Justification: possible data corruption
-=| marius adrian popa, 11.11.2014 15:57:19 +0200 |=-
From the build log i see that ppc64el is treated like a bigendian port
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5arch=ppc64elver=2.5.3.26778.ds4-3%2Bb1stamp=1415464014
Good catch
version 11.2
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:48 PM, marius adrian popa map...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have committed to both 3.0 and 2.5 branches
Here is the 2.5 list of patches (you can diff it with the release branch)
https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/60194/
https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote:
from google i see the machine is s390
i think we forgot the patch for xdr
if i compare the patch for debian with the one from fedora
http://patch
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
Source: firebird2.1
Version: 2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on lxdebian.bfinv.de
[...]
g++ -g -O2
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM, marius adrian popa map...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
Source: firebird2.1
Version: 2.1.3.18185-0.ds1-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
sbuild (Debian
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org wrote:
Package: firebird2.0
Version: 2.0.5.13206-0.ds2-4
Severity: serious
I intent to phase firebird2.0 out of the archive. firebird2.5 is to be
released
soon, and having three versions in squeeze is too much. Even in 2.5
6 matches
Mail list logo
