Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2022 20:27:24 +0200
with message-id <ytrujli3thfop...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#1015026: fortunes-debian-hints: FTBFS: po4a::chooser:
Module loading error: Can't locate Syntax/Keyword/Try.pm in @INC
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015026,
regarding fortunes-debian-hints: FTBFS: po4a::chooser: Module loading error:
Can't locate Syntax/Keyword/Try.pm in @INC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1015026: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fortunes-debian-hints
Version: 2.01.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> strfile hints
> "hints.dat" created
> There were 44 strings
> Longest string: 397 bytes
> Shortest string: 58 bytes
> po4a --msgid-bugs-address "Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org>" --previous
> po4a.cfg
> Unknown format type: text.
> po4a::chooser: Module loading error: Can't locate Syntax/Keyword/Try.pm in
> @INC
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/Locale/Po4a/Text.pm
> line 61.
> Compilation failed in require at (eval 37) line 1.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 37) line 1.
>
> List of valid formats:
> - asciidoc: AsciiDoc format.
> - dia: uncompressed Dia diagrams.
> - docbook: DocBook XML.
> - guide: Gentoo Linux's XML documentation format.
> - ini: INI format.
> - kernelhelp: Help messages of each kernel compilation option.
> - latex: LaTeX format.
> - man: Good old manual page format.
> - pod: Perl Online Documentation format.
> - rubydoc: Ruby Documentation (RD) format.
> - sgml: either DebianDoc or DocBook DTD.
> - texinfo: The info page format.
> - tex: generic TeX documents (see also latex).
> - text: simple text document.
> - wml: WML documents.
> - xhtml: XHTML documents.
> - xml: generic XML documents (see also docbook).
> - yaml: YAML documents.
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/07/16/fortunes-debian-hints_2.01.4_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220716;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220716&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 17/07/22 at 17:23 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 7:30 PM Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
>
> Thanks for all this tedious work!
>
> > If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with
> > mine
> > so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
>
> I can't reproduce this locally or via Salsa CI. See:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fortunes-debian-hints/-/jobs/3002295
>
> Is this sufficient? A diff would be difficult to generate in both build cases.
There was a po4a regression which was fixed in the next po4a upload.
I suspect this is what hit this package, so closing.
Lucas
--- End Message ---
