On 4 February 2015 at 12:00, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015, at 11:14, Axel Beckert wrote:
Ondřej Surý wrote:
do you think that we can push the resolvconf compatibility to jessie?
I see two possible paths here:
a) add Breaks: resolvconf
That's ok-ish. It would
Let this report (#776776) track the issue that dnssec-trigger breaks
resolvconf and therefore must declare a Breaks: resolvconf. This can
and should be fixed immediately, for jessie.
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Axel, can you please install resolvconf 1.76.1 and check that it works properly?
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+resolvconf (1.77) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * [eb81ca0] Eliminate bashisms.
+Thanks to Michael Gilbert (Closes: #775356)
+
+ -- Thomas Hood jdth...@gmail.com Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:46:34 +0100
+
resolvconf (1.76) unstable; urgency=low
* resolvconf.service: Install
Here's a cosmetically evolved patch which I'll commit and release
shortly. Thanks!
--
Thomas
diff --git a/etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf b/etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf
index 529504b..cf61615 100644
--- a/etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf
+++
package resolvconf
tags 775356 confirmed
stop
Hmm, yes, as you say this arises from the fact that isc-dhcp-client's
/sbin/dhclient-script switched from #!/bin/bash to #!/bin/sh last
September.
If you have a patch to send, please send it quickly as this is an RC
bug. A fixed release of
On 14 January 2015 at 16:18, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote:
It's up to the admin to change things in /etc/. Programs that play
around with things in /etc/ at runtime are not well behaved by Debian
standards.
Depends. I agree for anything in the maintainer scripts, but I
disagree for
On 14 January 2015 at 15:08, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
On 2015-01-14 14:14:22 +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
This is an allowed configuration (which is sometimes even useful). [...]
OK, but this is a very atypical usage for users of wicd, whose goal
is to make things work without
is
not a symbolic link to /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf?
--
Thomas Hood
resolvconf maintainers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I just read bug report #514597 entitled wicd does not work properly
with resolvconf which was closed in version 1.5.9-2 with the message
that 07-add_resolvconf_support.patch added. Although I don't see
this patch in the current source tree, I do see references to the
resolvconf program which
(1.76) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * resolvconf.service: Install into sysinit.target, not into
+network.target (Closes: #749405)
+
+ -- Thomas Hood jdth...@gmail.com Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:50:33 +0200
+
resolvconf (1.75) unstable; urgency=low
* [49dedb8] Update man page re: dns-nameserver
On 23 June 2014 05:45, Nick Daly nick.m.d...@gmail.com wrote:
What still needs to be done on this bug to resolve it?
I think it just needs to be tested. Have you tested the proposed fix at
all?
--
Thomas
Hi all,
First of all I must apologize for the inconvenience caused by this bug.
Martin, can you please comment?
--
Thomas
-is-installed ] || exit 0
The file /usr/lib/dnsmasq/package-is-installed could include a comment
explaining the purpose of the file.
--
Thomas Hood
Package: dnsmasq
Version: 2.70-1
Severity: serious
By means of
test -x $DAEMON || exit 0
the initscript disables itself if /usr/sbin/dnsmasq is not installed. But
this binary belongs to another package, dnsmasq-base. So the initscript
disables itself if and only if that other package,
is listening on.
--
Thomas Hood
Also tell me if there are any hot alternatives to pdnsd,
Most people use dnsmasq for DNS caching. It is very well maintained.
--
Thomas
Op 31 okt. 2012 23:36 schreef David Paleino da...@debian.org het
volgende:
I've fixed it by taking care of the case where resolv.conf is a symlink.
Please note the quotes around fixed.
:-)
Well let me think. Certainly making the backup does no harm. And restoring
a symlink with the same
Package: wicd
Version: 1.7.2.4-2
Severity: serious
In wicd-daemon.py the main() function backs up and restores
/etc/resolv.conf. To back up it does
shutil.copy2('/etc/resolv.conf', wpath.varlib + 'resolv.conf.orig')
which is like the following shell command.
cp -p /etc/resolv.conf
Thanks a lot for the report.
At the point the error occurs, please do the following and post the output:
ls -l /etc/resolvconf
ls -l /run
ls -l /run/resolvconf
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:02, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote:
root@polynomio:/# ls -l /etc/resolvconf
total 12
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 Mar 4 16:45 interface-order
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 6 10:58 resolv.conf.d
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 4 16:45 update.d
Wow,
package resolvconf
severity 662724 important
tags 662724 confirmed pending
stop
This is a chroot environment created with multistrap
From reading about multistrap I gather that multistrap doesn't always
run package preinsts. That would explain why /etc/resolvconf/run
doesn't get created by the
/etc/resolvconf/run should point to /run/resolvconf, not to /run. The
package's maintainer scripts see to that.
Why is your symlink different?
I suggest you purge the resolvconf package, install the package again,
check that /etc/resolvconf/run points to /run/resolvconf, then reboot.
--
Thomas
Hi there, thanks for the bug report and apologies for whatever I've
screwed up in version 1.62.
Can you please let me know a little more about your configuration?
Every time I reboot the system I have to fix /etc/resolv.conf to have DNS
working again. Since /etc/resolv.conf -
It is possible that this is the same issue as #651827. The issue there is
that no update is run at boot, so if your system only uses the base file
(and no interface configurers, e.g., ifupdown, dhclient, are run) then your
dynamically generated /etc/resolv.conf will be absent.
If you think that
Hi there and thanks very much for the additional information.
The mere absence of a file /etc/resolv.conf is not a bug. This is an
allowed situation if there is no nameserver information; the resolver does
not require the file to be present.
But from the fact that you are reporting here I infer
Hi again Elke,
Also, please make the change I described earlier in this bug thread and let
me know whether or not this fixes your problem.
(The change is to add a resolvconf -u to the initscript just after
resolvconf --create-runtime-directories.)
--
Thomas
On 05/06/11 22:57, Michael Prokop wrote:
3. Please send the content of /proc/mounts
I don't have /proc mounted
Ah, that explains it. I guess I should test resolvconf installation
into a chroot as well as onto a Squeeze virtual machine.
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
package resolvconf
tags 629186 pending
stop
Thanks for the report! Yep, it's a bug.
Fixed in svn. I'll ask for an upload ASAP.
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Workaround 'til 1.56 is released: Do mkdir /etc/resolvconf/run before
installing resolvconf.
By the way, it seems that /run/ and /lib/init/rw/ are not available on your
system. Why are they unavailable?
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hmm. Then I have a couple of questions, since I don't understand
why resolvconf's preinst didn't use either /run or /lib/init/rw for
run-time data.
1. After doing mkdir /etc/resolvconf/run and then installing
resolvconf, is /etc/resolvconf/run a symlink to /run/resolvconf?
2. Please send the
So one solution is for all suppliers of nameserver information
to include resolvconf packaging-event hook scripts. But that
is what we can call an, ahem, long-term solution.
In the meantime, how can we address the problem?
The crux of the problem is
1. resolvconf (normally) omits the external
package resolvconf
tags 628524 pending
stop
I have added the debconf note for release 1.55.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
there seems to be a nasty bug when resolvconf
is installed, purged and installed again.
Here is what happens, assuming no nameserver information
suppliers yet include resolvconf dpkg-event hook scripts.
Debian system boots up. Some interface configurer configures
a network interface and
(cont'd)
Here is what happens if nameserver information suppliers *DO*
include resolvconf dpkg-event hook scripts.
Debian system boots up. Some interface configurer configures
a network interface and obtains an external nameserver address.
Dnsmasq starts.
* /etc/resolv.conf lists both external
to be a nasty bug when resolvconf is
installed, purged and installed again. Under investigation.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: resolvconf
Version: 1.52
Severity: serious
Version 1.52 should not enter testing. Version 1.53 will soon be
uploaded with a different solution to #567059.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Marco wrote:
I agree with all changes. If you all agree, I could tag and upload
version 1.46 now.
Thanks for taking care of this, Marco. I made the necessary changes in
svn some days ago but due to lack of time didn't get around to
requesting an upload. Also, good for you for noticing
?
$ svn info
[...]
Repository Root: svn+ssh://jdthood-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/resolvconf
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
are filed. Note that resolvconf
does not write to /etc/resolv.conf but to a file under /lib/init/rw/ to
which /etc/resolv.conf is symlinked.
--
Thomas Hood
Member of the resolvconf maintainers team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
are available to your system which resolvconf doesn't
know about?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Through which network interface can those nameservers be reached? How
is that network interface configured?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
:
ifdown eth0
ifup eth0
Then your resolv.conf file should be correct. Please read
resolvconf(8) and the README file in/usr/share/doc/resolvconf for
background information.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Do you have a need for this package?
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
: `EX' not defined
What is the best way to fix this?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gulfstream wrote:
How to do if I want use some thinkpad device such as SMAPI?
Check out the tp_smapi driver: http://thinkwiki.org/wiki/Tp_smapi
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem.
Md: Do you think this is a udev bug or a thinkpad-base bug?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/udev$ cat thinkpad.rules
# Set permissions on thinkpad device
KERNEL=thinkpad, MODE=0664, GROUP=thinkpad
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
a new thinkpad release with s/KERNEL=/KERNEL==/ soon.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 357456 confirmed pending
stop
Julien Danjou wrote:
The postinst script of alsa-utils is not writtent correctly:
You're right---thanks for the report. Fixed in svn.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Running alsaconf, my modules.conf was modified:
-alias net-pf-10 off# IPv6
+# alias net-pf-10 off # IPv6
alsaconf runs update-modules after modifying /etc/modutils/sound.
If you made changes to files in /etc/modutils/ without running
is correct.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anywhere other than the install
dialogs.
There is a bug in util-linux: hwclockfirst.sh is not run early enough.
hwclockfirst.sh should be run earlier than checkroot.sh so that the system
clock gets correctly set before fsck is run.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
that file system
errors were corrected but that the boot may proceed.
The fsck(8) and fsck.ext3(8) man pages say that 1 means File system errors
corrected.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S02mountvirtfs and S04mountdevsubfs.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 343555 pending
stop
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Package: alsa-source
Version: 1.0.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
alsa-source's config script fails on my system (which has bash 3.1-1
installed as /bin/sh); AFAICT, the problem is constructs such as
Please test 1.0.10-3 which is now in incoming
http://incoming.debian.org
or unstable.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the solution is going to be: to fix the programs that use
the stat program so that they work either with the old or with the
new behavior, and/or to add versioned Conflicts to coreutils for
each package version containing a program that depends on the old
behavior, then I would suggest that
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-6
Severity: serious
We should probably keep 2.86.ds1-6 out of testing since we know it
contains bugs and we have another release almost ready for unstable.
pere: Please just close this if you disagree.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
; urgency=low
...
* NET_AGENT_POLICY is deprecated. use ifupdown allow mechanism instead.
closes: Bug#303383
So, it should suffice if netcfg is modified to write /etc/network/interfaces
that employ the new allow mechanism, in the manner you suggested.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.84
Severity: serious
Debian Policy states (§9.3.1):
Also, if the script name ends `.sh', the script will be sourced in
runlevel `S' rather that being run in a forked subprocess, but will
be explicitly run by `sh' in all other runlevels.
Package: console-common
Version: 0.7.54
Severity: serious
Debian Policy states (§9.3.1):
Also, if the script name ends `.sh', the script will be sourced in
runlevel `S' rather that being run in a forked subprocess, but will
be explicitly run by `sh' in all other runlevels.
Before /etc/init.d/rc can source .sh scripts, all we have to do is get
various maintainers to eliminate all these exit commands.
/etc/rcS.d$ grep exit *.sh
S01glibc.sh:exit_check () {
S01glibc.sh:exit 1
S01glibc.sh:exit_check
S01glibc.sh:exit_check
S01glibc.sh:
with the environment).
--
Thomas Hood
What packages are broken by the fact that sysv-rc does not source .sh scripts?
We know of one package that is broken if sysv-rc _does_ source.sh scripts.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: What is the purpose of those : exit 0 commands? Do they have an
effect under some conditions?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
Note: I believe that return should work to exit from a script both
when sourced and when executed but perhaps someone with a copy of POSIX
could confirm.
Disconfirmation:
$ cat /tmp/s
#!/bin/bash
echo foo
return
echo bar
[EMAIL
back to 1.0.9a-3.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 323331 pending
thanks
Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
The attached patch fixes the bitops to be independent of the size of
longs, and is confirmed to fix the bug on my box.
Applied in svn. Thanks!
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Since aspell-nl now has an RC bug (#319156) it might be the right time
to adopt the package?
I don't want to be the chief maintainer, but I am prepared to help
with the packaging as general packaging mankracht. For this to work,
the package must be in svn on alioth (or
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 12:00 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
If alsa-base does not use MAKEDEV, then alsa-base is buggy.
OK, this will be fixed in 1.0.9-1.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
What is the justification for assigning this bug report a severity level
of grave? Clearly the program isn't unusable.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/dpkg/info$ grep addgroup postfix.preinst
[ -x /usr/sbin/addgroup ]; then
addgroup postdrop || true
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
If bug #304188 in ifupdown 0.6.6 won't be fixed in time for sarge then I
have a 0.6.4-4.13 version ready which fixes #302519 in ifupdown
0.6.4-4.12.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does 0.6.4-4.12 work properly?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
How was your whole system broken?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1 Apr 2005 12:07:05, Stefan Kluth wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Thomas Hood wrote:
What version of the initscripts package do you have?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show initscripts
[...]
Version: 2.86.ds1-1
Please do dpkg -s initscripts|grep Version.
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 17:38 +0200
I am unable to reproduce the failure, so I speculate that the failure
only occurs when certain combinations of packages are installed.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: zeroconf
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
The copyright file says:
It was downloaded from http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/zeroconf/
That URL reports Your browser requested a page that could not be found:
Copyright:
This line must be of the form:
Copyright (C) date
Package: zeroconf
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
The ifup hook script is currently called '/etc/network/if-up.d/zeroconf-up'.
There is no need for an '-up' suffix because the file is in the if-up.d
directory. Other packages follow the convention of naming their hook
scripts after themselves,
:
ifupdown
After googling for a few minutes I found that
Can you give me the URL where you saw information about this problem?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. However, because the submitter had a
satisfactory version of initscripts installed, I don't yet know where
the bug lies.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Interesting idea, but it isn't that simple. For one thing, readlink
without -f prints a relative path rather than a canonical one. Second,
we have to make sure that we don't end up deleting the second symlink in
a chain, etc.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This RC bug was assigned to mdadm over a month ago and there has been no
comment from the maintainer. What is the status of this bug?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug certainly does not render the package unusable!
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you reproduce this problem when installing ifplugd 0.26-1, or is
this a reproducible problem introduced in 0.26-2, ... or is the problem
not reproducible at all?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it
into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW.
So should swf-player be removed from sarge?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 13:41 -0800, David Schleef wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
These are all fixed in 0.3.3-1, which is blocked from even making it
into sid because liboil0.3 is in NEW.
So should swf-player be removed from sarge?
No, why? It's
with an option
telling it not to run the start script.
We are still waiting for the required option to be added to ifplugd.
In the meantime, though, ifplugd should be doing the right thing on
package upgrade. What is the value of ARGS set in
your /etc/default/ifplugd?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL
the report below RC
level.
Nevertheless, the bug is important and must be fixed. Please test
ifupdown version 0.6.4-4.12~rc1 which I have made available at
http://www.aglu.demon.nl/ifupdown. I attach the postinst if you prefer
just to test that.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifupdown
Package: libjack0.80.0-dev
Version: 0.99.0-5
Severity: grave
For 0.99.0-4:
$ dpkg -s libjack0.80.0-dev | grep Depends
Depends: libjack0.80.0-0 (= 0.99.0-4), libasound2-dev, libglib1.2-dev,
pkg-config
For 0.99.0-5:
$ dpkg -f libjack0.80.0-dev_0.99.0-5_i386.deb |grep Depends
$
This caused the
to bloat it up. If several early-running
programs need libfoo and end up statically linking it then, depending on
how much of libfoo each program uses, and how popular each program is,
etc., it could be profitable to move the shared library.)
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
not to be of release
quality.)
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:35 -0500, Edward C. Jones wrote:
trying to overwrite /etc/init.d/rc', which is also in package sysvinit
What version of sysvinit did you have installed when this happened?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks to Jordi Mallach, alsa-utils_1.0.8-1_powerpc.deb is now available
at incoming.debian.org, pending installation in sid.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that it takes two weeks to build a package on
the powerpc arch. It is in the queue. There is nothing more that I can
do about it.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do this:
Edit the first line of /var/lib/dpkg/info/alsa-base.postinst so that it
reads
#!/bin/bash -x
then execute the command (as root)
/var/lib/dpkg/info/alsa-base.postinst configure
and send the output.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi. What is happening with this bug? It's still rated RC and there
hasn't been any visible (in the log) activity for a couple of months
now.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. I was looking at the bug logs and it isn't obvious to me why this
bug is rated RC. What's the status of this bug? Can it be downgraded?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
