On Wed, Jan 3, 2018, at 03:45, H.-Dirk Schmitt wrote:
> On Mi, 2018-01-03 at 02:06 +0200, era eriksson wrote:
> > Code outline for an emacs batch wrapper
>
> I do not insist on bash – you are free to fix it in any programming
> language ;-)
A fair amon
Your emacs-batch script seems to have some issues. I have not reviewed
it properly, but e.g. your prevalent use of the declare keyword is
definitely a bashism.
More generally, making Emacs package compilation more robust is
absolutely not a bad idea; but introducing new requirements should also
The following two Ubuntu bugs have similar symptoms:
* https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maildir-utils/+bug/1150593
* https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maildir-utils/+bug/1199553
The former reports that replacing an elpa install of org-mode with the
Ubuntu-packaged org mode fixed
We now have a report that uninstalling mu4e allows the emacs24 install
to finish, whereby mu4e can be installed successfully as well.
To follow up on my earlier note, I'm beginning to think that the elpa
diagnostic was wrong, and that the real issue is the sequence in which
you install emacs24
Just a quick note that Ubuntu Launchpad has a largish number of recent
duplicates for this bug.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xemacs21/+bug/789706
xemacs21 has been stable (as in basically unmaintained in Ubuntu) for a
long time, across several Ubuntu releases. This points to
merge 597530 397757
thanks
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:49 +0200, Stefan Monnier
monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
See #397757 why this would be correct.
Agreed. I guess this can be merged with #397757.
Hence.
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:51 +, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
reassign 597530 emacs23
Thanks. I was wondering how I should cope with this.
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:28:28 +0200, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the (testing) security team have a comprehensive page with
security best and worst practices? To be able to point people at it,
so one [doesn't] have to point at random wikipedia pages or google
hits?
No, but I
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:48:23 +1000, Sven Dowideit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
777 is on the working/tmp dir only, which is not used for any web
content. Also, as the twiki cgi scripts are callable from the command
line by any user, requiring the working/tmp dir to be writable by any
user, I
Package: file
Version: 4.19-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the changelog included in the GNU file 4.20 tarball at
ftp://ftp.gw.com/mirrors/pub/unix/file/, this version includes a
security fix:
2007-02-08 17:30 Christos Zoulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo