Bug#1006119: uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby3.0 as default

2022-02-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 03:26:42PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Control: tag -1 + patch > > On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:19:46 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Source: uwsgi > > Version: 2.0.20-2 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS > > Control: block -1 by 1004915 > > > >

Bug#1006119: uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby3.0 as default

2022-02-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: tag -1 + patch On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:19:46 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: uwsgi > Version: 2.0.20-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS > Control: block -1 by 1004915 > > Dear maintainer, > > I tried to binNMU your package for the ongoing ruby3.0 as default

Bug#1006119: uwsgi: FTBFS with ruby3.0 as default

2022-02-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: uwsgi Version: 2.0.20-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: FTBFS Control: block -1 by 1004915 Dear maintainer, I tried to binNMU your package for the ongoing ruby3.0 as default ruby transition. It failed: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=uwsgi Paul *** uWSGI