Package: eclipselink
Severity: serious
Hi
As the title says - here is the relevant part of the log:
>
> [...]
> dh --with javahelper build
>dh_testdir
>dh_auto_configure
>jh_linkjars
>debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/moon/debian/javahelp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# reopen'ing as upstream appears to be interested in changing this.
reopen 580856
found 580856 1.3-2
severity 580856 important
thanks
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://e
Hi
Just a reminder: you should remember to update JAVA_HOME in
debian/ant-wrapper to point to /usr/lib/jvm/default-java as well.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: libsysactivity
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
src/*BSD/cpu.c
* This program may be freely redistributed,
* but this entire comment MUST remain intact.
Does not explicitly allow modification.
The parts under this license was found under the BSD license (from the
same author) an
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libjbcrypt-java
> Version: 0.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100602 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>
Hi
Could you please check if you have a broken swt symlink or is missing an
swt.jar symlink in /usr/share/java[1]? The broken symlinks are usually
fixed by reinstalling libswt-gtk-3.5-java. Please see #568940[2] for
more information.
~Niels
[1] The output of
ls -l /usr/share/java/swt*.jar
sho
Hi
Sorry, I missed your reply. Yes it is the problem. See [1].
~Niels
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00065.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: jabsorb
Severity: serious
Hi
jabsorb contains some java files licensed under the non-free JSON license.
I suspect these are an embedded library.
I will try to see if I can find a solution or if it has to move to non-free.
~Niels
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
I think it is too early to tag it pending. While we got the updated
sources, it does not build yet. Also, neither of its dependencies (emf
and rse) are uploaded to the archive yet.
>> You are more than welcome to join the effort of getting the new
>> release of eclipse-cdt packaged. We could def
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, CDT 3.1.2 won't work with eclipse 3.5 in unstable, it works with
> eclipse 3.2.
> We should upgrade this to CDT 6.0.x.
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/downloads.php
>
>
> BTW...where's the source for that? I couldn't find it... ;(
> Should we get it fr
Hi
Is this bug still valid? It appears to be filed against a non-existent
binary package; the question is whether it should be reassigned to the
current version of the binary or just closed.
It is currently listed as blocked by #488989 in a package (java-common)
that I co-maintain and I would li
Torsten Werner wrote:
> Package: jftp
> Version: 1.52-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> Hi,
>
> the upstream tarball ships a lot of prebuilt binaries. The package
> cannot be built after removing those binaries:
>
> [javac]
> /tmp/buildd/jftp-1.52.dfsg/src/java/net/sf/
I believe the "javax" package is optional, so more a that gcj does not
have all the javax extensions.
Note these classes appear to be in libmx4j-java and libjboss-jmx-java;
which may allow it to be used even without openjdk-6 or sun-java6
>=20
> I am working on this. I just fixed this package yes
Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:36:58PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> #552480: eclipse: GTK dialog stopped working
>>
>> It has been closed by Debian Orbital Alignment Team
>> .
>>
>>* Added workaround for gtk problems. (Closes: #552480)
>>
>
> Am I w
Hi
With ries back up and the upload of libfreemarker-java accepted, I have
filed an RM of liblogkit-java (see #576349).
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# We are nearly ready to RM this package.
tags 563884 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
Thank you for taking the time to report this problem; however we are not
working on fixing this issue since this package has been superseded by
libexcalibur-logkit-java.
We will have this package removed when we have fixed
block 574611 by 441313
thanks
Sam Morris wrote:
> Package: eclipse-cdt
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Please call me stupid if I've overlooked something, but having installed
> eclipse and eclipse-cdt, I can't find any mention of C or C++ featur
tags 574607 + confirmed
thanks
Sam Morris wrote:
> Package: eclipse-platform-data
> Version: 3.5.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> When upgrading today:
>
> Unpacking eclipse-platform-data (from
> .../eclipse-platform-data_3.5.2-1_all.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/eclip
Christian Marillat wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Thanks for the bug report. Beginning with the next upload, eclipse will
>> use /usr/bin/java by default (and thus respecting your local alternative).
>
> start with this dialogbox :
>
> ,
Christian Marillat wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.4.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> eclipse doesn't start :
>
> ==
> searching for compatible vm...
> testing /usr/lib/jvm/default-java...not found
> testing
Hi
from the log:
>> STDERR: Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad
>> version number in .class file
Perhaps the JVM dependency and the class file versions do not match up.
freemind depends on
openjdk-6-jre | java2-runtime | sun-java5-jre | java2-runtime
But are you certain that
Can you still reproduce this issue in sid? We recently received a report
that it is not reproducible[1].
~Niels
[1]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D569002#25
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
I noticed that you decided to use some sequence of shell commands to set
JAVA_HOME. I can recommend using "/usr/lib/jvm/default-java" instead
(and build-depending on default-jdk which you are already doing).
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java is a symlink to openjdk6 on all arch
supporting openjdk and
gregor herrmann wrote:
> [...]
> What I don't understand is why the .jar is in /usr/lib/java/ and not
> in /usr/share/java in the first place. It's put there explicitly by
> debian/libswt-gtk-3.5-java.install.
>
> Installing it to /usr/share/java and adjusting
> debian/libswt-gtk-3.5-java.links wou
Package: src:azureus
Severity: serious
Hi
GPL and EPL are not compatible[1], yet azureus contains quite a few files under
GPL while Depending on SWT, which is under EPL. Furthermore the source itself
contains multiple files under CPL, which is also incompatible with GPL.
The file com/aelitis/azu
Teodor MICU wrote:
>[...]
>
> PS: how can I receive any responses on this bug without CC:me ?
>
Hi
I believe [1] will do the trick.
~Niels
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#subscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi
Have you looked at #560056?
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 570972 3.4.1-1
tags 570972 + sid squeeze
thanks
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Niels Thykier [2010-02-22 16:10:52 CET]:
>> forcemerge 553131 570972
>> thanks
>
> Your forcemerge removed the version information from the bug(s). This
> made the bu
Hi
Upstream has released 5.1.12 now (DEHS has only picked up 5.1.11),
perhaps this is fixed in either of those.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gpe wrote:
> Package: pdfsam
> Version: 1.1.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> pdfsam failed to start with this message:
> =
>
> pdfsam
>
> JAVA: java
>
> JAVA_OPTS: -Xmx256m
>
> CLA
Barry deFreese and I packed the new upstream release ago and I RFS'ed it
in December; I just bumped the RFS earlier today and hopefully I will
get a reply on it soon.
On a related note: I tried to mail the maintainer twice in start/mid
December though I have not heard from him yet.
~Niels
Origin
retitle 558693 eclipse: Too many files open - possible workaround
tags 558693 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
I came across a blog [1] that offered a different solution that I am
considering to adopt for the eclipse package. I would like to get some
feedback on this solution.
I believe the file the blo
forcemerge 507536 560398
thanks
Hi Lukas Czerner
Thank you for taking your time to report this bug. I believe you are
suffering from #507536[1] in one of its many forms. There some who have
reported a workaround that you can try[2].
We are preparing an upload of eclipse soon; but I seriously dou
forcemerge 507536 560162 556780
thanks
Hi
Thank you for spending time to report these bugs and for helping to
triaging them. I have (thanks to Jeff Wallance) determined that
these bugs are both one of the many manifestations of #507536[1]
(xulrunner problem).
We are preparing to upload ecli
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity: serious
Hi
java-gcj-compat-dev cannot be installed in unstable due to conflicts between
gjdoc and gcj-jdk.
java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5.1) Depends on ..., gcj, ..., gjdoc (>= 0.7.8), ...
gcj (4:4.4.2-1) Depends on ..., gcj-jdk (>= 4:4.4.2-1)
gcj-jdk (4:4.4
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.58
Severity: serious
Hi
Running cowbuilder with --login --bindmounts results in cowbuilder trying to
purge
a bindmounted /proc if the command-line specified bindmount fails.
$ sudo cowbuilder --login --bindmounts `pwd`/aginw
-> Copying COW directory
forking: rm
tags 558693 + confirmed
thanks
Hi
I know some people have experienced this e.g. by having translation
packages for eclipse installed (there is a bug about this on the Ubuntu
side requesting that the default limit is increased).
You can work around this by changing the limit of open files. (e.g.
tags 552480 = confirmed
thanks
Hi
Thanks for testing it - this is a known problem then and we have partly
fixed it in our VCS[1] and it will be fixed by upstream in eclipse 3.6
(and possibly also 3.5.2).
~Niels
[1] Partly fixed as in our VCS version suffers from fewer of these
problems tha
forcemerge 553131 553133
retitle 553131 eclipse: FTBFS - native libraries are not built from source.
tags 553131 = confirmed
reassign 553131 src:eclipse
thanks
Hi
It turns out (by looking at the build logs) that this is caused by the
3.4.1 build passing a misspelled path to dpkg-shlibdeps. I hav
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>> Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 21:41:24, Niels Thykier a =E9crit :
>>> Dear mentors,
>> Hi Niels,
>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-10 of my package
>>> "jlgui".
>
retitle 552480 eclipse: GTK dialog stopped working
tags 552480 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
Could you try if setting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 (and exporting it) makes
eclipse work? If not, please provide the logs (if it does not tell you
where to find it, then try $WORKSPACE/.metadata/.log)
~Niels
--
# This is the same problem really - just represented differently
# in different versions and later versions support xulrunner 1.9
forcemerge 507536 538871
retitle 507536 eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner
tags 507536 = confirmed
severity 507536 grave
# These two are solved by the same soluti
clone 491537 -1
retitle -1 RM: vmware-package -- RoQA: "May contain undistributable files"
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
severity -1 important
thanks
Hi
Since this issue has not been resolved for over a year and not even a
comment from the maintainer(s), I think this should be removed.
On a rela
Hi Sam Clegg
Any news or ETA on this one? It is almost a month ago you said you would
apply the patch from Onkar Shinde (which will also fix #548810).
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: vnc-java
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi
I have created a patch that replaces jikes and kaffe with default-jdk.
The reason for also removing kaffe is that the java team is planning to remove
it as
well [1][2].
~Niels
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-j...@lists.debian.org/msg134
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for nice (versioned as 0.9.13-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Niels Thykier
diff -u nice-0.9.13/debian/rules nice-0.9.13/debian/rules
--- nice-0.9.13/debian/rules
+++ nice-0.9.13/d
tags 528055 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libgnu-regexp-java (versioned as 1.1.4-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Niels Thykier
--00030105080906040304
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
tags 528066 + patch
thanks
Hi
I have created a patch that removes jikes and kaffe as build-depends for
this package and instead uses default-jdk.
~Niels
--010905080905030507040008
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
name="528066.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Dis
tags 529505 + patch
thanks
Hi
I have created a patch that fixes this problem and also replaces kaffe
with "default java" as (Build-)Depends.
~Niels
diff -u nice-deb-orig/control nice-deb-mod/control
--- a/debian/control 2009-09-13 00:10:58.0 +0200
+++ b/debian/control 2009-09-13 00:09:5
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>> Package: libjgrapht-java-doc,libjgrapht0.6-java-doc
>> Version: libjgrapht-java-doc/0.6.0-5
>> Version: libjgrapht0.6-java-doc/0.6.0-8
>
> libjgrapht0.6-java-doc/0.6.0-8 in main replaces
> libjgrapht-java-doc/0.6.0-5 in contrib. That is why
tags 543073 + patch confirmed
thanks
Hi
I have tested Luke's patch and this package successfully builds with it
on my machine. Though I cannot verify its "runtime" correctness (I do
not know this library nor does its build have tests/checks).
That being said - I think this patch is only fixing t
tags 543105 + confirmed
owner 543105 !
thanks
Hi
I can reproduce on i386 as well and I will have a go at fixing it.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Package: libxalan2-java
> Version: 2.7.1-5
> Severity: grave
>
> Running "java -jar /usr/share/java/xalan2.jar -DIAG -XSL t.xsl -IN
> References.html", I receive the following error message:
>
> (Location of error unknown)java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response
Hi
Those of you who have experienced this problem, could you please write
which version of xulrunner you have and whether it fixed it?
Those you still experiencing the problem, please check if your version
of xulrunner is listed here[1] next to the matching version of eclipse.
At least xulrunner
Hi again
Could you please tell me which of the following libraries (if any) you
have installed and which package (w. version) provide them?
/usr/lib/mozilla/libgtkembedmoz.so
/usr/lib/firefox/libgtkembedmoz.so
/usr/lib/xulrunner{,1.9,1.9.1}/libgtkembedmoz.so
/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/libgtkembedmo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Niels Thykier schrieb:
>> Hi again
>
>> I noticed RedHat had bug report similar to this:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 [1]
>
>> Could I have you test if:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Could you check if this problem persists in eclipse 3.4.1-1 (experimental)?
As far as I can tell this was fixed upstream in somewhere between 3.2.2
and 3.4.1 - the amd64 versions do not show this problem in 3.4.1.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Mostly a note to self)
Located here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=268651
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkp78x8ACgkQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Searched a bit and found this topic:
http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5250409
(mostly a reminder to self)
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again
I noticed RedHat had bug report similar to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 [1]
Could I have you test if:
echo "org.eclipse.ui/showIntro=false" > /tmp/noWelcomeScreen.ini
eclipse -pluginCustomization
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Niels Thykier schrieb:
>> Sadly, by looking at the class file alone I am unable to determine if
>> the problem exists... But if you can send it to me, I can use javap on it.
>
> http://ftp.de.debian.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Niels Thykier schrieb:
>> Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> Niels Thykier schrieb:
>>>> [...]
>>> [...]
>>> Your comments:
>>> java does not support the -c option.
>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Niels Thykier schrieb:
>> [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Your comments:
> java does not support the -c option.
> No package provides a usr/bin/javap, I also tried out kaffe,
> sun-java6-jdk, the open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I had a look around and there has been a similar problem in eclipse
version 3.2 [1], which may be of use in finding and fixing this problem.
Could I have you post the output of:
"javap -classpath
/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux
701 - 764 of 764 matches
Mail list logo
