Bug#488901: lakai: should this package be removed?

2008-07-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: lakai Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * First and last maintainer upload was on 2004 * Popcon has never reached 25

Bug#449356: elfsh: requesting package's removal

2008-07-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
severity 449356 normal retitle 449356 RM: elfsh -- RoQA; multiple long standing RC bugs, unmaintained forcemerge 449356 470682 reassign 449356 ftp.debian.org thanks It's been a while a nothing, visible, has changed. So I'm finally requesting this package's removal. Regards, -- Atomo64 -

Bug#474066: dag2html: orphaning package before requesting its removal

2008-07-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 474066 wnpp,dag2html retitle 474066 O: dag2html -- Generates HTML code from genealogic DAGs thanks The current maintainer of dag2html, Cyril Bouthors [EMAIL PROTECTED], is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and

Bug#481737: [php-maint] Bug#481737: PHP 5.2.6 with suhosin 0.9.6.2 causes bus errors

2008-06-15 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello, On Sunday 15 June 2008, Stefan Esser wrote: Hello, if I see correctly you are using an old GCC on a sparc. And Suhosin crashs with a bus error. I probably was not very clear on my previous message, my bad. As you can see in [1] it crashes in arm, armel, ia64, and sparc, so it is not

Bug#482517: [php-maint] Bug#482517: Bug#482517: php-net-ipv4: FTBFS: /usr/bin/pear: line 28: exec: /usr/bin/php: cannot execute: No such file or directory

2008-06-14 Thread Raphael Geissert
[No need to send me a copy of the message, I read the ML :)] On Saturday 14 June 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi Raphael, On Sun, May 25, 2008 05:05, Raphael Geissert wrote: 2008/5/23 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do you want to revert that change and depend on php5-cli instead

Bug#481737: [php-maint] Bug#481737: Bug#481737: FTBFS on arm

2008-06-14 Thread Raphael Geissert
Sorry for the late response. On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: I did another test build, this time without the suhosin patch (and no other changes). This build succeeded. Thanks for all your efforts, I'm now forwarding the bug to upstream. BTW, for both builds I had gcc-4.3

Bug#481737: [php-maint] Bug#481737: FTBFS on arm

2008-05-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
2008/5/31 Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FYI, I tried to build php5 5.2.6-1 on arm without the mysql_r patch, and it did not make any difference. It still gives an error at the same location (but no core dump). Was tzdata installed when the package was built? use_embedded_timezonedb.patch

Bug#419018: Intending to orphan this package with an upload

2008-05-31 Thread Raphael Geissert
As this bug, and all the other ones, have had no reply from the maintainer ever, I plan to address this bug, together with some others in an upload. The upload would also change the maintainer to the QA group, thus orphaning the package. If you still intend to maintain the package please

Bug#482517: [php-maint] Bug#482517: php-net-ipv4: FTBFS: /usr/bin/pear: line 28: exec: /usr/bin/php: cannot execute: No such file or directory

2008-05-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 482517 pending thanks Hello Lucas, 2008/5/23 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: php-pear Version: 5.2.6-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080522 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, A recent change in php-pear causes many packages to

Bug#472279: elog: Requesting package removal

2008-05-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 464902 wnpp,elog severity 472279 normal reassign 472279 ftp.debian.org retitle 472279 RM: elog -- RoQA; RC buggy, security issues, few users, unmaintaied thanks It's been slightly more than a month since we said it should be removed, requesting package's removal now. Cheers, --

Bug#456648: array-util: requesting package removal

2008-05-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
severity array-util normal reassign array-util ftp.debian.org retitle array-util RM: array-util -- RoQA; unmaintained, few users, oldlibs-dependent thanks It's been more than a month since I orphaned the package before requesting the removal; And more than five months since the removal was

Bug#477930: reassign 477930 to scons

2008-04-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6 reassign 477930 scons 0.98.0-1 thanks kio-locate can be built on a cleanupdated sid chroot as long as scons 0.98.0-1 scons = 0.98.0-1 does not set: -I/usr/include/kde/ -I/usr/include/qt3 Which is: admin/kde.py:

Bug#476419: [php-maint] Bug#476419: When i use the intern php-function preg_replace with a regex on a special text, i get a segmentation fault

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 476419 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On 16/04/2008, Kai Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: php5-cli Version: 5.2.0-8+etch10 Severity: critical Hi! If write a simple script: ? $file = implode(,file($argv[1])); echo == Original: $file\n; echo == Replaced:

Bug#476419: [php-maint] Bug#476419: More informations about the problem

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 476419 libpcre3 found 476419 7.4-1 found 476419 6.7+7.4-3 tag 476419 - unreproducible moreinfo tag 476419 + security severity 476419 important thanks On 16/04/2008, Kai Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! When i use valgrind, i get == ==29062== Stack overflow in thread 1:

Bug#476631: kgb binaries in !32 bits archs do not work

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: kgb Version: 1.0b4-5 Severity: serious Several assertions fail on old versions of the package (like the one in testing). This report is just meant to track the functionality issues and get the bogus versions out of testing. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word,

Bug#472279: Bug#464902: Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Thursday 03 April 2008, HOLZER Martin wrote: In case this package gets removed, Where can i find the obsolete files to build the package using dpkg ? You can always get it from snapshots.d.n: http://snapshot.debian.net/package/elog/

Bug#418315: Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal

2008-04-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
clone 418315 -1 retitle -1 RM: php4-kadm5 -- RoQA; RC-buggy, unmaintained reassign -1 ftp.debian.org severity -1 normal thanks Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24/11/2007): I'd like to know what is the progress on fixing this report. It was filled more than seven months ago

Bug#453430: Orphaning package before requesting its removal

2008-04-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 453430 camelbones,wnpp retitle 453430 O: camelbones -- Objective C - Perl bridge for GNUstep thanks Hi, Since the status of this package has not evolved, I am now orphaning it. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could allow someone to adopt the

Bug#456648: Orphaning package before requesting its removal

2008-04-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 456648 array-util,wnpp retitle 456648 O: array-util -- configuration viewer for HP (Compaq) SmartArray controllers thanks Hi, Since the status of this package has not evolved, I am now orphaning it. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could allow

Bug#446664: inform: should this package be removed?

2008-04-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello Jan, What's the status of this ITA? Note that, just like Lucas, I'm not interested in inform myself, but just checking packages that should probably be removed. It would be nice if you could provide some status information or even closing this report by uploading a new package revision

Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-04-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello Recai, Nico, On Monday 31 March 2008, Recai Oktaş wrote: [Also CC'ing to Nico... I've just noticed the response at #464902.] Sorry for the late response! I had already filed a bug report to orphan elog: #464902. However removing this package from the archives is also fine with me,

Bug#472279: elog: should this package be removed?

2008-03-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: elog Version: 2.6.3+r1764-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It has a RC bug * It has a history of security issues * last maintainer

Bug#471418: capi4hylafax: bashism in /bin/sh script

2008-03-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 18/03/2008, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 471418 -goal-dash severity 471418 serious thanks On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:23:30PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts

Bug#469776: linux-patch-bootsplash: should this package be removed?

2008-03-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: linux-patch-bootsplash Version: 2.6.21-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It is unmaintained upstream * It is superseeded by splashy

Bug#469775: linux-patch-bootsplash: patch doesn't apply neither on linux 2.6.24 nor 2.6.22

2008-03-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: linux-patch-bootsplash Version: 2.6.21-2 Severity: grave Trying to compile the Linux kernel from the linux-source-2.6.24 package with the bootsplash patch fails with: patching file drivers/char/keyboard.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 1179 with fuzz 1 (offset 8 lines). patching file

Bug#469237: twig: should this package be removed?

2008-03-03 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: twig Version: 2.8.3-2.3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It has two RC bugs (one of them more than one year and a half old) and

Bug#464951: twoftpd-run can't be removed: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist

2008-02-16 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Monday 11 February 2008, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:01:48PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hello, Looking for a simple ftp server/daemon I installed twoftpd-run but after being disappointed by its configuration system I decided to remove it. At installation time

Bug#462178: please remove this package

2008-02-11 Thread Raphael Geissert
Dear Holger, On 11/02/2008, Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Raphael, This package is being tracked by me I saw your mail to this bug, but I consider QA work team work :-) Sure it is :) and its removal will be requested after giving a grace period of time (more than one

Bug#462178: please remove this package

2008-02-10 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 462178 wnpp retitle 462178 O: ipxripd -- IPX RIP/SAP daemon thanks Dear Holger, This package is being tracked by me and its removal will be requested after giving a grace period of time (more than one week) so there are more chances for people to adopt it. I orphaned the package just

Bug#462860: libapache-mod-layout: orphaning package

2008-02-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 462860 wnpp severity 462860 normal retitle 462860 O: libapache-mod-layout -- Apache web page content wrapper thanks The current maintainer of libapache-mod-layout, Preston Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a

Bug#462178: ipxripd: orphaning package

2008-02-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 462178 wnpp retitle 462178 O: ipxripd -- IPX RIP/SAP daemon thanks The current maintainer of ipxripd, Eloy A. Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED], is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package

Bug#462861: libapache-mod-random: orphaning package

2008-02-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 462861 wnpp severity 462861 normal retitle 462861 O: libapache-mod-random -- Create random ads, quotes and redirects thanks The current maintainer of libapache-mod-random, Paweł Więcek [EMAIL PROTECTED], is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.

Bug#462908: gtk-theme-switch: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-27 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: gtk-theme-switch Version: 2.0.4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * many bugs without comment from the maintainer * no

Bug#462280: RM: newbiedoc -- RoQA; orphaned, out of date, licensing situation iffy

2008-01-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
reassign 462280 newbiedoc retitle 462280 newbiedoc: should this package be removed? severity 462280 serious thanks Marc: Someone intends to adopt this package so IMHO the RM request should be delayed (but feel free to get it out of testing :). By the way, you should probably list this kind of

Bug#462169: python-kinterbasdb: should this package be orphaned?

2008-01-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: python-kinterbasdb Version: 3.1.2-0.4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * last maintainer upload was on 2005 * four NMU's

Bug#462177: sauce: should this package be removed?

2008-01-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: sauce Version: 0.8.1-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It has no users (3 votes out of 7 installations) * FTBFS with dash * Last

Bug#462178: ipxripd: should this package be removed?

2008-01-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: ipxripd Version: 0.7-13.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It has a RC bug (filled about four years ago, severity increased recently

Bug#462180: realtime-lsm: debian/copyright doesn't provide correct/full Copyright information

2008-01-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: realtime-lsm Severity: serious Version: 0.8.7-3 Usertags: bad-copyright The copyright file[1] of the package doesn't contain the necessary copyright information. This is usually in the form of Copyright by John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#459672: aime: requesting package removal now

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
severity 459672 normal reassign 459672 ftp.debian.org retitle 459672 RM: aime -- RoQA; few users, dead upstream, FTBFS under kfreebsd and gcc-4.3, last maintainer upload 2 yrs ago clone 459672 -1 retitle -1 RM: aime-doc -- RoQA; few users, dead upstream, useless without 'aime' thanks There has

Bug#459669: gtk-engines: requesting package removal now

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Geissert
severity 459669 normal reassign 459669 ftp.debian.org retitle 459669 RM: gtk-engines -- RoQA; FTBFS (normal, non-bash shell, k*bsd), not in testing for 747 days, last maintainer upload was ~6yrs ago, few users, stalls libgtk1.2's removal thanks I guess the title says it all. $ apt-cache

Bug#459669: gtk-engines: should this package be removed?

2008-01-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: gtk-engines Version: 0.12-8.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It has a RC bug (although it is still recent) * FTBFS under two

Bug#459672: aime: should this package be removed?

2008-01-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: aime Version: 0.60.3-7.3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * It FTBFS under two situations (kfreebsd and gcc-4.3) * It has a low popcon

Bug#455097: libglade: debian/copyright doesn't provide correct/full Copyright information

2007-12-08 Thread Raphael Geissert
Source: libglade Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Version: 0.17-9 The copyright file[1] of the package doesn't contain the necessary copyright information. This is usually in the form of Copyright by John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED], and also reproducing an excerpt of the source's

Bug#453365: icedove: Missing copyright file

2007-11-28 Thread Raphael Geissert
/icedove_2.0.0.6-1/ [2] http://packages.debian.org/sid/icedove/i386/filelist Sincerely, Raphael Geissert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHTiZ7Yy49rUbZzloRAqKzAJ0WM6IFFmkAshCmzYeCXlFm8YWZlgCffCiQ l15ChDK5jRGFbsE5+uwItxU= =wCIl -END PGP SIGNATURE

Bug#418318: php4: Should not be included in Lenny

2007-11-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
retitle 418318 Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal retitle 418319 Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal retitle 418315 Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal thanks Hello maintainer, I'd like to know what is the progress on

Bug#424776: [php-maint] Bug#424776: achims-guestbook: affected by php4-removal

2007-11-04 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 04/11/2007, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Please keep the bug and me Cced with your responses, thanks] I don't understand why http://wiki.debian.org/PHP4Removal says that a dependency on php4 should change to php5 | php4 when the latter is no longer in the archives? I followed

Bug#446546: geoip: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: geoip Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While attempting to package a program I've noticed this package's version is old and more and more programs require the 1.4.x version of the library. There's also a security-related bug report which is almost

Bug#438162: Reopening: package in etch is still vulnerable

2007-10-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
reopen 438162 = tags 438162 etch thanks Package version in etch is 2.6-1 which is affected. -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Bug#435663: debmirror: Fix and an enhacement

2007-08-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: debmirror Version: 20070123 Followup-For: Bug #435663 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I installed latest debmirror on a sarge server (trying to fix what I reported on my other bug report). After fixing the other error I found debmirror not downloading any .deb/src/etc

Bug#428701: oooqs-kde: It's openoffice.org-core

2007-06-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: oooqs-kde Version: 2.0.3-8 Followup-For: Bug #428701 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Actually, the conflicting packages are openoffice.org-core and oooqs-kde. Shouldn't this package be tagged as proposed-removal? - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT

<    1   2   3   4   5