Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current state (for me), is my amd64 servers (also clients) are
running fine... some of my x86 machines are still experiencing a
plethora of segfaults daily
The private builds you did were gone, so I rebuilt the current
package sans the strip
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Howdy
I've fetched a patch from upstream which fixes a leaking file
descriptor, can you test the packages on my homepage [1]?
Sure, but not until Tuesday ... the home machines seem to be doing
ok after the last round of updates - and the office
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote:
Cfengine2 2.2.8-1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, are you able
to test this version as well? Upstream claims that they have been
fixing an important threading error that has become
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
==12662== Invalid read of size 1
==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)
==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)
==12662==by 0x807A48E: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)
==12662==by 0x8053AC0: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: cfengine2
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable + possible data loss
==12662== Invalid read of size 1
==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)
==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within
fixed 444650 2.2.3-1
retitle 444650 cfagent segfaults when using IPRange(...)
severity 452352 important
thanks
Stéphane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks alot for the testing!! Are you able to test with the newer
cfengine2-package (2.2.3) e.g. from backports.org [1]?
It does not
Stephane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can you verify this bug again with the newest glibc(libc6) installed
on these servers?
This might be related to the problem described in #369536 or
#401115. Hopefully this bug report is fixed with the update of
libc6.
The bug still exists with
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd prefer if it stayed open, so I can continue to track the status of
this package. Of course, it would be OK to close it if cfengine2 had
only that RC bug.
I assume that the other RC bug [1] only affects sarge, but I hope
Stéphane Glondu is able to
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands to
[snip]
If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close
this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.
What do you say Andrew?
I
Mark Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pardon me for saying so, but one recalls the story of the patient
visiting the doctor: Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this.
To which the answer is Then don't do that!
I don't agree with your comparison here, but ok. In my opinion a
program shouldn't
tags 448139 upstream
thanks
Hi,
here is a bugreport from one of our Debian users. I've confirmed this
bug on cfengine version 2.2.2.
- Werner
Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: cfengine2
Version: 2.1.22-2
Severity: critical
cfagent crashes with a segmentation fault when
11 matches
Mail list logo
