Bug#303324: file conflicts in freebsd-sendpr arla

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:15:16AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Package: freebsd-sendpr,arla Subject: freebsd-sendpr,arla: conflicting files Severity: serious At least the following files are included in at least two packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):

Bug#301841: Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: freebsd5-buildutils Version: 5.3+2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency

Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: freebsd5-buildutils Version: 5.3+2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on type-handling (= 0.2.5) can't be fulfilled in sarge. So why did it migrate to sarge in first place? CCing debian-release. --

Bug#265045: unrar for sarge?

Hi! As the sponsor of this package, I might have something to say :). Niklas, could you reconsider this? Currently sarge has _no unrar_ implementation at all. Sarge users won't be able to extract 1.x rar files unless they install: - unrar from sid - unrar-nonfree from non-free - an

Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Package: libsem-dev Version: error processing libsem-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got the following error: (Reading database ... 18003 files and directories

Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:08:22PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: On Thursday, 10. March 2005 12:25, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Package: libsem-dev Version: error processing libsem-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders

Bug#295884: cdbs: Changes control file to add new build dependency.

severity 295884 normal thanks The new version seems to change the control to add patchutils to the dependency list (when there is a control.in file). This is an optional feature. Your package requested it by setting the DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL variable. If you don't want that feature,

Bug#295554: can't remove the package

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:29:46PM +0100, Thomas Seyrat wrote: On February 16, 18:22 (+0100), Robert Millan wrote: Removing xinetd ... Note: all inetd services have been terminated. WARNING: you don't have an init script for the original inetd anymore! You may need to reinstall

Bug#295554: can't remove the package

Package: xinetd Version: 1:2.3.13-2+cfg Severity: serious When purging xinetd: Removing xinetd ... Note: all inetd services have been terminated. WARNING: you don't have an init script for the original inetd anymore! You may need to reinstall the netkit-inetd package to get

Bug#292904: missing upstream URL in debian/copyright

Package: openssl Version: 0.9.7e-2+kbsd Severity: serious Justification: policy 12.5 See subject. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i386) Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

<    4   5   6   7   8   9