At least that problem on ppc machines is due to fact that ppc64el is not
taken in account properly
A patch could be
diff xrdp-0.9.12/common/arch.h xrdp-bad/common/arch.h
64a65,70
> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN__)
> #define L_ENDIAN
> #else
> #define B_ENDIAN
> #endif
>
68,69c74,75
<
Hello
I've personally always used __powerpc__ .
Here is my reference, very useful for all arch related defines :
https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
Cheers
Thierry
I've Cc:-ed tille as his was the most recent upload. Let me know if
you'd like me to NMU with a
Source: tcpdump
Version: 4.9.3-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tcpdump=ppc64el=sid
--- 1 tests failed 441 tests
passed Failed test: ikev2pI2 41c41 < (v2auth: len=196 method=rsasig
this package rebuilt on
ppc64el. It is still failing with GCC 9. Looks like further investigation is
needed.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=check
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:57:02 +0200 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com" <
thie...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On
On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:54:46 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
Source: check
Version: 0.12.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=check
...
FAIL: check_check_export
FAIL: check_check
PASS: test_output.sh
PASS: test_check_nofork.sh
PASS:
Hello,
Is that bug still valid with current version 20130227+dfsg1-10 ?
thanks
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:42:12 +0100 Roland Gruber
wrote:
> Package: closure-compiler
> Version: 20130227+dfsg1-9
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the current version is so old that it got incompatible
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:04:06 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Laurent Bigonville , 2018-11-11, 11:18:
> >Do you have any .uuid files in these directories?
>
> IIRC, I didn't have any back then.
>
> >Can you try to run "fc-cache -s -f -v" (as root) and see if it helps.
>
> I think I upgraded some
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:15:12 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: qtwebkit
> Version: 2.3.4.dfsg-9.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
>
> qtwebkit should not be release with buster
> (RC bugs are already open against all r-deps).
>
>
As version 2.3.4.dfsg-10 is part of buster what do we
Hello,
As currently we have (for most of the platforms)
$ apt-cache madison libical2
libical2 | 2.0.0-4+b2 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian buster/main
amd64 Packages
libical |2.0.0-4 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian buster/main
Sources
What do we do with that bug ?
Thanks
On Wed,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:42:32 -0400 Phil Susi wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 3:54 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > Accessing /home leads to a blocked process. The reason is that (for
> > numerous years, due to reasons I don't remember) I had
> > x-systemd.automount in my fstab for /home
>
> That makes
So what about adding
case $Node_Name in
/dev/*)
Raid_Name=$(dmraid -i -r -cr $Node_Name | grep -vi "No RAID disks" > |
grep -vi "formats discovered")
break;;
esac
ou similar ?
> > As $Node_Name already contains "/dev", in my case dmraid is called
with > parameters /dev/dev/sdb and
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 01:09:28 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: clsync
> Version: 0.4.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=clsync=sid
>
> ...
> In file included from privileged.c:64:0:
> privileged.c:88:34: error: '__NR_select' undeclared here (not in a
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:48:49 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: shark
> Version: 3.1.4+ds1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/i386/shark.html
>
> ...
> 57/160 Test #67: Trainers_MissingFeatureSvmTrainer ***Failed
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:47:06 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: hyantesite
> Version: 1.3.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> hyantesite FTBFS on most architectures with varying test failures:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hyantesite
>
>
Since the tests are failing because
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:50:00 +0100 "Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com"
wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:49:41 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 05:38:57PM -0500, Matthew Fluet wrote:
> > >If it is just the `
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:49:41 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 05:38:57PM -0500, Matthew Fluet wrote:
> >If it is just the `world` regression tests that are failing, then it
> >is almost certainly due to save/restore world being incompatible with
> >ASLR; see
Package: kcov
Version: 25+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
Compilation usually fails with messages
cd /<>/kcov-25+dfsg/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src && /usr/bin/c++
-I/<>/kcov-25+dfsg/src/include -I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu
-std=c++0x -g -Wall -D_GLIBCXX_USE_NANOSLEEP
Hello,
Just wondering why this test seem to have passed in 0.10.6-3 (sid) and
not any more ?
As this test is failing on most arch, shouldn't we disable it ?
Thanks
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 12:43:02 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: qtile
> Version: 0.10.7-2
> Severity: serious
>
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:50:24 +0200 Juhani Numminen
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream
>
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:23:34 +0200 Juhani Numminen
> wrote:
> > Upstream has committed some GCC-7-related fixes.
> > https://github.com/DIGImend/hidrd/commit/7e94881
> >
Did ppc64el compiled fine for version
> 0.5.0+dfsg-1 (without that fix)?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:41:04PM +0100, Thierry fa...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>> Unfortunately the workaround mentioned for arm64 breaks ppc64el arch as
>> co
Unfortunately the workaround mentioned for arm64 breaks ppc64el arch as
compiling on buster fails with following error - what do we do ?
Thanks
BT check (recess model): prob vs. prob_fv OK
2c2
21 matches
Mail list logo
