thought you might have an idea.
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
1.1.4-1.1 is now in Installed state on armel, so presumably this bug
should be marked as fixed by this version?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
]:
pam_systemd(gdm-launch-environment:session): Failed to create session: No such
process
Nov 20 12:17:57 ensifera console-kit-daemon[5521]: (process:6470):
GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed
Anything else I can do to help?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote (20 Nov 2013 12:06:58 GMT) :
On 20/11/13 12:26, intrigeri wrote:
Nov 20 12:17:57 ensifera gdm-launch-environment][6451]:
pam_systemd(gdm-launch-environment:session): Failed to create session: No
such
process
I suppose you're running your own kernel without
Hi Vasudev,
Vasudev Kamath wrote (01 Nov 2013 16:24:11 GMT) :
Yeah I actually read it in a wrong way, here is fixed patch
It now looks good to me.
Regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
to see what his plans are.
If he doesn't want to continue working on it we should stop supporting
it. If he does, I'll push a fix.
Any news on this side?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
-systemd is
installed. Attaching the relevant log files. Note libGL error: failed
to load driver: i965 in :0-greeter.log, that might indicate an issue
with permissions on /dev/dri/card0 or something.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Vasudev Kamath wrote (26 Oct 2013 15:08:39 GMT) :
On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
So did I do something wrong in understanding above?
I believe you did it the wrong way.
FTR, we've just clarified this on IRC, Vasudev understood his mistake,
and will refresh the patch
should be
enough to fix that bug. Going to do this right now, and then I'll ask
David to try reproducing the bug with the updated package in his
environment, and if it works, then I'll ask upstream if they want to
take such a patch.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Hi Jonas,
Jonas Smedegaard wrote (28 Sep 2013 13:29:59 GMT) :
I have now changed package pandoc to depend on pandoc-data,
in git.
Thanks. Any ETA for an upload with this change?
I've just had one package auto-removed from testing due to a FTBFS
caused by #724102.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
on patch let me
know if its fine.
The attached patch removes an empty line somewhere unrelated to
its purpose. That's what I call unrelated changes.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
3.10.1-1
ii python-mutagen 1.21-1
ii python-pdfrw0.1-1
mat suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Cheers,
--
Intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
of bugs with no
reply from the maintainer for years, and the last maintainer upload
was in June, 2010. So perhaps this package would be a candidate for
removal from Debian? Radu, are you still interested in maintaining
xmail in Debian?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
to try and backport the systemd-related fixes to the
live-config Wheezy branch in 2014Q1, so perhaps we could wait a bit
before removing the package, now that the problem is documented.
Hölger: thanks for filing this bug!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
majority of usecases, so I would strongly
prefer to see a depends here instead of a recommends.
But I'm not the maintainer of pandoc.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Control: tag -1 + upstream
I'll upload that patch now,
Thanks :)
but i think this issue needs to remain opened until bitlbee is
ported. this is just a crude workaround...
Sure. I suggest downgrading its severity too, once it does not block
any transition anymore.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
instead hard-depend on it?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
finishes the porting work $soon
2. remove bitlbee from testing altogether to make it stop blocking
the libotr5 transition
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (17 Sep 2013 18:14:34 GMT) :
looks good to me (that's at least what came to mind while reading the
beginning of the thread).
Thanks.
Do you have a patch handy, or should I take care of that now?
I don't, feel free to take care of that :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (30 Jul 2013 07:47:05 GMT) :
Wilmer van der Gaast wrote (06 Jul 2013 16:05:27 GMT) :
Just had a response from him on Twitter now, might get a fix over the
next weeks.
Any news on this front?
If nothing has happened on this front, I'm afraid the OTR support in
BitlBee
Package: libcatalyst-perl
Version: 5.90042-1
Severity: serious
Upgrading to libcatalyst-perl 5.90042-1 fails because it tries to
replace
/usr/share/man/man3/Catalyst::Plugin::Unicode::Encoding.3pm.gz, that's
also shipped by libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl 1.8-1.
Cheers!
--
To
Vasudev Kamath wrote (04 Aug 2013 03:00:53 GMT) :
I've requested front desk providing required information
for porter access but not got any reply from them still.
During DebCamp might be a good time to ping them.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
Hi Vasudev,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (21 Jul 2013 11:30:54 GMT) :
http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/
Any news on that front?
(Acting as Vasudev's AM.)
Regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
downgrade
attacks (while libotr2 doesn't). See this paper for details:
http://www.jbonneau.com/OTR_analysis.pdf)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
://bitbucket.org/McKael/mcabber-crew/issue/102/libotr-400-support
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
not happen so soon (unless someone backports it, and
Rails 3.x, to wheezy-backports, which I assume is non-trivial a task).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
) only, with the same apt-get command
line as above (but removing redmine-plugin-markdown/unstable), then
the installation completes fine.
Perhaps this plugin or its packaging should be updated for Rails 3.x?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
at the right time
part, but I don't plan to learn how to use/test the AppArmor changehat
Apache module any time soon, so this really should be done by
someone else.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
Kees applied
when he uploaded a candidate package for this transition in
experimental last year.
The resulting libapache2-mod-apparmor package looks good (same files
list, seemingly sensible control differences). I haven't tested
it though.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
this in a timeframe that's
suitable for Wheezy? Perhaps keepass2 has free replacement icons for
the problematic ones? Anyone interested to help Felix?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
this will
help the release team make a decision :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
intrigeri wrote (04 Mar 2013 10:16:35 GMT) :
In any case, it looks now clear that this needs to be unblocked else
php5-midgard2 will be broken by midgard2-core is no valid reason, in
itself, to grant the unblock requested by #688966. Hopefully this will
help the release team make a decision
Hi again,
and sorry for the flood..
Piotr Pokora wrote (04 Mar 2013 09:15:53 GMT) :
Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Thank you.
-midgard2[1] are
distributed together.
Why?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
upload
is a bit different and should document it details every change it
brings in).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
to be apply cleanly)?
FWIW, I've asked about the same on the Monkeysphere mailing-list last
October, see dkg's answer there:
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/monkeysphere/2012-10/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
program, or should one look closer?
Thanks a lot for your work on KeePassX!
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/698832 (please ignore the possibly
mistaken part about preferred form of modification for now)
Warm regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
. Again, I'm sorry about the confusion
induced by my overlarge quoting a sentence, whose end was outside of
the scope of the issue I was reporting.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
are the
same as in the 0.4 series, then the fix should be pretty easy.
[1] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2013-January/002420.html
[2] git://gitorious.org/keepassx/keepassx.git
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
, that fixes #681652? (You may have to reinstall
phonon-backend-gstreamer, if you have removed it as indicated by your
previous message, and verify that you can reproduce the bug before the
upgrade).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
at the time of your writing, and the latter was... not
released upstream yet. I'm removing the indication that this bug
affects 0.17.1 accordingly.
Helmut, Jayes: can you please confirm that this bug is fixed in mpd
0.17.1-1, that's currently available in Debian unstable?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi VLC maintainers,
intrigeri wrote (23 Sep 2012 14:22:32 GMT) :
I confirm the upgrade process is left is a deeply broken state, which
apt-get -f install and dpkg --configure -a are unable to resolve.
I had to manually dpkg -i a few dozen packages in the right order
before apt-get could get
Hi Michael,
intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 22:44:13 GMT) :
Michael Gilbert wrote (19 Nov 2012 00:10:21 GMT) :
reassign 680084 grub-common
forcemerge 680084 673573
thanks
I'm glad you found the root cause of #680084, but perhaps another kind
of relationship would have expressed more clearly
tags 684923 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fontconfig (versioned as 2.9.0-7.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
diff -Nru fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog fontconfig-2.9.0/debian
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 22:44:13 GMT) :
Michael Gilbert wrote (19 Nov 2012 00:10:21 GMT) :
reassign 680084 grub-common
forcemerge 680084 673573
thanks
I'm glad you found the root cause of #680084, but perhaps another kind
of relationship would have expressed more clearly
Rob Browning wrote (02 Dec 2012 20:34:59 GMT) :
For now, I'm inclined to fix the /usr/local issue, and then hope to
continue this discussion after the release.
Plausible?
I think this totally makes sense.
Thanks for tackling this RC bug :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Agustin Martin wrote (28 Nov 2012 12:11:20 GMT) :
Since #670292 seems indeed the same problem as #619367 and #677191
and is fixed in sid xemacs21 21.4.22-4 (and so should be #619367 and
#677191) I am reassing all those bugs to xemacs21 package and
forcibly merging them to get all closed.
still like #680084 to be fixed independently for Wheezy.
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
of the time, but...
I'll try to generate a new release this weekend.
Excellent!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
of hoping for 2.0.8...)
I'm happy to see there's a plan. In the meantime, I've been triaging
a few bugs that are important or tagged patch, in the hope it helps
clarifying what is worth cherry-picking for Wheezy.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
Hi Keith,
intrigeri wrote (29 Oct 2012 21:19:47 GMT) :
Otherwise, this patch seems fine to me. Nice job!
Tagging patch accordingly: I propose we fix this bug that way, and
clone/reassign/whatever to the policy if there's still disagreement,
or need for clarification, on how to interpret
Hi Rob,
intrigeri wrote (04 Nov 2012 14:15:33 GMT) :
Rob, how about applying this patch to fix #454778 and #676424?
(Please note that the latter is RC for Wheezy, that's why I landed
here in the first place.)
(Gentle) ping?
I'd rather wait for a solution #677191 to be available, so that both
dist-upgrade
Could anyone please enlighten me?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
there. While we're
at it, any other important enough bugs that you really want to get
fixed in Wheezy, that can be fixed in a minimal enough way to go with
the RC bug fix through a freeze unblock (e.g. I'm thinking of #691390
and #691758) ?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
the bug and see if
someone reports something similar in the future?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
yet another
upload just for changelog clarification.
Fair enough.
Case closed, then! :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
address into integeri,
but luckily I was subscribed to the bug :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ
path.
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
, but else I can
surely find better ways to use my time :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (14 Nov 2012 21:30:25 GMT) :
I think this is not necessary. Alexander Wirt is currently already
preparing the upload:
Awesome!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (20 Sep 2012 11:21:04 GMT) :
#681426: syslinux-themes-debian-wheezy: extlinux/theme.cfg refers to
debian-squeeze files
It has been closed by Daniel Baumann
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net.
I stumbled upon this critical bug while looking at the
.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
be granted a freeze exception. So,
what's the plan? Fixing #675895 in Wheezy through tpu? Removing parrot
from Wheezy altogether?)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
.
Great news! One less RC bug in Wheezy :)
I think it can be set as fixed by icu/4.8.1.1-8.
I'll let you proceed, then.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote (10 Nov 2012 20:51:33 GMT) :
I did test both and in both cases I had .dpkg-something files
around. Maybe I just did not torture dpkg enough to test all
cases...
I just tried again:
1. install 2.0.0-1 (not sure it's needed, but I wanted to simulate
a coming from
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (08 Nov 2012 09:21:06 GMT) :
#690409: php5-xcache: upgrades clobber local changes to xcache.ini
It has been closed by Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org.
I'm a bit unsure about the bugfix:
I just upgraded php5-xcache 2.0.0-2 from testing to 2.0.0-3 from sid.
applied right from the beginning, and I guess it's good for Squeeze to
Wheezy upgrades, but apparently it does not deal well with
Wheezy-Wheezy upgrades :(
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
.
If they put themselves at the front of the load-path they that's
where they stay. (A deliberate decision so as not to upset anything
which has to or had to force an order ...)
Yes. This will be for other bug reports, I guess. Let's fix that
one first.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
just be busy with DebConf13...
Thank you for taking care of this.
I certainly loved a clear patch ;)
Then you should be happy with gregoa's one,
and Wheezy will have one less RC bug! :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (31 Oct 2012 17:15:28 GMT) :
intrigeri, since you could reproduce the problem, could you test,
whether this patch fixes the problem for you?
I confirm I cannot reproduce the bug anymore with brasero 3.4.1-4.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
this problem by copying into
a fresh user account parts of your dotfiles until you manage to
reproduce the problem?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
in Squeeze, looks doable.
But perhaps we want to avoid hard-coding this path once again?
Any idea how this could be achieved? (I guess the maintainers did not
do it that way simply by choice, so I guess it's not trivial.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
packaging
repository. Thank you. Tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
a RC bug.
So, from a release engineering PoV, I suggest we address the
RC-buggy(?) part of the bug report first :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
it!
All reproducible RC bugs against dovecot have been fixed in Git for
a month. Can we expect a package suitable for a freeze unblock request
to be uploaded any time soon?
Thank you for maintaining Dovecot in Debian!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
, I'm wondering if my
testing method is correct...
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
to the policy if there's still disagreement,
or need for clarification, on how to interpret the local changes to
configuration files must not be overridden idea as far as symlinks
are concerned.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
, as far as this specific bug is concerned, I concur with
Andreas Metzler's analysis (non-buggy, but undocumented behaviour),
and I will review his patch right away.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
tags 680084 + patch
thanks
intrigeri wrote (30 Sep 2012 09:42:14 GMT) :
I can see that too with os-prober installed.
TL;DR --- see patch at the bottom of this message.
I retried, and I did not see that *the first time*.
First time log:
$ pgrep -l grub-mount
$ sudo update-grub
is *needed*, count me in.
Else, I'll go spend my time somewhere else in more useful ways :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
.
(Closes: #619399)
After reading #619399, it seems to me the answer to my question is
a clear yes, so goto #2.
Thoughts?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Paul Gevers wrote (13 Oct 2012 17:01:09 GMT) :
I purged emacs23 packages, removed /etc/emacs23 directory, loaded
the emacs23-common_23.4+1-3_all.deb
emacs23-bin-common_23.4+1-3_amd64.deb emacs23_23.4+1-3_amd64.deb
files from snapshot.debian.org and upgraded normally. It works for
me, the
Hi Jonas,
Jonas Genannt wrote (17 Oct 2012 06:18:07 GMT) :
we should remove it from testing, because Gitalist was also removed.
Do you want to do it, or do you prefer me to?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
close 680829 0.17-1
thanks
Builds fine in current sid with libcatalyst-perl 5.90015-1,
as expected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: xul-ext-torbutton
Version: 1.4.6-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream, fixed-upstream
Starting iceweasel 10.0.9-ESR today triggered a bunch of errors from
Torbutton (a few dialog windows to dismiss per open tab):
* Torbutton Exception in sandbox evaluation. Date hooks not applied:
close 680826
thanks
Builds fine now that sid has libcatalyst-perl 5.90015-1,
as expected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Lucas Nussbaum wrote (08 Jul 2012 17:09:35 GMT) :
Test Summary Report
---
t/01-app.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=2, Tests=7, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.02 sys + 1.13 cusr 0.12 csys
= 1.28
CPU)
Result: FAIL
make[1]:
Hi,
Andreas Beckmann wrote (03 Oct 2012 19:12:45 GMT) :
Version: 1.2.8-par-2.3
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
[...]
debsums: missing file /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/002_NetMan_pdnsd
(from pdnsd
package)
This file is missing after the
depending on the content of /root (aka uses configuration files
that are not in /etc) is RC buggy.
OK, I'm convinced. Going to merge the bugs and fix that ASAP.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
, well, metche is not *directly* violating the FHS, but rather using
a program whose default settings were really meant for interactive
use, instead of being used by non-interactive tools such as metche.
Do you think that this indirect FHS violation is RC?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (02 Sep 2012 19:41:21 GMT) :
[But anyway, Paul already did an analysis which in any case (even
not triggered here) should further 'stabilize' the possible purge
process for gdm3.]
Sergio Villar Senin wrote (03 Sep 2012 13:53:04 GMT) :
I'm running sid right now,
found 680084 1.56
thanks
Hi,
Harald Dunkel wrote (19 Jul 2012 07:42:06 GMT) :
Looking at the grub-install: It seems that os-prober (run by
update-grub) starts a grub-mount tool that keeps on running, even
though the update-grub already did an exit. ps -ef showed me a few
of these:
! :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
tags 195720 - patch
thanks
Hi,
Tom Goulet wrote (01 Jun 2003 19:55:26 GMT) :
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.11z-1
Howabout only deleting what the package puts into place, otherwise
leaving the admin with whatever he had before?
| if [ ! -f /etc/rc6.d/K25hwclock.sh ] [ ! -f
Hi,
Tim Retout wrote (08 Jul 2012 03:30:28 GMT) :
# libembperl-perl installs fine in squeeze
tags 666011 + wheezy sid
I'd be very thankful to be quickly explained our (team) use of these
release tags, or pointed at an existing explanation.
Given libembperl-perl is currently not in testing,
401 - 500 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
