Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:43:31 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: go: could not create module cache: mkdir /sbuild-nonexistent: permission denied To make this go away, the package must Build-Depend on dh-golang. However, that does not seem to be enough. The way subpackages are fetched or not during

Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

On 1/9/23 23:26, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le 08/01/2023 à 00:46, Richard B. Kreckel a écrit : 2) Based on mozillavpn_2.9.0-1.debian.tar.xz, apply some changes to debian/ directory:    a) -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF to dh_auto_configure argument in debian/rules (without it it FTBFS trying to run some

Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

On 1/9/23 10:38, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Or just push a fork on github. I can take it for there :) For work-related reasons this isn't going to happen the next few weeks. Can you, please, update to 1.12.0 and include the minor described fixes to debian/*? It should work, afaict. -richard.

Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

On 1/8/23 12:36, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: I am unfamiliar with GitLab. Sorry. Well, then I thought that could give it a try... Is there a simple walk-through what to do to create salsa MRs in a case like this package? (I've spent the whole Sunday now and I'm giving up frustrated

Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

Szlvestre, On 1/8/23 00:54, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Could you please submit a MR here ? https://salsa.debian.org/sylvestre/mozillavpn I will be happy to upload it then Is that really necessary? I am unfamiliar with GitLab. Sorry. -richard.

Bug#1027506: Status of mozillavpn in Debian

of the build failure on mipsel and mpis64el. It makes little sense to insist on these architectures if upstream doesn't care. Please decide how to proceed and let me know if I can help in any way. -richard. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : `. `' `-<http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Bug#1026072: Fix for the bug

I am having it too and downgrading to 107.0.1-1 fixes the problem. It seems like someone was seeing something similar before and reported it here <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024351> but the bug got closed? -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <https://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Bug#1016283: onetbb: FTBFS: _segment_table.h:63:63: error: member ‘tbb::detail::d1::segment_table, 128>, tbb::detail::d1::cache_aligned_alloc

I am unable to reproduce the above compile-time error.

Bug#1016363: libx11-6 1.8.1 also breaks glxinfo

xed anytime soon, it's best to work around in Debian. -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <https://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Bug#1016363: libx11-6 1.8.1 also breaks glxinfo

. thunderbird 102.) -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <https://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Bug#906777: ginac: FTBFS in buster/sid (-I: command not found)

This is because makeinfo is missing in your build environment. Will add a build-depend on texinfo to fix this. -richy.

Bug#900511: libcurl4 Conflicts: libcurl3

On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 23:14:40 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > libcurl3 is not part of buster, and using libraries from previous > releases that are no longer present in a new stable Debian release is > not strictly supported - it works most of the time, but when problems > are reported a

Bug#850149: shotwell: Freezes when trying to open an image in fullscreen mode

Looking back at the original description, it might be this upstream bug: .

Bug#850149: shotwell: Freezes when trying to open an image in fullscreen mode

ase 0.24.5 (Closes: #850149). > > Thanks for this! Shotwell is finally usable again. > > However the original problem (as described in the first comment) is > still present, do you want me to file a separate bug for that, or what > do you prefer? Is there a reference to an upstream

Bug#849688: Acknowledgement (package in debian/testing is development version, severely broken)

On 12/29/2016 08:59 PM, Richard B. Kreckel asked: > Can a user downgrade to 0.24 once he has started using 0.25.1? On 12/29/2016 09:22 PM, Jens Georg replied: > Yes, that's perfectly fine as long as you go for shotwell-0.24.3, > otherwise you re-introduce an db index issue.

Bug#849688: package in debian/testing is development version, severely broken

) or 2) move along with the version from git and hope for the best. I don't know which option is more feasible. This is a question for Jens Georg: Can a user downgrade to 0.24 once he has started using 0.25.1? -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>

Bug#830532: package should be re-built with gcc-6

Package: ginac Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious The uploaded amd64 package was built with gcc-6. But on other architectures, it was built with gcc-5 -std=c++11. To avoid any ABI breakage or yet anther soname bump, this package should not migrate to testing. A new package should be uploaded as

Bug#781222: mpmath.polyroots fails with NameError: global name 'orig' is not defined

= ctx.prec tol = +ctx.eps with ctx.extraprec(extraprec): deg = len(coeffs) - 1 -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#535323: libcln-dev: inappropriately ships /usr/share/info/dir.gz

is the culprit, though. -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : krec...@debian.org `. `' krec...@ginac.de `-http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#535323: libcln-dev: inappropriately ships /usr/share/info/dir.gz

Richard B. Kreckel wrote: I can and will work around the problem, but this does not look like the right place to fix it. I don't know which build system component is the culprit, though. I removed usr/share/info from libcln-dev.dirs and provided a libcln-dev.info containing usr/share/info

Bug#455681: Attaching a patch to fix this bug

Maximiliano Curia wrote: Please notice that there is a new upstream release available (1.4.2) [1], it might be worth the extra effort and upload that one. I will upload 1.4.3 from upstream soon. It does contain a fix for that problem. -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : [EMAIL

Bug#392578: ginac: FTBFS on arm

Thomas Weber wrote: please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=ginacver=1.3.5-2arch=armstamp=1160247427file=logas=raw Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392054 -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-http

Bug#357231: Dupe of #340590 ?

of libs from GCC and was fixed Thu, 16 Mar 2006. Anyway, both bugs are archived. Why should anyone care? -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#325841: ginac_1.3.2-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: no matching function for call to 'GiNaC::registered_class_options::print_func(void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::print_context, unsigned int)const)'

on every compiler version I've tried on any platform, it's just ia64 that doesn't seem to like it. Strange. Regards -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]