important
This is a FTBFS, thus using severity serious.
... on hurd, which is not a release architecture.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: ressign -1 wine-unstable
control: forcemerge 677416 -1
This issue will be fixed in wine-unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 wishlist
It was correct at the time it was downloaded. This is more of an
accuracy of the documentation issue.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I don't understand your version number. Please see devref [1] and consider
that this does not appear to be a native package.
1:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-changelog
Devref is not an
package: imagemagick
version: 8:6.7.7.10-5
severity: serious
imagemagick fails to build on sparc. convert fails:
# make xpm
/usr/bin/convert
/build/buildd-imagemagick_6.7.7.10-5-sparc-QgV24K/imagemagick-6.7.7.10/debian/display.im6.svg
-resize 32x32 \
control: tag -1 -patch
Looks like more work needs to be done here. Removing patch tag.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Let me know
if I should delay longer or rework it somehow. Please see attached
patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
oss4.patch
Description: Binary data
And I'm also not sure that your NMU for libimager-qrcode-perl is
correct; if I understand this correctly, it doesn't need any specific
version of Imager, but just the same at buildtime and runtime, so a
simple binNMU should be enough to fix the current bug. - Of course
that's not a long term
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:46:13 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
And I'm also not sure that your NMU for libimager-qrcode-perl is
correct; if I understand this correctly, it doesn't need any specific
version of Imager
It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found.
Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra
time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead.
Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
os-prober.patch
Description: Binary data
Attached is a debdiff, if someone has interest.
Hi, are you planning to upload this? It would probably be weird for
another DD to sponsor it since its your work and its a big diff.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/8. The extra
time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload taking into
account your stated dislike for nmus. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
paramiko.patch
Description: Binary data
control: tag -1 -patch
Removing patch tag since it seems more work needs to be done here.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 16:57:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra
time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead.
Please see attached patch.
Isn't this bug
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 12 Nov 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi, are you planning to upload this? It would probably be weird for
another DD to sponsor it since its your work and its a big diff.
I didn't here from the maintainer, so I am hesitating
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@debian.org wrote:
On Mo, 12 Nov 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The 5 most recent uploads have been nmus and the last maintainer
upload was in 2008, which is likely why you haven't heard from the
maintainer. The package should probably
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Typically one would contact the maintainer before doing an NMU which you
failed to do.
Quite the contrary. The message you just replied to is my contact
prior to the nmu. It has not happened yet. It is currently in a kind
of limbo land
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Michael Gilbert
It's still in DELAYED/1, though, just in case more issues are found.
Not sure if you saw this, but this seemed to not reach unstable.
I forgot to update to the bug that it's
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Thank you for volunteering to become the new paramiko package maintainer
since you have so much spare time.
I did this nmu to try to help make progress against the huge list of
rc issues we have in many packages. I'm not that interested
Right, I was thinking of a possible new libimager-qrcode-perl upload
_whith_ a versioned dependency on libimager-perl = 0.90. Sorry for
having been unclear.
Of course if they don't update libimager-qrcode-perl they'll never
get a fix for #692979 :) But if they do, they get the new enough
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Not my problem... You put the burden on me, I'm giving you the burden since
you obviously took the time failing to contact me to ask and ascertain
whether the maintainer might actually be in the process of doing anything
with the package.
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
gst.patch
Description: Binary data
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu to delayed/5 fixing this issue. Please see
attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
libimager.patch
Description: Binary data
package: libimager-perl
version: 0.93+dfsg-1
severity: serious
Hi, the ABI bump in version 0.85 breaks at least libimager-qrcode-perl
and perhaps other packages.
This can be fixed with a breaks libimager-qrcode-perl =
libimager-qrcode-perl_0.033-1.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
package: tk-html3
version: 3.0~fossil20110109-1
severity: serious
The copyright file does not appropriately document the files included
in the source package.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Are you fine if I upload the sqldeveloper-package with attached
debdiff?
Please go ahead. You can upload to delayed/X to give the maintainer a
chance to review/cancel:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#delayed-incoming
Otherwise time is being wasted by not just
control: tag -1 -patch
Nobody seemed to express any explicit concern with the patch, why
shouldn't we just go ahead and NMU that?
I think you may be referencing:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/10/msg00373.html
That doesn't actually do anything to address this issue.
Best wishes,
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see
attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
cm-super.patch
Description: Binary data
control: tag -1 confirmed
Confirming that apt-move get apt-move move behaves like this.
Building and installing 4.2.27-1 on wheezy doesn't help. Testing on
squeeze, it does work.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
package: python-scientific
version: 2.8-3
severity: serious
Due to unintended abi change in numpy 1.6.1 affecting PyArray_CHAR,
this package needs to depend python-numpy = 1:1.6.1-1. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/685812
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/51931
Best wishes,
control: reopen -1
* Several of the .swf files are now built from source and the rest have
been removed from the package. (Closes: #591199)
This seems to be incorrect about 2.9.0-1. The following pre-built swf
files still exist in the upstream tarball.
./examples/storage/swfstore.swf
control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo
I am not able to reproduce this at all.
ii linux-image-2. 2.6.39-3~bpo i386 Linux 2.6.39 for modern PCs
ii linux-image-3. 3.2.20-1~bpo i386 Linux 3.2 for modern PCs
I see that you're runnig a backports kernel. Those are quite a bit
control: reopen -1
A lot going on in this bug report, but after a cursory look, it seems
that unstable would still be affected, and being an rc bug, I'm
reopening to appropriately track it as an unfixed issue there.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
control: reopen -1
This issue still apparently affects unstable, so reopening to track
the fact that it needs fixing there.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The original closure report only closed the bug for the version in
experimental, the bug was still listed as open in unstable:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ekiga;dist=unstable
reopening is not the way to indicate it effects specific versions, rather
please
use the
package: ruby-pgplot
version: 0.1.3-3
severity: serious
Hi,
Your package has failed to build on the buildds due to a
build-dependency on missing pgplot5 for a while now. That is
considered missing since it is a package in non-free.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
control: severity -1 important
ptex-jtex Non-free package -- Should be in suggest field to be safe
(non-free can not be in recommends but can be in suggests.)
Until the Tech Committee makes a decision on #681419, which will only
apply to jessie and later anyway, this is allowable.
Best
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
The fix for #691860 intended to move afio to the end of a long
alternatives. But instead it made afio an alternative to a strict (and
unrelated) dependency on buffer.
I've uploaded the attached patch to delayed/2 fixing this problem.
Best
401 - 500 of 1088 matches
Mail list logo
