Bug#953852: ardentryst: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: ardentryst Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * dead upstream: * last new upstream release in debian in 2011 * https://sourceforge.net/projects/ardentryst/ reports "Status: Abandoned" * http://www.jordantrudgett.com/ardentryst/ is

Bug#953851: pymissile: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: pymissile Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * dead upstream, no new releases since 2007 (!) * no debian uploads since 2016 * last reverse dependency of python-usb (py2removal effort) if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to

Bug#953850: tinywm: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: tinywm Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * no upstream release since 2005 (!!!) * no upload since 2012 * last reverse dependency of python-xlib (py2removal effort) if i dont hear back within a week a good reason to keep this package, i'll file for its

Bug#937897: python-lockfile: diff for NMU version 1:0.12.2-2.1

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
/changelog 2016-08-21 01:59:20.0 -0400 +++ python-lockfile-0.12.2/debian/changelog 2020-03-13 19:12:13.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +python-lockfile (1:0.12.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #937897, #939930 + + -- Sandro Tosi Fri

Bug#938027: [Python-modules-team] Bug#938027: Bug#938027: python-pip: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:51 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I don't know of a reason not to go ahead, but if you do, please be careful of > what's already in git. Update to the new version is staged there. It is > blocked on updates for some of the packages it builds wheels from. oooh i see

Bug#953828: nevow: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: nevow Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * upstream still hasnt finish porting it to python3, https://github.com/twisted/nevow/issues/101 * no rdeps * relatively low popcon and dropping rapidly if i dont hear back within a week with a

Bug#953820: foolscap: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: foolscap Severity: serious Hello, i belive this package should be removed: * python2-only * upstream hasnt finish porting it to python3 https://github.com/warner/foolscap/issues/48 * no rdeps in testing if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep it, i'm gonna file

Bug#953818: python-paver: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: python-paver Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * while upstream has released a py3k compatible version (and several others in between the one in the archive), the debian maintainer didnt upload this package since late 2013 * no rdeps *

Bug#938027: python-pip: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:44:13 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:python-pip > Version: 18.1-5 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal the only rdeps of `bin:python-pip` have been removed from testing, so it's probably time we

Bug#953807: tftpy: should this package be removed?

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: tftpy Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed: * python2-only * upstream released 0.8.0, py3k-compatible, but it's now non-free, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784028#10 * still in

Bug#937942: marked as pending in python-netaddr

2020-03-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937942 in python-netaddr reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#953610: spambayes: should this package be removed?

2020-03-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: spambayes Severity: serious Hello, i believe spambayes should be removed from debian: * python2-only and upstream shows no progress in porting to python3 * low popcon * no reverse dependencies * blocks python2 removal effort in Debian. if i dont hear back within a week with a good

Bug#953609: bley: should this package be removed?

2020-03-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: bley Severity: serious Hello, i believe bley should be removed from Debian: * python2-only * no reverse dependencies * extremely low popcon * 3 RC bugs already pending * last upstream release in 2014 (ok, upstream and DD coincide) if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to

Bug#938086: marked as pending in python-pypump

2020-03-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938086 in python-pypump reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#935927: debian-science: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 935927

2020-03-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:science-numericalcomputation)Recommends->ipython Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#936869: libgnatcoll-bindings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936869

2020-03-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:libgnatcoll-bindings)Build-Depends->python2-dev (source:libgnatcoll-bindings)Build-Depends->libpython2-dev (binary:libgnatcoll-python18-dev)Depends->libpython2-dev

Bug#951982: marked as pending in tqdm

2020-03-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #951982 in tqdm reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938310: marked as pending in pyzmq

2020-03-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938310 in pyzmq reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:25 AM Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:39:41PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Package: sslstrip > > Severity: serious > > > > Hello, > > i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian: > > > > * py

Bug#936740: ipe-tools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936740

2020-02-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:svgtoipe)Recommends->python-pil Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#937166: nuitka: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 937166

2020-02-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:nuitka)Build-Depends->python (source:nuitka)Build-Depends->python-all-dbg (source:nuitka)Build-Depends->python-all-dev (source:nuitka)Build-Depends->python-setuptools

Bug#951818: sslstrip: should this package be removed?

2020-02-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: sslstrip Severity: serious Hello, i think sslstrip should be removed from Debian: * python2 only app * low popcon * only r-dep is websploit, recently removed from testing, and which doesnt use sslstrip anymore in the latest upstream release * last upstream release and debian upload in

Bug#942945: marked as pending in defusedxml

2020-02-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #942945 in defusedxml reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938840: xcffib: diff for NMU version 0.8.1-0.8

2020-02-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
+++ xcffib-0.8.1/debian/changelog 2020-02-17 01:30:44.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xcffib (0.8.1-0.8) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #938840 + + -- Sandro Tosi Mon, 17 Feb 2020 01:30:44 -0500 + xcffib (0.8.1-0.7) unstable; urgency

Bug#950145: marked as pending in python-cycler

2020-02-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #950145 in python-cycler reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937681: marked as pending in python-cycler

2020-02-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937681 in python-cycler reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936262: marked as pending in cairocffi

2020-02-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936262 in cairocffi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938848: marked as pending in xlwt

2020-02-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938848 in xlwt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936772: jupyter-client: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:21:43 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:jupyter-client > Version: 5.2.4-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal Hey Gordon, jupyter-client (and python-jupyter-client) is the last reverse depends on

Bug#937910: marked as pending in python-mccabe

2020-02-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937910 in python-mccabe reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937757: marked as pending in python-flake8

2020-02-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937757 in python-flake8 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#948428: marked as pending in html5lib

2020-02-14 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948428 in html5lib reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:51 PM Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > > koji is keeping createrepo in the archive, which keeps python-lzma in > > > > the archive. > > > > > > there's also

Bug#950799: marked as pending in matplotlib

2020-02-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #950799 in matplotlib reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937791: Blocked on reverse dependencies

2020-02-08 Thread Sandro Tosi
> Is it possible to remove the AUTORM tag until this is done, or should we > let it get deleted and upload a new python3-gmpy package after that? it will just be removed from testing, which is fine: it will go back in when the python3 package hits unstable and no more RC bugs pop up -- Sandro

Bug#937533: pyserial: diff for NMU version 3.4-5.1

2020-02-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
+++ pyserial-3.4/debian/changelog 2020-02-03 11:29:07.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pyserial (3.4-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #937533 + + -- Sandro Tosi Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:29:07 -0500 + pyserial (3.4-5) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#937445: marked as pending in pyglet

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937445 in pyglet reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937089: marked as pending in mpmath

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937089 in mpmath reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937791: Blocked on reverse dependencies

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
> > $ apt-cache rdepends python-gmpy > > python-gmpy > > Reverse Depends: > >obfsproxy > >python-tlslite-ng > >python-sympy > >python-gmpy-doc > > > > > > Dependencies on obfsproxy and python-sympy documented with affects and > blocks. python-tlslite-ng has been removed already,

Bug#937738: python-et-xmlfile: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-2.1

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I'd have been happy to, but at the time, DPMT was using git-dpm and it > didn't seem worth learning to use an unmaintained tool just to package a > couple of python modules. yeah, i feel you, and since then we migrated to salsa and a plain gbp + pristine-tar workflow -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My

Bug#937738: python-et-xmlfile: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-2.1

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
; Closes: #937738 + + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:13:55 -0500 + python-et-xmlfile (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Use compliant binary package names (Closes: #822742) diff -Nru python-et-xmlfile-1.0.1/debian/control python-et-xmlfile-1.0.1/debian/control --- python-et-xmlfile

Bug#936762: jdcal: diff for NMU version 1.0-1.3

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
2017-09-24 21:15:10.0 -0400 +++ jdcal-1.0/debian/changelog 2020-02-02 15:10:30.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +jdcal (1.0-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #936762 + + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 02 Feb 2020 15:10:30 -0500 + jdcal (1.0

Bug#948420: marked as pending in python-future

2020-02-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948420 in python-future reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#950445: python-couchdb: should this package be removed?

2020-02-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: python-couchdb Severity: serious Hello, i believe this package should be removed from debian: * currently py2 only in Debian, with py3 support upstream * no reverse dependencies * low popcon * deprecated upstram, python-cloudant suggested as a better replacement

Bug#937435: pyexiv2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-02-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I'd preffer to drop pyexiv2 completely. The recommended upstream > approach was to use GI (and gir1.2-gexiv2-0.10) and that's where most > of the reverese dependencies have migrated. Sure, that sounds like a good plan: do you want me to file the RM bug? -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website:

Bug#937435: pyexiv2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-31 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:33:40 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:pyexiv2 > Version: 0.3.2-9 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal Python3 support has been developed in a separate project

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-31 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:06 PM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 05:40:55PM -0800, Mike Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know &g

Bug#950340: volatility: keep out of testing (for now)

2020-01-31 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: volatility Severity: serious Hello, this is a temporary RC bug to prevent volatility to get into testing, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938797#46 for maintainer's ack. this can be closed when volatility3 (python3 port of volatility) has been packaged and

Bug#937129: netifaces: diff for NMU version 0.10.9-0.2

2020-01-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
:02.0 -0500 +++ netifaces-0.10.9/debian/changelog 2020-01-31 00:43:09.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +netifaces (0.10.9-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #937129 + + -- Sandro Tosi Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:43:09 -0500 + netifaces (0.10.9

Bug#936975: marked as pending in m2crypto

2020-01-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936975 in m2crypto reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:12 AM Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know > > what's the status of the "RedHat infrastructure" in debian? many (if

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
> > koji is keeping createrepo in the archive, which keeps python-lzma in > > the archive. > > there's also mock, yum, rpm, deltarpm and yum-metadata-parser affected by > this. yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know what's the status of the "RedHat infrastructure"

Bug#945701: mock: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:58:50 + Sandro Tosi wrote: > Source: mock > Version: 1.3.2-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal it looks like the latest upstream release, 1.4.21-1

Bug#936806: koji: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:57:23 + Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:22:19AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: src:koji > > Version: 1.16.2-1 > [...] > > Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2 > > in the

Bug#949312: txsocksx: should this package be removed?

2020-01-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
> According to DAK there is an rdepend that needs to be addressed: > > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Build-Depends: > foolscap: python-txsocksx > > Dependency problem found. ok i see what happened here: the dependency chain is: python-txsocksx -> foolscap -> tahoe-lafs both

Bug#947251: [Python-apps-team] Bug#947251: mypaint: Please build-depend on python-gi in addition to python-gi-dev

2020-01-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:57 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > The long-term solution is dropping Python 2 (#937099). there is a new beta version for 2.0.0 that should support python3; it's in my backlog of activities for py2removal, but if someone wants to have a go at that, that'd be great --

Bug#936857: libfreenect: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I would have tried going "longer" way, given the age of 0.5.3. Would > you have time for it Sandro, or should I try? if you have spare cycles, i'd prefer if you could have a look at it Cheers, -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian:

Bug#949938: d-feet build depends on the removed pep8 transitional package

2020-01-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
yep, this is clearly my fault. i could either reintroduce pep8, or maybe we could have pycodestyle provide pep8 and that should satisfy the dependencies? On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:45 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > Control: tags 949938 + pending > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 13:21:03 +0200, Adrian

Bug#936857: libfreenect: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:23:14 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:libfreenect > Version: 1:0.5.3-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal in the archive we have 0.5.3, released in 2015; the latest upstream release is 0.5.7

Bug#938283: python-yubico: diff for NMU version 1.3.3-0.2

2020-01-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
+++ python-yubico-1.3.3/debian/changelog 2020-01-26 21:30:44.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +python-yubico (1.3.3-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #938283 + + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 26 Jan 2020 21:30:44 -0500 + python-yubico (1.3.3-0.1

Bug#938130: python-reportlab: diff for NMU version 3.5.31-1.1

2020-01-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
/changelog 2019-10-26 11:25:54.0 -0400 +++ python-reportlab-3.5.31/debian/changelog 2020-01-26 16:27:20.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +python-reportlab (3.5.31-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #938130 + + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 26

Bug#937422: marked as pending in pyenchant

2020-01-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937422 in pyenchant reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#948473: Users of cain please raise your voice (Was: Bug#948473: cain: should this package be removed?)

2020-01-25 Thread Sandro Tosi
is listed as other > Uploader. I think if we do not hear from either of you in the next two > weeks I agree with Sandro and a removal seems to be the best idea. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:40:14AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > c

Bug#949859: google-apputils-python: should this package be removed?

2020-01-25 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: google-apputils-python Severity: serious Hello, i think we should remove google-apputils-python from debian: * last upstream release in 2014 * upstream marked[1] it as "Obsolete. Please migrate to absl-py instead." * no reverse dependencies for both py2 and py3 packages * RC-buggy since

Bug#938763: marked as pending in utidylib

2020-01-24 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938763 in utidylib reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937271: marked as pending in pep8

2020-01-24 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937271 in pep8 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938478: shortuuid: diff for NMU version 0.5.0-1.1

2020-01-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2017-09-16 04:22:09.0 -0400 +++ shortuuid-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2020-01-24 00:05:18.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +shortuuid (0.5.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop python2 support; Closes: #938478 + + -- Sandro Tosi Fri, 24

Bug#936511: marked as pending in feedparser

2020-01-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936511 in feedparser reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937969: python-omemo-backend-signal: diff for NMU version 0.2.3-1.1

2020-01-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
python2 support; Closes: #937969 + + -- Sandro Tosi Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:04:01 -0500 + python-omemo-backend-signal (0.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial package (Closes: #919367) diff -Nru python-omemo-backend-signal-0.2.3/debian/control python-omemo-backend-signal-0.2.3/debian/control

Bug#937815: marked as pending in python-html2text

2020-01-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937815 in python-html2text reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937163: ns3: diff for NMU version 3.30+dfsg-3.1

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
+ + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:21:22 -0500 + ns3 (3.30+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix FTBFS: move all Build-Depends-Indeps to Build-Depends. diff -Nru ns3-3.30+dfsg/debian/control ns3-3.30+dfsg/debian/control --- ns3-3.30+dfsg/debian/control 2019-09-16 05:18:03.0 -0400

Bug#938259: marked as pending in python-webob

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938259 in python-webob reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938131: marked as pending in python-repoze.lru

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938131 in python-repoze.lru reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938575: marked as pending in subliminal

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938575 in subliminal reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#945722: pinot: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 945722

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 3:19 PM Olly Betts wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 09:58:15PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards > > Python2 packages, in details: > > > > (binary:pinot)Recommends->p

Bug#945722: pinot: diff for NMU version 1.05-4.1

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
-1.05/debian/changelog 2020-01-19 14:45:31.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pinot (1.05-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Drop unnecessary alternative Recommends on python-docutils; Closes: #945722 + + -- Sandro Tosi Sun, 19 Jan 2020 14:45:31 -0500 + pinot (1.05-4

Bug#949312: txsocksx: should this package be removed?

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Source: txsocksx Severity: serious Hello, i think txsocksx should be removed from debian: * python2-only * upstream is not progressing on the py3k porting: https://github.com/habnabit/txsocksx/issues/19 * leaf package if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this package,

Bug#938407: marked as pending in routes

2020-01-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938407 in routes reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#936296: marked as pending in cherrypy3

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936296 in cherrypy3 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937214: openturns: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 937214

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:openturns-examples)Depends->python Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#943259: vim-autopep8: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 943259

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:vim-autopep8)Build-Depends->python-sphinx Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#938890: zinnia: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938890

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:zinnia)Build-Depends->python-all-dev Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#937169: nut: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 937169

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:nut)Testsuite-Triggers->python Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#943104: pygobject: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 943104

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:pygobject)Build-Depends->python-all-dbg (source:pygobject)Build-Depends->python-all-dev (source:pygobject)Build-Depends->python-cairo-dbg

Bug#943096: libreoffice-dictionaries: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 943096

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:libreoffice-lightproof-pt-br)Depends->python-uno Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#938006: python-pattern: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938006

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:python-pattern)Build-Depends->python2-minimal Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#938459: seafile: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938459

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:seafile-cli)Depends->python:any Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#937941: python-neovim: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 937941

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:python-neovim)Build-Depends->python-all (source:python-neovim)Build-Depends->python-setuptools (source:python-neovim)Build-Depends->python-msgpack

Bug#936924: libsvm: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936924

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:libsvm-tools)Depends->python:any Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#938072: python-pyknon: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938072

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:python-pyknon)Build-Depends->python-all-dev (source:python-pyknon)Build-Depends->python-sphinx (source:python-pyknon)Build-Depends->python-pytest

Bug#942943: decoratortools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 942943

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:decoratortools)Build-Depends->python-all (source:decoratortools)Build-Depends->python-nose (source:decoratortools)Build-Depends->python-setuptools

Bug#938184: python-socksipychain: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 938184

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:python-socksipychain)Testsuite-Triggers->python-all Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#936723: ifeffit: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936723

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:ifeffit)Build-Depends->python-all-dev (binary:python-ifeffit)Depends->python (binary:python-ifeffit)Depends->python (binary:python-ifeffit)Depends->python:any

Bug#936566: fs-uae: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936566

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:fs-uae-arcade)Recommends->python-lhafile Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#936740: ipe-tools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936740

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:ipe-tools)Build-Depends->python (binary:svgtoipe)Depends->python (binary:svgtoipe)Depends->python:any (binary:svgtoipe)Recommends->python-pil Re-opening, so that

Bug#936513: ffrenzy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936513

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:ffrenzy)Build-Depends->python (binary:ffrenzy)Depends->python:any (binary:ffrenzy)Depends->python-gtk2 (binary:ffrenzy)Depends->python-glade2

Bug#942976: crudini: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 942976

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (binary:crudini)Depends->python:any Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#936282: ceph: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936282

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:ceph)Build-Depends->cython Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

Bug#936305: citeproc-py: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936305

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:citeproc-py)Testsuite-Triggers->python-all (source:citeproc-py)Testsuite-Triggers->python-lxml (source:citeproc-py)Testsuite-Triggers->python-pytest Re-opening, so

Bug#942975: conque: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 942975

2020-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: reopen -1 This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards Python2 packages, in details: (source:conque)Build-Depends->python (binary:vim-conque)Depends->python Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >