Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-12-15 Thread Santiago Vila
El 13/12/22 a las 16:03, Bastian Germann escribió: I guess the rule was to use a wildcard when it is possible. You can certainly list every file but then the copyright file will be much bigger. Note: What I finally did was to keep the lib/* and m4/* wildcards and expand the others. > How

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-12-13 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 11.12.22 um 19:56 schrieb Santiago Vila: What rule is being followed to use wildcards sometimes and sometimes not? This is a little bit crazy. How did you generate the file? It is not generated. If you can come up with a better file that is fine. This was just a helper because otherwise

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-12-11 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. I'm looking at the proposed copyright file and found this: gnulib-tests/h* gnulib-tests/ioctl.c What rule is being followed to use wildcards sometimes and sometimes not? This is a little bit crazy. How did you generate the file? And more important, because without this I

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-11-10 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 10.11.22 um 21:38 schrieb Santiago Vila: For example, your proposed copyright file has this: Files: *Makefile.in I guess this means "anything including the 'Makefile.in' string, which includes a file called Makefile.in at any directory depth but also something called

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-11-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 23/9/22 a las 11:34, Bastian Germann escribió: Source: diffutils Severity: important Version: 1:3.8-1 Hi, diffutils has an incomplete copyright file. At least LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2+ licenses are missing even though they are applicable to some files. While they can be distributed as GPL-3+,