Isn't this a duplicate with #606268 ?
P.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-1.1
On 7/5/12, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> found 503861apertium-en-ca/0.8.9-1
> found 503861apertium-en-es/0.6.0-1.1
> found 503861apertium-eo-ca/0.9.0-1.1
> found 503861apertium-eo-es/0.9.0-1.1
> found 503861apertium-eu-es/0.3.1-1
> found 503861apertium-fr-es/0.9.0-1.1
> found 50386
found 503861apertium-en-ca/0.8.9-1
found 503861apertium-en-es/0.6.0-1.1
found 503861apertium-eo-ca/0.9.0-1.1
found 503861apertium-eo-es/0.9.0-1.1
found 503861apertium-eu-es/0.3.1-1
found 503861apertium-fr-es/0.9.0-1.1
found 503861apertium-oc-ca/1.0.5-1.1
found 503861apertium-oc-es/1.0.5-1.1
--
found apertium-en-ca/0.8.9-1
found apertium-en-es/0.6.0-1.1
found apertium-eo-ca/0.9.0-1.1
found apertium-eo-es/0.9.0-1.1
found apertium-eu-es/0.3.1-1
found apertium-fr-es/0.9.0-1.1
found apertium-oc-ca/1.0.5-1.1
found apertium-oc-es/1.0.5-1.1
thanks
Hi,
The above packages fail and should be fixe
At debian-java we're pretty happy with the exception and we didn't
feel the need to run it through -legal. I haven't had time to make an
upload with the exception documented in the debian/ folder so the bug
it is still open (but the packaged didn't get removed, which is the
important part :-)
P.
(my previous e-mail about Sleak.java missed the main issue that is GPL azureus
using EPL SWT.)
This bug has been forwarded to upstream's bug report forum:
http://forum.vuze.com/thread.jspa?threadID=90780
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Further looking into this matter, the file that Niels talks about is a
debugging aid, as described here:
http://www.eclipse.org/articles/swt-design-2/sleak.htm
it can be easily deleted during build (and the same goes with
org/gudy/azureus2/ui/swt/Sleak.java )
I can commit a patch for this next
Hi,
We seek some advice regarding #572982 [1] (azureus, a well-known torrent
client, combines source licensed under incompatible licenses).
From Niels quoted sources, there is no doubt about the incompatibility of GPL
and EPL. But LGPL and EPL might be a different matter and Google has proved
Actually, upstream has already modernized its autoconf scripts on their CVS as
part of their work on version 0.99.
Patching version 0.98 plus Winnie's fixes to the control file fixes this bug.
I'm part of the team that maintains the package, so I'll check the fixes into
our Alioth SVN, run a nu
More progress:
The libtool error is related to the --tags parameter. The generated libtool
script defines only the tag CXX and the generated Makefile.in use --tag=CC.
Changing the many Makfile.in that invoke libtool to use CXX instead of CC
builds the package to completion.
Now I'm trying to f
fixed 553644 6.1.22
thanks
(resending as I forgot to CC: the BTS)
We don't ship the test WebApps enabled by default (from what I can
gather, it seems we don't ship them at all) and
this new version fixes the remaining XSS vulnerabilities (I double
checked the fix is in).
This bug will be closed
fixed 6.1.22
thanks
We don't ship the test WebApps enabled by default (from what I can
gather, it seems we don't ship them at all) and
this new version fixes the remaining XSS vulnerabilities (I double
checked the fix is in).
This bug will be closed when the new version gets uploaded.
--
To U
12 matches
Mail list logo
