Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-15 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 12/15/22 18:42, Sven Joachim wrote: > It seems you are slightly mistaken here, as the same problem had been > reported for 2:1.20.4-1+deb10u3 already. It has been fixed post-buster > in 2:1.20.6-1. Oh, sorry, that bug report didn't show up for me. I did search for bug reports against

Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-15 Thread Mihai Moldovan
[Resent to the bug tracker as well] * On 12/15/22 19:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. The patches are in > debian/patches/ and are applied during build using quilt. Thank you for looking into it. > From the amd64's build log [1]: It won't

Bug#1004863: Bootstrapping a Fedora produces a system with an empty package database

2022-02-10 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 2/2/22 6:05 PM, Enrico Zini wrote: > I'm trying to use dnf to bootstrap rpm-based chroots, which seems to > work, but the rpm package database on the resulting distribution is > empty, as in, `rpm -qa` returns no output, and `rpm -q` on any package > complains that it is not installed. The

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-01 Thread Mihai Moldovan
* On 1/31/20 8:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > As for yum and yum-utils, their replacements are dnf and > dnf-plugins-core (which have subpackages yum and yum-utils > respectively to act as legacy interfaces). > > My understanding is that Mihai Moldovan was working on this for Debian

Bug#879667: [debhelper-devel] Bug#879667: Missing component in generated control file Section: line for dbgsym packages

2017-10-24 Thread Mihai Moldovan
On 10/24/2017 06:40 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have attached a patch that I hope you can test to see if it fixes your > problem. I've rebuilt the debhelper package in sid with the patch applied and inserted it forcefully into an sbuild build environment. Seems to work, the dbgsym packages now