Bug#618965: libetpan15: Breaks build system on Debian Sid

2011-03-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
[CCing -devel because there are several questions below] Package: libetpan15 Version: 1.0-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Installing libetpan15(-dev) causes libdb-4.8 libdb-4.7 libdb-4.6 to be removed since libetpan depends on libdb-5.1. libdb5.1-dev cannot

Bug#618965: libetpan15: Breaks build system on Debian Sid

2011-03-19 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libetpan15 Version: 1.0-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Installing libetpan15(-dev) causes libdb-4.8 libdb-4.7 libdb-4.6 to be removed since libetpan depends on libdb-5.1. libdb5.1-dev cannot coexists with libdb libdb-5.1. Package should always be

Bug#605912: runit package changes /etc/inittab ?

2011-01-08 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
While we are on topic. Maintainer scripts of runit package modify /etc/inittab Although looks like /etc/inittab is not owned by any package, so policy is not violated, this IMO still looks strange in debian context. Is modifying /etc/inittab from postinst ok for random debian package these

Bug#518049: I considered NMU a fix for this bug, but ...

2009-11-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
...but decided not to do so. Package looks very dirty: autotools-based build system is broken and can't be restored with autoreconf co because if dirty tricks used in configure.ac, there are subversion temporary files left, etc NMUing this particular bug with suggested workaround won't help

Bug#521918: ubuntu's patch is broken

2009-11-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
tags 521918 -patch thanks Patch suggested by ubuntu is broken: build target mush build everything, including arch-independed part. See Debian Policy, sec. 4.9. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#544104: readline-common depends on dpkg version not in archive

2009-08-28 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: readline-common Version: 6.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: not installable readline-common 6.0-3, currently in unstable, depends on dpkg (= 1.15.4), while unstable contains dpkg 1.15.3.1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#466373: This package should be removed

2008-06-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
reassing 466373 ftp.debian.org retitle 466373 RM: libcompress-lzo-perl: bindings to a library being removed thanks Ok, reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org In short, package libcompress-lzo-perl is a perl library for liblzo1; upstream looks dead for years, there is no interest in porting the

Bug#466373: This package should be removed

2008-06-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
reassign 466373 ftp.debian.org retitle 466373 RM: libcompress-lzo-perl: bindings to a library being removed thanks Ok, reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org In short, package libcompress-lzo-perl is a perl library for liblzo1; upstream looks dead for years, there is no interest in porting the

Bug#472848: This package should be removed

2008-06-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
reassign 472848 ftp.debian.org retitle 472848 RM: libcompress-lzo-perl -- RoM: bindings to a library to be removed thanks Ok, reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org In short, package libcompress-lzo-perl is a perl library for liblzo1; upstream looks dead for years, there is no interest in

Bug#473569: DBusViewer tries to run /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java, but does not depend on package providing it

2008-03-31 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: dbus-java-bin Version: 2.4-1 Severity: serious After running 'apt-get install dbus-java-bin', when I try to start DBusViewer, I get /usr/bin/DBusViewer: line 10: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: No such file or directory /usr/bin/DBusViewer: line 10: exec: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java:

Bug#473569: DBusViewer tries to run /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java, but does not depend on package providing it

2008-03-31 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
On Mon Mar 31 16:06, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Package: dbus-java-bin Version: 2.4-1 Severity: serious After running 'apt-get install dbus-java-bin', when I try to start DBusViewer, I get /usr/bin/DBusViewer: line 10: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: No such file or directory

Bug#464953: ptpatch2008.c does not work

2008-02-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
but seems to be another solution which apparently compiles to a kernel module which will catch and report attempts to (ab)use vmsplice at http://home.powertech.no/oystein/ptpatch2008/ptpatch2008.c I've just tried to compile this module. It successfully insmod'ed: Feb 11 12:54:29 zigzag

Bug#415547: gcc manpages shipped without separated docs (fsf-funding, gpl, gfdl)

2007-03-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: gcc-doc, gcc-4.1-doc Severity: serious The invariant part fsf-funding, plus the license texts are split out from the manual pages, but currently not shipped. Removing invariant parts and cover texts from the docs seems to be a license violation of the GFDL. The former

Bug#393318: Unreproducable

2006-10-16 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Just tried in a pbuilder. etpan-ng 0.7.1-3 builde ok in pbuilder against libetpan 0.47-1 Maybe something wrong in your chroot? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#375611: Processed: found 375611 in 0.45-3

2006-08-14 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 found 375611 0.45-3 Bug#375611: libetpan: FTBFS/ia64 Bug marked as found in version 0.45-3. This is fixed long ago, isn't it? Current version (0.46-1) builds ok on ia64, as well

Bug#351761: Probably etpan issue?

2006-02-07 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
as Sylpheed uses etpan for IMAP access, the problem with not working SSL will be probably in it. Since people are only downgrading Sylpheed, not libetpan, to get functionality back, this does not look like a library issue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the script) are attached. Comments and/or testing welcome. Comment to myself: The

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH won't point to directories with local libraries. That's not true. ldd will just happily print libfoo.so.1 = not found and exit with exit code 0. So

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps -l option because it doesn't honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can someone tell me

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello people. objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the other shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch which is of critical importance to get this stuff right. Hmm... But what for is that search path? As far as I understand, dpkg-shlibdeps

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2005-08-21 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the other shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch which is of critical importance to get this stuff right. Hmm... But what for is that search path? As far as I understand, dpkg-shlibdeps should just get NEEDED