, whereas for nq, the fq binary seems to
only be a small part of the functionality of the package. Therefore, I
think that nq should rename the fq binary.
Stephen
.8 and I've set that at
> the 'forwarded' URL. There's no release/tag with that commit though.
As mentioned in #1071293, the upstream commit results in a non-functional
module. I don’t think it’s an appropriate fix for Debian.
Regards,
Stephen
pgp5MUEFLsk3N.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ussion in
https://gitlab.com/ddcci-driver-linux/ddcci-driver-linux/-/merge_requests/15
Regards,
Stephen
pgpWOb9Q1xZQL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1069528 in mingw-w64 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
e situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: gcc-i686-linux-gnu but it is
> > not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken
> > packages. apt-get failed.
gc
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066939 in xboxdrv reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #101 in heroes reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1061317 in gemrb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:38:26 +0100, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
> I think until the licensing problem is not resolved,
> this old version of the game should not be included in a release.
Why not? The license of the old version is still valid...
Regards,
Stephen
pgpxVFjnDIF0f.pgp
Descr
Hi,
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 04:44:14 +0100, Nick Morrott
wrote:
> On 2023/07/22 at 08:43, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >aOn Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:14:06 +0200, Bastian Germann
> >wrote:
> > > I suggest to remove the package. I do not think upstream will deal with
> >
ST_APPEND to DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_INCLUDE
+in debian/rules to work with newer gem2deb
+
+ -- Stephen Gelman Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:39:10 -0500
+
ruby-aws-partitions (1.653.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team Upload
diff -Nru ruby-aws-partitions-1.653.0/debian/rules
ruby-aws-partitions-1.653.0/deb
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:14:06 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> I suggest to remove the package. I do not think upstream will deal with
> this.
qxw’s usage of pcre seems simple enough, I’ll try to come up with a patch.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpJ5rnX7z89K.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
teresting issue, but see #1029063. Admittedly the absence
of a ddcci module is unlikely to ever prevent a system from booting, so
perhaps we could have a way of telling dkms that build failures in a given
module shouldn’t be treated as errors. Andreas, what do you think?
Regards,
Stephen
pgpdvmAJgP37_.
hould a)
> restore the missing file and b) be compatible with current kernels
Regards,
Stephen Kitt
pgprVyzst0n5p.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
issue will also arise for Debian Stable "Bulleye".
Regards
Stephen Lyons
cessful (test) compile
The package builds correctly in unstable, including from a directory
containing a +.
This *might* mean that other packages need to be backported too, I haven’t
checked.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpDYg4JyVrwP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cies where appropriate, so I’m
leaving this open, but as a wishlist bug.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpiVTQxbKULW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 21:21:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:04:13PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:53:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >...
> > > The RC severity is based on looking at a related question:
> > > How
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1030701 in intelrdfpmath reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
that
makes sense), arm64/ppc64el/riscv64 are assumed to behave like amd64, and
s390x is supported explicitly.
If you want to track the unsupported architectures, please open a new bug. As
far as I can tell, even if libmongocrypt were built in Debian using its
embedded copy of intelrdfpmath, it would fail on the same architectures.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpgzApOVtQZ1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:59:41 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> The issue got CVE-2022-46338 assigned by MITRE.
>
> Stephen, the issue is marked no-dsa for bullseye, but a fix might go
> still trough the upcoming point release (scheduled for 17th december).
Thanks, I’ll submit a s
ull/297
I’ll upload a fixed package shortly and see about a security update for
stable.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpAyQZyWANAs.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.149-1
Followup-For: Bug #1022051
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Normal kernal package upgrade and reboot.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
egards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
,
Stephen
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:42:08PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Source: siconos
> > Version: 4.3.1+dfsg-2
> > Severity: serious
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
> > Tags: sid bookworm
> > Control: block 1016597 by -1
> > User:
On Aug 29, 2022 at 6:52:06 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
> ha scritto:
>
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
&
l me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
> Regards,
> Luca
>
This is awesome, thanks so much! It was on my todo list to fix but I hadn’t
gotten around to it yet… Would you be interested in creating a MR for your
changes to salsa? If not that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in
the changes myself.
Stephen
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #945748 in xboxdrv reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
It seems rebuilding the package fixed this…
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gdu=5.13.2-1%2Bb1=ppc64el
On May 3, 2022 at 4:07:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: gdu
> Version: 5.13.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
> Justification: fails to build from
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1010236 in xye reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1006815 in xmoto reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
reason why "make check" doesn't work in
osslsigncode. It will work when the tests are ready for production
use. Hopefully soon. We're working on this.
Noted, thanks!
Regards,
Stephen
You’re very welcome! I hope the changes aren’t too invasive; since short
dh “just worked”, including cross-compilation, I went with that.
Regards,
Stephen
Le 20/12/2021 17:44, David Given a écrit :
Thank you for fixing these; I completely missed both of these bugs when
they got filed
Package: ufiformat
Version: 0.9.9-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ufiformat (versioned as 0.9.9-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -u ufiformat-0.9.9/debian
at least is required for licensing reasons — it replaces code
which is stripped from the upstream tarball because it’s not DFSG-free. See
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-convert-utf-code for details.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpjqbqVKwhVK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
,
Stephen
diff -u binstats-1.08/debian/changelog binstats-1.08/debian/changelog
--- binstats-1.08/debian/changelog
+++ binstats-1.08/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+binstats (1.08-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Switch to short dh rules. Closes: #999022.
+
+ -- Stephen
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #998563 in golang-github-jbenet-go-context reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #972084 in gweled reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997168 in scottfree reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997398 in xmoto reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #995597 in bsdgames reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #984181 in htmlcxx reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Reason ---
--
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
I’m guessing this should be converted to an RM, but I’ll leave that up to
Mike.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpgP9Ob8nrAb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags -1 + bsp-2021-04-AT-Salzburg
owner !
thank you
pgpo9U557kYkO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags -1 + bsp-2021-04-AT-Salzburg
owner !
thank you
pgpwwO2v1CVKD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I was unable to reproduce this issue. The build was successful for me
locally and on Debian Salsa server. The salsa build log can be found
here:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/jobs/1562650/raw
My local build log is attached from running dpkg-buildpackage.
regards,
Stephen
Control: severity -1 important
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:21:36 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 13:10 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Unfortunately this would be rather difficult to fix in loggedfs itself.
>
> Ugh, sorry for the bugs then. I did strings on loggedfs,
usermount will be used; it could run “fusermount
-V” and parse its output — but it can’t determine which binary libfuse2 will
actually use...
See also #918984, #939767, #927291.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpVjfTwgx1Tl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
flects the
reality of what is present in the file (apart from the version numbers
which are added manually).
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: fixed -1 1.1.1-1
Control: close -1
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:12:04AM +0100, Jann Haber wrote:
> fixed -1 1.1.1-1
> close -1
> thanks
>
> Looking at the package, it seems like this bug has been fixed in version
> 1.1.1-1 - I can find no more references to unversioned python in that
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #975492 in scummvm reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
ll in the first place. The current package
only supports amd64, i386, ppc and arm; version 0.9.6 adds ppc64, and the
forthcoming 0.9.8 will add arm64.
Downgrading however since it does build on amd64.
Regards,
Stephen
pgpRBYfVtnmDb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n the next upload.
Doesn’t this mean though that users who *do* have the CDM component installed
will no longer receive updates to it?
Regards,
Stephen
pgpDwIGuGsQnc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Axel,
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:29:04 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Dear Maintainer,
>
> You're writing to yourself as "Dear Maintainer"? :-)
I didn’t bother changing the reportbug template, and who knows the maintainer
might not always be
/gdb-source/copyright
In particular it's missing /usr/src/gdb.tar.*, making it useless.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable'),
(100, 'unstable-debug'), (100
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:30:48 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:19:43 AM CST Michel Le Bihan wrote:
> > The Debian patch for #963548
> > https://salsa.debian.org/mimi8/chromium/-/blob/ece23b4ca107cd968ac9a40
> > 9f
>
ectHost.
> I also think that it might be an upstream bug, but can't confirm unless
> tested and reproducible in Google Chrome.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 is originally
reported against *Chrome* 87.0.4278.0
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/
chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070#c15 (in the other direction)
It's been an Chromium issue for a while with no clear fix on how to handle
cyclic service dependencies in general: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/
issues/detail?id=1135070#c18
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 3:49:06 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I got a crash (attached)
>
> Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to
> me, whic
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 2:38:32 AM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I got a crash (attached)
Looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1135070 to
me, which has a fix, but I haven't yet figured out what release(s) the fix
made it into.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 11:22:21 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I'll have to play around with disabling extensions to see which one(s) cause
> a crash within 30 minutes. Super annoying since I do use every one of them
> literally every day. :(
Looks like maybe Proxy Swi
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 10:47:31 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> All my extensions were pulled down during the Google Sync and ran fine on 87
> for roughly an hour -- that's twice as long as my longest browser session
> for version 87 on the old profile.
>
> I
On Tuesday, December 22, 2020 5:26:04 PM CST Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:43:23 +0100 Michel Le Bihan
wrote:
> > I was not able to reproduce those crashes.
>
> That's unfortunate. I'm up to 50 just today. I'm probably going to have to
> downgrade to
e to reproduce those crashes.
That's unfortunate. I'm up to 50 just today. I'm probably going to have to
downgrade to 83 at least until there's another update.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
Twitter:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #976492 in bochs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
, the value written to
memory will depend on the alignment: if the value is aligned, it will
be written as expected (MSB first), but if it's not aligned, it will
be written in a mixture of little- and big-endian. The tests always
use the host memory order.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:39 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Control: retitle -1 siconos FTBFS with more than one supported python3 version
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:38:42PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >
> > I built siconos in a clean chroot environment. The recent rebuild of
> > siconos also
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #970820 in intelrdfpmath reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #971161 in evemu reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
by Debian FTP Masters
(reply to Stephen Kitt
).
Thank you for resolving the build issue with openjfx.
I didn't notice that GSTREAMER_LITE was defined for the autobuilders
but
not being defined when I built the package locally (which never failed,
which made this more difficult to diagnose
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:24:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and
> uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437.
Except not, because I forgot to update my key in the keyring and it’s
expired. Ho hum...
R
Package: libglade2
Version: 1:2.6.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and
uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -Nru libglade2-2.6.4/debian/changelog
Control: tags 966188 + patch
Control: tags 966188 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for d2x-rebirth (versioned as 0.58.1-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -Nru d2x-rebirth-0.58.1/debian/changelog d2x
Control: tags 966187 + patch
Control: tags 966187 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for d1x-rebirth (versioned as 0.58.1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -Nru d1x-rebirth-0.58.1/debian/changelog d1x
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #966063 in rocksndiamonds reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: src:binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 8.10
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
binutils-mingw-w64 FTBFS on s390x and other big-endian architectures;
the test suite fails with
FAIL: objcopy executable (pr25662)
Regards,
The Maintainer
-- System Information:
Debian
Control: tag -1 + stretch
Control: fixed -1 3.0.1-1
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 11:51:43 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 11:42:08 +0200, rpnpif wrote:
> > The command hubicfuse /mnt/hubic -o noauto_cache,sync_read
> > get the result :
> > hubicfuse: error while loa
bssl1.1 was needed.
What does
command -v hubicfuse
show?
Regards,
Stephen
pgpMaNyzVoDm6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:53:58 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:08:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 at 15:21:37 -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM Adrian Bunk <[1]b...@debian.org>
> > >
of these approaches (and
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcml/-/commit/22d753b1c820ea339b6b52cbc1cdf6e05229fbf9#34a4bacbb5ecf973fa5f481819228c77da389f43
for the resulting symbols file simplification).
Regards,
Stephen
pgpk2c5j6uPEd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
output below
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libcegui-mk2-0.8.7/DEBIAN/symbols
doesn't match completely debian/libcegui-mk2-0.8.7.symbols
[...]
Fix:
I wonder if the real fix shouldn't be for cegui-mk2 to stop exporting a
pile of Boost symbols...
Regards,
Stephen
Le 20/05/2020 13:02, Matthias Klose a écrit :
nulib2 ftbfs on s390x (failing tests), built before:
Thanks, the tests fail on all 64-bit big-endian platforms:
ERROR: kNuAttrNumRecords 12884901888 vs 3
12884901888 is 0x3 ;-).
I’ll look into it...
Regards,
Stephen
I am confused. This bug is filed against
0.1+git20200419.5d3c63c+ds-1, which contains a patch for this exact
problem, but the build logs indicate that the previous version,
0.1+git20181019.a61b76f-2, is being built.
Steve
The package has been updated in salsa and is awaiting sponsorship.
regards,
Steve
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:48 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Source: lasagne
> Version: 0.1+git20181019.a61b76f-2
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, nu...@packages.debian.org
> Tags: sid
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #958536 in chipmunk reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
the standard envisioned by you? That would be productive and helpful for
> a change.
For obvious reasons I don’t think there’s any point in continuing this
discussion.
Stephen
pgpF2eM7dDBqu.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 09/04/2020 14:47, Markus Koschany a écrit :
Am 09.04.20 um 13:58 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Le 09/04/2020 13:44, Markus Koschany a écrit :
Am 09.04.20 um 13:24 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:37:03 +0200, Markus Koschany
wrote:
Am 09.04.20 um 11:36 schrieb Ivo De Decker
Le 09/04/2020 15:18, Stephen Kitt a écrit :
[...]
When a user installs a package in Debian, there’s a reasonable
expectation that the user will get when the maintainer intended. Even
Sorry, *what* the maintainer intended.
[...]
Le 09/04/2020 13:44, Markus Koschany a écrit :
Am 09.04.20 um 13:24 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:37:03 +0200, Markus Koschany
wrote:
Am 09.04.20 um 11:36 schrieb Ivo De Decker:
It seems runescape downloads a binary and runs it, without verifying
its
integrity. At least
ty by hand?
This is a bit different: runescape downloads a binary the first time it’s
run by any given user, so each user can potentially get a different binary.
Checking orig tarballs (whether using a signing key or manually) produces a
result which remains the same for all users...
Regards,
Ste
extra build flags in
debian/rules).
Regards,
Stephen
pgp5DPGSogNPs.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:08:35 -0400, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:28 PM Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Thanks for the report, the package is missing a build-dependency on
> > gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64.
>
> There is more to it than this. I am working on it now.
ingw was requested.
> > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:150: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
Thanks for the report, the package is missing a build-dependency on
gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64.
Michael, I can take care of fixing this, doing a rebuild to make sur
On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 02:44:51 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 February 2020 2:28:04 AM AEDT Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for d1x-rebirth (versioned as 0.58.1-1.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/5.
>
> Thank you very much for doing this, Step
Control: tags 947559 + patch
Control: tags 947559 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for d2x-rebirth (versioned as 0.58.1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -Nru d2x-rebirth-0.58.1/debian/changelog d2x
Control: tags 947558 + patch
Control: tags 947558 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for d1x-rebirth (versioned as 0.58.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Stephen
diff -Nru d1x-rebirth-0.58.1/debian/changelog d1x
ch:any to
arch:all, and they lost their documentation link to the base arch:any link. Do
you have a pointer to further details about the issues with symlink_to_dir
problems in this type of migration?
Regards,
Stephen
pgpHtYoDuZfUr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ah good catch, thanks for that!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:45 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Followup-For: Bug #940485
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> buster-pu request: https://bugs.debian.org/948854
>
>
> Andreas
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #945301 in fcml reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcml/commit/9cbc8414682b69fd74aa71ee5f3664c3a1d5f928
1 - 100 of 954 matches
Mail list logo
