clone 630107 -1
reassign -1 grub-common 1.99-6
retitle -1 grub-probe segfaults on GNU/kFreeBSD after commit r3118
thanks
Since we're talking about GRUB now, I'm cloning this bug. Please
followup to the new one.
2011/6/12 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
Robert Millan wrote:
I'd check
2011/6/12 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com:
A better fix is to wait for Guillem's upload and then schedule a
binnmu. Sorry for the noise.
OK
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Sorry for the noise, this message was sent to wrong bug #.
Btw, as for #616323, could you consider uploading the same fix to
squeeze-proposed-updates?
2011/6/7 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2011/6/6 Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz:
Switching to gcc-4.6 and no changes to CFLAGS
access /lib/modules/8.2-1-amd64/unknown.ko: No such file or
directory
What filesystem(s) are you using?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
check your device.map? Try regenerating it (grub-mkdevicemap).
Also please check wether grub 1.98+20100804-14 (from squeeze) also suffers
from this problem.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
/trunk/grub/
If it's a regression, it could be a bug in GRUB or maybe it's a
silent ABI bump (I'd check if a GRUB rebuild helps).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
when building GRUB with libgeom
8.1 and running it with libgeom 8.2). But that's just one
possible cause.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2011/6/6 Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz:
Switching to gcc-4.6 and no changes to CFLAGS.
But have to be tested widely.
How about uploading that to experimental?
Good idea. Only DD can.
Would you mind to do it ?
Uploaded.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Package: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.2-1.1
Severity: serious
=== 3dfx (all)
gcc-4.6 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
Hi,
Do I understand correctly that switching to gcc-4.4 and adding -fno-gcse to
CFLAGS is the proper solution?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
not k-k-h).
_BSD_SOURCE would enable the no-underscore types, but it can't
be assumed that every application will define this macro.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
buggyness. It assumes:
- That sys/types.h is included.
- That _BSD_SOURCE is defined.
I propose this patch.
--
Robert Millan
--- /usr/include/sys/mount.h2011-01-30 16:26:51.0 +0100
+++ mount.h 2011-06-04 22:37:11.0 +0200
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include sys/stat.h
Package: kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-amd64
Version: 8.1+dfsg-8
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Details at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154591
Upstream developer (yong...@freebsd.org) provided a fix by backporting
the if_msk driver from HEAD. I've verified that this resolves the
problem when
Package: qemu-user-static
Version: 0.12.5+dfsg-3
Severity: critical
(I know this might be a bug in binfmt-support or in linux, please
reassign if appropiate)
When qemu-user-static is installed in combination with binfmt-support:
[...]
S'estan processant els activadors per a man-db
S'est
2011/3/4 Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz:
After rebuild of php5 against such header, apache responds.
build-rdeps libapr1-dev lists 25 more packages, how would we go
about having all them binNMUed, contact buildd admins?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
Package: libapache2-mod-php5
Version: 5.3.3-7
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
When libapache2-mod-php5 is loaded, with every trivial HTTP request
(fetch of http://localhost/ in default apache2 install), one of the
apache2 children segfaults, as registered in
Package: partman-zfs
Version: 5
Severity: grave
Tags: help
When partitioning is not done from scratch (i.e. when used partitions
already existed), the pre-existing embed area is used instead of a
new one with the usual size (1 MiB). Usually it's 31 kiB instead.
If ZFS is used for the root
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610885
A workaround is to disable use of any partition other than the
first one (primary), or switch to GPT.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to stop
doing so on kFreeBSD. Probably not that much work, but I'm too busy with
other stuff right now.
Proposed patch is in #612480.
kFreeBSD 8.2 has v4l already, its header is in
sys/compat/linux/linux_videodev.h
Shouldn't we provide this header instead of disabling v4l?
--
Robert Millan
Package: usbutils
Version: 0.87-5
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
lsusb doesn't print any output on GNU/kFreeBSD. If the package is
rebuild with libusb2-dev instead of libusb-dev, then lsusb works
as expected.
I'm unsure if this should be
Package: partman-base
Version: 147
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Default install fails on kfreebsd-amd64 with the following error:
The attempt to mount a file system with type swap in SCSI1, partition #5
(da0s5) at none failed.
You may resume
.
(freebsd-utils_8.1-3.1 is being uploaded ATTOW)
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
or not)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
these changes upstream
(FreeBSD) someday, I suggest that we consensuate a name with
them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
wouldn't play well with that.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
were installed in the buildd, causing build
failure.
A quick glance at the source suggests that ALSA is
only used for midi sound playback, and that
timidity/oss is a viable alternative. If that's the case
would you please add:
Build-Conflicts: liboss-salsa-dev
to debian/control?
--
Robert Millan
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98+20100804-4
Severity: serious
Tags: fixed-upstream
Justification: unsuitable for release under package maintainer's opinion
If an error happens during load of a boot entry, and gfxterm (the default
mode) is in use, error messages are not displayed.
To make things
experimental, I get the error
you describe.
It seems that there's a bug in Linux, but I don't think it's the cause
of #598234
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Btw I did the same test again. Compiled emacs23
23.2+1-5.1 with binutils 2.20.1-15 and gcc 4.4.5-6
and the resulting binary doesn't exhibit this bug.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
2010/11/20 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org:
I'm not sure I understand where we stand with respect to this bug. Do
we think the newer binutils fixes the problem or not?
TBH, I'm not sure anymore. I just know rebuilding it on my (clean)
squeeze system produced a working binary.
--
Robert
2010/11/6 Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de:
Could you please test emacs23 23.2+1-5.1 and report whether the problem
is fixed in that version?
It isn't.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: dvi2ps
Version: 4.1j-3
Severity: grave
Segfaults on mipsel when processing a trivial (attached) test.dvi.
$ dvi2ps test.dvi
@(#)dvi2ps (j-version) 4.1j
Prescanning Segmentation fault
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500,
);
the resulting binaries seem to work fine:
Thank you, it will be included with next upload.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2010/10/31 Martin Schitter m...@mur.at:
just for testing purposes i set up a 0.9 array on my machine:
Thank you.
btw. -- i did all this tests using patched versions from upstream. it's
perhaps not so trival to backport everything to 1.98+20100804 faultlessly.
I backported the patch, please
2010/10/30 Vincent Danjean vdanj...@debian.org:
You should apply it to the grub2 package and upload it to unstable.
It is sure that some regression will be fixed. And, perhaps, other
regressions will occur. But there is currently no current indication of
that and, as with this regression,
)
Have you tested this with the version in Debian? Is it known to
work with 1.x and not cause regression with 0.9?
Please let me know, I'll try to get it in squeeze when this is
confirmed.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
of the code to ACK
this kind of patch during freeze.
Has this patch been sent upstream? Was it reviewed there?
If it hasn't, please do. If it's committed or at least ACKed in upstream,
I see no problem with adding it.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
tags 601087 pending
thanks
Hi,
I will upload a fix this afternoon.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
DEBUG_CONFIG 0x02
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forcemerge 566947 598234
found 598234 23.2+1-4
tags 598234 patch
thanks
Hi,
I can confirm that rebuilding with current toolchain solves the problem.
Rather than just a binNMU, I'd recommend this patch to ensure this
doesn't happen again.
--
Robert Millan
--- debian/control.in~ 2010-08-14 18
an md5sum check would help,
if it's available.
In any case, I can confirm a rebuild helps.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98+20100804-4
Severity: grave
Tags: fixed-upstream
When the boot drive contains partitions (as usual), but is identified
as a floppy by the BIOS, GRUB skips the partitions.
As a result, with certain BIOSes it becomes impossible to install Debian
on an USB drive.
--
Package: unfs3
Version: 0.9.22+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Running unfs3 on GNU/kFreeBSD resulted in multiple I/O errors in client
side (client boots via nfsroot and was initially able to startup, but
soon became unusable due to read errors).
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.7.dfsg-9
Severity: grave
Switched server from Debian GNU/Linux to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (both squeeze,
running
atftpd 0.7.dfsg-9, using same configuration), then atftpd stops working. Client
is stuck on TFTP, server lists the following in daemon.log:
Sep 29
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.9.1-4
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
This driver behaves unreliably on GNU/kFreeBSD. After a while of running it
(usually 1 or 2 h) screen stops updating (I didn't determine whether X
crashed, but disk and
.
That seems entirely unnecessary. ORed Depends would be an option though.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: tinyproxy
Version: 1.6.3-3.2
Severity: grave
debian/copyright reads either version 2 of the License. which is
nonsensical/ambigous as part of the phrase is missing.
Inspect of upstream source reveals it's licensed under GPL, either
version 2 or (at your option) any later version.
--
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20100115-1
Severity: grave
Tags: fixed-upstream
A bug causing read of kfreebsd.gz from Debian GNU/kFreeBSD CDROM to be
corrupted has just been fixed in GRUB Bazaar (rev 2143).
Vladimir Serbinenko explains:
01:15 nyu phcoder: you fixed the bug in debian
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:45:22AM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2010, 03:11 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:12:32AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
set root=(hd0,3)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set
35c8f65e-c312-484e-ace6-a04bb56c5270
was built with
the necessary options, otherwise it can get confused.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:00:44PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
But it seems we need to do a better job at ensuring Linux was built with
the necessary options, otherwise it can get confused.
Would you please try attached patch and regenerate grub.cfg ?
It can be applied directly to /etc/grub.d
mail.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
problem is your setup is using blocklists, but your
initial report didn't include the information to determine that.
Please could you attach the output of:
sudo bash -c /usr/share/bug/grub-pc/script 31
?
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
. For starters, it doesn't even
know which device it's supposed to install to, unless the user
tells.
We have a debconf template for that, but it has some reliability problems,
see #554790 for details.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to detect what version of the bootloader is already installed
and give appropriate advice,
Sorry, that's not possible. Most of the time they're not even versions
but Bazaar snapshots. And we don't track internal ABI in upstream because
it'd be unsustainable.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change
postinst didn't copy it already.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:11:01AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:12:32AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
set root=(hd0,3)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 35c8f65e-c312-484e-ace6-a04bb56c5270
if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then
Does it help if you
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:40:13AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:36:18PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Sorry, my bug description was not correct: By accident notail was
_not_ set. The workaround mentioned on the Ubuntu bug tracker worked:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see in the world -- Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
address.'
Ok.
General opinion on debian-project is that a closed list
address is not suitable.
In that case, I think you'll have no trouble getting Policy ammended so that
§3.3 says explicitly that a subscriber-only list is not suitable.
--
Robert Millan
Be the change you want to see
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20091210-1
Severity: grave
if test x$TARGET_CFLAGS = x; then upstream check in configure.ac caused
GRUB build to miss -Os optimization, loop/function alignment hack and GCC 4.4
-fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm flag.
This increases core.img size considerably and will break some
Package: iceowl
Version: 0.8-6
Severity: grave
Justification: completely useless on mipsel
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
r...@yeeloong:~$ LANG=C iceowl
/usr/lib/iceowl/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 3223 Segmentation fault $prog
${1+$@}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
APT
2.37-3 (lenny).
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
found 538762 2.45-1
thanks
Hi,
I run the testcase again, this time with nsis 2.45-1. It still
fails, but only with Windows 98. The other versions of Windows
(including Wine) don't seem to be affected.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when
+20091125 grub fails at startup with:
error: grub_gettext not found
Hi,
I don't think we have any routine in our code that could possibly construct
that error string. Could you re-check that this is *exactly* what it is
printing?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs
/bzr-backup2/
Should I file a new bug in upstream?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all
use of bzr+ssh (see https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?107077)
with an old (1.6) bzr daemon.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove
Package: bzr-svn
Version: 0.4.10-2
Severity: critical
Justification: data loss
Using version 0.4.10-2 of this plugin to push commits from Bazaar to SVN
resulted in severe data loss. Corrupted data spread to a number of branches
in our repository, as well as ~/.bazaar/svn-cache, forcing us to
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.97-1
Severity: serious
Some setups used by D-I now require --force, and grub-installer only
passes this flag starting with 1.47.
D-I team: please close this bug when we don't need to support
grub-installer 1.47 anymore.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
.
And Testing could help on this. Even if you decide to RCbug it after.
Hi Pierre,
Testing *is* the upcoming release. Being in testing implies being in Squeeze.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data
Package: gnote
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
This package is not actively maintained. It's had no release or development
activity since last August. I'm not confident with it being part of an
official release untill this situation is resolved.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
Package: nagios-plugins
Severity: serious
debian/copyright claims there's FSF-copyrighted code in this package
whose license is:
[...] GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991.
but there's no file in the source tree under these
grub2, grub-pc
and grub-common from Debian Stable repository 1.96+20080724...
Is this still an issue with 1.97~beta3 ?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still
.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
getcontext, since that would fix similar problems in other packages.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all
Thanks everyone for your assistance.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:40:55AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:22:32AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this fix
merged ASAP.
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
Second attempt:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix2/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:13:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this fix
merged ASAP.
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
Second attempt:
http
longer. Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Still broken, not noticably different.
There we go again:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix4/
Improvement
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
Please test:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2464/
It works correctly here.
Thanks. Then please test:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2476
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
Please test:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2464
Btw, make sure you're not passing vga= parameter to Linux, it would
disrupt the test.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
2476 is badly broken. The package has trouble even installing, and
after manually interfering, the actual grub fails, too. Can't go
into graphical mode, can't boot, unaligned pointer.
Great, just
to #250864 and #241239.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
believe these are
the cause of your bug.
Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this fix
merged ASAP.
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:43:55AM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:18:19PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Here's the first one:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
Still works.
Second one
/2440/
Remember that one should be very careful when doing these tests. A single
mistake can compromise the whole series and make us start over!
So don't worry that others are testing the same thing. Duplicate checks
*are* helpful.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data
needed for you.
Because graphical mode works after manual switch, I would go to the next
snapshot.
Yes. And others have confirmed it's working too. I'll prepare a new
snapshot.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access
). The version numbers from the package are
not really meaningful, they're just from the debian/ directory I
used to build them.
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Would you please test the version in squeeze (1.96+20090808-1)?
Fails.
And the one in lenny (1.96+20080724-16)?
Works. I purged before installing this one, because I wouldn't want to
bet
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:34:25PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Still down. I guess I'll be your snapshots.debian.net today.
:-)
Here's the first one:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
I'm sorry, my T43p is fairly old (2005 model). Its Pentium M
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:18:19PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Here's the first one:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
Still works.
Second one:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2297/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs
it's
the same bug.
Would you please test the version in squeeze (1.96+20090808-1)?
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/grub-pc
Also, please don't drop the BTS from CC. It's hard enough to keep track of
all this information already.
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data
[ Please don't drop the BTS from CC. ]
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:59:42AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:21:01AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Do you know how to run a regression test? You can do that e.g. with
svn-bisect, but it's a bit tricky since you'll need
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:20:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
Again, it doesn't go into graphical mode by itself, and boots okay
in console mode. Here are the results for different commands on the
console:
terminal_output.gfxterm:
Clears the screen
(for all tests):
- Install the packages.
- Run grub-install
- Run update-grub
- Reboot into new GRUB. Make sure graphical mode is enabled.
If it wasn't, it means the test has failed (proceed as in with
the out of range pointer error).
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 10:27:09PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:51:17PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 06:51:00PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:36:23PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:36:38PM +0100
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-58
Severity: grave
Dummy bug to prevent migration of `grub' package to testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-libre2-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU
301 - 400 of 810 matches
Mail list logo
