are other (security)
implications, what are they?
Stiepan
On 08/10/17 19:40, Stiepan Aurélien Kovac wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I have checked my Thunderbird version and I have the latest available
> one on my platform:
>
> "apt
of)
So I still think that this bug should be reopened for the specific
architecture that I am using.
(in clear, that Bug #869774 should be reopened for PPC)
Regards,
Stiepan
On 08/10/17 15:12, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi there Stiepan--
>
> On Wed 2017-08-09 01:21:38 +0200, Stiepan A
it to that version
for powerpc, if there are no other security implications (did not have
the time to sort them out, but basically messages sent encrypted were
sent encrypted, never in clear).
--
Stiepan A. Kovac
M Sc ICT Security
IT+Tech. Tel. Eng.
and taking necessary
action.
And let me know if I can be of any further help, this is a productivity
killer for me.
Best regards,
--
Stiepan A. Kovac
M Sc ICT Security
IT+Tech. Tel. Eng.
P.S.:
When trying to install from the official Thunderbird repo., getting the
message:
"eni
suggesting (specifically for lxc-user-nic - the current approach with
1-1 uid mappings seems fine for network-unrelated things).
Stiepan
Original Message
Subject: Re: [oss-security] LXC: CVE-2017-5985: lxc-user-nic didn't verify
network namespace ownership
Local Time: 15 March 2017 11
h includes the fixes for the aforementioned
CVE). I will post an update on oss-security with the security-relevant part of
this thread.
Stiepan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#857295: Bug#857295: Inf
ne. Still, I thought that
LXC enabled using lxcbr0 bridges in user mode, as lxc-user-nic's man page
suggests is possible. Can you confirm whether this is the case with the current
version?
Regards,
Stiepan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
Original Message
interface "vethXJW6PL" from host:
Operation not permitted. With "plain old" br0, it still works as expected.
Stiepan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
Original Message
Subject: Bug#857295: Info received ([oss-security] LXC: CVE-2017-598
unning lxc 2.0.6 in user mode using
lxc-net. So a safe fallback (for Debian 8), for the time being, seems to be to
avoid using user mode lxc networking and use a plain old br0 instead. This
should work on all CPU architectures (even on powerpc, known to be recalcitrant
to lxc on Debian 8)
finds its way into jessie-backports: that would be great!
Stiepan
Original Message
Subject: Re: [oss-security] LXC: CVE-2017-5985: lxc-user-nic didn't verify
network namespace ownership
Local Time: 14 March 2017 2:06 AM
UTC Time: 14 March 2017 01:07
From: tyhi...@canonical.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
