in 1.0.0-2 version.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
, please take over the
package.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Hello Max,
Did you have time to look at the new release of klibc?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:18, Risto Suominen risto.suomi...@gmail.com wrote:
It's probably because of the frame buffer problem that's been
discussed in bug #614221.
As a workaround, try: install video=ofonly.
If this works, we ought to merge those bug reports right?
--
Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 05:10, Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org wrote:
On 12/24/2010 12:38 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
status update please.
blocked by #603554, waiting for otavio.
It has been commited and are available on dialies.
You can use it as base.
--
Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 05:09, Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org wrote:
On 12/24/2010 12:39 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Status update please?
blocked by #603554, waiting for otavio.
Available on dailies AFAIK ;-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
regarding squeeze, i'll only sync those from debian-cd, so if debian-cd uses
the correct things, so will syslinux-themes-debian.
It will. I am going to handle it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981
-maint so please take it over :-D
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.7
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
During the build of Debian Installer we have the possibility to use
localudebs so a build/localudebs directory scanned and a Packages file
is generated for it.
In the case of an empty Packages file (gzipped) is used, APT fails to
read it
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
Hmmm, still. John explained that he specifically did not create any
user, so I fail to see how re-using the /home partition would create a
problem
is not going to help in fixing the bugs
you found (or think to have found).
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
-linux
packages to provide the symbols and shlibs files. The later gives the
wrong information since it is hardcoded to 2.16 while 2.17 is the
newest one. The right solution from my POV is to use the symbols only
and drop the shlibs.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
Hello,
We have uploaded a parted 2.3 package (with the required changes
backported) to sid and would be nice if you could do a new test using
the daily snapshot of d-i and let us know if it works or not.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
Hello,
I've tryed to reproduce this bug using Parted 2.2-7 and it works fine.
Can you check if you can still reproduce it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
Hello,
Please test the images at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/powerpc
Those are suppose to be OK; I want the confirmation to announce it.
TIA,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53
and would
be nice if you could do a test on it. We intend to announce it on
friday so please give it a run.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
with upstream.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
this is the current codebase. Besides, it would be
good if we push it upstream, we can work on that after this has been
ported to 2.1 version.
Can someone from Sparc take a look and port it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55
in Virtualbox, also during mirror
selection.
And it does not go away if I recompile cdebconf (tried for amd64).
This is similar to what happened in powerpc to me. I have no glue why :-(
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Norberto Feliberty
thegame4121...@msn.com wrote:
That's great to hear Hopefully this will get things rolling again
.
We need someone with direct access to a machine to test it and debug
to check where it segfaults.
Anyone want to help?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
to reproduce it.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Hello,
Good news :-)
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
I'll resume what I've gotten from my debugging session today.
I got it working and I've asked for a binNMU for cdebconf to be
queued. It looks to fix it, at least it did for my test here
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Norberto Feliberty
thegame4121...@msn.com wrote:
That's great to hear Hopefully this will get things rolling again since I
see that the latest daily squeeze build has stopped on Jan 11.
This is also fixed now.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S
(for text mode, that is). however, imho, it
actually could be uploaded (has to trough NEW though).
No problem in uploading it. Beer in mind to follow the upload process
documented inside of installer/doc/devel.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
and it is used in every
installation. Could you try to reproduce it and report back to us?
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Luk has asked me to generate the overrides using Lenny version so I took
the 2.78 from GIT and did it. I'm attaching the tar in this mail.
task-overrides_2.78_all.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
.
You're welcome to upload it then. Just be careful to follow the instructions
at
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/trunk/installer/doc/devel/package-upload.txt?view=markup
Thanks a lot by handling it fastly :-)
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
Hello Jim,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
Thanks to Otavio Salvador for finding/reporting this.
Here's the patch I'm considering:
I think it sorts it out; it would be nice to have it fixed in Debian
in meanwhile so it makes our life easier (I'm using
Package: coreutils
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hello,
While updating d-i kernel I've found a regression in sort, against
stable.
$: sort -um -o list list work
The files are attached to easy the reproducability.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
file).
Yes, it works nicely in stable release (hence the notfound usage) so it
qualifies as a regression IMO.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Hello,
This behaviour change breaks unrelated code so I raised the severity; our
mass build script fails due it.
Please fix it ASAP.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
Sorry but I mistakenly sent it to this bug while I intended to send it
to #515346
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
Hello,
This behaviour change breaks unrelated code so I raised the severity; our
mass build script fails due it.
Please fix
.
(ubuntu and fedora disabled this, afaik)
How you'd suggest to deal with this issue? Do you have any pointer for
that information?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I am not tagging the bug +patch because the problem probably needs to
be solved by a different patch in Lenny and in the main branch, see
below. I also lack the time to do proper testing (and also to 1prepare
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: serious
Version: 20090123
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
D-I was built with version 3.1.1-5 of dhcp3-client-udeb included in images
[1], but after that build a new version 3.1.1-6 has been accepted into
James Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is to let you know that booting with noapic fixes the issue
Did you test it with RC1 and sid kernels?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not going to NMU because I'm unsure whether it's generally a good
idea to leave hidden partitions untouched. If it is, please apply this.
I also am unsure about it. parted should be able to touch everything
and I'm not sure this is the proper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
Please upload fixed packages.
Note that I thought this was still being tested by Jérémy and that no
mail to debian-release was sent, but apparently my input was requested...
:-)
Thanks by acking it. From
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have rebuilt cdebconf with these packages after updating the
Build-Depends and removing the special dh_shlibdeps case for
cdebconf-gtk-udeb. Building and testing an installer with the resulting
udebs lead to a successful installation.
Using the
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Beckett wrote:
The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do
any cairo work today.
One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package
by me is that it is unsupported upstream. The customer for debian
is really
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 06 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've done a look on dmraid and it looks simple to change. The attached
patch should do that.
Oh, wow! Yes!
Let's make a change that's really dmraid upstream's business in Debian
Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador ha scritto:
We have two possible way to fix that. Change parted to use previous
I think we have a third possible way, merge some good work from Ubuntu.
For example, attached debdiff is an attempt to fix (p) naming issue
Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I merged all relative dmraid Ubuntu changes in:
devmapper
Looks to be safe but requires an OK by maintainer and RT.
parted
Looks fine however there's a wrong indentation on the static vars to
hold the uuid values. Please take a look and resend.
Giuseppe Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. Are you subscribed to the d-boot list or should we keep you CCed?
No, I'm not subscribed, please keep me CCed.
Please subscribe! You are doing a very good job helping d-i team to
get this sorted out and would be awesome to count on you from
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I have done what I can here to identify the issues. From here on
it is up to Jérémy and Otavio to actually fix the bugs that have been
identified.
I really do not know at this point whether that means reverting some change
in libparted, or fixing
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 05 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It is indeed a change on libparted side however this is doing right
using the p here. Would be too hard to change partman-dmraid to use
it?
The problem is not really partman-dmraid. The problem
in the archive at all?
No. It is not possible since stable didn't have armel and we grabed
the binary package from that.
This was my fault indeed. :(
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-15 09:01]:
No. It is not possible since stable didn't have armel and we grabed
the binary package from that.
And it's not possible to upload libparted1.7-udeb for armel to t-p-u?
If RT do not object
Stefan Alfredsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok - the drive is actually detected in d-i-2. I can do manual partitioning
in the console with fdisk /dev/sda1.
However, the installer fails at the step [!] Detect disks, and asks me
to choose a driver for the disk chipset.
If I continue by
Hello,
Could someone give a try on the attached patch?
TIA,
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index f2f14c9..b75b15a 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ build-udeb/config.status: autotools-update-stamp
dh_testdir
[ -d build-udeb ] || mkdir
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Hess wrote:
If so, jusr db_progress STEP 1 4 should work just as well and less
messily, like in my patch.
Your patch works. Please disregard mine.. many thanks.
Joey, could you please commit it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# apt (0.7.14) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Apply patch to avoid truncating of arbitrary files. Thanks to Bryan
#Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patch. Closes: #482476
#
package apt-utils apt-doc apt apt-transport-https
severity 477331 important
thanks
Sebastian,
Please, revert the directfb changes to fix this bug. However wait few
days to upload it to unstable. We've added a workaround that works for
d-i usage and we'd like to release Debian Installer Lenny Beta 2; this
upload could mess up with our timeline.
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:35:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I did a bisect and it shows f3cec9d1c2a4d43cd734aae4bc7f8e7410a5e89a
as the bad one. Looking at it I had figure that
08516d97a1b34cbb119d6d842ae31e4cb4e08740 might be the responsable
notfound 1.4.14-1
found 1.5.6-1
thanks
I've been able to reproduce the issue outside d-i environment, using
cdebconf, and this allowed me to test with previous available versions
of package.
I figure that, of available packages, the first to show this issue is
1.5.6-1 while 1.4.14-1 was the last
Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
notfound 1.4.14-1
found 1.5.6-1
thanks
I've been able to reproduce the issue outside d-i environment, using
cdebconf, and this allowed me to test with previous available versions
of package.
I figure that, of available
Sebastian Dröge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Samstag, den 26.04.2008, 17:47 -0300 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
notfound 1.4.14-1
found 1.5.6-1
thanks
I've been able to reproduce the issue outside d-i environment, using
cdebconf, and this allowed me to test with previous available versions
Package: dpkg-cross
Version: 2.2.1
Severity: critical
As you may know, we use dpkg-cross to build linux kernel and modules
udebs (throught massbuild script) and while doing the last upgrade I
noticed that the generated .changes file doesn't include the source
anymore. Instead, it builds a
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Package: libsdl1.2
Version: 1.2.13-2
Severity: serious
Your package has a build dependency for a non existent package called
libusbhid-dev and it block it to go to testing. Please take a look at
it.
The build-depency
Package: libsdl1.2
Version: 1.2.13-2
Severity: serious
Your package has a build dependency for a non existent package called
libusbhid-dev and it block it to go to testing. Please take a look at
it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please post patches (including changelog entry) to the list before
committing.
Here's a patch based on your advice. Unfortunately I can't test it, because
my Efika died. Hopefully someone else can.
Please, feel free to commit it if nobody points
Package: kvm
Version: 57+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Using current sid kvm package (58+dfsg-1) it doesn't even boot the
debian installer mini.iso however downgrating the package to 57+dfsg-2
solves the problem.
TIA,
-- Package-specific info:
selected
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following patch works for me. I tested with zero, one and two
disks.
The patch looks OK .. please commit and upload it :-)
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following patch works for me. I tested with zero, one and two
disks.
Cool. Could you commit and upload it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
clone 448406 -1
retitle -1 lacks pselect support on arm and m68k
severity -1 normal
thanks
I'm cloning this bug report since arm and m68k lacks pselect syscall
support and to allow APT to drop the racy pselect implementation we
need to get it solved.
Please, if possible, when closing this bug
Sergi Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
All operations with Apt shows this error:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
what(): basic_string::basic_string
Aborted
Can you
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
severity 445507 serious
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-06 14:08]:
Binary files c/lib/libc.so.6 and m/lib/libc.so.6 differ
This is what makes a difference. I copied c/lib/libc.so.6 (i.e. made
with mklibs-copy) to the image
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: live-helper
Version: 1.0~a30-1
Severity: serious
This change from a29 is broken since $$ is shellspeak for getpid().
Purging configuration files for memtest86+ ...
/usr/bin/lh_binary_disk: eval: line 60: syntax error near unexpected token
Hello,
Looking at the source code, looks like it's using struct aufs_branch
before it gets defined and then it could raise a parser error. To
workaround it, we just define it there so the compiler know that we're
aware of it.
I _think_ this could be the cause of compilation failure but I can't
reassign 443897 grub
retitle 443897 update-grub fails to reconize /dev/i2o/* root
partitions
thanks
Daniel Koc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Manual editing grub entry has helped to mount the root partition, but
the system was unable to mount all the other partitions, because all
fstab
Moritz Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If an attcker is able to hijack or otherwise influence the DNS server
used when Debian GNU/Linux is installed using win32-loader, she may be
able to run any command that is available on the system to be installed
as root by redirecting requests to a
Hello,
I think that the easiest way to fix this bug is package the lastest
release of pciutils. In 2.2.6 release, pkg-config support has been add
and hence fixing all this mess in a easy way.
my 2c,
Rgds,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Otavio Salvador, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 16:55:08 -0300, a écrit :
I've produced [...] a test that was suppose to fail without the
libparted/disk.c change (included on the patch and that you need to
revert for testing) but I cannot make it to fail
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 31 Aug 2007 09:16:02 -0300, a écrit :
Can you try to make it to fail properly?
I'm in the train so I couldn't download version 1.8 of parted with its
test engine, but the attached program fails without the patch.
Right
the problem is at QTParted. Can you check the test
and see if you can make it fail, reverting libparted/disk.c part?
From 45a6703fc9b65335862522b0c3223f2d5070011a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:52:03 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Really duplicate
Luigi Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I'm sending back the logs of an execution trace of the
lock-setup.postinst
script.
Please attach it so it's easier to read.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Does the removal of the package cache works for you? To test it, do:
#: rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
#: apt-get update
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As this can be considered a licence change and as you have contributed to
silo-installer in the past, please OK this licence change by replying to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short statement of your agreement.
I
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest using debconf (#328842) to get answers to the questions
asked by -C, then to feed those to no-ip and tell it to generate
a file in /var/lib instead.
I agree on it but I lack the time to work on that.
If I move it to git and collab-maint,
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.06.27.1847 +0200]:
I agree on it but I lack the time to work on that.
If I move it to git and collab-maint, can you help me on it?
I don't have much more time myself, really. I just wanted to file
Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ?
Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used. If
it's 800x600x24, it works well.
Ah nice. Robert, I think we might reduce the color depth used by
retitle 423268 update-grub do not handle /boot on separate partition properly
clone 423268 -1
retitle -1 update-grub doesn't import other installed OSes entries.
priority -1 wishlist
thanks
Bharath Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.95+20070507-1
Severity: critical
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs update-grub
which
uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot is mounted on separate partition the
grub.cfg still retains /boot/vmlinuz-* as the location for the kernel and
similarly for
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:06:12AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs
update-grub which
uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot is mounted on separate
Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does your video hardware support vesa?
Yes, it works correctly if c is typed and input.
grub font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
grub insmod gfxterm
grub set gfxmode=800x600x8
grub terminal gfxterm
Does:
grub font /boot/grub/unifont.pff
grub set
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:22:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do not perform update-grub compulsorily by postinst. It is very
unpleasant to overwrite grub.cfg freely.
I suppose it doesn't harm
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do not perform update-grub compulsorily by postinst. It is very
unpleasant to overwrite grub.cfg freely.
I suppose it doesn't harm to add an option to disable it; perhaps we could
even reuse /etc/kernel-img.conf. Could you file a separate bug
Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 1.95+20070505-1 version of grub2 drops me to OF just after starting
the system. I have only been able to boot after booting from CD and
reinstalling an older grub2 (1.95-1, which doesn't give me a menu, but
allows me to boot at least).
Hey Jordi,
Hello David,
As we talked at IRC it's being use by partman. partman is a module of
Debian Installer project and it uses ntfsresize for NTFS resizing.
There's a know bug on NTFS resizing utility but it doesn't look to be
related since it just avoid a flag on the final filesystem[1] while
the
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, does it really matter _why_ they did it? The problem here (as I
perceive it, at least), is that parted is for some reason fixing the
starting sector of the partition, while it shouldn't touch the beginning
of the partition at all. All it should
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem here is how to decide if we should or not align it. That's
the most difficult question...
If the partition is merely being resized, the begin sector should
_never_ be changed, I think.
On NTFS specific case would be difficult to detect
Package: grub2
Severity: critical
Since GRUB2 is changing too much and it's not yet ready for production
use we prefer to keep it out of Etch release.
Don't close this bug without maintainers permission.
Thank you
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Goedson Teixeira Paixao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Em Qua, 2006-12-06 às 17:12 +0100, Andreas Barth escreveu:
* Goedson Teixeira Paixao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061206 17:07]:
diff -ru apt-0.6.46.3/apt-pkg/deb/debindexfile.cc
apt-0.6.46.3.new/apt-pkg/deb/debindexfile.cc
---
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are a few reasons why I thought we could tag the libparted issue
etch-ignore:
1) it is not a regression from Sarge
2) there has been precious little attention to the issue from the
maintainers of parted even though the BR was already 3 months
Mikhail Gusarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% ls -l /sbin/grub-install
4.0K -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 373 Oct 4 00:04 /sbin/grub-install
Please check and close this bug if everything is ok.
We made a mistake. The .real isn't need. We just need to use the
wrapper for
Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 12:20:25AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
What method for running trac is being used? mod-python, perhaps?
mod-python, yes.
Aaah! Look at this. You are right about the 2.3 thing!
$ dpkg -l libapache*-mod-python* | grep ^i
Pier Luigi Pau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In debian/rules, in fact, a line to install the wrapper to /usr/sbin is
missing:
The wrapper isn't need on /usr/bin but the wrapper needs to check the
.real script or it'll fail.
I understand that a wrapper in /usr/sbin is not wanted and this is why
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adding submitter for bug #387500, as well as Petter Reinholdtsen who
provided a fix, to Cc. This bug and #387500 were basically different
aspects of the same problem (failure of grub-install in d-i and on
grub updates), therefore #387500 is probably
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right but if it's not too hard and complex might be good.
People should be using grub-install; if we still want compatibility I think
it's
an upstream decision.
Mats, could you send your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with Rebert here.
--
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
