Bug#981484: webext-exteditor: not compatible with current thunderbird

On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 20:56:35 +0100 Ivo De Decker wrote: > package: webext-exteditor > version: 2.0.4-1 > severity: serious > > Hi, > > Thunderbird 1:78.7.0-1 has 'Breaks: webext-exteditor (<= 2.0.4-1)', which > means webext-exteditor doesn't work with it. Upstream isn't active anymore. I

Bug#999619: Confirmed to be caused by tcmalloc that is default in 10.0

On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Hi, I was able to confirm that rebuilding glusterfs without tcmalloc (now also on x86) fixes this issue. Debugging revealed that this is due to tgt late dlopening optional storage backends. So if you have some of them installed like packages tgt-rbd

Bug#909505: bidentd: calls update-inetd with wrong arguments

Control: tags -1 + patch On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As > per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for > a release, thus the severity. > > From the attached log (scroll to

Bug#915834: marked as pending in irqbalance

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #915834 in irqbalance reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#946155: marked as pending in fscrypt

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #946155 in fscrypt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#946155: libpam-fscrypt: PAM module config broken

Alex Hofbauer wrote on 04/12/2019: > Package: libpam-fscrypt > Version: 0.2.4-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi! > > Apparently in the latest version (0.2.5-1) the path substitution was broken, > resulting in "PAM_INSTALL_PATH" being used instead of the library

Bug#945796: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#945796: rust-url-serde: (build-)depends on obsolete virtual package.

control: block -1 Wolfgang Silbermayr wrote on 29/11/2019: > On 11/28/19 9:04 PM, peter green wrote: >> Package: rust-url-serde >> Version: 0.2.0-1 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: bullseye, sid >> >> librust-url-serde-dev depends on and rust-url-serde build-depends on >> librust-url-1+default-dev

Bug#945796: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#945796: rust-url-serde: (build-)depends on obsolete virtual package.

Wolfgang Silbermayr wrote on 29/11/2019: > On 11/28/19 9:04 PM, peter green wrote: >> Package: rust-url-serde >> Version: 0.2.0-1 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: bullseye, sid >> >> librust-url-serde-dev depends on and rust-url-serde build-depends on >> librust-url-1+default-dev which is no longer

Bug#935578: (no subject)

We settled with 'batcat', see https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/656 Ongoing discussion on the upstream tooling make the rename easier and keep the manpage consistent: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/659 Paride

Bug#934850: (no subject)

We settled with 'batcat', see https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/656 Ongoing discussion on the upstream tooling make the rename easier and keep the manpage consistent: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/659 Paride

Bug#935578: (no subject)

control: forcemerge 935578 934850 Merging the two bugs, as what we need is a full rename of the 'bat' binary file and of its manpage, as #935578 bug states. Paride

Bug#935578: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#935578: bat: bacula-console-qt already ships /usr/sbin/bat (and /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz)

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 Paride Legovini wrote:> I guess I'll have to rename some files here. This isn't obvious at the > moment as the build dependencies for rust-bat are not satisfied in unstable. I'm asking upstream if they have a preference for the alternative binary name, and if will co

Bug#935578: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#935578: bat: bacula-console-qt already ships /usr/sbin/bat (and /usr/share/man/man1/bat.1.gz)

Andreas Beckmann wrote on 24/08/2019: > Package: bat > Version: 0.11.0-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install > because it tries to overwrite other packages files. > > Since

Bug#911912: Bug #911912 in golang-github-gin-gonic-gin marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #911912 in golang-github-gin-gonic-gin reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#893542: ntpsec-ntpviz: shares /var/log/ntpstats with ntp, which gets zapped when ntp is purged

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 Richard Laager wrote: > If this coordination is acceptable, I believe it solves the various > interactions. I'm happy to test more scenarios if anyone thinks I missed > something. Hello Richard, Just a friendly ping on this, as I'd like to see ntpsec migrate to testing. What

Bug#896109: flif FTBFS: bouncing-ball-frame01.png is not the same image as decoded-test-frame-000.pam

The package also compiles fine in my local sbuild environment and on debomatic-amd64: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/flif/0.3-1/buildlog Paride

Bug#896109: flif FTBFS: bouncing-ball-frame01.png is not the same image as decoded-test-frame-000.pam

Control: forwarded 896109 https://github.com/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/498 On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:34:44 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > flif FTBFS (also reproduced on amd64): > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flif=sid Dear Adrian, Thanks for your report. I noticed