Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk writes:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 03:07 +, Wookey wrote:
End of the build log at:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linuxarch=armelver=3.13.4-1stamp=1393291598
some modules are in more than one package
debian/jffs2-modules-3.13-1-orion5x-di
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Hi all,
Hi,
I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
the MIPS PLT support [1]
Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On 2 August 2010 at 10:20, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org writes:
|
| Hi,
|
|
| | (the failing program is attached). It seems that r-base hit bug
| | #519006 (see [1]). It's a bug in gcc-4.4, and it's
Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
| (the failing program is attached). It seems that r-base hit bug
| #519006 (see [1]). It's a bug in gcc-4.4, and it's unlikely that
| Tcl/Tk itself can do something to it.
|
| yeah, r-base is hitting this bug. As a _workaround_, you can
Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru writes:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Shane McDonald
mcdonald.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
Mips and mipsel definitely have Tcl/Tk.
Investigating a little further, I tried building rcmdr on a mipsel
system with tcl8.5 and tk8.5 present, but it still gave the
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
Matthias Klosed...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
of dump in testing is now months out of date.
Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
this is up to the debian-mips
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Hi,
Could the Debian ARM list/porters possibly comment upon this
bug? Please could you keep buildd-tools-devel and the bug
in the CC on any reply. Thanks.
It's not clear to me why this bug has suddenly appeared, and
only on armel. There seem to
Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de writes:
Hi,
Package: ams
Severity: serious
relevant log:
g++ -D_REENTRANT -DLADSPA_PATH=\/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib/ladspa\
-DTRANSLATIONSDIR=\/usr/share/ams/translations\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/qt4
Hi,
I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini
[ iirc, this line comes from the parsing of the
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf. ]
This line is interpreted by the shell as the following two lines :
$ etex
10 matches
Mail list logo
