Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-09-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: severity -1 important On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 18:04:43 +0200 Jan Kiszka wrote: Upstream patch proposal sent: https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/mailman/message/37684742/ Thanks for that, Jan. Seems your patch was rejected unfortunately. I couldn't quite follow the reasoning of the

Processed: Re: Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-09-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1013341 [gnu-efi] /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1013341:

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-07-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Upstream patch proposal sent: https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/mailman/message/37684742/

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-07-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Note that there is also the upstream ticket https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/bugs/28/. I'm not sure why EFI stacks would need to be executable. The better solution should be resolving that upstream and meanwhile carrying a gnu-efi patch. This does not only affect systemd-boot.

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >Am 22.06.22 um 11:49 schrieb Julien Cristau: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:50:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> > Marking as RC, as it causes a FTBFS >> > >> Not using -Wl,--fatal-warnings might be a workaround for systemd

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 22.06.22 um 11:49 schrieb Julien Cristau: On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:50:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Marking as RC, as it causes a FTBFS Not using -Wl,--fatal-warnings might be a workaround for systemd until gnu-efi fixes this? Yeah, I'll probably add a workaround like diff

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:50:48AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: gnu-efi > Version: 3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2 > Severity: serious > Forwarded: https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/bugs/28/ > > Hi, > > since the latest update of binutils to 2.38.50.20220615, > the systemd source package

Bug#1013341: /usr/bin/ld.bfd: warning: /usr/lib/crt0-efi-x86_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: gnu-efi Version: 3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/bugs/28/ Hi, since the latest update of binutils to 2.38.50.20220615, the systemd source package fails to build: ``` $ ninja -C build/ ninja: Entering directory `build/'